User Profile: mcsledge


Member Since: January 04, 2012


123 To page: Go
  • November 23, 2014 at 9:07am

    In Christ’s Original Church, Paul taught new members that they were no longer strangers and foreigners, but fellow citizens with the saints in the household of God.

    Christ never changed this definition. Nor did Christ discard the concept of Apostles and Prophets for Popes
    and Cardinals.

    Responses (2) +
  • [4] November 20, 2014 at 3:30pm

    Seeing how the US Constitution was meant to limit the powers of the federal government and protect the rights of both the citizens and the States, I would love to see a State pass immediate legislation declaring that it will not honor any form of amnesty set forth by the President. It should state that any illegal alien today will be considered an illegal alien after any unconstitutional executive order and the punishments will remain the same.

    It doesn’t take a fifth grader to see in the US Constitution that naturalization is under the power of the Legislative Branch, not the Executive Branch. Let this play out in the Courts if it must (potentially to our own self destruction).

  • [19] November 20, 2014 at 3:15pm

    You have to pick your battles. Prioritize. Regardless of how right your cause is, being the only one to support it will never advance your cause. Regroup and restrategize.

  • [5] November 20, 2014 at 3:08pm

    “At no time was Mr. Leal told that his distribution of material or his statements were inappropriate at school because of their religious content,” school attorney Michael Patterson said in an October 27 letter to Leal’s attorney. “Rather, he was informed of District policy … and told that he needed to comply with it. He was also informed that he could not create a substantial disruption at school or school events.”

    I call BS unless handing out religious materials is the school’s very definition of disruption.

  • [3] November 20, 2014 at 3:02pm

    As a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (AKA Mormons) I believe that I can unequivacally say Reid is dead wrong. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints believes in honoring and sustaining the laws of the land. We also believe the US Constitution is inspired of God. That same Constitution which makes it perfectly clear that naturalization (citizenship) is under the authority of the Legislative Branch, not the Executive Branch. If the laws need to be changed, there are procedures for making that happen. NO ROGUE AUTHORITY is allowed to step in and make it so.

    Both this president and Reid choose to violate their oath of office by violating the US Constitution.

    And by the way, Reid is about as devout a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints as Lucifer is Christian (by their fruits ye shall know them).

  • [15] November 20, 2014 at 2:24pm

    I have but one talking point for the Democrats…..

    Do you honor your oath of office in protecting the US Constitution? If you side with the President, you are an OATH breaker and a LIAR and your word means nothing!

  • [5] November 20, 2014 at 2:17pm

    It’s even more clear than that………….

    Article 1, Section 8:
    The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States; but all duties, imposts and excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
    To borrow money on the credit of the United States;
    To regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes;
    TO ESTABLISH A UNIFORM RULE OF NATURALIZATION, and uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies throughout the United States;……………

  • [38] November 19, 2014 at 3:19pm

    Harry, you can shut up and sit down now. Between the back stabbing and screwing, Americans are trying to recover from your pathetic, anti-Constitutional puppet job you played for Obama.

    Responses (1) +
  • [59] November 18, 2014 at 6:48pm

    Dems vote against economic prosperity. Well that figures. They are too busy trying to give America away to foreigners.

    Responses (2) +
  • [22] November 18, 2014 at 6:43pm

    Many claim the Founders to be Deists. And many are wrong. While they may not have openly used divine titles, they believed in Providence and where devout followers of the Bible.

    The Founding Fathers of this great nation where inspired by the God of Heaven.

    Sell your satanic propaganda elsewhere.

    Responses (9) +
  • November 18, 2014 at 2:17pm


  • [8] November 18, 2014 at 12:40pm

    It has to do with being recorded. In some states, notices have to be amply present so that both parties know that filming and voice recording are taking place. In other states, only one party needs to know that the filming and voice recording are taking place.

    Responses (2) +
  • [14] November 18, 2014 at 12:37pm

    Correction……Big Love has nothing to do with The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. It does have to do with apostate break-offs.

    Responses (1) +
  • [19] November 18, 2014 at 12:35pm

    No, she never would have passed the honor code and she would have been sent packing.

  • [1] November 17, 2014 at 4:58pm

    To be honest, Cummins has the best diesel engine on the market. Unfortunately to get one, you have to buy the best of the truck.

    Unless things have changed quite a bit, the best truck would be the Ford heavy duty body, the Cummins engine and the Allison transmission. At least so I have heard in the past.

  • [37] November 17, 2014 at 4:53pm

    I have a nice 2013 Ruby Red XLT 4×4 with the 3.5 L Ecoboost. The 3.5 L Ecoboost is quiet, but has more horses and torque than my previous 2006 FX4 with 5.4 L Triton. My one major regret is not buying leather seating. I am a bigger guy and leather feels and wears so much better. If you’re going to spend $40K plus for a truck, spend a couple of extra $K to get the items you really want. The payments aren’t going to very that much.

    I will never buy Government Motors (GM, Chevrolet, etc.). They have proven to be anti-American.

  • November 17, 2014 at 4:38pm

    An atheist activist group is suing a California school district, claiming that its meetings generally “resemble a church service” and not a secular public gathering.

    Atheists have made it clear that they promote secularism. If this is the case, then there argument is that their form of religion (secularism) is not ruled superior to the Christian religion. Now you don’t remove religion because two religions can’t get along.

    If a jury is expected to reflect the populace of the area, then one should expect the meetings to reflect the populace of those attending. So if we have 10% atheists to 90% Christian, we should have 9 meetings following their present pattern for every 1 held under the direction of secularism.

    Responses (4) +
  • [23] November 17, 2014 at 1:52pm

    The Story of Abraham serves three purposes.

    1) God had to test Abraham, his faith and his obedience prior to bestilling upon him one of the greatest promises given to any man (i.e., all men shall be blessed through his family lines).

    2) It demonstrates to mankind that unless they (mankind) are willing to be obedient and show faith in the Living God that they will not be found worthy to return to that Living God.

    3) The almost sacrifice of Isaac by Abraham was symbolic of Christ’s future sacrifice for His Father. The Old Testament is full of symbolism leadin back to Christ and His sacrifice (i.e., Isaac and Christ, meat sacrifice and Christ, serpent on a pole and Christ on the cross, manna and Christ (bread of life), etc.).

    Responses (4) +
  • [1] November 17, 2014 at 1:35pm

    Correct me if I am wrong, but isn’t Spitzer the harlot chacer? He certainly has little honor or character to back any kind of a moral stance on any matter.

  • [2] November 17, 2014 at 1:22pm

    Hey stupid, did you not raise your arm to the square and swear an oath to protect the US Constitution. And are you aware that the US Constitution authorized Congress (not the President) to naturalize citizens in these United States (Article 1, Section 8).

    Why in the hell are we voting for people who openly violate what they just swore to protect? This man has no morals, no character, no honor and his word obviously doesn’t mean crap because his oath of office was a lie.

123 To page: Go