User Profile: Lucretius


Member Since: June 13, 2013


123 To page: Go
  • July 25, 2014 at 4:01pm

    “By the way Bernie..that “writing styles” thing you attempted? Check out your post as Jamescur at 12:33 and the Lucretinous identity’s post at 2:38. LOL. ”

    “You make this WAY too easy buddy.”

    AHAHAHAHAHAHAHa because I used 1) 2) 3) and he used a) b) c)??

    Lol…dude get a grip man.

    Honestly I don’t care what you think but this is my only account that I use. Seriously, why do you think that is advantageous? I don’t understand.

  • July 25, 2014 at 3:51pm


    I know you can read. Why do you keep calling me Bernie? Are you having a seizure? You should have someone call 911 if you are.

    “You asked for evidence as to an agenda among homosexuals to normalize sex with children.”

    No. Reading comprehension counts. I asked for evidence that allowing two consenting adults who love each other to marry will lead to acceptance of child and animal rape. You have not done that, as a counter I have provided places that have allowed such legal unions for 10-25 years. Yet somehow their moral fabric has not torn so much that animal and child rape are now so common that you can’t even get on your wooden shoes before you have raped one of them. Wait, I think Holland is the one with the wooden shoes.

    I agree with you that NAMBLA is disgusting organization. What more is there to say? The evidence just doesn’t support your conspiracy theory. Most pedophiles are heterosexual as someone said above…is “traditional” marriage to blame?

    Despite all this “normalizing” of this perversion societies ages of consent have only increased since, let’s just say, the bible. What makes you think we will go back to having multiple underage wives like some of your heroes in the bible? Because no evidence supports that…in fact evidence supports the opposite.

    “You were “defeated” many posts ago champ”

    Lol. Ooooookkkkkk

    “You make this too easy sport.”

    Sorry Grandpa

  • [2] July 25, 2014 at 3:32pm


    “LOL…how hysterical is that? Bernie the troll with the mulitude of screennames he hides behind and stalks and baits others is demanding to be respected and addressed as an adult.

    “You’re a piece of work man”

    I don’t have a multitude of screenames nor do I do any of the things that you accuse me of. I should have been more clear. I was not DEMANDING to be treated as an adult, I was asking you to act like one. Futile as it may seem I still hold out hope that one day your tough guy facade would fade into a meaningful and useful conversationalist. *sigh* :)

    You are an easy piece to work man.

  • [2] July 25, 2014 at 3:24pm


    “LOL..yeah you’ve tried that “sickle cell” line with me when you post as Harry Potter Bernie”

    I’m not either one of those people. It’s a reasonable position considering your logic.

    “I can list the heatlh and psychological issues plaguing your beloved lesbians Bernie but all it will do is provide corridors for you to scurry into to deflect and distract again. I’m not up to smoking you out’s tedious. ”

    More nonsense…you should have just not said anything at all.

    “yeah and being a herion addict is normal to being a heroin addict but it doesn’t make it safe or normal for the human species though does it champ? ”

    Heroin? WTF? We are talking about the spectrum of human sexuality and people who can’t stand someone who is on a different rung on spectrum as them.

    “You’re asking society to treat homosexuals as normal because the only way you can further the homosexual agenda is by making it appear as normal as you can make it.”

    If I have to have an agenda it’s equality. Yes, because homosexuals are normal people who deserve the same rights as you.

    “This is why you and your other screennames won’t address the presence of groups like NAMBLA…”

    I only have two logins…Lucretius and CosmicJewishZombie…which I never use anymore. I do not support NAMBLA whether supported by homosexuals or heterosexuals. Has there been a massive explosion of NAMBLA support in Denmark, the Netherlands, or Mass

  • July 25, 2014 at 2:38pm

    Lol…why is that such a theme? You think I need sock accounts to defeat your weak argument or something?

    1)Change the person’s name to something I think is funny and insulting
    2)Call them a troll or prog troll.
    3)Get red faced
    4)Call them names of different users that I disagree with
    5)Accuse them of being the same user
    6)Lose argument
    7)Claim victory

    Plus our writing styles are completely different. Also, I’m not married nor do I have any kids. Got me a couple of dogs though and a pretty girlfriend :)

  • [2] July 25, 2014 at 2:23pm


    You could make communication so much easier between us if you just use the name that is directly beside my avatar. It’s what adults do.

