User Profile: Lloyd Drako

Lloyd Drako

Member Since: September 02, 2010

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • March 3, 2015 at 11:58am

    That bit about the Persian bazaar was a little racist, no? Still, very suggestive. Simply to walk away, with or without the assurances Netenyahu says he wants, risks a nuclear-armed Iran within a year, not a decade. Since there was a not-so-veiled threat here that Israel might take military action alone, why doesn’t Israel negotiate with Iran directly?

    Responses (1) +
  • [3] March 3, 2015 at 10:06am

    What a remarkable drought, if it stopped at the Syrian border. Why wouldn’t it also have affected adjacent regions of Iraq, turkey, Jordan, Israel, Palestine? Clearly this report is incomplete.

    Responses (1) +
  • March 3, 2015 at 10:04am

    Syria is not “in the Sahara Desert.” I recommend remedial Common Core geography.

    Responses (1) +
  • [25] March 1, 2015 at 7:37pm

    Howzabout a little copy editing now and again, TheBlaze? When I saw the headline “Police Toss out Drag Demonstrators,” for want of a comma, my mind conjured up images of glitter and tutus and eye shadow. Imagine my disappointment.

    Responses (2) +
  • [3] March 1, 2015 at 6:01pm

    Let’s be fair. There are a few other persons of color on MSNBC, for example, MHP (not to be confused with NPH).
    Does anyone except floundering MSNBC care about Sharpton on TV? Sharpton on MSNBC is simply a clown,Sharpton at the WH is another matter. That’s what Allen should be concerned about. Personally, I doubt that Obama really consults Sharpton on much of anything, still, his very presence there is skeevy in the extreme.

  • [2] March 1, 2015 at 5:57pm

    At the bottom of every page I see “speak your mind.” I’d like to hear you do so without insinuation and innuendo.

  • [3] March 1, 2015 at 4:18pm

    “Dozens” of people tweeted outrage over the skit? Hardly above the threshhold of Twitter visibility. Yawn.

  • February 28, 2015 at 6:02pm

    Elaborate, please. I would like to know in what way my comment is wrong. I’m not advocating umlimited immigration. So far as I’m concerned, the borders could be sealed as tightly as in the 1920s-1960s. That would not change the fact that for the first half of the nation’s history, immigration for free white men was almost completely unrestricted.

  • [6] February 28, 2015 at 4:34pm

    The Vulcan hand sign was derived from the one used in blessings by Cohanim. Leonard Nimoy was one, and is said to have learned the sign from his father. RIP Mr. Spock.

    Responses (1) +
  • [-3] February 28, 2015 at 4:00pm

    Levin doesn’t know what he’s talking about.

    He says, “This has never been the American experience. Immigration is to be managed, limited, gradual to allow for assimilation and Americanization,”

    In point of fact, unmanaged, unlimited immigration without any formal requirements for assimilation and Americanization was the American experience for most of the 19th century. Immigration was not even a federal responsibility until the 1890s; it was handled by the states.

    Any (white) person who was not obviously suffering from some loathsome communicable disease, had a few dollars in his pocket, and gave some plausible patter about going somewhere or other with the prospect of some kind of work, was allee allee in free.

    Only during and after WWI did the US impose serious immigration restriction, based on literacy and national origin, with a quota system favoring some European countries over others.

    Responses (3) +
  • [-8] February 27, 2015 at 5:02pm

    Grow up, Louie. Obama didn’t make a law, he made an executive decision concerning the implementation of an existing law, the one governing deportations of illegal aliens. Any time you can get a 2/3 majority in both houses you can easily override his decision. That’s the constitutional way.

    Responses (2) +
  • [1] February 27, 2015 at 4:41pm

    Perhaps we should skip Jeb and Hillary and go straight to Jenna and Chelsea?

  • [4] February 27, 2015 at 4:37pm

    I’ll say one thing about a Clinton-Bush faceoff. Voter turnout will be less than in any election since the 1920s, Clinton would probably win, because a lot of people want to vote for a woman just so they can say they voted for a woman. Sort of like Obama being black in 2008.

    In reply to the story Jeb Bush Inspires CPAC Walkout

    Responses (1) +
  • [5] February 27, 2015 at 4:32pm

    Is it more important to keep the GOP voters or to attract independents? Since barely 50% of us vote even in presidential years, you need someone who can rouse the rabble. Jeb Bush ain’t it.

  • [-1] February 27, 2015 at 4:31pm

    Y’all don’t need a milk toast cra cker, y’all need a real one. I trust you are not serious about Ben Carson.

  • February 22, 2015 at 7:09pm

    You haven’t been paying attention. What about King Abdullah? or General el-Sisi? Or the Muslims who protectively encircled a synagogue in Norway to demonstrate solidarity with Jews in Denmark? You are a disgrace to TheBlaze, which reported the story this very morning.

  • February 22, 2015 at 7:03pm

    In the end, we did take care of them–after their military defeat. It was called the Marshall Plan, and Germans benefited from it as well as other Europeans. It helped make Germany the powerhouse it is today.

  • [1] February 22, 2015 at 7:01pm

    It’s Islamic as all get out. It just doesn’t deserve the dignity of being called a state.

  • [9] February 22, 2015 at 6:48pm

    Since no one reads Mother Jones anyway, why does O’Reilly with his 50 trillion viewers even bother?

  • [-2] February 22, 2015 at 6:45pm

    It’s because McCain is a warmonger, ashamed of his country for not going to war whenever the opportunity arises. Obama, on the other hand, is a craven peacemonger, so ashamed of his country for its assorted crimes against humanity that he will do almost anything to avoid getting more Americans killed.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love