User Profile: lmao@dems

Member Since: August 28, 2011

CommentsDisplaying lmao@dems's 10 most recent comments.

  • Keep repeating what theytold you, dont look up the facts Brucy poo. Keeps us laghing at how you have been told what to think and have no clue on how to think. Its a shame, but facts are facts.

  • I agree, this is something most of us know and if eyebrows rose it was because he made sense for once in his life. Or because he made sense, and it was the sheeple, (like the trolls that post here) that could not understand him and raised there eyebrows.

  • So he is saying it does not matter what happened, no big deal, that is what I take from that. So seems they really do not care about American lives. In a month or so, we will hear him say Sandy hook and Boston that was a long time ago, people need to stop using that for political reasons. RIGHT? And the sheeples they will hop on here and defend him. They come out and say what ever they want because they know that half this country can not understand and hve know clue of the truth and will defend this administration. Or they will hop on and troll themselves trying to shut down the people that know there lies.

  • All, be careful, he is using the same analogy (what you call common sense) for gun control. He will say there are millions of guns in America and a few are used in crimes, agree with him on the above and he will come back and call you racist when you disagree with him using the same analogy on guns. He is still a liberal who cannot distinguish the different between the rights of Americans and what he wants to impose on us.

    I can distinguish the different and I agree also with him on this, but would stand against him on the other and would take the 4th grade name calling he would use.

  • Koch Brothers Make Play for Media Empire

    April 21, 2013 at 6:37pm

    In reply to welovetheUSA.

    “Millions of Angelenos count on the Los Angeles Times for real facts, real issues, and unbiased information.”
    That explains why Califonia is so messed up. Most are so lazy they would not even verify what the paper was telling them what to think, rather defend it and say everyone else is wrong, Heck they come here and try defending what they believe because there paper told them to believe it. Even when all the facts say something else. In the end they have no one to blame but themselves.

  • Sheeples, that actually believe us, were not going to do that! (Not Right away) We will Progress to that. In a few more years we will bring more control up and tell you that we are just adding to the existing laws, then a few more years later same thing and so on until if you have any kind of arms it will be illegal.

  • So my question is, are these Representatives, Senators and the President going to give up there armed security because they are saying these laws are going to stop incidents of random shootings, or do they feel our children are less important than they are? Why is no one asking that question? They are going after everything except what has worked for them, arming the people around them. This is a sure sign that anyone for gun control is only after control and power and stands for nothing else. The solution is all around them, but they choose to ignore that and want to put all law abiding Americans (except themselves) in more danger buy making it very difficult to protect themselves.

  • I sold all mine, can not remember to who either. So I guess I go down as not having any. For one it is no ones business if I have one (many) or not. And how many people feel the same way?

  • Bobby, you just proved Ben is right.

  • Poor little Johnny, You have no idea what liberty is obviously, only what you are told from your masters.For one Marriage is derived from religion that word was defined long ago. You want to change the definition of that word, even though it is religious. Once again your masters have stepped in and told you they control the definition o words, there goes religious liberty. As for arms control, the constitution says shall not, you also believe they have the right to define shall not when they see fit. These words defined legally many centuries ago, but again you have been told how to think and you think that some (in the right positions) have the right to change those words when they see fit. Civil unions are derived from government why would you not support that; civil unions would give the same benefits in a civil society.it would not be against religion and the word definition, oh yea I know why! You are so closed minded and cannot support anything except what you have been told to support by the same ones that have told you what to think. Bottom line is the government has stepped in many years ago and hijacked marriage through progressives income tax, taking your property from you, (yes money is your property when you labor for it). Also as soon as gay marriage was approved in California the very next day a church was being sued because they would not marry a gay couple (against their religious beliefs). Then they will change the meaning of prohibit in the 1st Amendment.