See EVERYTHING, IS ALRIGHT IN GLENN-LAND, IF, YOU AGREE WITH HIM !
April 24, 2014 at 1:29pm
BECK’S BALLYHOO, is at the crossroads, with this BUNDY issue…Beck is separating the Wheat…I.E.THE RELIGIOUS ACCORDING TO GLENN…FROM THE SHAFT…CONSERVATISM AND LIBERTARIANISM . WHICH SIDE ARE YOU ON GLENN ??? Please send us a letter, when you find out, for yourself ? It’s hard to keep up. THIS morning’s show, he asked members who didn’t go his way, to leave his customer base.
March 10, 2014 at 10:11am
He acted very well for someone on the other end of a law suit. ONLY a Sucker would cooperate, with ANYONE, who is trying to “get” them. He showed up didn’t he ?
February 26, 2014 at 9:45am
HAVE THE 3 MUSKETEERS, HERE, been approached by Gingrich to shill for him ???? According to Michael Savage the dinner mates, were there to discuss a “deal” with Gingrich, to ‘place’ stories within their daily talk fests, AND TO SHILL FOR A GINGRICH PAC ! HAVE THEY SOLD THEIR LISTENERS OUT, FOR 30 Pieces of Silver…and has Beck done the same ????
February 2, 2014 at 4:16am
This Dana person got, what she was looking for..a better ‘gig’. Good Riddance to her…she didn’t belong here, at THE BLAZE, in the first place !
WHY is Glenn losing his business ‘grip’ ?
January 31, 2014 at 8:29am
It’s a VERY bad business decision..I thought Beck, and at least Levin were smarter than this.
It only servies to DIVIDE.
January 31, 2014 at 6:50am
Rush is TOO SMART, to be a part of these THREE STOOGES !
A BIG BECK, and LEVIN Mis-Step, here…hooking up with a wimp and failed talk show host like Hannity….a real UN COKE here !
[-5] December 21, 2013 at 9:18am
I agree here ONLY. The Face of Fox is a 2 faced one. Most haven’t noticed.
Just look at THE FIVE…really Low Information News Discussion…very pedestrian.
December 6, 2013 at 9:25am
It is hard to believe that Glenn Beck, hisself, would give license to ANYONE on his staff, to write this one-sided DRIBBLE, about this Communist Terrorist, whose friends numbered Arafat, Fidel Castro, and Muammar al-Gaddafi.
Stewart is in the same league as Ross and Stephanapolis, though he doesn’t want to let you figure that out..just making a joke out of a catastrophic information gaffe, doesn’t lessen or hide Stewart and his ilk, and their purpose…And that is to spread Lies and disinformation about The Regime.
March 11, 2012 at 10:35am
What’s ironic and sad about this story, is, there is a MTA/LIRR Police Precinct located in the station itself, and visible to, the EXACT LOCATION where thIs beating and kidnapping occurred !
But then, as with other MTA Law Enforcement Issues, they only come out from their “hiding place” there at the station, when they have to…it’s not like they are a clear, physical presence on the platforms at this particular station !
Someone, on duty, was “Cooping”…sleeping and not looking at the cameras !
Cooping? I understand you. So the police were hours away & not minutes. Comforting.
Loto...you need to crawl back in the hole you came from.......what kind of person are you?!!!!
This goes on every day in Oxnard, CA. I used to watch out the window on sixth and Oxnard BLVD, as men dragged out women from their hiding places, threw them in a car, and drove off with them. My window and the window of a witch were on the same side, and the events occurred usually behind a restaurant. The police really didn't care because there were worse things going on like stabbings and Mexican gang warfare. The Christians got together with the police and held regular prayer meetings over the city.
Another disturbing point is there were plenty of witnesses and nobody intervened.
Check the White House.
...I mean the outhouse!
Looks more like a case of, "Keepin the pimp hand strong."
...awesome non-story blaze...thanks
No, I'll tell you what's ironic and sad about this situation. There were witnesses.
Why wouldn't you run up and try to help the woman? If you couldn't get there in time, why wouldn't you run over and memorize the license plate?
