User Profile: Lordbowler


Member Since: August 31, 2010


  • [24] February 3, 2016 at 9:14am

    I hope Rand Paul decides to support Cruz and not Trump. I can’t see him supporting anyone else, except for maybe Rubio. He is closest in ideology to Cruz followed by Rubio with some major differences.

    Rand Paul would make a great surrogate for Cruz on the Campaign Trail.

    Responses (7) +
  • [11] February 1, 2016 at 11:10am

    It appears so… Wouldn’t it be great if Trump chooses JEB as his VP? That would be a ticket to success!

    Although, more likely he’ll choose Rubio. I’ve been really disappointed by Rubio, who I liked, and his willingness to “make deals” with dishonest Dems (Gang of 8).

    Responses (1) +
  • [19] February 1, 2016 at 11:07am

    Trump is a sexist, not an abuser. He hits on any attractive woman that has a pulse. Once rejected he retaliates with words and tries to destroy their credibility.

    Marla Maples, Ivanka, and recently that BBC journalist have said this about him in the past.

    Responses (4) +
  • [88] February 1, 2016 at 11:03am

    Trump is a serial womanizer, we all know that! If he ends up in the White House, he’d likely do the exact same thing that Bill did in the White House or JFK for that matter.

    Responses (22) +
  • [2] January 27, 2016 at 1:02pm

    They fix it in post with CGI.

  • [4] January 27, 2016 at 1:02pm

    Or two actors, one Black for Jackson’s “Black” period and one White for his “White” period.

  • [16] January 14, 2016 at 3:44pm

    Let’s make it a Class Action Suit!

  • [1] January 14, 2016 at 1:44pm

    That’s because Hillary will have Michelle as her running mate!

    Responses (1) +
  • [-3] January 12, 2016 at 3:41pm

    Especially when Obama gets back into office after Hillary chooses Michelle Obama as her VP and crushes Donald Trump in the General.

  • January 12, 2016 at 11:12am

    In this day in age, business could run active shooter drills, where employees with no weapons take cover and stay out of the line of fire. Although this is already mostly instinctual, it’s good to drill it in so those without the instinct won’t have to stop and think. Remember “Stop, Drop, and Roll” drills? This would minimize any “collateral damage” as employees armed (if allowed by company policy) can return fire without hitting a co-worker.

    That being said, bullets can travel through walls so care would still have to be taken. As any shooter knows, know your target and what’s beyond it.

  • [46] January 12, 2016 at 11:07am

    Don’t you mean the advice to throw staplers and scissors at the perpetrators?

    I recall that was some of the advice given by Biden or someone in the Administration that you hide and when they are near, you throw stuff. Great advice!

    Interesting that with at least 6 hours of training (1 day), all of the people at least hit the chest area, and the two with the least training had kill shots. Thank you Call of Duty! The general rule of thumb is to aim for the biggest target (Chest), unless you have the time and skill to go after the smaller target of the Head/Neck.

  • January 12, 2016 at 9:38am

    Why isn’t Bruce Springsteen, an outspoken liberal and mostly likely Hillary supporter, demanding that Trump not use any of his music at his rallies?

    Responses (2) +
  • [1] January 7, 2016 at 10:39am

    I love this story from a Big-Government State like NJ. It will likely remain after the group pays a fine aka “Bribe” to the State in order to not have to tear down the structure.

    Also, there was no “Hurricane Sandy”. It was downgraded to a Tropical Storm when it hit, but that didn’t fit the Climate-Change narrative of more Hurricanes because of Climate Change, so the storm was renamed “Superstorm Sandy”. Other than in Asylum Films, Superstorms are a storm classification used by the National Weather Service at least in my limited knowledge.

    Like Bill Nye, I also don’t have a degree in the Climate Sciences!

  • [15] December 23, 2015 at 3:23pm

    Because the media is trying to spread the narrative that all guns are malevolent and are trying to kill you.

    Responses (1) +
  • [48] December 7, 2015 at 8:59pm

    So, Dash and Peters get penalized when Dash’s slip was an honest error. Bob Beckel got bleeped every day on The Five. Col. Peters was asked for his reaction and gave it.

    And, Red Eye has bleeps on almost every show and they swear on purpose!

    All Fox had to do was apologize for the naughty language on the air and move on!!! Just like MSNBC does when they air Conservative Commentary by accident.

  • [2] November 17, 2015 at 1:39pm

    Ditto, It would be interesting to see who can handle a joke at their expense and who cannot. Huckabee is personable on camera, even though I’m not a fan of him. It would be interesting.

    The stiffer candidates who run everything by polls wouldn’t do well. Bush, Kasich, and Graham would be at a severe disadvantage.

    Carson and Fiorina are the unknowns…

  • [2] November 17, 2015 at 1:22pm

    I agree, like the law or not, it’s on the books. Every Legal GOP candidate should get an offer to host an episode of SNL.
    Sure, most would suck at it, but it’d be like a car-wreck, some of us would still watch.
    And, other candidates may shine. Particularly Christi and probably Huckabee (who’s had a lot of TV experience like Trump). I would think Cruz, Rubio and Paul would do a decent job given veto approval (like Trump was).
    Can’t imagine Kasich, Graham, Gilmore, Santorum, and Bush doing that well with it, but you never know.

    SNL has to be fair under the law! If you allow one GOP Candidate, you must offer it to all of them.

  • [2] November 17, 2015 at 1:17pm

    This is AWESOME!!!

    Can you imagine if SNL is forced to allow EVERY Republican Candidate to host an episode of SNL? That would be amazing even if every candidate just used that timeslot to air a 90-minute campaign commercial, it would be worth it.

    Most though wouldn’t do well in that format. Cruz, Rubio, Paul, and maybe Huckabee and Christi would do well in that format.

    Responses (1) +
  • [154] October 19, 2015 at 9:47am

    I agree, why is it necessary immediately after the game? They can’t wait until the exit the Locker Room? What’s next, in the showers with the players?

    Responses (2) +
  • July 22, 2015 at 10:51am

    ManBearPig / Hildebeast 2016!

    That is a winning Democratic Ticket!

Restoring Love