User Profile: madmanGTR1

Member Since: March 27, 2012

CommentsDisplaying madmanGTR1's 10 most recent comments.

  • Sounds like you subscribe to the absurd idea that humans are driving up the planets temperature, eh. If you had been paying attention in 5th grade science, you would have learned we are exiting an ice age, therefore temps ARE gradually warming. The causal link to my muscle car’s tailpipe is not there. The carbon argument is a joke, and the IPCC “scientists” have been discredited in so many ways as to render their findings scientifically irrelevant. Oh by the way, the old “settled science” and “consensus” statements have no place in scientific theory. Every theory must withstand critical debate and challenge. To simply dismiss challenges by discrediting the author or name calling (typical tactic of anthropological caused climater change enthusiasts), does not constitute, a coherent, valid response.Carbohydrates or hydrocarbons, it really makes no difference. Feel free to ride your bike (or horse) to work, I’ll drive my big-block Cobra.

  • Any 14 yr old who was reasonably alert in junior high science class could tell you we are exiting an ice age, therefore retreating ice should be expected. Ice sheets across North America in places were a mile thick. The melting started long before the internal combustion engine was invented. I treat man made global warming/climate change or whatever they call it this week with the same respect as politic correctness: I don’t participate in their BS. Go read some science.

  • Yeah we make more guns… and houses, and cars, and electronics, and lots of things. The fact that most of the guns came from the US is a pointless argument. And another thing, the STUPID argument that our “lust” for drugs justifies their bringing them into our country is not valid. Nobody I associate with cooks up meth in their bathtubs even though there is a market for it. That’s because I don’t associate with CRIMINALS! It’s CRIMINAL behavior, that’s the bottom line. I thought this president was supposed to be smart. I would love to debate him. His stupid arguments only work for low IQ people… of course they are his voter base so he knows there’s more idiots in this country every day.

  • AP Boston. Today authorities learned a crazed atheist and a similarly inclined sibling inflicted horrific loss of life and multiple cases of limb dismemberment when the two detonated explosive devices placed near crowds of innocent observers of the Boston Marathon. The militant atheists then shot and killed a local police officer, detonated other improvised explosives in a futile attempt to escape authorities. The younger sibling was enraged enough to charge authorities with the stolen auto running over his cohort most likely inflicting the fatal injuries before being captured. JUST IN: It has come to our attention that no atheists were involved. The perps were well known religious fanatics. My bad. Back to our regularly scheduled programming.

  • Dawkins would absolutely shred you in a debate. I would pay money to see that. A clue to one’s intellect is the ability to construct a proper sentence.

  • Oh, you mean one of these wonderful countries run by religious lunatics? I think you just made his point thank you

  • I could recommend several good science texts which will help you understand evolutionary biology if you like. Your sad, simplistic version only serves as humor to people with closed minds and/or low IQ. Read some non-fiction sometime, you will learn something :)

  • You people crack me up. While I listen to Beck and agree with most conservative policies, I also use my head and study science rather than merely follow others statements and beliefs as far as how old the earth is, how basic biology works, how physics and quantum mechanics have allowed us to advance so far in electronics and communication. I see a pattern here of people decrying the indoctrination of kids in Islam, yet defend the same with Christianity. Sticking your head in the sand with regard to simple science, while enjoying the benefits of other branches of science is highly hypocritical. Users of the internet gleefully spew their anti-science views oblivious of the fact that were it not for scientific understanding of quantum theory, their computer and the internet would not be possible. GPS, spaceflight, MRI machines, lasers etc would not be possible. So while embracing these “sciences” yet denying the legitimacy of evolutionary biology, comparative anatomy, radiometric dating, plate techtonic theory, nuclear sciences, and basic high school biology, they truly show their ignorance. Dawkins argues for education and understanding nature. Not just his version of it, but encourages further reading of related branches which tend to bolster and confirm results of the others. To deny radiometric dating for example is tantamount to denying that nuclear bombs worked. I understand that Christianity does not produce lunatics. Just pointing out the hypocrisy.

  • Your vocabulary is immense, your wisdom is vast. Your jealousy though is very transparent! Where is the proof of your assertions? Did you attend public school on a short bus?

  • What material currently in use, would be a competitive substutute as far as weight/stiffness?