User Profile: majasdad

majasdad

Member Since: June 18, 2011

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [4] January 30, 2015 at 11:06am

    Really?
    “First Time in Nearly 100 Years, Motion-Sensitive Cameras Caught This at Yosemite National Park?”

    Wow, I had no idea motion sensitive cameras have existed for over 100 years….

  • January 29, 2015 at 6:47pm

    They are indeed awesome, I’ve seen several of their videos, but the last thing they need is for Glenn Beck to “promote” them.
    It would be like, “Hey, we just got an endorsement from someone called Glenn Beck!”…. silence…. “Guys?”….. silence….. “Hello?”……silence….. “Where’d everybody go??”

  • January 28, 2015 at 3:41am

    @Wyoming
    I was referring to the entire disjointed speech as one big gaffe, made no mention of any specific part of it.

  • [-3] January 26, 2015 at 7:21am

    That’s exactly why she should run….

  • [-3] January 26, 2015 at 7:20am

    If you can’t see that, you’re as unintelligent as Sarah Palin.

    Responses (3) +
  • [-1] January 26, 2015 at 7:20am

    If Palin were to win the Primaries, the Democrats would win the election by a landslide.
    Run Palin Run!!! PLEASE!!!

  • January 21, 2015 at 11:03am

    @cantstandlibs
    In an effort to be more clear, let me quote the article in Huffington Post under the headline “Study Finds Fox News Viewers Least Informed Of All Viewers”:
    “Another study has concluded that people who only watch Fox News are less informed than all other news consumers.//As the study explained, though, people who watched only Fox News fared worse:
    The largest effect is that of Fox News: all else being equal, someone who watched only Fox News would be expected to answer just 1.04 domestic questions correctly — a figure which is significantly worse than if they had reported watching no media at all. On the other hand, if they listened only to NPR, they would be expected to answer 1.51 questions correctly; viewers of Sunday morning talk shows fare similarly well. And people watching only “The Daily Show With Jon Stewart” could answer about 1.42 questions correctly.”
    There you have it.
    And yes, I do live in Sweden, and “No Go Zones” are indeed bull.

  • [-1] January 21, 2015 at 6:18am

    The Blaze? Fact checking??
    Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha…..pause for catching my breath ….hahahahahahahahahaha
    hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah….

  • January 19, 2015 at 6:27am

    You’re an idiot. Upon visiting the United States people inevitably warn against visiting South Central in Los Angeles or South Bronx in New York, but that doesn’t mean that they’re “No Go Zones”.
    Furthermore, that moron on Foxnews also said that Sweden had “No Go Zones”, which is a complete lie. I know this for a fact since I live in Sweden.
    A recent poll stated that watching Foxnews actually makes people more ignorant. You are obviously proof of that.

    Responses (3) +
  • January 19, 2015 at 6:20am

    We can find no credible source that Foxnews is a credible source.

  • [-2] January 15, 2015 at 4:26am

    Says a man who calls himself A**man.
    Priceless.

    I’m sure your parents are super proud of their little A**man.

  • January 12, 2015 at 4:31am

    You’re an idiot, Mike. I didn’t say anything about race.

    You obviously like putting words into people’s mouths. That’s not very cute at all.

  • [-1] January 11, 2015 at 6:42pm

    Typical.

    Even after countless indications of George Zimmerman’s volatile nature, which people are finally starting to accept, most of you Blaze morons cannot even grant a murdered innocent teenager the respect of a few short words: I WAS WRONG, SORRY TRAYVON.

    Please, just admit you people were wrong about Trayvon being a thug.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] January 11, 2015 at 6:29pm

    TWO IDIOTS???
    That Zimmerman was an idiot from the get go was obvious.
    But on what do you base calling Trayvon Martin an idiot??

    Just swallow your pride and say it: I WAS WRONG ABOUT POOR TRAVON MARTIN AND I FEEL AWFUL ABOUT IT.

    Trust me, the truth will set you free.

  • [2] January 11, 2015 at 6:24pm

    Ok, so you finally realize this Zimmerman is bad news yet you still can’t put two and two together and accept that Trayvon was a totally innocent young man was senselessly murdered the lunatic.
    Strange….

  • January 9, 2015 at 7:17pm

    @jr23
    What rape statistics has to do with the issue here is beyond me, but now that you brought it up, let me educate you.
    Here’s an excerpt from a BBC article back in 2012.

    /On the face of it, it would seem Sweden is a much more dangerous place than these other countries. But that is a misconception, according to Klara Selin, a sociologist at the National Council for Crime Prevention in Stockholm. She says you cannot compare the countries’ records, because police procedures and legal definitions vary widely.
    ‘In Sweden there has been this ambition explicitly to record every case of sexual violence separately, to make it visible in the statistics,’ she says.
    ‘So, for instance, when a woman comes to the police and she says my husband raped me almost every day during the last year, the police have to record each of these events, which might be more than 300 events. In many other countries it would just be one record – one victim, one type of crime, one record.’

    Something’s going on, but Klara Selin says the statistics don’t represent a major crime epidemic, rather a shift in attitudes. The public debate about this sort of crime in Sweden over the past two decades has had the effect of raising awareness, she says, and encouraging women to go to the police if attacked.
    ‘the major explanation is that people go to the police more often, but also the fact that there has been reform in the sex crime legislation, which made the legal definition of rape much wider than before.’/

  • January 9, 2015 at 4:50pm

    Just doing my part, Don.
    Posting a comment twice is a small price to pay to get you knuckleheads to listen.

    And regarding the rest of your comment, are you just simply as stupid as a box of rocks or wilfully ignorant?

    Either that or you must be deaf dumb and blind to have missed all the moderate muslims denouncing these horrific acts of terrorism in the media.

  • January 9, 2015 at 5:39am

    Jeezus. Another dimwit who listened to that “terror expert” clown on Hannity.

    That talk of the “no go zones” is a load of hogwash. He mentioned Sweden as having them as well. Well I live in Sweden and I know for a fact that that is entirely untrue, completely made up, and the only one implying that in Sweden is the ultra right-wing Nationalist party, that just happen to be Nazi sympathizers.

    Please try other news sources than Foxnews. Please.

    Responses (2) +
  • January 9, 2015 at 5:31am

    Thrilling discussion topic….
    Classy.

  • [-1] January 9, 2015 at 5:26am

    That’s amazing.

    Not one, NOT ONE, of you idiots commenting here are acknowledging that painting all muslims with a broad (paranoid) brush is a far too simplistic approach, which I assume was the point of this vague article.

    Not only is it a far too simplistic approach, it is downright unconstructive and insanely dangerous. It will only lead to an rapid escalation of the violence.

    You are making the huge mistake of playing into the hands of these terrorists. What they are actively trying to do is to create tension between muslims and non-muslims, thus making it easier for them to get new recruits. AND YOU ARE HELPING THEM DO JUST THAT. CONGRATULATIONS.

    The terrorists have thrown out a bait that we should at all costs steer clear of so as not to increase friction between religious groups/ethnicities. And you people have willingly swallowed it whole – hook, line and sinker. A typical example of how extremists on opposites ends of the spectrum bolster each others’ twisted, perverted world views.

    In the tense wake of the bloody attack in Paris it is vital to keep two things in mind at the same time:
    (1) to defend freedom of expression while (2) NOT stigmatizing an entire population or religious/ethnic group in the process.

    Responses (2) +
123 To page: Go