Why raise the budget limit if we are currently without rule of law, the debt goes ‘unchanged’ for months, and we borrow to just pay interest on the debt? Why should we even continued to 'give' the IRS any credence or import at all? Why does crack head economics make sense to leftists?
"Take the bait"? As in doing their job, and oppose this muslim communist?
rePROGlicans and rePROG-o-krats... all--ALL!! THE SAME DAMN ONE-WORLD-GOVT CRASHING PARTY!!
 August 26, 2015 at 6:46pm
It’s not a private school so it doesn’t matter if it’s decades old, Government doesn’t endorse any religion
 August 26, 2015 at 6:35pm
I would feel bad for this guy if he and his organization didn’t wage a war on gays like they are the problems when he himself just showed some of the true dangers to straight families, infidelity and divorce
 August 26, 2015 at 6:29pm
Lol that’s what I’m thinking. Like just….how…
 August 26, 2015 at 3:04pm
With all the outrage over planned Parent hood you will never hear them bate an eye at this info
August 26, 2015 at 3:03pm
Agree. Look at Medieval times ( not the restaurant, people)
Watch the videos in their entirety and come back lib. Actually the lib handle is offensive to rational, free thinkers who detest murder for profit. But you won’t rectify that, you’ll continue to assist and obfuscate for it. Real swell pal their in the mocking and laughing at crushed heads. Standard leftist, sick and depraved. May you never have to beg from the God you deny.
 August 26, 2015 at 3:00pm
I don’t disagree that what’s going on over in the ME is bad for Christians, I just disagree with the idea of sending our military over their again to solve it
It's bad for everybody. Our military can be counted on to make it worse.
 August 25, 2015 at 9:54pm
This guy again. Family research council already had no credibility with me but this is just sad
 August 25, 2015 at 8:03pm
It’s so easy to say that but the reality is, it’s either Assad or Isis until the people in the middle east can truly grasped what democracy entails. You can force that move if people are not ready.
Rand is telling it like it is, we armed terrorist one week to fight them the next. If 2 administrationso has gotten it wrong with intervention l, why should we trust a third?
So yes, if that person is not a danger to America and it’s allies them we shouldn’t be interfering to solve all the world’s problems. Let the people of those countries sort their own deal out. America forge in policy should not be let’s fix everything in the world by what we think it’s right, it should be to defend American stategic interest and apply pressure when neeeded.
I’m tired of funding an over bloated military industry complex that pushes to send our family members to war all over the world.
 August 25, 2015 at 7:57pm
Why aren’t republicans and Democrats listening to this man?!?? $
Republicans and Democrats don’t listen to Rand because Republicans and Democrats are Anti-Free Market, Gun Banning, Collectivist-Socialists.
The ONLY exception being that some of them are Marxists.
But then I think you already knew that….
 August 24, 2015 at 3:47pm
Seems like Obama wants someone who he can enforce more “control” over. Especially given how much animosity His camp has with the Clintons
Atheists worship no gods, but don't worry obviously the miracles of the universe coming into being from nothing and of life spontaneously forming from lifelessness can be explained away by faith in an unscientific multiverse myth.
I favor that old standby . You know , atheists believe in nothing , stand for nothing, and are good for nothing. ……………but don’t despair. Every knee shall bow and tongue confess that Jesus is God. And that includes you lib. Sure, you lead a miserable pointless existence . But I take great satisfaction in knowing that in your case, no matter how bad it gets ,it can always get worse. You ain’t seen nothing yet!
[-6] August 23, 2015 at 2:20pm
Well for one Obama didn’t say have the things trump has been spewing. He didn’t go out the gate with “Mexico is sending rapist, but maybe some are good people” thing.
And the people hitting trump hardest is Fox news, buddy.
if you're referring to George Soros, then yes! I agree!
[-5] August 22, 2015 at 10:46pm
For the life of m I have never understood how any Republican could support the citizens united decision. Or anyone average joe. It basically says the super elite holds the power over our elections and unless you can out spend them then you can’t do anything about it
LibbieBubble - Fact: the top ten political donors from 1989 to present day are not Republican.
Fact: 100's of millions in donations are from unions.
Fact: The evil Wall Street players like Goldman Sachs donate more to Dems.
Fact: The Koch brothers are the 59th ranked donor.
Fact: Progs have abused the system for decades (Soros, Acorn, etc) but I'm sure you had no problem with that.
Fact: you live in a bubble
I think the amount of money required to run for office is less than ideal. It can restrict who is able to run for the highest offices to the wealthy, or those beholden to the wealthy. Unfortunately every other solution that I've ever heard has far worse consequences.
If you establish welfare for politicians in order to fund campaigns, the party in power will be able to select who is eligible to receive those campaign funds. This "solution" can lead only to either a one party system, or one in which only the independently wealthy can run. It places more power in the elites you resent.
The Koch brothers only place 17th in the top 20 largest political contributors, and all of the others donate entirely to Democrat politicians. Democrat talking points regarding citizen's united may sound like they favor the little guy, but the Democrats that make them are in the pockets of big donors.
While the Koch's support political leaders who fight to reduce the size of government, and the power of elites over the little guy, the Democrat party fights to expand the size of government, and the power of elites over the little guy.
Unions could spend unlimited funds before citizens united. Democrat opposition to the ruling isn't in the interest of leveling the paying field. Its in order to eliminate the ability of people to oppose
Sanders may reject Super Pacs but I'm sure he'll accept support from unions, many of whom also want the government to control the little guy.
I do not recall my vote ever being 'bought'. So, what are you inferring? Holding what power?
Libsknownothing, how many Obama phones do you have now?
You don't need to outspend them. We the people will ultimately decide who will be in charge of administrating our Republic. notice I did not say running our republic. we need to pay attention to who we elect based on principals and issues. not on who gives us a free cell phone.
We need to put government in it's place, not entrepreneurs.
August 22, 2015 at 1:03am
I know about Iran, but he’ll look at what the US has done in terms of supporting terror in Syria alone. We are those radicals, as we did back when Russia was in Afghanistan. How in the hell does that not seem to count as terror supporting.
Not abosolving Iran, but people are sure quick to swept all the things America pull under the rig to criticize others