I don’t think democrats care who you want to vote for once you die, I think they just want to use your active voter registration to vote as they require.
 February 8, 2016 at 9:27pm
omit based on what is editorially relevant
So the fact that the truth is that the religion of Islam was founded by a violent pedophile isn’t editorially relevant?
 February 8, 2016 at 5:54pm
What’s the difference between John Kasich and a democrat?
 February 8, 2016 at 3:39pm
How is it that the Super Bowl pregame always is incredibly patriotic and pro-America, and then the halftime is so frequently hate and divisiveness nowadays?
[-2] February 8, 2016 at 12:39am
Cruz will never be on a Trump ticket. Their views are diametrically opposed. At least with what Trump has said for more than the last few months while campaigning, as well as all of Trump’s cheap shots. Cruz won’t play that game at all, but fortunately it won’t matter because Trump isn’t going to come close to getting the nomination
 February 7, 2016 at 9:57pm
torn between Trump and Democrat Bernie Sanders. She called Trump’s speech scattered. Her mother, Louise McCormack, agreed, but the professor at the college says she is leaning toward voting for Trump.
Shocking. The progressives are torn between Trump and Sanders….
Progs are liars and these three quoted fools would never vote for Trump.
Unbelievable! The dumbing down of Americans is coming home to roost!
 February 7, 2016 at 6:40pm
What difference, at this point, does it make? We all know what Marco’s promises are worth, right? His fabulous no amnesty promise leaps to mind.
 February 7, 2016 at 6:37pm
I wonder if the “strong supporter of women’s rights” knows how many females have been murdered by planned parenthood? The federal government shouldn’t be supporting any private business at all, via subsidies to farmers, tax breaks to corporations, funding to PP, etc. aside from how despicable PP is in general. Trim down the government by billions if not trillions. PP itself is 500 million/yr.
From a May 4, 2010 story in "The Economist":
XINRAN XUE, a Chinese writer, describes visiting a peasant family in the Yimeng area of Shandong province. The wife was giving birth. “We had scarcely sat down in the kitchen”, she writes (see article), “when we heard a moan of pain from the bedroom next door…The cries from the inner room grew louder—and abruptly stopped. There was a low sob, and then a man's gruff voice said accusingly: ‘Useless thing!'
“Suddenly, I thought I heard a slight movement in the slops pail behind me,” Miss Xinran remembers. “To my absolute horror, I saw a tiny foot poking out of the pail. The midwife must have dropped that tiny baby alive into the slops pail! I nearly threw myself at it, but the two policemen [who had accompanied me] held my shoulders in a firm grip. ‘Don't move, you can't save it, it's too late.'
“‘But that's...murder...and you're the police!' The little foot was still now. The policemen held on to me for a few more minutes. ‘Doing a baby girl is not a big thing around here,' [an] older woman said comfortingly. ‘That's a living child,' I said in a shaking voice, pointing at the slops pail. ‘It's not a child,' she corrected me. ‘It's a girl baby, and we can't keep it. Around these parts, you can't get by without a son. Girl babies don't count.'”
Good Point...Future generations of females....that is probably the goals....Stop babies from being born.
These are all good reasons to support Cruz.
You can't control their vote if you ain't giving them something! The government is enslaving more and more by the expansion of welfare in every form. We have allowed our children for 40 years to be brainwashed and it is now showing big time. Have you ever seen so many that want free stuff?
 February 7, 2016 at 1:54am
he did chicken out. Cruz offered one on one not on debate night but over the weekend, the 6 mill Trump raised for vets (which is silly, when you are worth billions, you could have donated that and then some any time any where, just like hollywood stars using their celebrity to help disaster folks by asking for donations from those not making 25 mill/yr!)
Trump wouldn’t respond because he can’t beat Cruz on substance. He knows it as does everyone else not a Trumpster.
 February 7, 2016 at 1:50am
Really? explain to me his definition of what a conservative is then.
 February 7, 2016 at 1:44am
the “live free or die” state is now a very liberal state. has been for almost 20 yrs. Trump should do well there as it is a neighbor state to where his base primarily is. progressives love progressives. Most interestingly wold be if Rubio hurt himself with such a poor performance tonight that Cruz gets a solid 2nd.
If Trump doesn’t win, he is done, If Cruz get #2, Rubio is basically done. Tuesday results will be very interesting.
February 7, 2016 at 1:35am
Funny how immediately after the debates, the online polls all seem to show Cruz winning each debate, but by morning, Trump is “dominating”. Just like he did in Iowa, I guess. what a WINNER!
I watched this poll most of the night cruz led fo 5 mins only. And by only 2percent trump dominated all night
Cruz took most of Trump's ideas and used them as his own in the debate. I'm surprised Trump didn't call him out on it.
 February 7, 2016 at 1:30am
Trump won how? His unbelievable completely not understanding what conservatism is? His bitching at the audience because they didn’t like his responses?
