User Profile: mdy616


Member Since: August 31, 2010


123 To page: Go
  • [2] October 8, 2015 at 1:25pm

    That’s why Bond Arms makes the “Snake Slayer.”

  • [3] October 8, 2015 at 1:15pm

    Glory says “you forgot to mention …he was a white republican…” Then Obama is a white president!!

  • [6] October 6, 2015 at 2:41pm

    knowbodyknows…VERY WELL SAID!!!

  • October 6, 2015 at 2:39pm

    I say we have huge restrictions in place already. It is interesting what is happening in England with its outright ban on handguns (an extremely HUGE restriction). In Obama’s latest “dance on the dead” speech, he said we should politicize this and we should compare homicides here vs. around the world. He wants us to believe if guns are gone homicides drop. The homicide rate in England and Wales has averaged 52% higher since the outset of the 1968 gun control law and 15% higher since the outset of the 1997 handgun ban (a law requiring civilians to surrender privately owned handguns to the police.) How do you explain this? Don’t you believe a crazy person will use some other way to kill people?
    Here are a few examples of mass murderers using something other than a gun:
    - April 19, 1995 the Oklahoma City bombing,
    - March 25, 2008, Sitka, Alaska: An 18 year killed 4 people with a 5-inch knife.
    - June 8, 2001, Osaka, Japan: A school janitor killed 8 children with a kitchen knife.
    - July 1, 2008, Shanghai, China: A man stabbed 6 police officers to death and wounded 4 others with a knife.
    - August 6, 2004, Deltona, Fla.: Four men decided to bludgeon 6 people using baseball bats to steal an Xbox (all were old enough to buy a gun)

    My point, crazy people will find a way to murder. Freedom comes at a cost. You either accept the cost and choose to protect yourself OR give up your freedom to a govt that gives the illusion it could stop this.

    Responses (1) +
  • [7] October 6, 2015 at 1:40pm

    Think about it. Would you rather invade a country that you knew it citizens had no arms (think of Britain in WW II, had to ask American citizens to send them every type of rifle and handgun at the outbreak so British people would have some means of defending their homes and islands against the Nazi hordes massing across the English Channel) or a country where every person could have a gun and behind every tree there could be armed citizens (think of the Civil war)? Once again you show the lack of leftist logic. Could an armed US citizenry stop a foreign invasion? Who knows? I can tell you if there are no guns then most definitely not. If every citizen has a gun? MUCH better chance.

    OR just as important, could an unarmed citizenry stop its government from taking over ? Absolutely not. Could the armed citizens stop an out-of-control government? Certainly has a better chance and one I am not willing to bet my future on.

    If YOU do not want a gun, then YOU have that right. Why does the left insist I do not have that same own one if I choose?

    Why does the left seem to think my ownership of a gun in Michigan is going to stop a crazy person in Oregon or California or some other place from murdering people? Why does the left insist I must disarm so I cannot protect myself, my family or my country from someone wanting to do harm?

    You seem to believe an armed populace would not stop a foreign invasion. I think it might. Constitution agrees with me.

  • [3] October 6, 2015 at 1:05pm

    “carrying a gun…is about projecting an artificial sense of power over others…” Really? Well it seems to work at keeping the crazies away!!

    And you believe having a gun in a classroom would not do any good if that classroom were attacked by a crazy with a gun? Your response would be what? Inform them they are in a gun free zone so stop it. Or, telling them they are breaking the law by shooting people and murder is a crime. Or YOU would probably pull some student on top of you for protection.

    IF someone like you were teaching my class I would drop it. I know you would do everything in your power to make sure the students were victims before you were. I would also realize your priorities only concern you and know one else just like a good leftist. If you are too small, or too unimportant (according to the left) or occupy a certain space the left decides you get to die. Why should it be any different in a classroom shooting where you were the “teacher?”

    Responses (1) +
  • [3] October 6, 2015 at 12:55pm

    Your screen name needs to be changed to “Leftist.” What she is saying is her family has the same right as Obama’s family to guns for protection. Since she cannot afford all the secret service protection (which Obama could not either if he were not president) she is just as entitled to have a gun to protect herself as Obama. She also mentioned cars with 8 inch military grade doors. I guess you think she does not deserve this also IF SHE WANTS IT??!!