March 4, 2012 at 3:04pm
If your Really want Mahr to go away, and just “dry up”, don’t give him publicity, Please.
FUNNY HOW this doofus Columbia teacher could quote George Bush's grades at HARVARD?
HEY MARC-----SHOW us Odummers GRADES.
Everytime I see this guy on TV---I MUTE HIM
He is a RACIST.
Pity his "POOR" students.
Wake up Bill----Stop having these loons on your show or I will be MUTING YOU.
Marc Lamont Hole is a dumb, racist @sswype.
Marc Lamont Hill is a moron. He's a car salesman (no offense to car salesman) at best i.e. a slick talker with no real IQ. Face it, anyone with a real IQ would be in a math and/or science & technology oriented field of endeavor. Marc is a talking head and not really a rational one at that. Just a typical libertard with no real intelligence to speak of.
Professor...not...only by affirmative action... certainly not by pulling himself by his own boot straps...just another plantation Black!
How arrogant and rude this man is to make such comment, can't believe Bill was quiet, he should have walked him off the stage, if he's thinking he's smart with all due respect I don't know what to say, wake-up people, wake-up America!!
"Hill cautioned that he’s not saying “Republicans like dumb people,“ but ”they don’t like people who perform intellectuality in public spaces.”
All this coming from a black studies professor.
Black studies was introduced in the universities to give blacks jobs in order to get some token black faces on the faculty. They were not able to have representation to any degree in any of the difficult subjects until black studies was installed.
And, how difficult is the course? Well, it requires somebody who can read and write on about a high school level, hashing over African American history in the US.
And that's just about it.
There's a long line of black studies professors in the media today who somehow got the notion that all of sudden they're some kind of great scholars, as if black studies is some kind of difficult discipline.
And why do they assume that attitude? Because, if there is a common factor among blacks, it is their propensity toward arrogance. They blow up the least little accomplishment they make into something above the ordinary.
Look at this little dork. He's been awarded a dumbed down professorship and he's howling about black briliiance and accomplishment though none exist in the world today. In his own mind he is the Duke of Earl strutting his stuff throughout his dukedom, looking down on all the little honkies who are beneath him and chiding them for not reaching his high level of accomplishment.
Before moving to Columbia, Hill was barely tolerable. He appeared on "Red Eye" from time to time and was amiable. Now he just acts like an entitled pain in the a**.
Robert's reply is that the Marc Lamont Hill teaches a black studies class...well shoot, that won't take long. What do you reckon they do the rest of the semester for subject matter??
What did you major in college?
You seem so ready to denounce another person's undergraduate focus, I am curious to hear your story.
This dumb ass only has his face on TV because he is black.
These phucking people are teaching our children! America WTFU ! Fire this racist POS Vote to change 2012 or we are doomed.
This P.H.D. IN moron couldn't even teach a Jay-Z class. I can't belive he broke Bill's B for the Soul train coment!
Posted on December 7, 2011 at 4:42pm
"You seem so ready to denounce another person’s undergraduate focus, I am curious to hear your story."
Ah, yes, and I'm supposed to immediately jump into a litany of my educational background simply because you think I need to qualify before offerring up an educated opinion, eh? Hahahaha. Then the focus would be on me instead of the imposter who I directed my comments at and his ilk, eh?
Also, you don't have it quite right, old guy. My comments in the above post was on black studies, so let me, in turn, ask you, how do you arrive at the conclusion I'm "so ready to denounce another person's undergraduate focus" on the basis of criticizing a nonsense program like that by an arrogant, anti-white black who is quick to denounce anyone who doesn't think like him as a non-intellectual?
Did I criticize somebody else's subject matter? Did I make a blanket condemnation on undergraduate studies, making you feel as if you were included with my comments?
Or, more likely, does it bother you that he is being criticized? Obviously it does or you wouldn't have raised the question you raised.
A black professor of black studies who thinks he's more intelligent than anybody else should be a definite target, since most of the far left radicalism comes from their mouths: Cornel West, Mark Hill, Eric Dyson, Henry Gates, to name but a few.
