User Profile: mewnani

mewnani

Member Since: January 09, 2011

CommentsDisplaying comments newest to oldest.

123 To page: Go
  • April 20, 2014 at 12:08am

    Ought to be…. what? Scared? Angry?

  • April 18, 2014 at 7:49pm

    We need worker bees don’t we? Can’t have too many chiefs with a lack of indians.

    Jokes aside I find it real interesting…

    Responses (2) +
  • April 18, 2014 at 5:53pm

    Hey Wade, if it was about slavery, than why was slaves only freed in the slave states? In border states they remained slaves. And why didn’t do it the first thing the war started? Why did they wait so late in? And don’t tell me the North was better regarding blacks; they were as discriminant as the South was. It remained that way for a really really long time.

    As for your original question, that article was directed towards the Confederate government itself, not the state governments. It wasn’t the the job of that government to regulate slavery so that clause was put in there to keep them from doing it.

  • April 18, 2014 at 2:07pm

    Yeah… he illegally kept Kentucky as a Union state. Illegally.

    Responses (2) +
  • April 18, 2014 at 2:06pm

    The war was about state’s rights, not slavery. It only started to include slavery towards the end, and Abraham only saw them as a means to an end, not people to really be freed, at least at first. He even said himself he would get the South back with or without the slaves. The South seceded because they felt they were being oppressed by the government and the North, and while it doesn’t entirely justify it it’s not exactly about slavery. People used to think of themselves as citizens of the state they were in as opposed to a citizen of the country, and that thinking is partially what brought the war on. Of course that too wasn’t uncommon or wrong back then; states were being annexed all the time and even the original colonies were colonies first before being made members of a country. Also the feds were much less intrusive back then, with individual states handling matters instead of the feds today, thus the mindset partially leading to the war.

    But no it wasn’t about slavery, and you really need to look up your history.

    Responses (7) +
  • April 15, 2014 at 10:51pm

    You don’t need to be a prohibitionist to tell others that something is bad for you. If anything I support these kinds of findings cause it shows the hypocrisy in big government’s crusade against cigarettes when marijuana is even worse for you.

    Responses (9) +
  • April 15, 2014 at 9:14pm

    Wow that… totally didn’t make us look cowardly or incompetent… at all.

    Responses (1) +
  • April 15, 2014 at 5:20pm

    Well someone woke up on the wrong side of bed today.

  • April 15, 2014 at 5:19pm

    Yeah… sure it does…

  • April 15, 2014 at 5:18pm

    I don’t speak for the camp that says they’re messing with God’s plan but you’re sounding even more silly as they are. I think it worked out, cause these twins get to live and probably end up with two different mothers if the other woman chooses to be involved.

  • April 15, 2014 at 5:17pm

    But then you have these twins dying in their place.

  • April 15, 2014 at 5:14pm

    Ok, lets see… we have 4 lunar eclipses in two years all happening on Jewish holidays. There’s a solar eclipse in between, taking place during the same year in the Jewish cycle as 9/11 and the recession according to a poster, and at the same time the planets are lining up, which all the astronomers say is astronomically rare.

    What do you think?

  • April 15, 2014 at 2:06pm

    Why can’t we get this poor girl out of there? If this was a nursing home these people would be in jail!

    Responses (2) +
  • April 15, 2014 at 1:40pm

    The kids are hers. She’s carrying them to term herself. Now maybe they could let the other mother come visit them from time to time. Man that’s gonna be a really wacky family.

  • April 15, 2014 at 1:18pm

    I still would be happy. Not only does she get two for the price of one, but they were saved from being miscarried. Think about it; the other mother would have lost those two.

    Responses (1) +
  • April 15, 2014 at 1:16pm

    Eh. She’s carrying them to term so they’re still pretty much hers. I think it’s fortunate it happened like that cause if their genetic mother was carrying them they would have been miscarried.

  • April 14, 2014 at 8:59pm

    And Kentucky… every single time an astrological event happens it’s cloudy. :(

  • April 14, 2014 at 8:58pm

    Actually scratch and sniff would be great if it was about fruits and vegetables and flowers and such. This… nope. DX

  • April 14, 2014 at 1:27am

    I’ve already said it but I’ll just say it again: what the hell is wrong with us? Since when was this dark material normal to anyone or even good to anyone?

  • April 14, 2014 at 1:17am

    Nice one Joddball. They say babies are just globs of cells… but every living thing in existence is also a glob of cells. Ah the logic.

123 To page: Go