User Profile: lordjosh


Member Since: October 12, 2010


123 To page: Go
  • October 24, 2014 at 6:30am

    C’mon. I ask, “what would I see if I saw a Christian practicing Christianity “freely” and the answer chinga gave was that they would “wear a cross around…(their) neck”.
    I asked, “Is that(wearing a cross) what it means to be Christian?
    And yes, your correct, god commands us to preach to all who will listen and to abandon those who won’t.
    So I guess, if Christianity was freely accepted tomorrow here in the US, everone Christian would hit the streets to preach the Good Word? I have to say, for a “Christian Nation”, I don’t see much “Christianity” going on. What gives? Or did we get it wrong, Granny? Maybe, being a Christian means something else?

  • October 23, 2014 at 11:54am

    I agree. They are out there.
    All are called. Are you listening or watching and opera?
    Please go back and reread, I believe you misunderstand my comment. I defend God’s Law.

  • [-1] October 23, 2014 at 11:43am

    Any. Tomorrow for the dramatic effect. I know the obvious, like CHING presents. I am looking for a little more substance. I highly doubt a Christian would define oneself as a cross wearer and Christians are free to proselytize all over the western world but only seem to care when they are told they can’t in a certain forum. I wonder when was the last time CHING proselytized.

  • [-1] October 23, 2014 at 8:10am

    Sorry for the poor grammar.

  • October 23, 2014 at 7:57am


  • [-2] October 23, 2014 at 7:52am


    That is priceless! Can you tell me how many Laws were broken for those people to be in a position to reject such business? or, to find themselves punished for making such a stand?

  • [1] October 23, 2014 at 7:37am

    I agree with you. However, the discomfort that comes from discovering The Scriptures initially is usually the result of discovering that all these people who claim to be in Christ are full of sheit.
    “I became a Christian man, and not in a ********** bulls**t way — in a very real way,”

  • [1] October 23, 2014 at 7:23am

    Nothing worse than ignorance fancying themselves informed( by a friend who used to live on a farm).

  • October 23, 2014 at 7:12am

    And your comprehension of English sucks. I said the statute was plain English. I would not have commented if Crack misinterpreted legalese.

    The statute does not exempt ALL county and local department vehicles. The last part of the sentence is the qualifier. The only vehicles exempt are those used by county and local departments “for special undercover or confidential investigative purposes.” The commas do not separate the qualifier from those subjects. I know. I blame the public schools and the Christians who send us there.

  • [-9] October 23, 2014 at 6:59am

    I have to hand to the lady. She stood by her convictions, her religion, and rejected the opera.
    Find me a Christian who practices God’s law and would choose God’s law over worldly things.

    Responses (12) +
  • [-2] October 23, 2014 at 6:57am

    freevoice is a muslim expert because he read a book written by a non-burka-wearing muslim.

  • [-5] October 23, 2014 at 6:53am

    Woodeye no good, woodeye no see.

  • [-2] October 23, 2014 at 6:52am

    “islam is not a religion – it is a cult”

    What difference does it make what YOU label it. The lady at the opera house did not hurt anybody. I thought the left had the market on labeling and condemning.

  • [-5] October 23, 2014 at 6:45am


    I pray you will one day have two brain cells.

  • [1] October 23, 2014 at 6:41am

    So, what would a Christian do if they were allowed to “practice their religion freely”?
    What would we see if, tomorrow, Christians were free to express themselves openly?

    Responses (6) +
  • [-9] October 23, 2014 at 6:37am

    The veil is an article of clothing. France banned the veil because they don’t like the reasons Muslim women wear them.
    France banned veils because they a not in line with feminism. The opera actors were not afraid of being blown up, they were offended. They were kicked out of the opera because the couple’s views on appropriate attire differ from the people of the opera house and the France lawmakers.

    Let me ask you, God commands us men to wear long pants and woman are not allowed to wear pants. Men’s hair is to be short, while a woman’s is to be long. What will you say when your gods decide for you what is appropriate attire?
    Only a Christian would completely ignore the dress code set forth by God while condemning another for practicing what their god told them.

    Most you people commenting on this story are extremely mentally sick.

  • October 20, 2014 at 6:10am

    I wouldn’t scoff at someone who can’t read legalese. This is plain English, MR. CRACK.

  • [-2] October 19, 2014 at 9:29am

    I suppose, just like police officers, medical examiners never lie?

  • [-2] October 19, 2014 at 9:14am


    If that is your example of the fine research one should do before reporting a story……the Blaze may have a position for you.

  • [-5] October 19, 2014 at 9:09am

    Fishheads and fertility symbols.

123 To page: Go