User Profile: LonestarFree


Member Since: September 02, 2010


  • [9] September 24, 2014 at 11:16am

    SCOTUS has held that we, the people, have the right to travel about the country freely, this includes the use of a motor vehicle to do so, as it is considered a common form of transportation. It is a right in our country to travel unencumbered, thus the licensing of a right violates the principle of what a right is. If you do not conduct commerce for pay with your vehicle like a delivery driver, or cab driver, etc… the state (any state) has no authority to require a driver license, however they can test your ability to operate a motor vehicle in the interest of public safety. Every state will tell you driving is a privilege, and that a license is required, but this is not supported by the constitution under your rights as a free person. The government granting itself permission to conduct DUI check points is an egregious violation of our 4th and 5th amendment. Any judge who would rule in favor of such an act should be treated as compromised and found unfit to wear the robes of a justice. Those of you who think this is an OK practice, and being done to protect the public need to ask yourself this: Are you are willing to be stopped, frisked, and demanded to produce ID while walking down a sidewalk? Demanded to explain where you are going? It would be considered an investigatory detention, and presumes your presence on a public sidewalk is reason enough to stop you. New York city police have actually done this, so I’m not reaching to make a point. Do you value your freedom?

    Responses (3) +
  • [10] September 23, 2014 at 11:42pm

    And with a proper campaign donation you to cam get a permit.

    Responses (1) +
  • September 23, 2014 at 11:40pm

    Since when can you look up someone’s DL and get their home address

  • [2] September 23, 2014 at 11:37pm

    I think you would be surprised at who has a gun on them. Little old ladies, suites, normal people you wouldn’t suspect.

  • September 23, 2014 at 11:21pm

    When will this issue be put to rest. The right expressed in the constitution is unqualified. We have the right to carry concealed or open without any license by an overreaching government, federal, state, or local. How is it exactly that a right can “licensed”

  • [5] September 18, 2014 at 9:57pm

    CNN shows the benefits of common core. Apparently there’s a lot of Democrats in Scotland

  • [10] September 3, 2014 at 3:39pm

    BTW, christianity is not the reason That I am able too speak my mind..that right comes from a secular society; not a theocratic one.
    It is not my goal to argue this with you in this forum but I thought you should be aware that the concept of individual liberty is uniquely christian and our constitution was based on those values. Equal justice is another christian concept we are all the same in the eyes of God therefore no man is to be treated differently than any other with respect to the law and those who have broken it. Not that we do a great job of executing these principles, but that too is part of human nature.

  • [1] September 3, 2014 at 11:28am

    If the kid loves his country and the second amendment his avatar is fine. At 11 years old I was an avid hunter with a .22 rifle and a 30-06 I was completely unsupervised and nobody worried I might hurt someone because they knew I was as competent with a firearm as any adult. No stigma whatsoever should be attached to this picture, that there is, is just an indication of the successful anti-gun campaign perpetrated by the left to indoctrinate our children, and the success of past indoctrination reveled in adults.

  • [2] July 23, 2014 at 11:25am

    You take to the internet to insult people you know nothing about on a subject you apparently know nothing about. Here is a free, brief lesson. It does not matter what “you” believe, Christians, Muslims, and Jews believe and that is what matters on this subject. The Palestinian’s are Muslim and they are taught from birth to hate Jews, and anyone who is not a Muslim, and will not convert is an Infidel. Both Jews and Infidels are to be hated and killed for Allah, so peace between Muslims and Jews is virtually impossible even though the Jews do not have a mandate to kill Muslims. The Palestinians could have peace today if they would stop trying to smuggle weapons into Gaza and shooting rockets into Jewish cities. The Jewish people would be happy to have peace they are not the hate filled zealots in this fight.

  • [2] July 23, 2014 at 10:58am

    No mention of how Hamas has indiscriminately sent rocket after rocket into Jewish cities absolutely unprovoked and without response. The Israeli government has a responsibility to protect it’s citizens. It is unfortunate the Palestinians have let Hamas put them in this situation, but I don’t believe for a second they are innocent. Their silence about the weapons being brought into their communities, and the location of the network of tunnels makes them complicit in the activities of Hamas and a party to the terrorism they represent.

