User Profile: mdy616


Member Since: August 31, 2010


123 To page: Go
  • [12] May 18, 2016 at 9:38am

    “…he was representing himself as a woman today,” “A Ross spokesperson reportedly said the company does not discriminate against transgender individuals”

    I wonder if the ‘discriminate” against people who represent themselves “today” as a dog or if they represent themselves “today” as a psychopath or if they represent themselves “today” as a 5 year old.

    I am dumb founded at the stupidity of the left!

    Responses (3) +
  • [5] May 18, 2016 at 9:33am

    I disagree, the truth NEEDS to be spoken. If you do not think so I would ask you to go watch some of these videos by Colin Flaherty on youtube.

  • [9] May 17, 2016 at 12:49pm

    I guess you want yet another mental illness “taken off the books” because of militant demands by those who are sick??!! I am sure you have heard the saying “the inmates are running the asylum.” Because the “inmates” are forcing people to accept them does not take away their status as inmates! You and the others on the left may believe it but then the left falls for just about anything.

  • [7] May 17, 2016 at 12:43pm

    Dr. Charles Socarides — who was at the meetings and was an expert in the area of homosexuality, having treated homosexuals for more than twenty years — described the political atmosphere leading up to the 1973 vote. He writes that during this time, “militant homosexual groups continued to attack any psychiatrist or psychoanalyst who dared to present his findings as to the psychopathology [i.e., the study of mental disorders from all aspects] of homosexuality before national or local meetings of psychiatrists or in public forums.” Elsewhere Socarides stated that the decision of the APA trustees was “THE MEDICAL HOAX OF THE CENTURY.” Was this the end of the debate? Did the vast majority of “competent” psychiatrists agree with the APA’s decision? In 1977 ten thousand members of the APA were polled at random, asking them their opinion on this. In an article entitled “Sick Again?” Time magazine summarized the results of the poll: “Of those answering, 69% said they believed ‘homosexuality is usually a pathological adaptation, as opposed to a normal variation,’ 18% disagreed and 13% were uncertain. Similarly, sizable majorities said that homosexuals are generally less happy than heterosexuals (73%) and less capable of mature, loving relationships (60%). A total of 70% said that homosexuals’ problems have more to do with their own inner conflicts than with stigmatization by society at large.”

    so militant tactics are what suddenly made homosexuality “normal.” Sound familiar?

  • [7] May 17, 2016 at 12:39pm

    “I noticed Dr. Ablow didn’t bring up that we don’t consider homosexuals mentally ill simply because they identify as being homosexuals.”
    Who does not consider homosexuality a mental illness, you? And now you are going to cite how it is no longer classified as a mental illness BY the APA like that makes it “normal?” In 1973 suddenly it was taken away as a mental illness, why? Did all psychiatrists agree? Did a majority agree? here is a little history (see if it doesn’t sound familiar to what is happening today!)

    it is a misconception to think that this came about only after dispassionate and scholarly discussion, and only after listening equally to all sides of the issue. Also, it is important to note that the APA’s vote was anything but unanimous. In the three years leading up to the 1973 APA meeting, the previous national meetings had been repeatedly disrupted by gay activists. At the 1970 meeting in San Francisco certain sessions were broken up with shouts and jeers, prohibiting any rational discussion or debate. It was against this backdrop that the association’s trustees finally made its controversial 1973 decision. When a referendum on this was sent out to all 25,000 APA members, only a quarter of them returned their ballots. The final tally was 58 percent favoring the removal of homosexuality from their list of disorders. Four years later, Dr. Charles Socarides — who was at the meetings and was an expert in the area of homosexuality, having treated homosexuals fo

  • [2] May 17, 2016 at 12:17pm

    I agree. When I went to middle school for the first time I was terrified of the bathrooms because of the stories of what upperclassmen did!! I heard of golden swirlies and physical pain! Those first few months were hell and I ’bout exploded walking in my door after school!! But I guess now, it is a right to not be uncomfortable somewhere if you are a leftist with a mental disorder.

  • [5] May 17, 2016 at 12:13pm

    I’ve lived my life as a woman for years. You’re taking away our rights.”

    Maybe you should go get help for your mental illness!! Next the left will be saying boys and girls have to share lockerrooms with murders because they “have lived their life as a murderer for years!” The left thinks we have to celebrate someones mental illness of gender identity problems! When will the left see how screwed up they are as a group?

    It is beyond insane that a sitting US president has decreed those with mental illness have more rights than those of us who are not! On top of it, his decree is endangering everyone who is sane. It is too bad Obama or his kids will never have to experience the danger he has put our children in.

