User Profile: mdy616


Member Since: August 31, 2010


123 To page: Go
  • [6] November 11, 2014 at 1:41pm

    It is so sad to see all of you naysayers commenting on Glenn’s cure. Why do you care if this place is, in your opinions, a sham? It OBVIOUSLY helped Glenn and who cares what the reasons!! He feels better, acts better and is happy. You people can’t stand it when another person gets help from something you think is a sham. You NEVER have to go to this place if you don’t want. BUT, I am guessing you would be there in a heartbeat if EVERYTHING ELSE you tried did not work. Can’t you just be glad for him?

  • [1] November 10, 2014 at 9:50pm

    It is clear he was not elected because he is gay. It is equally clear the leftists in California hate gays! He should go to California Supreme Court and demand he be elected because the leftists discriminated against him and he should demand all votes against him be thrown out. After all, to not be elected on account of his sexual preference is unconstitutional. We have learned from our leftists courts sexual preference is somehow included in the constitution!! (This is not too far fetched to believe if he were a democrat)

  • [7] November 10, 2014 at 9:43pm

    Instead of getting mad about someone making a comment on their belief about evolution why don’t they just give us ONE EXAMPLE of evolution?

    Please, you oh so brilliant and logical leftists, please give us one example of anything that started out as one species and evolved into another. One example of something evolving from, for example, a dog evolving into a cat. Show us one example of not adapting but evolving.

    I will now get all kinds of leftists saying that is not what evolution is. They will argue it is more along the lines of adapting than evolving. The leftists cannot ever keep their definitions to anything consistent; they change as they are shown to be wrong.

    Example: global cooling in the 1970s (ice age in the next 10-20 years) changed to global warming (oceans rising and wiping out part s of California by 2010 and all the ice melted at the poles by now) to now climate change (meaning whatever the weather does that is what we meant and we told you so and you flat earthers would not listen).

    Same for evolution; went from a theory to fact to having to make up finding certain bones to “prove” their case to now not really evolution but more along the lines of adaption. Now they so scared of people showing the fallacies of evolution that anyone who does not fall in line behind their theory needs to be “lined up and shot.”

    By wiping everyone out who shows the truth they can live in their make-believe-world!! Typical leftist “fix”…kill the messenger!

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] November 10, 2014 at 9:27pm

    “Why do people inject their stupid religious beliefs in their commentary.”
    Funny how these leftists hate people injecting their religious beliefs into discussions but have no problem with anyone injecting “their stupid” anti-religious beliefs in EVERYTHING! Just the left’s way of showing their love of freedom of speech and thought.

  • [10] November 10, 2014 at 8:11pm

    Donit yu goes makin her mat!! she goin to beet yous ask so bat dat you bee nnedin a amblance!!

  • November 4, 2014 at 11:27pm

    I am sure this is another “calibration” issue. You know that is so common to have a machines calibration go off just a smallllllllll bit so a republican name is left off the machine entirely!! The sad thing is the leftists sheeple will believe it and blame conservatives for crying about nothing.

    MSNBC will then run stories for the next month about the whinny republicans crying over a technological glitch. Obama will then give a speech about the republican enemies who will complain about anything if they think it will help the rich people; Holder, or the clone that will take his spot, will “investigate” and find that every vote in Texas was valid and the republicans are trying to disenfranchise black voters by complaiining about a small glitch and will say this proves voter ID laws are nothing but racist attempts to stop blacks.

    The newly elected majority republican senate will then stand up and say they do not want to make waves because it may turn off the hispanic voters so they will do nothing about anything and blame the tea party (which will cause the leftists to jump on board).

    The teeny, tiny error or omitting a republican’s name from the ballot will go down in history as “TEA PARTY TRYING AGAIN TO MAKE SURE THE BLACK VOTE IS NOT COUNTED AND TRYING TO KEEP HISPANICS FROM POLLING STATIONS!” And NO ONE will do anything about it . WELCOME TO THE NEW AMERICA!!

  • [1] October 27, 2014 at 6:06pm

    Do I understand you correctly when you think it is enough now days to just ask a child “is that your dad” and let the child go if he/she says “yes?” If that is your position, then I am afraid you forgot some common sense and if you are being sarcastic then forgive me for what I am going to write.

    My wife is a principal at an elementary public school and you would not believe the stories I hear about parents. There are many divorced parents and some of these parents are forbidden from picking up the children per a court order. The child would say “yes, that is my dad” and the principal would release the child and then dad kidnaps the child. Who is blamed then? The principal, because the child said “yes” to “is he your dad.”

    Or the ever-trusting kindergartner. Many will say “yes” to any question you ask them especially at the end of the day when there is confusion going on around them and if the adult whispers “say I am your dad.”

