@ Aya, “Are they not allowed to protect themselves as they see fit?” NO. They have to obey the law just like everybody else. A camera is not a threat. The SCOTUS has ruled on this. As long as you are at least 8 feet away, you cannot be considered interfering. He had no valid reason to point his weapon in the direction of that guy. Be ready? yes, keep a close eye on him? absolutely. Point his weapon? No way. Turn on the light? No, that’s a big deal, it’s considered an offensive act. I certainly would consider that a threat. Having said all that, the LEO was just being a jerk, he’s obviously a smart azz. Turning on his light proves that. Happens every day. There are bigger things to worry about.
 October 1, 2015 at 10:31pm
Right. In other circumstances, if that were me, & some cop did that, I would consider that an offensive act & baldy would have a little red laser dot between his eyes. Let’s see how he likes it. Why couldn’t this guy act professional like the others? And they all wonder why the public hates them.
September 9, 2015 at 8:16pm
Did people pay to attend the rally? Did she or Huckster sell video of the rally? Did they use the song to make money? If not, then it’s non-commercial use. Just like playing the radio.
[-1] September 3, 2015 at 6:52pm
This is the second or third time the pats have been caught cheating. They are serial cheaters. They have shown a consistent pattern of not being willing to follow league rules that all the other teams seem to be able to follow. So, Yes, a years suspension is in order. You seem to be under the assumption that rules of evidence used in a court of law, have something to do with this situation, they don’t. The “evidence” only has to meet the standard that the commissioner feels is sufficient. The courts have nothing to say about it. It’s a league matter, & the owners are the boss, & they make the rules, not the court. If the players don’t like it, they can start their own league, or go play in Canada. As of now, the NFL has been taken over by some idiot judge, & is no longer a private entity run by the franchise owners. I don’t care that much anymore because I don’t like where the game has gone. It’s not the NFL I grew up with. For those brady lovers out there, that girlieman couldn’t play in the 70′s, when football was real, & quarterbacks were still players, not untouchables.
[-1] September 3, 2015 at 2:23pm
It’s not up to brady to determine what penalty he will agree to. The perp doesn’t get to decide the sentence. The League is the boss. The commish has the right to use his judgement in accordance with the owners wishes. He can hand down any penalty he wants, if the owners back him. It’s THEIR league, a “closed system”, if you will, not general society. The NFL went easy on brady. I would have suspended him & Belichick for a year, starting with the Super Bowl.
September 3, 2015 at 2:14pm
@ Think, Exactly! The NFL IS pro football. It’s THEIR league! They can make any rules they want. If Brady or anyone else wants to play in THEIR league, they have to play by NFL rules. The rules are whatever the owners say they are, through their representative, Goodell. (who in my opinion is an idiot.) Legal standards have nothing to do with this. Rules of evidence have nothing to do with this. In years past, the NFL had rules limiting the length of player’s hair. Teams had rules banning player’s facial hair. The NFL can suspend any player for any reason anytime they want, It’s THEIR league! A sports league has the right to govern itself they way they see fit. No court has jurisdiction. If I was Goodell, I would announce that any game Brady plays in is forfeit, & if Kraft allows Brady to play, then he is suspended indefinitely pending an agreement by a majority of owners whether to remove the franchise from Kraft. Belichick & Brady would be suspended indefinitely for defying NFL rules. You cannot allow players (employees) to dictate league (owners) rules or policy.
 August 26, 2015 at 8:01pm
They have accomplished what they wanted to accomplish. Run interference for the regime.
August 26, 2015 at 7:59pm
Cruz’s wife is Goldman Sachs & a CFR member. Sorry, that disqualifies him in my book. I want to vote for him, but I won’t be fooled again.
 August 19, 2015 at 8:47pm
Right Cav. IF she didn’t use that server & phone for classified business, what device DID she use, & where is it? As Sec State, she communicated classified info all day, everyday. She had to use some device, or only communicate face to face verbally, with a Govt. stenographer present to record what was said. Every communication by a Sec State is recorded verbatim in case if a dispute later. She is guilty of multiple felony’s anyway you look at it, even if what she claims is true!