    Next decree from Obama will be outlawing the NRA because they are killing children in schools…

    Responses (2) +
  • [3] May 17, 2016 at 12:06pm

    “The focus is on racial disparities and inequities in education that must be addressed,” Tagliavia continued.

    And BLM is the poster child for supposed inequities? Oh brother, what another crock of s**t. Why not have it taught by Jewish people who experience more threats and “inequity” than any other group?

  • May 13, 2016 at 6:26pm

    I predict this song by The Barbarians will be a hit…again!!

  • [3] May 13, 2016 at 6:21pm

    Sounds just like Tony Soprano. That is not a threat I am just giiiuuddiinngg you.

    Obama and the left could learn a little something from Brother Nathanael.

    Responses (1) +
  • [3] May 10, 2016 at 9:32am

    “…he will not film in the state unless and until the law is fully repealed. Disney and the Marvel franchise have made similar proclamations.”

    GREAT!! That is their right to not go to any state they are not in agreement with! Somehow that is supposed to scare everyone? Well Rob and Disney, I will NOT visit any state that supports mental illness as “normal” and demands that I accept it too! Take that!

  • [12] May 9, 2016 at 10:48am

    RevSixEight -May. 9, 2016 at 10:39am
    I come back once in a while to check. the blaze / cruz network is still the same. We’re voting for Hillary because we hate Trump. Even Glenn is still so anti-Trump I can only listen a few minutes. Get over it already, I liked Cruz from the beginning, but it’s over, let’s not destroy the country because we didn’t get our way.

    So, voting for Hillary will NOT destroy the country but voting for Trump will? ARE YOU NUTS??!! You KNOW how evil Hillary is and what she will do but you THINK Trump is evil but have NO IDEA what he will do. So you choose GUARANTEED DESTRUCTION OVER AN UNKNOWN??!! Yeah, that is a great way to fix the country.

    Responses (2) +
  • [-1] May 9, 2016 at 10:45am

    I was thinking the same thing!! Suddenly any leftist organization going after Trump or Trump standing up to the leftists is now a bad thing and the ones who said “Never Trump” while only supporting Cruz are no different than the HuffPo people or any of the others on the leftist blogs.

  • May 6, 2016 at 4:43pm

    As long as their are people like you who will do everything in their power to put Hillary in the office, you should be first in line with your hand out!

    I am amazed there are people who will not vote for him because they THINK he may be bad for America yet they will LET Hillary win KNOWING she will destroy America. Why are you so ready to hand it over to a known liar and criminal and dismiss the fact Trump may be great or merely good? Because you THINK badly about him?! Great reason to allow the country to burn under Hillary.

  • [3] May 6, 2016 at 4:37pm

    Don’t you just love the hypocrites of the rino party? At the first debates, they make Trump promise to support the republican nominee if not him and Trump does. Now these RINOs will not do the same thing Trump was forced to promise! Easy to treat him badly and think you painted him into a corner when they thought he would not win. Now that he has won, they are now showing they do not care one bit for the people’s choice. This is a slap in the face of everyone who calls himself/herself a Republican!

    Responses (2) +
  • [7] May 5, 2016 at 11:22am

    “Cameroon and Nigerian governments allow volunteer groups to bear arms, including guns and homemade weapons, to defend themselves against the threat of the Islamist group Boko Haram.
    They are also allowed to carry out other functions normally associated with law enforcement, including intelligence gathering and questioning travelers.”

    In other words, trusted by their governments to do the right thing and given the freedom to do. More freedom to protect yourself and community than in the USA.

    Responses (1) +
  • [5] May 5, 2016 at 11:13am

    Now SI is using males, who THINK they are females, as their cover “girls.” Gosh, now SI goes into the pile of useless leftist rags which celebrates mental illness. I hope all men and women athletes who KNOW they are male or female will distance themselves from this rag that is glorifying mental illness and condemning anyone who points this out.

  • [6] May 5, 2016 at 11:04am

    Clinton national press secretary Brian Fallon said “there is absolutely no basis to believe the claims made by this criminal from his prison cell.”

    Well, there you have it! case closed! Clinton’s press secretary denied it all; that will be good enough for the leftists!

  • [2] April 27, 2016 at 10:57pm

    “I’m hopeful we will be able to meet with the students and talk about what course of action they want to take next.”

    If that were one of my kids and I was paying the bill, the next step would be a different college.

  • [3] April 27, 2016 at 10:50pm

    Confusing, isn’t it? Hate is legit; gender is evil yet they call themselves a “woman’s” college. Isn’t that hateful under their “logic?”

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love