I seriously doubt even one of them could pass a high schoo
EVERYTIME I see this man on Fox .. I turn the channel
Thanks for posting this GB and crew. I really appreciate it. The Monk.
Gawd, this guy has a BIG MOUTH !!!
Who are you referring to?
Lamont Hill is absolutely correct. He handled himself very well as he always does. Unlike many people posting on this site...Lamont Hill speaks for a wide range of races, ages, and ethnicity's (which is the future of America) compared to most of you where all of your settings look as though you are sitting at a Klan rally ;-)
Whoo Hoo...you can get other white people to like and agree with you. Haha, big deal!
If Lamont is such a loser..why does Bill O'Reilly have him on? Bill obviously likes him. Bill could easily get another Black face? Is Bill O'Reilly and idiot too?
My only question is how are all you guys going to feel when Barack gets re-elected in 2012? How does it make you feel that this mixed man (Black) can relate with your own people better than you? How are you going to handle it when the day comes when a brown skin man can run for President and he wont need but a small amount of the white vote? That scares you to death doesnt it?
You are so pathetic. There will be a day when a white person in America wont have a prayer of becoming president unless he or she can relate WELL with the Mark Lamont Hills and Latinos of America. Sorry guys, I know it hurts...but sticking to your Klan Rally's in the future is not going to cut it. Lol
George Bush pulled himself up by his own bootstraps? Are you kidding me? GB was BORN on 3rd base and Republicans walk around as if he hit a tripple. If GB was Black or Brown...O'Reilly wouldnt have him on...
Uh that's exactly my point. You ARE denouncing his degree because you think his field of study was easy. Hence why I asked what YOUR degree was in because, surely you must have a graduate level degree in the sciences or engineering... right? Otherwise, why else would you be so quick to qualify his education background?
Surely you got into Columbia, or better yet, have been hired on as a PROFESSOR at the institution, right?
I mean, either that or you're just a racist that feels intimidated when a well educated Black Man speaks his mind and puts your prophet O'Reilly in his place.
Why else would you assume his ignorance in the face of his obvious intelligence?
But you're right, you're not on trial. You don't have to tell me why you are qualified to talk down to someone. Just realize that you get what you give and, until you prove otherwise, I am going to consider an uneducated bigot. And yes, me and my Masters of Science degree will be talking down to you from now on.
Do you understand what I wrote?
Hey black d.....yes, a second term of this guy does scare me to death.....
And this Idiot is a teacher in Columbia University. Now I can understand why the students are Stupid.
Also Bill Ayers and his "genius" wife Bernadine TORPE=clumsy. Poor students in hands of those marxist hypocrites!
I looked up Hill's PhD thesis: More garbage in addition to what he shovels out on TV. He certainly ranks high on the affirmative action list: Obama, Holder, Hill...n.
The best example to date as to what Political Correctness has done to the American education system. Twenty-five years ago this guy couldn't get into a college much less get the degrees they hand out to anyone who wants one.
Posted on December 8, 2011 at 12:09am
"Uh that’s exactly my point. You ARE denouncing his degree because you think his field of study was easy."
Of course. Who said otherwise? For somebody who claims to be educated your reading comprehension isn't very good. I'm betting you have a low I.Q. There's no way what I wrote could be misconstrued by even someone of average intelligence. It was very clear.
And, yes, I have a high I.Q. also.
But, the important thing here is that you haven't offerred one iota of rebuttal to my contention. The best you can do is write it off as racism, because you can't challenge the facts or you don't have the ability to do so. But, let me go a bit further. It wasn't only easy it was no "field of study" at all, unless you think majoring in a subject on a par with physical education is somehow intellectually stimulating.
"I am going to consider an uneducated bigot. (sic) And yes, me and my Masters of Science degree will be talking down to you from now on."
You haven't done a very good job so far. And....please...how idiotic. Claiming accreditation in science as if that qualifies you for anything else, especially since you've done such a deplorable job of rebuttal, is really ignorant.
You're no more than one of Pavolv's mentally conditioned dogs who salivates politically correct dogma when the politically correct bell is wrung.
Bring it on, El Twinko.
