User Profile: LonestarFree

LonestarFree

Member Since: September 02, 2010

Comments

123
  • [19] December 12, 2014 at 10:45am

    I don’t know about California, but in Texas it is a crime trying to stop or erase someones personal video. It is considered evidence tampering and is a very serious (felony) crime.

  • [1] December 8, 2014 at 11:42am

    I saw all the commercials, but I didn’t tune in to watch. I told my wife at the time that I didn’t think it was possible because an anaconda would crush and break many if not all the bones before eating a person.

  • [16] December 4, 2014 at 5:06pm

    Give “us” a break, who is “us”? The “majority here lose credibility” is certainly a broad statement and based on the assumption that the majority is simply against anything the president does. I think the majority here are people who care about the United States, and want to see common sense used even when handing out political favors, surely the president knows someone that donated big to his campaign that speaks Spanish. You imply that this sort of thing goes back to George Washington which can be a debate for another time, what I want to know is why you, or anyone, is so willing to accept that this is just how things are, and because others have done it, that makes it OK. I think the majority of the people here are fed up with the lies, corruption, political games, and misuse of funds in the public treasury. The hardest thing for you to believe will probably be that “the majority” of us don’t care if the person is a republican or democrat, male or female, or what race they are. I think the majority her would agree we want someone honest, someone who understands and reveres the constitution, someone who knows Washington has grown to large, it’s become oppressive to the states and the people, someone willing to relinquish power and restore liberty back to the people. OK, I have to admit, it is unlikely you would ever find a Democrat that meets any of those requirements, and only a handful of Republicans. We need the hearts and minds of those who long for liberty to serve.

  • [1] November 21, 2014 at 11:38am

    OK Vision Harry that was funny, thanks for the chuckle.

  • [9] November 14, 2014 at 2:35am

    More people watched the clip than CNN has viewers.

    Responses (1) +
  • November 13, 2014 at 11:08am

    After the police investigate themselves and find no wrongdoing, unless she has a good lawyer it will never see a court room where the officer faces jail time for felony assault. They file a civil case, she gets paid off, and the next citizen to be beaten pays the price.

  • [4] November 13, 2014 at 10:55am

    So what could she have done that justifies doing this to her in front of her child? Do you think this kid will ever trust the police after seeing what they did to to his mother for yelling at him. The police continue to sow the seeds and build distrust in the community, look at Detroit as example of citizens who don’t trust.

  • [3] November 13, 2014 at 10:45am

    I get your point and I have seen enough to know that there are two sides to every story, but the physical abuse delivered by police today for seemingly nothing is completely out of control in America and apparently Canada too. Officers are committing acts of violence on the public daily without any accountability which is a prescription for abuse of authority. I don’t care what this woman did she did not deserve the handcuffed beat down she got. The police are out of control and if you can’t acknowledge that I suspect you would be a good candidate to be one of them.

  • [2] November 10, 2014 at 4:55pm

    I don’t support her being fired or even disciplined. Freedom of speech means people will say things you don’t like. She is a nobody, but the mob is all ready to come after her. I’m a middle aged white man and I support her right to say and think whatever she wants. As to issues of her being a school teacher and saying such things If it isn’t said in her class what right do we have to police her actions unrelated to school activities? I’m sure the school has some guideline about conduct outside of school if this is a violation and an embarrassment in violation of her contract then the school has a job opening, but the mob does not get to decide.

    Responses (6) +
  • [58] November 5, 2014 at 11:00am

    I believe Sharyl Attkisson’s account of the cover up. CBS had hard evidence of the presidents’ claim being untrue then purposely, with meaningful intent, hid the truth from the public. CBS along with other news organizations have chosen sides, which means you only get the new they want you to have, presented in a way that is most favorable to their side, even when the news is devastating to their side. That is exactly what was done in this account from Sharyl Attkisson, the truth doesn’t live at CBS.

    Responses (8) +
  • [9] November 5, 2014 at 10:11am

    Nilsson – You are wrong and while we could argue it out in this forum I agree that we should revisit this post in 2 years and let her record stand for itself. I believe her to be a true conservative, and she has spoken at Tea Party events by invitation I think that qualifies her as having the Tea Party backing. Let her actions reveal the content of her character.

