If you are with Adam and Eve it means you are human inbred. If you are with the Darwinian Scientists you are ape inbred, fling poo, eat bananas, fornicate with other little apes all day, and generally have copious amounts of butt gas and still ....can't find any transitional fossils. But, there still are plenty of pig teeth to make fake human like ape skulls out of and on.....to the next.....HOAX!
Not if you came from another galaxie like the rest of us. I'm not really supposed to talk to you.
What you have to have is faith in God. If you believe in Jesus then when you get to heaven you can ask about Cains life in Nod, etc. If you write a book of your life it would be quite long if you wrote what you did minute by minute or even month by month too.
Have faith or you have nothing. God Bless
Not only inbred, but somehow all of the different races split off from these inbreds. Of course, they were all killed ina flood, then the inbred descendants of Noah split off into the different races. Seems pretty darn ridiculous if you actually think about it. You would think that if all of their "proof" was so convincing, then there wouldn't be so many religions that say otherwise.
Mach, This is a misconception that only Adam and Eve were here. I believe that there were other humans, I point you to Genesis 1:26, "Let us make man in our image and our likeness", and Genesis 1:27, "And GOD created the man in his image and in his likeness"; Why does the scripture describe the same event two ways? I think it is making reference to 2 creations of humanity. 1 the race. and 2 the individual. ???
LIZ: "fling poo, eat bananas, fornicate with other little apes all day, and generally have copious amounts of butt gas." Judging from what's on television, I might have to reconsider and become an evolutionist.
CHIPS...I had to turn you in. falchads of your rank are not allowed in this arena.
JAYCEN....For the true scripture scholar,(as opposed to 'bible skimmers') All the "ethnos" (races) were created, on the sixth day of creation. He looked upon them all, and said, "it is good." On the seventh day of creation, the LORD saw he had no ''husbandman". So, on the eighth day of creation, he created (the) Adam, and from his "rib" (helix curve), he created eve, the mother of all living. She is called that because through her bloodline would come Christ, the anointed, without whom, none, has life.
That's the point he is counting on not having to prove. The setup operates on the premise that the Bible is right until proven otherwise; not from a null position of no premise is right until proven. I also question many other aspects of this trial. I see a lot of room for discombobulation; distracting the judge by dragging in other scientific disciplines such as cosmology, instead of focusing on evolutionary theory.
Also, where would this "trial" take place, who would be the judge(a graduate from Bob Jones U, or Liberty University would not exactly be unbiased), and several other issues that would have to be resolved.
Not that I expect that it will happen. This is a publicity stunt, and he gains more by making sure the conditions are unacceptable for a "trial" to occur than he does by going through with it.
Morning Eric, how is the weather down in Tampa this morning? I understand that it is about 43 degrees F but will warm into the 60s soon.
You can't unless you were there. You can't take an atheist off the streets and take him back in time and show him how the world was created, so you can't really prove it to a non-believer. A Christian sees proof everywhere, as they see everything around them as a creation of God's, while an atheist just sees a tree that is there by chance. If they won't listen to you, then they won't believe the same thing you believe. Ever. I just live and let live; if people don't believe what I believe that's no problem of mine, as it's not my position to determine if what they believe is wrong or not.