    Or what about the parent who has charges of being a sexual predator and is not allowed to be around the school yet have his child unsupervised. “Is that your dad?” Answers, “yes it is” and then who is in trouble? Right, the principal/school.

    I am sure you are not involved in public education because if you were, you would know a simple “yes he is my dad” may not be enough today in our public schools. That is NOT the fault of the principal trying to do the right thing and keep the child safe. This dad should have said “Thank you”

  • October 27, 2014 at 5:52pm

    NO THEY MIGHT NOT. Go to a kindergarten class and you will find the most trusting children in the world!! They will go off with almost anyone and this is why my wife, an elementary school principal, worries so much at the end of the day when kids are let out.

    Trying to make sure these children are going on the right bus, with the right parent in the right car is a HUGE responsibility that they do not take lightly.

    I don’t know why the parent was mad. He should be grateful the school principal cared enough to make sure the child was going with the right person!! He should have said “THANK YOU” for making sure his child was safe!! Instead, he gets mad at the person entrusted with the care of his child.

    Was he offended the principal did not recognize him personally out of the perhaps 1,000 parents in the school (500 students x 2 parents each). This same parent would be the first to sue the principal if the child went with someone who was not supposed to pick him up. Along with many on this board, who would condemn the school for letting the child go with a wrong person.

    It is no different than the politicians forcing moronic things on businesses even though the politicians know nothing about business. People do not blame the business owner yet they are quick to condemn the teacher/principal for things they are FORCED to do and that includes COMMON CORE!! Teachers, as a rule, love children and want the best for them and that includes the child’s safety!

  • October 27, 2014 at 5:33pm

    So stop blaming teachers and principals at public schools. At least in my area the teachers and principals love these children and only want to see them suceed AND be safe! The STATE will be the first ones to blame the teachers and principals if they were to release a child to the wrong person and the general public is the first one to blame teachers and principals for being cautious when they do not know the adult there to pick up a child. At this point in time the ONLY thing they can rely on is a picture ID or a piece of paper from the court. Blame the politicians (STATE) for putting everything on the backs of the principals because the one thing you are right about: THE STATE WILL NOT BE ACCOUNTABLE (think ebola and it is not the govt fault or the mystery illness pouring across the border, not Obama’s fault. same with our education departments in federal and state government).

  • [1] October 27, 2014 at 5:27pm

    So what would you have the principal at the school use to identify the parent? His word that he/she is the parent? What if this is a new family to the district and the principal/teacher is not sure who this adult is? Just release the child and then find out later this adult is not a parent or is a parent but does not have rights to the child because of a divorce? My wife is a principal at a public school and there are “parents” who are prohibited by court from picking up the child.

    I get so sick of everyone criticizing the teachers/principals when they are OBLIGATED to follow certain procedures put in effect by politicians!! Why don’t you go to school at 3:30 when all 400-500 children are let out and try to keep your eyes on all of them at once to make sure they are all safe, getting on the right bus, making sure they do not wander away and make sure the right adult is there picking them up.

    I agree the STATE does not want to be accoountable, the STATE puts accountability on the back of the teachers and ultimately the principal of the building. The STATE makes moronic laws and TELLS teachers and principals they MUST follow them and if they don’t the school will lose funding. The STATE mandates ALL students in elementary school pass a math test b y 5th grade NO EXCEPTIONS, then the STATE mandates these same schools MUST teach students who cannot even feed themselves and these students are mandated to pass also or the school looses funding!!

  • October 27, 2014 at 5:10pm

    Speaking of moronic…Our state politicians have decreed how fire alarms will occur, when they will occur and they must send a report to the state. If cancelled then the state needs to be notified AND a letter written to justify it. since when do politicians have time to discuss and over see fire alarms? What if it is raining or there is a snow storm? They don’t allow the principals to use common sense!! OR they have decreed all students will pass a math test no exceptions. My wife has students that can’t feed themselves let alone do math.
    I say we should make those same politicians vote 100% of the time on every bill and if they don’t then they are docked pay. OR they have to keep EVERY PROMISE they make on campaign trail or they are immediately kicked out of office. They are so good at micro managing everything to death eyt they cannot do their own jobs.
    So rufus, the next time you want to call all of our public school teachers and principals “moronic” or “stupid,” remember it is the politicians forcing them to do many of these moronic things and that includes common core!! Believe me when I say these teachers would do a much better job without politicians telling them how and what to teach. Just like our businesses could grow faster and bigger without them telling business people how to run a business.
    The MORON and STUPID ones are the politicians NOT the teachers (in 99% of the cases anyway).

  • [1] October 27, 2014 at 5:03pm

    My wife is a principle of one of our elementary public schools. The staff there is neither “moronic” nor “stupid.” When these schools have over 400 children being let out at the same time every day it is very hard to keep an eye on every child although believe me, they do try. There are cases where parents are divorced and one of the parents does NOT have the right to pick up the child and if they show up the school is obligated to get the police involved. Otherwise, some “moronic” politician or parent will blame the principal for letting the child go with the parent that is not allowed to have the child!