    You know what I find most intriguing?

    I always see you talk about liberals “creating a protected class”.

    But hilariously you are the one giving them the reason to do so.

    You know why black people became a protected class? Because people didn’t want them drinking at the same water fountain as them.

    If you would just back the F off perhaps we could avoid a disaster like “The Great Society”. You are the ones fueling the fire for uber libs to create this “protected class”.

    Your ignorance and hate is reaping what it sows…and we are all going to have to pay for it.

    You are like a bad father(society) who then blames his bad kids on anything and everything but the very environment in which you raised them.

  • [2] July 25, 2014 at 2:11pm

    “yes Lucretinous you are asking for homosexual sex practices to be portrayed as normal and safe by virture…”

    Nope, being homosexual is normal to homosexuals. There are a lot of things people do that are not “normal” to me. I’m asking the government and society to treat them as normal.

    “”…”just like black people and civil rights” nauseum”

    I can keep it going if you like…you know…using your line of reasoning. Black people are more susceptible to sickle cell anemia…they shouldn’t be allowed to marry white people right? Because they are a higher risk for that condition?

    “it’s far from anything resembling normal by virtue of the health and psychological issues intrinsic to it.”

    Again, then lesbianism is the healthiest!!! As more and more people like yourself are relegated to obscurity I’m sure some of those psychological effects will be eased. My girlfriend and I saw a picture of some dudes in robes standing all tough around a burning cross…today in the 21st century! We literally both laughed out loud. This is what is going to happen to people like you too unless you have a revelation.

    “homosexual agenda is to tell school age children to”

    I wouldn’t agree with teachers suggesting any type of sexual encounter. I am for proper sex education and counselors who can deal with both hetero and homosexual issues that may arise in school age children.

  • [2] July 25, 2014 at 1:27pm


    You have anything substantive to add? So, far the arguments have been utterly weak.

  • [2] July 25, 2014 at 1:22pm


    Again, you keep saying that but I’m not deflecting.

    I’m not asking for it to be portrayed as anything. Sex is risky, some sex is riskier than others. What is your point? We need to stop people from doing things because it is risky to them? Who is the prog troll again? It should be portrayed just as it is. If your homosexual you don’t have a choice with who you want to have sex with.

    My performance? Lol…easy Avenger you might be getting to worked up. I have already explained to you that it is not deflecting if I’m using the very line of reasoning that you are. It should be universal right? Logically.

  • [2] July 25, 2014 at 12:43pm


    Considering most of our conversations end with me having the last word I think you need to calm down a bit. I never assume you are running and hiding. You get so worked up.

    There are risks to having sex…even what you consider “normal” sex. Homosexual men do tend to be more promiscuous and in particular are more susceptible to a particular strain of HIV. But even in heterosexual couples the men are the most promiscuous and most susceptible to STDs. Again, it is not a deflection if you are drawing a correlation between morality, normalcy, healthiness, and the rate of STD contraction. If this is the line you are drawing then Lesbians pass this morality gauntlet better than heterosexual couples.

    So, again, like most of this arguments the logic doesn’t compute.

  • July 25, 2014 at 12:11pm


    In Denmark it has been 25 years. What is going on there?

  • July 25, 2014 at 11:54am


    “Lucretius, you don’t know how to use google?”

    I sure do…

    “There are a host of groups pushing pedophilia as a sexual orientation, and some claim that it does no harm to the child and can actually be a healthy, loving relationship”

    I’m sure there are. There are also groups of people who like to remove a body part during sex. There are groups of people that believe that government officials are lizards from outer space. Again…you have done nothing to show that our morality will move towards removing the power of consent from those who cannot give consent. It has always been the opposite as I pointed out.

    “as to bestiality, there are already several European countries that allow people to marry their pets”

    Nope…I googled it.

  • [-2] July 25, 2014 at 11:38am

    didn’t quite understand you.

    Say again?

