User Profile: MetaphysicalJustice


Member Since: July 06, 2012


  • [4] July 3, 2016 at 3:01am

    More like Franklin, Jefferson, Washington, Jay, Madison, Hamilton, Hancock of 1776.

  • [11] July 3, 2016 at 1:10am

    I believe you may be correct. I’ve been thinking this for a while, too. Not that I’m hoping it will happen. I am heartbroken that it appears there may be no way out. I believe the first volley will begin the day our SCOTUS strips our 2nd Amendment rights. It looks like it’s only a matter of time now unfortunately.

  • [6] July 3, 2016 at 1:04am

    I believe it is inevitable that we will, at some point in the near future, do the very thing of which you speak. Count me in, Sir!

  • [3] July 3, 2016 at 12:50am

    I think most who come here have a similar mindset. Those that don’t should simply be ignored. Fighting with words written on these pages basically accomplishes nothing. If you really believe in your principles, live them. If a Corporation has policies you don’t like, don’t spend your money with them. If your State Legislature is doing something tou don’t like, pick up a phone and let them know. Resist the urge to waste your time fighting here. Our time may be better spent organising and being effectual locally. Personally, my family has decided we will never spend another dime at Target. Too bad, too. We loved Target.

  • [3] July 3, 2016 at 12:33am

    I wouldn’t get your hopes up if you think our Justice Department will act on any FBI recommendation to Indict. After 7 plus years of watching how this administration conducts itself, there is no way on earth they will foul up Cankles McPantsuit’s bid for the White House and send her to the Big House. My faith in our government is officially at it’s lowest point.

  • January 15, 2014 at 3:46am

    I believe we are on the same page. You are correct and we need pay attention to these important details. When speaking to friends and family about these matters clarity will make all the difference.

  • January 15, 2014 at 3:20am

    Sir, I believe you are right. Sad but true.

  • January 15, 2014 at 3:17am

    There are two ways two propose amendments to the constitution. They can come from congress or from the states. Either way they must still be ratified through the same process. If you think Washington will propose amendments which limit their own power you are seriously misguided. It is about time the states rise up and reclaim some of the power they lost with the 17th amendment.

    Responses (1) +
  • October 29, 2013 at 5:13pm

    Damage control could be the reason for his actions. However, knowing Chris Matthews, I am more likely to deduce that he fell in the shower and received a head injury.

  • May 20, 2013 at 10:53pm

    If Barry is guilty of high crimes and/or misdemeanors, surely Joe is as well. When Barry is removed from office, Joe should leave simultaneously. When the President and Vice President are no longer qualified to hold office, who takes their place? Remind me of the order of succession. How does that work again? Who is third in line? Hmmmmm?

  • January 12, 2013 at 1:00pm

    @flypantherfan…signed your petion. Thanks for taking a lead. For all those here that are unafraid to use your own info when signing into go do it now and sign the petition. For those of us that are more wary, use a fake account! Not difficult to do. Use your imagination!

  • November 24, 2012 at 12:44pm

    Wildlife officials propose killing barred owls, which are taking territory from spotted owls.
    Northern spotted owls earned a place on the endangered species list due to habitat loss from logging and fire, but their biggest nemesis now is an East Coast cousin.

    Larger, more aggressive, more adaptable barred owls moved West in the 1960s, found food and shelter to their liking and have since displaced spotted owls throughout much of British Columbia to Northern California. Spotted owls declined 40 percent over the past 25 years, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service says they may go extinct in some parts of their range if something isn’t done about barred owls.

    So it means to kill them. Perhaps hundreds of barred owls will be shot — “removed” is the gentler agency word for it — during a 3- to 10-year experiment in tightly defined areas of Northwest forests. Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar said the government “can’t ignore the mounting evidence that competition from barred owls is a major factor in the spotted owl’s decline.”

    The fate of spotted owls has been at the heart of the “timber wars” since they were listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act in 1990. Killing one species to benefit another, however, is a drastic action that troubles scientists and activists on either side.

    A draft environmental impact statement to be released soon includes options for capturing barred owls instead of killing them.

    Google “spotted owl barred

  • July 21, 2012 at 12:32pm

    Another example of negative consequence resulting from a decision based not on True Reality. This is pervasive in our society today and the root of our problems. Can you say Metaphysical Justice?

    Responses (1) +
  • July 8, 2012 at 1:54pm

    We need a NEW COMPROMISE. One that REDUCES the size of government. It is time we only pass or sign legislation that accomplishes this. Stand up and defend a new direction!