  • [1] November 4, 2014 at 11:40am

    The only outrage here is that there are people outraged over this. This is a matter of choice it could be viewed as good press, or as it is being treated like there is something salacious about it. I can go to any beach and see this level of exposure, however with some of them you might wish you had seen a little less. If they had appeared at a USO show the only mention would have been in Stars and Stripes. Frankly I’m pissed off that someone was stripped of command for this and that any soldier would be disciplined for their participation in any aspect of the photo shoot. If they can fight and die for freedom then they should be afforded a little liberty of their own.

  • October 16, 2014 at 4:37pm

    Before I say anything further I have a driver license and I am polite and compliant to law enforcement. Who told you driving was a privilege? It was the first thing I learned in a drivers education class, that’s what the State says. The horse and buggy defense is entirely relevant. The weapons citizens can posses under the second amendment is based on what is usual and customary for the times, or we would all still be firing black powder single shots. So to this end it is relevant what the customary form of transportation is. I am free, therefore I am free to drive a vehicle anywhere I please without the consent of the State or Federal government. States have an obligation to protect the citizens and with that obligation the right to test a driver. Forcing you to produce a license for something you don’t need their permission to do is overstepping the authority they have. A one time permit is all you should have to do. It took me some time to accept this, we have been slaves for so long its difficult to conceive of true freedom and we won’t get our freedom back till we make the courts acknowledge it.

  • [4] October 16, 2014 at 12:20pm

    I got this from the U.S. News & World Report / Education
    “The university is recognized for fostering intellectual creativity. At SOU, we don’t simply encourage students to be creative. We surround students with a culture based on creative expression and critical thinking. We expose them to different points of view. We challenge conventional thinking. And we provide an open, inclusive environment where students are free to speak their minds.”
    I may be wrong, but that statement isn’t exactly true if the campus has an area designated as a “Free Speech Zone”. It might be a good idea for the administration to review what exactly a public university is, and then read the constitution paying special attention to the “Bill of Rights”. I don’t mind these young impressionable kids being indoctrinated, as long as it is in the the concepts of inalienable rights, freedom, and the individual liberty enshrined in, and protected by, the United States Constitution. Everywhere is a “Free Speech Zone” in the United States of America, at least for now.

  • [3] October 13, 2014 at 4:38pm

    I don’t think it is possible for a legitimate historian to be “very liberal”. RL TW made comments that I have to agree with, and thought the sentiment was well stated.

  • [10] October 3, 2014 at 3:30pm

    I wonder how many have asked her if she ever has suicidal thoughts, and if she can drive a truck.

  • [9] September 24, 2014 at 11:16am

    SCOTUS has held that we, the people, have the right to travel about the country freely, this includes the use of a motor vehicle to do so, as it is considered a common form of transportation. It is a right in our country to travel unencumbered, thus the licensing of a right violates the principle of what a right is. If you do not conduct commerce for pay with your vehicle like a delivery driver, or cab driver, etc… the state (any state) has no authority to require a driver license, however they can test your ability to operate a motor vehicle in the interest of public safety. Every state will tell you driving is a privilege, and that a license is required, but this is not supported by the constitution under your rights as a free person. The government granting itself permission to conduct DUI check points is an egregious violation of our 4th and 5th amendment. Any judge who would rule in favor of such an act should be treated as compromised and found unfit to wear the robes of a justice. Those of you who think this is an OK practice, and being done to protect the public need to ask yourself this: Are you are willing to be stopped, frisked, and demanded to produce ID while walking down a sidewalk? Demanded to explain where you are going? It would be considered an investigatory detention, and presumes your presence on a public sidewalk is reason enough to stop you. New York city police have actually done this, so I’m not reaching to make a point. Do you value your freedom?

    Responses (3) +
  • [10] September 23, 2014 at 11:42pm

    And with a proper campaign donation you to cam get a permit.

    Responses (1) +
  • September 23, 2014 at 11:40pm

    Since when can you look up someone’s DL and get their home address

  • [2] September 23, 2014 at 11:37pm

    I think you would be surprised at who has a gun on them. Little old ladies, suites, normal people you wouldn’t suspect.

123