User Profile: mcsledge


Member Since: January 04, 2012


123 To page: Go
  • [1] February 11, 2016 at 2:44pm


    Your concept of the American way is not the American way of the past two hundred plus years.

    Is the American way the freedom to sodomize another? Laws were on the books making such an act illegal. And yet America prospered more then than it does now.

    Is the American way the freedom to lie and deceive as one chooses? Integrity and honor use to mean something, now people run from responsibility, blame others or make excuses. Is this the new American way? Are we flourishing because of such deceit?

    Family values use to be the foundation of America…..and America prospered. Today, its about promiscuity and the right to abort natures consequence (conception) or engaging in sex (choice). Is this the new American way?

    Religion has promoted that one love his neighbor and respect his neighbor and his neighbor’s property. Today political correctness has led to intolerance and hate, not to mention disrespect for one’s elders, one’s parents and other peoples property. Now people demand to reap what another has sown rather than to adhere to God’s law which is that one reaps what one sows, not what another sows. Is America better today? NOT A CHANCE IN HELL.

    Ignorance must be bliss.

  • February 11, 2016 at 2:30pm

    The existence of God is as factual as the existence of the nucleus of an atom. Few of us have seen the nucleus of an atom first hand, but there are individuals who have seen and witnessed this scientific fact. And we accept it as truth. Likewise, few of us have seen the Resurrected Savior of mankind, but thousands of individuals (Jerusalem, Americas [other sheep], etc.) have seen and witnessed the risen Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, and have left their testimonies of this divine truth. Yet many choose not to believe it.

    The question is no longer whether God exists, but whether you choose to call these thousands of witnesses liars. Good luck with that because your eternal reward depends upon it.

  • [1] February 11, 2016 at 2:17pm

    Wrong. At the time of the Fourteenth Amendment, more than half of the States had sodomy laws on the books as illegal. The authors of the Fourteenth Amendment never intended this right to include sexual perversions (or gender identity confusions). And you don’t have gay marriages unless you have sexual perversions.

  • February 11, 2016 at 2:13pm

    Yes, history sucks when it is actually backed up by the writings of the people who experienced it and not just some fantasy that a liberal progressive thought up in their head. One’s credibility is based on the support for their writings. Barton is far more supported by historical fact than most want-to-be historians.

    Changing the past doesn’t make it history and it certainly doesn’t make it truth. But then again, when did liberal progressives care about the truth.

  • [-3] February 11, 2016 at 2:08pm

    What a stupid analogy.

    Responses (3) +
  • February 11, 2016 at 2:05pm

    too late.

  • [4] February 11, 2016 at 2:04pm

    Christ’s Church was supported by the tithes of the Saints. Today, any Tom, Dick or Harry starts a Church and demands donations. Christ’s Church is authorized to receive those funds for and in behalf of the Lord. Others are just pilfering from individuals who are tossed to and fro with every wind of doctrine.

  • [2] February 11, 2016 at 1:56pm


    It is called meritocracy (i.e., one reaps what they sow).

    If you sow godlessness, you reap godlessness.
    If you sow corruption, you reap corruption.
    If you sow promiscuity, you reap promiscuity.
    If you sow compassion, you reap compassion.
    If you sow righteousness, you reap righteousness.

    What could be more fair than one’s actions (agency) defining one’s recompense.

    Whiners and complainers alway seek to avoid responsibility and reap what they do not merit.

  • [-1] February 11, 2016 at 1:50pm

    Yes, but you are talking about an anti-Christ…..Obama. Your suggestion does not fit the situation.

  • [39] February 10, 2016 at 2:27pm

    By your fruits ye shall know them!

    If you are religious, to whom do you worship?

    I know God’s word and your fruits demonstrate that you serve a different master. Don’t call yourself a Christian if you don’t believe in the doctrine (all of it). We all sin, but breaking a commandment is different than opposing it. In doing so, you oppose the author, GOD!

  • [11] February 10, 2016 at 2:21pm

    While one’s religion is personal, there is but one God the Father and He has made His Will known through His Only Begotten and Prophets and Apostles. If your religion supports views that opposes God’s Will, it may just be that you serve a different master.

    If ye love me, keep my commandments. What do acts of opposition show?

  • [4] February 10, 2016 at 2:13pm

    The fact is the liberals are ignorant to truth and they don’t believe it when it is presented to them. You can educate the ignorant, but you can’t fix stupid. And unfortunately, liberals don’t believe in truth.

  • [2] February 9, 2016 at 2:24pm

    Cruz is not possessed. But if one were possessed, crosses will not remove evil spirits. It requires the authority and power to act in the name of God through His Holy Priesthood in the name of Jesus Christ. We have an example in The Bible where some tried to cast out spirits and they were taken by those evil spirits because they had no authority or power over the spirits.

    The Bible does not give one this power. It is bestowed on one by the laying on of hands by one who possesses it and has the authority to confer it on another. This is the very manner by which Christ bestowed the Priesthood to His Apostles.

    Responses (1) +
  • [59] February 9, 2016 at 2:08pm

    Answer: Why do you defy God’s moral (and natural) law?

    Responses (6) +
  • [9] February 8, 2016 at 1:27pm

    The God of Heaven sent His Only Begotten Son, Jesus Christ, to save the world from sin. If one believes in a God that does not consider Jesus Christ as The Creator, The Savior and The Redeemer of this world and does not worship Christ as The Son of The Living God, he/she’s God differs from the Christian God.

    After all, there is only one truth and it never contradicts itself.

    Responses (2) +
  • [-5] February 8, 2016 at 1:22pm


    ‘Our’ means more than one.

    God The Father is not Christ and Christ is not God The Father. While the Godhead is Biblically supported, the concept of Three Gods in One (or the same essence) is not. God the Father, Jesus Christ and the Holy Ghost are three separate and distinct Beings. One in purpose, three distinct Beings.

    Jesus Christ is the offspring of The Father (both spiritually and physically). He was the only one to be physically born by God The Father. That is why He is called The Only Begotten of The Father. However, we like Christ were spiritually begotten by The Father (offspring). The Bible makes this clear.

  • [4] February 8, 2016 at 1:10pm

    And to think she used to call herself a good Christian girl.

  • [7] February 5, 2016 at 5:30pm

    For a guy that professes to be looking out for future generations, he is certainly screwing them to the hilt. Let’s make a negligible change on our environment while indebting generations with more than $10 trillion (at this point) in debt and bankrupting our economy.

    Can one be more sodomized without receiving the real thing?

  • [2] February 5, 2016 at 1:25pm

    Palin lost credibility when she dropped out as the Governor of Alaska. Up until that time, I really liked her. But I do not support a quitter. She failed to fulfill her oath of office at that time so I do not trust that she will do so in the future.

  • [-2] February 5, 2016 at 1:08pm

    God The Father is our spiritual Father. While we may not enter into His Kingdom and be acknowledged as joint heirs with Christ, we are all His spiritual offspring. Your doctrinal point is incorrect.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love