    I don’t know why the police were involved in this case but believe me, any principal in my wife’s school system would never call the police unless absolutely necessary. Many of you want to condemn all ppublic schools but you foregt there are many like my wife who truly love these children and only want the best for them. The problem lies with politicians who make stupid laws that make the teachers ans principals look stupid for having to enforce them.

  • [17] October 27, 2014 at 4:45pm

    Do you think the next time I am stiffed by a customer and I get a CIVIL judgment against them the police will use their SWAT to help me get paid?? Of course not, that ONLY applies when the government wants theirs “right now.” You and I will simply have to wait in line if we sue and win a civil judgment.

    HEY? Maybe if I take all of my family along, dress them in fatigues and arm them all do you think the local police will tell me good job when I force a debtor to pay me on my civil judgment?

    Responses (1) +
  • [4] October 21, 2014 at 2:29pm

    Mr. Stohlhandske said “Even if you disagree with gay RELIGIOUS marriage, please see that Jesus did not ask His followers to take his words, convert them into laws, and then force everyone to abide by them; that is the opposite of the way in which He asked us to share His message of hope and salvation.”

    How far does he take this idea of his? In the Bible it is written that marriage is between a man and a woman. Mr. Stolhandske thinks we should not have laws based on this. Well, it also says in the Bible that murder is a sin, stealing is a sin, but yet we have laws against those things. Would he advocate those laws be done away with because they are Biblical? Or does he like to pick and choose which things in the Bible we should ignore because it does not fit his agenda?

    The people in this story displaying the love of Jesus are the Kleins. “Our culture has accepted 2 huge lies. The first is that if you disagree with someone’s lifestyle, you must fear or hate them,” she wrote. “Second is that to love someone means that you must agree with everything they believe or do. Both are nonsense.” Klein concluded, “You don’t have to compromise convictions to be compassionate.”

    Seems the Kleins understand the Bible a bit better than someone who believes the Bible condones gay “marriage” and ignore the part that says it is between a man and a woman. Call it a union or call it “gayage” but marriage it is not!!

    Responses (1) +
  • October 17, 2014 at 8:56am

    I don’t understand why any conservative would go on this show to debate Stewart. If you notice, anytime Stewart is backed into a corner he just resorts to jokes and stupidity.

    Stewart is nothing more than a comedian who tries to act intelligent and once his “logic” is shown to be completely illogical he resorts to his comedy routine. The leftists think Stewart is some kind of sage but he is nothing more than a comedian.

    It really makes sense the left thinks of Stewart as their voice of reason: he is a comedian and every logical thinking, common sense person knows the left is nothing but a bunch of court jesters!!

  • [3] October 17, 2014 at 8:21am

    The picture shows one of the staff in a suit that is meant to protect the wearer from air borne threats; positive pressure and ventilator. Why? The CDC has assured everyone it is not possible to catch ebola through the air and MUST come from contact of bodily fluids. I am thinking the person in all of that gear is probably from the CDC!!

    Just like the rest of this regime, the CDC lies and does not have a clue. They give the dumbest answer why flights from Africa should not be stopped yet they stop USA citizens from flying in this country??!! The answer: LEFTIST LOGIC!!

  • [1] October 16, 2014 at 11:43pm

    I think you hit the nail on the head!! We can’t stand for someone actually succeeding!!

  • [1] October 16, 2014 at 11:41pm

    Jrook, are you using that leftist “logic” again?? NO ONE SAW HER CHEAT OR CAUGHT HER CHEATING and you say they gave her the benefit of the doubt??!!

    Is it such a stretch for a good leftist to think that a “dream student” who received great grades her entire school career gets a great grade yet again on another test (in a class she was already receiving an “A” in up to the very end of the year)? THAT is grounds to say she was cheating when no one saw her or caught her?

    It becomes clearer all the time about leftist logic. We CATCH Obama and his regime “cheating”(breaking the law and constitution) all the time yet the left says he is doing nothing wrong. When the left THINKS someone is cheating (unless it is another leftist) then they find them guilty. Gosh, makes no sense why Obama has screwed up the world in 6 short years does it you leftist sheeple!!

  • [1] October 16, 2014 at 11:31pm

    A real stretch to think a ‘dream student” with great grades her entire school career gets a great grade on a test??!! Sounds like the “logic” of the left at play again!

  • [5] October 16, 2014 at 11:28pm

    She is probably a (gasp!!)…Christian too!! OR maybe a …conservative!! PROOF of being a cheater right there, right leftists? Sounds like the typical “logic” of the left.

123 To page: Go