 February 7, 2016 at 1:28am
Ted lifted Trump’s health care plan? What a huge lie. Trump says everyone should be covered at govt (taxpayer) expense, because all the poor are dying in the streets (which is a complete lie as usual, someone should post the Monty Python and the Holy Grail “bring out your dead” video). Trump wants all covered at our expense while Cruz wants free market response by allowing insurance sold across state borders, not tying insurance to employment, and fixing tort laws. I don’t thnk Trump even knows what tort laws are…
 February 7, 2016 at 12:01am
FoxNews bias at all? They interviewed every candidate in the spin room after the debate in their post-debate coverage EXCEPT for Cruz.
Yes just watched fox and friends this morning and after they talked about the "Cruz-Carson" Iowa debacle, they immediately switched to the subject of the heroin epidemic from the debate and said Christie had a home run and only showed the Cruz political response and not Cruz's personal response about his half sister. They are anti-Cruz and it shows. Since they are a 24 hour news station, they could have shown the full response of both, but instead they showed the best part of the response from Christie and took the emotional part out of Cruz's response. Blatant bias.
While the emotional part of his response was touching it in NO way answered how he planned on battling the issue. So when you got a limited amount of time on a show do you show people the 90% of the answer that wasn’t answering the question, or the relevant 10% where the question was answered?
That shows the person in charge of the show knows what they were doing, not that they hate cruz. I’m not saying they aren’t anti cruz (I refuse to watch any MSM they are ALL biased af) I am saying that claiming they are anti-cruz for this reason is wrong,
So maybe Cruz will skip the next debate? Maybe do something actually useful?
Yes they did Megyn Kelly interviewed him.
Yeah, I was surprised Greta Van Susteren didn't interview Cruz but with Rove and Carson segments she shredded Cruz's reputation with name calling. He should be ashamed... She was all indignant.
I heard that what happened also was Carson, Cruz, Trump didn't get their audience 130 tickets a piece because they were all gone so that was the Governor's supporters and donors, Trump was right.
Still voting Cruz though I think he won the debate.
I sure haven't seen Cruz onthe O'reilly factor, despite billy boy's claims that he has invited him on.
 February 6, 2016 at 11:51pm
thanks JPM, I missed the first 40 minutes of the debate, I didn’t realize this one started an hour earlier than every other one, very annoying. I turned to ABC early, think i would be ready and saw they were already debating and was, huh? then damn…
And since it isn’t cable may not replay, so will try and see if it becomes available on demand
You didn't miss anything, Marnin. Trump won big time.
Really? explain to me his definition of what a conservative is then.
With respect to mister sarcastic, and you of course, you did miss out.. Look up Rubio's nine minutes of shame, where he repeated himself three times in a row and got majorly called out on it. It was epic!
 February 6, 2016 at 11:48pm
@Cd you had more lies in one post than Cruz has had the entire campaign. Cruz never denied the GS or Citi loans, as you characterized, He disclosed them in public paperwork which is how they were found by oppo research. He simply didn’t report them on one FEC report that he has since amended which at worst will be a small fine, but unlikely anything at all, as it was never anything hidden.
CNN did report and he reflected it accurately and reached a conclusion based on available evidence, and has since apologized. Can you name a single Iowa voter who has complained that their vote was changed because of misinformation?
He always considered himself a U.S. Citizen. I don’t know if he knew he was canadian dual citizen or not, and do not recall whether he ever said “I don’t know if I am”, but considering the rest of your post is a lie, I am inclined to believe that statement is as well. Either way if he didn’t know, once he found out he gave it up in 2014. Many citizens have dual citizenship, there is nothing criminal or illegal about it. Get over it and argue about real issues.
[-3] February 6, 2016 at 11:39pm
he is in dead last (excluding Gilmore) in NH, not surprised he got little face time. Then he whined about limited face time for half the time he did get it.
Don’t get me wrong, he is my 2nd choice to Cruz at this point, but he just isn’t a strong debater, and NH is not conservative. Unless, of course they understand and agrees with Trump’s definition, if anyone understands that slop as he tried to define what conservatism is.
 February 6, 2016 at 11:33pm
cd – you realize Trump is amnesty, right? He is looking for touchback amnesty, send them all home then let them all come back legally. Not to mention he didn’t deny his single payer health with having the govt paying for it all (i.e. we taxpayers), and the total lie of “poor people dying in the street”, doesn’t happen today, laws require hospitals to admit any emergency without asking if they can pay first.
Head on back to lala land, though and keep supporting the narcissistic totalitarian in the race.
 February 6, 2016 at 11:23pm
except of course that he not only proposed them first and has fought for many of them in the Senate, and Trump only came to most of those positions after declaring running for president.
As far as CNN, Both Levin and Rush both played the exact comments made on CNN and Cruz’ response and proved that what he said was 100% correct and the CNN people backing up as “unequivocally false” was, actually unequivocally false.