User Profile: Matrix22

Member Since: January 10, 2011


123 To page: Go
  • March 5, 2016 at 4:17am

    If she didn’t want to get pregnant because it would “take away her life,” then why was she having sex? With or without protection, doesn’t matter. We all know that protection fails sometimes. Or, if she’s just worried about keeping her perfect life, there’s this magical thing called adoption.

  • [11] February 19, 2016 at 3:20am

    Right…walls never work. Like on prisons, homes, the white house, schools, China, etc. etc. etc….they’re all just there for aesthetics.

  • [10] December 31, 2015 at 8:44am

    Abortion: The only medical procedure where the patient isn’t supposed to make it out alive.

  • [2] September 27, 2015 at 7:15am

    Simple question that will stump any Liberal…If Hilary only had one email account, and by her own words she claims she never received or sent classified emails, then what the heck was she doing the entire time?

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] June 6, 2015 at 7:53am

    Since everyone is exactly equal in liberals minds, what’s wrong with being a trash collector? I actually am extremely grateful for the guys willing to work “dirty jobs” – certainly more so than a lot of “social workers” I’ve met.

  • [7] June 5, 2015 at 2:42am

    I honestly don’t understand the irony. The meme was depicting what heroism is, which is reflected in the acts of the soldiers, not the photographer. Obviously I don’t condone beating up anyone for their choices, but I don’t see how a horrible incident to the photographer makes what the meme initial implied any less significant. The meme isn’t meant to say, “ok go beat up transvestites” is just a simple reflection on our priorities and what we are terming “heroism” now.

  • April 29, 2015 at 2:23am

    If that adulterer were to come in and ask for a t-shirt that said, “I support Ashley” (the adultery website), then yes, I do think that they would object and have a right to deny service. It wasn’t the person they object to, it was the message. Get a clue.

  • [4] April 29, 2015 at 2:09am

    When are people going to realize it’s not the person, it’s the action, that these businesses object to. I’m sure that if a gay person walked into their business and asked to have shirts printed for their softball team, he’d have no problem with that. It’s the MESSAGE or ACTION that they have a problem with, just like the bakeries, florists, caterers, etc.

  • [76] April 28, 2015 at 4:44pm

    If liberals think we should let a 5 year old decide their gender, I’m pretty sure we should let them choose their lunch as well.

  • [9] April 28, 2015 at 3:21pm

    I love how the gay militia claims that this is just “capitalism” at work. Yeah, cause capitalism usually involves threats, intimidation and lawsuits.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] April 23, 2015 at 10:26am

    I would say, “I would have, except I would have to take a number…right behind diabetes!”

  • [38] April 17, 2015 at 1:14pm

    To protect the 1st one.

  • [2] April 17, 2015 at 3:50am

    It will be interesting to see what happens. I wonder if him just saying he will do that is enough to cause trouble, or does he actually have to reject someone first before it becomes an issue.

  • [2] April 16, 2015 at 12:29pm

    no no…she just “misspoke”

  • [3] April 16, 2015 at 12:26pm

    The absolute best argument that there is no pay gap…If there were a pay gap, and I own a business, I would hire ONLY WOMEN because apparently I can get the same work for less money!

  • [312] April 14, 2015 at 5:43pm

    Unless you were raped, if you’re pregnant, you made your choice.

    Responses (14) +
  • [9] April 4, 2015 at 2:54am

    I think the scariest part of this email is the fact that he had to wait hours to see a doctor about a cold…in a clinic! This wasn’t an ER, this was a simple clinic. This is what happens when everyone has “free” healthcare and they go to the doctor for every little thing. Even though copays can be annoying and costly, they do serve a purpose in that they make you think twice about going. You have to determine, yes, this is important and worth it, or no, it’s just a stupid cold and the doctor won’t do anything about it anyway.

  • [59] April 2, 2015 at 4:04am

    Don’t be silly, Obama only trades terrorists for traitors, not heroes.

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] March 26, 2015 at 6:44am

    I’m gonna have to agree with 000 on this one. Even if they took a bird in the windshield, that wouldn’t create the scene like they are now describing. There is almost no chance at all that the plane wasn’t on autopilot, so even if they took a bird, there’s no reason for it to start descending, and certainly not a controlled descent. Secondly, why the situation with the pilot being locked out? Unless it was just an absolute 1/1000000 chance that the one pilot happened to step out and exactly the time the bird struck, and that happened to incapacitated the pilot, and for some reason the other pilot couldn’t get back in. There have been a couple incidences in the past were planes lost pressure for some reason, and everyone went hypoxic and passed out. The autopilot just kept them flying straight and level until the plane finally ran out of gas, then it crashed, but it definitely wasn’t a controlled descent crash.

  • [12] March 25, 2015 at 10:45pm

    I can’t agree with you on that one Monk. I’m a military C-130 pilot, and I can tell you that yes, bird strikes are dangerous and potentially fatal, but the chance that a bird could take down a high-flying aircraft like this is basically impossible. First off, very very few birds fly above a few thousand feet. In all my time flying, I’ve never seen one, but I do know they exist. Second, even if it did take out an engine, it would have to take out both engines for it to crash, and then it wouldn’t be a controlled descent, it would be a crash. Finally, the fact that there was no distress call is extremely telling. We are taught to “Aviate, Navigate, Communicate”, but you can’t tell me that in 10 minutes of flying no one bothered to make a distress call – it takes literally 10 seconds. After reading this article, the only 2 conclusions that make any sense are that the one pilot left and the other became incapacitated somehow, or it was intentional and the copilot drove the plane into the mountain on purpose.

123 To page: Go