User Profile: lqtm

Member Since: August 31, 2010

CommentsDisplaying lqtm's 10 most recent comments.

  • Yeah, you do strike me as being on par with the bovine intellect.

  • As a civil liberties organization, they are likely aware of the situation and weighing the costs and potential benefits of litigation as well as sub-legal administrative remedies. So what? There’s a real world out there, a world which apparently you have only a vague, spiteful appreciation for. Keep that up and let me know how it works for you.

  • I’ve studied property law for a long time now, and you have not, Vaman. You shouldn’t tell people you’re about to educate them and then misinform them.

  • We allow non-black students to join the Black Law Students Association at my law school. There have been no problems because we are reasonable human beings who appreciate all forms of student involvement. Additionally, typecasting by skin color and appearance falls apart when you have biracial parents, which might give rise to students who don’t fit into your petty understanding of racial classes, but who nonetheless identify as asian or another race. Sure it might be strange to consider admitting a non-believer into a christian club, but doesn’t that represent an opportunity for them to learn more about Christianity? There are myriad reasons your comment is silly and I don’t feel like typing them down. Overall, you need to realize and embrace the fact that people are people. How anti-christian is that?

  • Usually when you push something to its logical end you then begin using logic. Here, however, we see merely a sad attempt to distort logic, and perhaps a total lack of understanding of what the original underlying logic was.

  • Oops, your ignorance is showing. There are a specific set of protected classes which have been identified by the Supreme Court to stem from our Constitution (something you probably tell people you believe in). Their protections have been codified into positive law through the following acts, which merely effectuate the protections demanded by the 14th. The Supreme Court is the highest authority on the interpretation of our Constitution. They are far, far more thoughtful in their interpretations that you, who merely interpret based on what you would prefer the answer to be. Here are the classes and their relevant statutes. Thanks Wiki.
    Race – Federal: Civil Rights Act of 1964
    Color – Federal: Civil Rights Act of 1964
    Religion – Federal: Civil Rights Act of 1964
    National origin – Federal: Civil Rights Act of 1964
    Age (40 and over) – Federal: Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967
    Sex – Federal: Equal Pay Act of 1963 & Civil Rights Act of 1964
    Familial status – Federal: Civil Rights Act of 1968 Title VIII
    Disability status – Federal: Vocational Rehabilitation and Other Rehabilitation Services of 1973 & Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
    Veteran status – Federal Vietnam Era Veterans Readjustment Assistance Act of 1974
    Genetic information – Federal: Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act

  • There is a video called “what if I’m wrong” by a user called A5Hellcat on youtube, and he addresses your confusion with patience and tact, which I lack.

  • @Woody- Yeah, they’re spreading hate by disallowing exclusion from groups based on belief. That would require you to construe inclusion as a hateful motive, which I’m sure you do. Problem is people assume you take strong medication when you argue say like that.

  • Also, in re: Starman, there ARE Christian clubs at almost every single university, so does your rationale imply they must not be Marxist. Oops.

  • Your local mosque is not a public university.