    Why must leftists insist the family of an American is not as valuable as the president’s family? The leftists are the ones crying about children being precious yet when a conservative says YES THEY ARE AND I CHOOSE TO PROTECT THEM the left goes nuts and says we are not worthy BUT the president’s children are!

    This is yet another example of the left deciding who gets protection and who does not. If the left says “you are important enough to be protected” you get everything you need (also think of banks, judges, airports, etc). BUT NOT YOUR CHILDREN, NOOOOOO!!! The left INSISTS they are all housed together in a GUN FREE ZONE and ADVERTISE IT and then wonder why a crazy goes there and shoots it up??!!!!

    The left, decides who gets protection based on assumed importance, size, age and location. If the person is deemed not important enough, too small or occupying a space deemed “NO PROTECTIONS” you get to DIE! THEN they act upset when some they deemed “not important enough for protection” are killed. The left’s “logic.”

  • [6] October 6, 2015 at 12:39pm

    Really? Please give us some examples of those who changed their minds about gun rights after “someone they care about gets the crap shoot [sic] out of them.”

  • [8] October 6, 2015 at 12:36pm

    Correction…USED TO BE the most powerful. Why are his kids more important than mine? The point is, because it went over your head, GUNS are used to protect the “most powerful man” in the world then they should be good enough to protect me and mine. Why should we not be entitled to the same protection? Now it is importance that decides who gets to have a gun and who doesn’t?

    You must also believe in killing children because of their size and location!! Typical leftist. It is the place or the perceived importance or the size of a person that decides who gets protection and who does not.

    Responses (1) +
  • [6] October 6, 2015 at 12:30pm

    She is saying what I have believed for years! NOW if only we could some of our congressman to say the same thing…what am I saying!! We would need some congressmen with backbones to stand up for our rights!!

  • [16] October 2, 2015 at 8:25pm


    Responses (4) +
  • [13] October 2, 2015 at 8:24pm


    Responses (1) +
  • [2] October 2, 2015 at 8:21pm

    It’s funny how the old media is not reporting about the murderers close friend. He just happens to be a muslim and ISIS is claiming the murderer is one of them!! Seems Obama forgot to mention this also!!

  • [1] October 2, 2015 at 7:59pm

    Obama talked about how the younger generation is becoming immune to this violence. He wonders why we are so “violent.” I wish someone at the press “conference” would have asked him about his public stance on abortions and especially late term abortion (murder).

    The leftists are to blame for anyone who has become immune to violence and death!! We have a country full of “leaders” that support a national organization that commits hundreds of thousands of murders a year on babies AND THEN SELLS THEIR BODY PARTS and they laugh about it while sipping wine and eating their salads!! And OBAMA HAS THE NERVE TO TO BLAME PEOPLE LIKE ME WHO KEEPS GUNS FOR PROTECTION AGAINST TYRANTS LIKE HIM AND MURDERING THUGS LIKE THE P.O.S. IN OREGON!! Obama, YOU are to BLAME for any person being immune to violence!! OBAMA YOU PROMOTE VIOLENCE every day when you support murdering a healthy child and selling his/her body parts!! YOU OBAMA and YOUR LEFTIST CRONIES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR HITLER TYPE EXTERMINATION OF AN ENTIRE BODY OF PEOPLE BUT NOT EVEN HITLER SOLD BODY PARTS!!

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] October 2, 2015 at 7:45pm

    How is taking away MY protection here in Michigan going to stop gangbangers from shooting each other in Ohio? Why can’t ANY leftist understand the simple logic? You can pass all the laws you want and it will not stop criminals from being criminals!!! All of those 1st degree, 2nd degree, 3rd degree etc etc murder laws did not stop the gang member from murdering a child!! WHAT??!! Why not?

    Well we need to make another law!! How about making it illegal to drive by a house on Fifth St. and fire a bullet in the direction of a house? THAT will stop those gang members!! Who cares we already have a law against reckless discharge of a firearm inside city limits causing death. NO!!! We need more laws!

