User Profile: listeninginVT

listeninginVT

Member Since: October 08, 2010

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • September 29, 2016 at 9:05am

    I’m cautious about the planned narrative. would like to get the full story.

  • [1] September 26, 2016 at 10:48pm

    So, this ‘disgruntled lawyer’ has no name? I smell a minimize and wait until 4th or 5th page news before properly i.d.ing this person and their motives, another words, HIDE IT.

  • September 23, 2016 at 6:23pm

    TBI = traumatic brain injury.

    Talking in uncommon abbreviations doesn’t help. I’m looking in the video for a ‘TBI’ ??? I had to look it up to find out what it was.

    That doesn’t mean he didn’t have a gun, it means major difficulty in communication though.

  • [3] September 18, 2016 at 12:20pm

    They only shut down pipelines AFTER catastrophic failure, it’s too expensive otherwise. Also, to note, this seams to be standard practice. City water lines leak an very many places, but those don’t get fixed, even in drought conditions, until they flood an area. So it’s not just gas/oil that does this but water/sewer.

    Not saying it’s right, but that is what happens. And they are putting in another pipeline across the upper US.

  • [18] September 17, 2016 at 12:14pm

    So pointing out extreme hypocrisy is now a ‘threat of violence’?

    Responses (4) +
  • [6] September 14, 2016 at 12:15pm

    seriously excellent smack down video.

    Too bad they couldn’t work in the funny numbers and stat’s for US debt and unemployment.

    Responses (1) +
  • [6] September 13, 2016 at 10:03pm

    Are these people seriously that crazy/insane?

  • [3] September 10, 2016 at 5:35pm

    When you have a system so completely corrupted the only recourse is total exposure, seemingly with the intent of stopping the corruption. With the media now complicit in coverups and propaganda committed by gov’t's, what is left for the regular person to find out the truth in area and how you get that truth is far less important then having it.

  • September 10, 2016 at 5:30pm

    seriously, people take pic’s at funerals, and of the dead loved one, for ‘remembrance’. I find it on the creepy side personally, but this seems comforting to the ones doing it, so oh, well let them absorb the experience in whatever way works for them, it isn’t harming anyone.

  • [2] September 10, 2016 at 5:28pm

    I figure there are just different types of people. Some who need ‘proof’ they were there–so lots of pic’s of themselves in front of x,y,z. And those who just absorb the experience, they may take a pic or two of the ‘big picture’ type of thing for their own recall but prefer to ‘soak up their surroundings’ than take selfies.

    I don’t think it is a right/wrong situation, like in every other aspect of our lives we make decisions based on what works best for us an individuals/marriage mates/families/friends etc….

    Why are the media always on the lookout, or trying to create, drama on personal choice issues? My way may be different from you way, but that doesn’t make either of us wrong. peace.

  • [4] September 7, 2016 at 9:49am

    Can we get that in writing? notarized? Maybe all liberals will make that threat and a law can be put in place and force them to live by their word??? maybe….

    Drama queens

  • [6] September 5, 2016 at 10:02pm

    What is it with people, any people, today that they think they have ‘justification’ to commit criminal acts, like it won’t come back and bite them in the butt with a criminal record. The erroneous thinking that ‘the laws don’t apply to me’.

    I really don’t understand the rational, if there is one.

    Responses (2) +
  • [1] August 28, 2016 at 11:55pm

    idiocracy at it’s finest. What’s next, booty showing day for men and women, show us your girly/boy bits, how exciting. *sarc*

    Making a spectacle of yourself isn’t the same as making a point.

  • [1] August 25, 2016 at 12:32pm

    that would be ‘racial socialism’, right?

  • [5] August 19, 2016 at 7:27pm

    So according to this woman any stance you take when someone is in your face, leave, argue, stay, withdraw, is a “sign of white fragility”. I’m saving my $60 and calling BS

  • [9] August 13, 2016 at 6:55pm

    So let’s check some facts. Zika has been around for about 70 years, causing little to no symptoms, most don’t know they contracted it. Only in 1 area in Brazil did they try to connect small heads at birth with the virus, only 1 district, a poor district that gets repeatedly sprayed with pesticides to combat mosquitoes. In that pool of defects, less than 17 % of them tested positive for Zika virus, while ALL tested for heavy pesticides. Zika is in all the other districts in Brazil, none resulting in birth defects…..Then there are all the other countries for 70 years of having Zika spread by mosquitoes again resulting in no birth defects or any other chronic health issue.

    This is a fund raiser for the CDC, nothing more. Those in Brazil have already back stepped with the ‘it’s Zika doing this’ and are now semi-looking at the pesticide issue( the gov’t funded spraying of poor communities) and by the way, the gov’t is super corrupt and the leaders are being prosecuted for their crimes, while the new leaders have shown to be complicit with the old, people are revolting. So let’s cause a health issue that needs the gov’t to step in to bring unity to the p.o.’d masses.

    So sick of the chronic lying that is pretty much all the news.

    Responses (1) +
  • [53] August 10, 2016 at 4:03pm

    yes.

  • [4] August 10, 2016 at 11:10am

    and they have POC on their side to self implement. crazy.

  • August 8, 2016 at 6:16pm

    yikes…I wouldn’t want to be that SUV driver.

  • [3] August 8, 2016 at 5:56pm

    So the “progressives” are fully endorsing segregation?……again… just wow.

    Responses (1) +
123 To page: Go