  • [7] July 21, 2014 at 5:50pm

    I wanted to ask, do you get paid to repeat and post this administrations propaganda? or are you just stupid? You obviously have internet access has it ever occurred to you that you can and should fact check any and all statements made by the president and his administration, because in reality stretching the truth does not make a bigger truth, and a lie couched in truth is still a lie.

  • [1] June 23, 2014 at 11:40am

    I once asked the same question of an officer who had pulled me over “Why did you pull me over everyone else was speeding too?” He asked “have ever been fishing?” to which I replied “yes” he then said “well there are thousands, maybe even millions, of fish in a lake I’ll bet you didn’t catch them all.”

  • June 9, 2014 at 3:57pm

    Exactly what is the legal justification for them to confiscate his rifle? and revoke his license? Under what authority does this state have the right to determine who can, and can’t, have a firearm without some form of hearing or court order to at least make a determination as to his mental competence. If he were going to shoot someone it should be the legislators trying to gut the 2nd Amendment at the state level.

  • [18] May 30, 2014 at 3:18pm

    Going to the restroom has a cost associated with it. It doesn’t matter if it is not real money it is real enough to the students, and charging them to go to the bathroom that I have provided with real money is just the beginning of what kindles my fire against our public schools.

  • May 29, 2014 at 11:56am

    These problems go back years, even decades, and our service members deserve better. Our representatives have a responsibility “of the people” to honor the contract to our veterans. Ours is a nation of laws to which I find congress in breach of the people’s contract with our veterans due to a lack of leadership and misappropriation of the people’s funds. Before we send another dollar in aid overseas, or subsidize any domestic activity, we need to spend whatever is needed to see that our veterans receive the best, most timely, care to be found anywhere in the world. To start this process congress and the president need to quit grandstanding for the cameras admit they knew far more about these problems than they have publicly disclosed and start cleaning the bureaucratic house starting with Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric Shinseki.

  • [2] May 29, 2014 at 11:16am

    A license to conceal carry in Texas comes with a background and proficiency check it also says to law enforcement “I have guns” when it is time to confiscate guns in Texas come to my house first. I am licensed to carry and I don’t get the point of the open carry groups banding together to carry long guns, it is legal to open carry them I would support the right to open carry a sidearm if it means I don’t have to register myself as a gun owner with the state. Concealed carry is my preference but I consider my license to be about the same as gun registration.

  • May 21, 2014 at 11:25am

    I would be interested in hearing your reason for saying NO. Did you have guys shooting their own squad members in combat? I realize some people shoot themselves it happens in the civilian world too, but probably more so with our soldiers, a guy needs to recognize when he needs help.

  • [1] May 21, 2014 at 11:08am

    As an enlisted man I served at Ft Hood for 3 years in the mid 1980′s we were not allowed to carry on post, and personal weapons on post had to be kept in the armory. I think carry on post should mirror state law wherever your post is. If you can be licensed for concealed carry in your state that should be good on post as well. The same with open carry only it has to be part of the uniform so those who open carry will match, the military is funny about that. If I were commander in chief I would see a sidearm issued to every service member and require it be carried at all times, because it takes to much time to draw rifles at the armory to the point that if troops were air dropped on a US military installation as a surprise attack in the states they would be virtually defenseless.

  • May 15, 2014 at 12:16pm

    That would be article 5, not the 5th amendment which prevents self incrimination.

  • May 15, 2014 at 12:09pm

    We the people DO NOT want congress to control the flow of money described as political spending. If I have an NRA membership I don’t want it considered political spending just as a donation to the NRA-ILA should not be considered political spending. If you give congress the authority to label your spending they will do it to curtail anything they don’t like. Harry Reid is deceitful and corrupt he will gladly accept money from 1 billionaire who gives money based on ideological principles Reid agrees with and then lambaste the Koch brothers who do the same thing only he doesn’t agree with their ideological principles, so he accuses them of trying to buy the elections and politicians on the Senate floor. Why is a United States Senator allowed to stand at the Senate microphone and speak disparagingly of American Citizens, who have broken no laws, just because he doesn’t like who they make contributions to?