    How about a gun law that says anyone caught shooting a gun inside the city limits while pointing at a house while driving in a vehicle (that can include any vehicle with 2 or 4 wheels) is illegal! THAT will stop the murder of children!! WHAT??? We already have a law like that?

    Well how about this…ENFORCE THE LAWS WE HAVE AND NO PLEA DEALS FOR ANYONE MURDERING SOMEONE WITH A GUN!! HOW ABOUT NOT PLEADING IT DOWN TO RECKLESS DISCHARGE CAUSING DEATH SO THE THUG IS BACK ON THE STREET IN 6 MONTHS IF HE EVEN GOES TO JAIL!! WHAT?? That makes too much logical sense? You are right, the leftists running the city and sitting on the bench cannot have that!! After all, the poor gang member had a tough upbringing so he needs to be talked to and given another and another chance

  • [25] October 1, 2015 at 10:05pm

    I am so SICK of the LEFT’S HYPOCRISY!! Leftists do not care about Christians being murdered in the Middle East, why the outrage of Christians being murdered here leftists? Leftists do not care about babies being murdered here and their body parts being sold, why the fake outrage over a few Christians being murdered in the USA? Leftists do not care about criminals crossing our borders and running down people in cars or raping Americans. Why the fake outrage over this shooting leftists? Leftists PROTECTED an illegal who murdered a US citizen on San Francisco. Why the fake outrage over this shooting leftists? Leftists CHOOSE NOT to ARM ONE guard at this school. Why the fake outrage over this shooting then leftists?

    ADMIT IT LEFTISTS, YOU ARE AFRAID OF AMERICAN PATRIOTS BEING ARMED AND WHEN THEY SAY ENOUGH OF YOU RUINING THIS COUNTRY!! It is NOT the shootings that bother leftists. They FEAR what AMERICAN PATRIOTS will do when the LEFT pushes us too far!! The left cares NOTHING about these Christians being murdered! The left shows us over and over death of people they disagree with does not bother them. They continually side with criminals over conservatives and Christians. Obama fights harder and call Christians in the USA and conservatives worse things than he calls ISIS!!! Obama et al just want our guns so they do not have to ever worry about pushing us too far!!

    Responses (2) +
  • [2] October 1, 2015 at 9:41pm

    This takes the cake!!

    The former president of the college reported today “Joe Olson–the former president of Umpqua Community College–says the “SCHOOL ONLY KEEPS ONE GUARD ON SHIFT AT A TIME AND THE GUARD IS UNARMED.”
    Olson left his position in June. He says one of the biggest debates at the school in 2014 was whether or not to hire armed officers.

    Responses (1) +
  • [12] October 1, 2015 at 9:34pm

    THIS WAS A GUN FREE ZONE. FROM BREITBART NEWS: During an October 1 appearance on CNN’s Newroom, former US Marshal Art Roderick said the gunman at Oregon’s Umpqua Community College probably chose his target by knowing it was as gun free-zone and therefore “an easy target.”

    Roderick’s exact words: “[The gunman] probably knew that the facility was a gun free facility, [which is] an easy target for these kinds of coward individuals. They know they’re not going to get any response unless they happen to run into security or a campus police officer.” ************************/big-government/2015/10/01/former-us-marshal-oregon-gunman-chose-gun-free-facility-umpqua-community-college/

  • [14] October 1, 2015 at 9:24pm

    Every article I have read about this shooting, NONE of them describe the shooter. I know if he were a white, conservative, Christian who had a FB page stating he hated muslims we would all know he was white, Christian and conservative. Since NOTHING is being written about him he must be black and a muslim.

    We all know the left would never tell us a black muslim is crazy so they will have to come up with some other story to justify the shootings. Obama will tell us he was getting even for the crusades and the left will run with that.

    Responses (3) +
  • [18] October 1, 2015 at 9:19pm

    That may be true at some campuses but this was a “GUN FREE ZONE.” I guess the shooter did not see the sign, it was probably too small. The answer is to make bigger signs so these wack jobs will see it.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love