  • [1] July 25, 2014 at 11:29am


    Ok then if we follow your logic…lesbians are the most “normal and healthy” couples.

  • [1] July 25, 2014 at 11:25am


    No. I find it hard to believe that well over 100 years ago when the government first got involved in marriage that their initial intent was to “normalize” gay marriage.


    “First, voting wasn’t redefined, the law was changed to allow others to participate.”

    Sure it was…voting was defined as only being a right a man had. We changed the law to include women. Same thing here…marriage was defined as only being a right that same sex couples had. We are changing the law to include same sex couples.

    “Marriage isn’t a law, it’s a covenant between man, woman and God. God created this institution not man. Man can’t change this covenant, he can only violate it. ”

    Woah woah…what are you talking about? Those are your religious beliefs, that has nothing to do with marriage as defined by the laws of the United States.

    “Okay, I’ll play your game though, I want to redefine gays and their supporters as inhuman, mutant, alien invaders.”

    Well you would have to vote and get enough support for elected officials who feel as you do. Good luck.

    “But no, it has to be called marriage ”

    Because that is what the United States calls it.

    “You can redefine anything you want and even make laws that enforce it, but that doesn’t make it right or moral.”

    It’s not me personally it’s society and societies decide what is right or moral.

  • [-3] July 25, 2014 at 10:29am


    “People thought they would never normalize same sex marriage, but look at where we are today.”

    People never thought we would normalize black people, I’m sure there were people who thought they should always be slaves. I’m sure people thought we would never normalize interracial marriage, or normalize women to vote. Once there were people who thought it was normal for underage children to work in sweatshops. Our morality and what we find “normal” or moral always changes but it has always trended towards more freedom and more power of consent. Never has it trended towards less power of your consent…but perhaps there is an example I’m not thinking of. So, again, where is the evidence that normalizing gay people leads to normalizing the rape of children and animals. Help me follow this logic.

    Black people-power to their consent and freedom
    interracial couple-power to their consent and freedom
    women-power to their consent and freedom
    children-power to their consent and freedom
    gay people-power to their consent and freedom

    But now you are saying that the last one will lead to….

    Animals-less consent and freedom from unreasonable abuse
    children-less consent and freedom from unreasonable abuse

    I need some evidence.

  • July 25, 2014 at 10:15am

    “Hey, if you want to be ruled by men”

    What other choice do we have? That is what I was asking…how is it even possible not to? Even if you lived alone in the woods you would be follwing the rules set by yourself and the environment for which you live. You are a “man”.

    Again, can you name an instance when we weren’t ruled by men or that our laws were written by anything other than men? Even natural law is an idea from men…inacted by men.

  • [-3] July 25, 2014 at 10:04am

    But it is a good conversation starter :)

  • [-3] July 25, 2014 at 10:02am


    No, I get it but it doesn’t follow. That is why I keep asking why you would ever think that. I mean MA has had gay marriage for over 10 years now…I haven’t heard of rampant support for child and animal rape there. How long does it take?


    “They’re already trying to say pedophilia is a “sexual orientation.”

    Who is they? And where is the evidence for the rest of your post. Do have any evidence that allowing two consenting adults to love who they want will lead to adults forcing love on those who cannot give consent? I just don’t see how your logic follows. Show me some evidence not just your own personal anecdotes.


    “Once the door is open and morality gets thrown out the window anything will be allowed. ”

    How is allowing two consenting adults who love each the same rights to protect their shared interests and assets not moral?

    And if this is a slippery slope argument, how long does it take? There is no polygamy in MA and gay marriage has been legal for 10 years? Denmark has legally recognized same sex partnerships since 1989…the Netherlands has recognized same sex marriage since 2001. How long does this decay take? I’m just trying to follow your logic but the evidence just doesn’t support it.

  • [1] July 25, 2014 at 9:47am


    “interracial marriage never redefined a damn thing.”

    Except to the people who were against it. Plus we are free to redefine anything we want. We shouldn’t have to hold on to tradition for the mere sake of it. We are free people to remove, write, and change the laws that govern us as we see fit. We were able to redefine what voting meant and now women can vote…right?

123 To page: Go