Yes, sweet, innocent little Megyn. So shocked to hear what the Donald had to say. How does she explain the see through top photo that has gone viral? I guess that was before she became a feminazi. She doesn’t seem shy in that pic. And also, she said she almost missed the debate due to a headache. How does she explain the photo on her FB page of her & some other FN female staffers laughing and clowning around right before the debate started? I guess the Tylenol had kicked in. Right Megyn?
August 9, 2015 at 5:25pm
Just wait until Monday night. O’Reilly will have rove on with a N.O.W. gang poll trashing Trump. Then the little eraser headed fairy will scurry back to the jeb camp giggling to himself how he screwed Trump. I can see the little wimpy white board now.
August 9, 2015 at 5:17pm
All that is needed to remember about jebby boy is two words. Terri Schiavo. Ol’ jebby hid under his desk & let a slimeball ex-husband and a crooked judge (both Hemlock Society members) murder a helpless young woman, while her family pleaded for him to save her. He’s a despicable POS.
August 9, 2015 at 5:09pm
@ Native, Right you are. While I’m not anywhere near sold on Trump’s viability as POTUS, nobody can question his business acumen. He sees his competition (other candidates) for what they really are. Basically, hookers in Brooks Bros. suits. I see many people say he’s there to monkeywrench the conservative candidates, but I can’t remember hearing him trash Cruze anywhere. Has anyone else?
 August 7, 2015 at 8:40pm
You are very naive. Kelly’s “questions” were personal attacks. Her goal was obvious. He responded in kind & owned her. Serves her right. Carson is a good man, a nice man, but nowhere near tough enough for POTUS. We need what you don’t like. A tough guy. A man who is no one’s fool. A man who has been there & done that. A man who can size up the opponent, & defeat him. We need John Wayne, not Mr. Rogers. Being nice has gotten us (in part) where we are. There are wolves in the woods. We need a hunter. Is Trump that guy? I don’t know. It seems to me that only Cruz & Trump might have what it takes.
I agree with your assertion of our president being tough but I am not naïve. I see toughness through action and not words. Ben Carson is subdued because he learned from his knee-jerk reactions to frustration and anger after he stabbed a kid in his younger life in Detroit. That’s beside the point. Trump isn’t tough, he’s a peacock. Cruz is a valid candidate and I appreciate you considering him. I want a president that isn’t only tough but also smart. We don’t need John Wayne we need a Bruce Lee or Dolph Lundgren. Obama is not “smart” he is cunning and deceitful and that is a big difference. I actually do hunt and part of “hunting” is the preparedness for the hunt, as well as the patience for the game to come into sight and range, and the cerebral part and timing and conditions…. I like your analogy because Trump isn’t a wolf he is a loud and stupid dog that barks at the mailman and bites his rear end. If he was a “hunter” he would be the equivalent to the guy who doesn’t shut up, goes in the field wearing a wife beater and jeans, smells like AXE, doesn’t approach from the right direction, is loud as hell and when pulling the trigger jerks it to high and misses completely, and doesn’t pick up his shell.
 August 7, 2015 at 8:24pm
@ Melp, I do. I want my president to tell it straight, NO PC. Trump does. Would he be a good POTUS? I don’t know. Yet. Let’s see how it plays out.
 August 7, 2015 at 8:18pm
Sorry, she is not even close to conservative. She’s a big pro gay feminazi. And FWIW, these days it doesn’t take a genius to pass the bar exam.
August 7, 2015 at 8:15pm
McCallum has 2 problems. 1, she is a prog, and 2, she is as dumb as a box of rocks. But you are right, she is very attractive. I guess I’m at war with women too.
August 7, 2015 at 8:09pm
@ Ihvd6639 Bingo!
 August 7, 2015 at 8:06pm
@ walk, Yes, I am OK with it. If they actually are “fat pigs, dogs, slobs, or disgusting animals. Some women want it both ways. They want to play in the big leagues, but they also want to be protected. It doesn’t work that way. If you want to play with the big boys, you have to be able to take a punch. Just like anyone else. Want “equality” ? You got it. Live with it.