Posted on December 7, 2011 at 11:40pm
"Lamont Hill is absolutely correct. He handled himself very well as he always does."
I'll give you this: Hill is above the black norm, but if you think he's anything exceptional above the national norm, you have pretty low standards.
Why? What he uttered for the most part is nothing but a racist, anti-white rant, and your acceptance of it means only that you too are anti-white, which isn't surprising since most blacks are, as is evidenced by the many black on white mob attacks, and their vitriolic rhetoric throughout the country by their leaders and the rank and file as well.
"Unlike many people posting on this site…Lamont Hill speaks for a wide range of races, ages, and ethnicity’s (which is the future of America) compared to most of you where all of your settings look as though you are sitting at a Klan rally"
Hill speaks only for blacks and admits it. Trying to claim he includes everybody as if you're some kind of objective multiculural analyst is pretty easy to see through.
You like to refer to the Klan even though there isn't a vestiage of it nowadays. And you do that because it is you who is a racist, who stupidly tries to flim flam people into believing the opposite of what they can see is obviously apparent., by putting your ignorant black spin on it.
You have no support outside the black community for your racism except for limp-wristed effeminates and brainwashed whites.
Ever notice how Dr, Hill starts talking really fast when he's BS'ing?
This time he's right. There are no conservatives at Columbia.
It's a sad state of education. Columbia should be ashamed.
A person looking for a liberal (true meaning of the word) education would never choose Columbia.
Why did you not post my reply? If I violated one of your policies, please tell me which one I violated. Thank you.
You have presented no facts for me to rebuke, only your ignorant opinion.
And you have a "High IQ"? What does that mean? Are you Mensa? How do you know you have a high IQ? Did you take some online test you found in the sidebar ad on this site? Do you have a degree from an accredited university that might suggest your intelligence? If so, please tell...
Lamont is probably "smart" for these FACTUAL reasons:
- Associate Professor of Education at Teachers College at Columbia University
- Assistant Professor of Urban Education and American Studies at Temple University
- Author of two books
- founding board member of My5th
- affiliated faculty member in African American Studies at the Institute for Research in African American Studies at Columbia University
- Ph.D. graduate from University of Pennsylvania (his dissertation received Highest Distinction)
- Bachelor of Science from Temple University
Now, please give me some FACTS as to why he shouldn't be considered "smart". No opinions please, just the facts.
Lets see if you have the brains to follow through on this remedial task.
Posted on December 8, 2011 at 4:50pm
"You have presented no facts for me to rebuke, only your ignorant opinion."
No, old boy, it is your opinion that is ignorant. The position I took was a fact based one. Everybody knows black studies are nonsense. The subject matter speaks for itself. Even your radical leftist cohorts. And your assertion that you and your science accreditation are going to take care of me is really laughable, since science is specific to a particular subject, not to overall knowledge and debate itself. Im sorry, old boy, but I don't believe you have any kind of college accreditation at all. I think you're lying, and you have a low I.Q. as well. That's pretty plain from what you are displaying. You aren't even able to lay out any kind of logical presentation to anything I've said.
You should have outlined the information on Hill that you did finally do above in order to support your position originally. You did not. Instead you chose to dismiss everything I wrote with your usual Pavlovian response as racism. That made your possition null and void.
Laying out these long useless lists of leftist propaganda that can be obtained by any leftist fool in the country today is not a rebuttal. It is a continuation of the propaganda that has molded your thinking to the point you speak in politically correct cliches, hoping to support people who support the homosexual agenda.
Interestingly, George Bush had a higher grade point average in College than John Kerry, and yet this doofus professor says John Kerry is very intelligent. That would make George Bush out to be a pure genious. Fact is, democrats voted for Kerry and not for the more intelligent one. And this man is a professor? He's a joke.
"Everybody knows black studies are nonsense."
Those aren't facts. That is, again, AN OPINION...
Please tell me you're just pretending to be a huge idiot.
If not, please tell me you're too dumb to know how to register to vote - or procreate for that matter.
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 1:57pm
“Everybody knows black studies are nonsense.”
"Those aren’t facts. That is, again, AN OPINION…"
Ah, but common acceptance of incidents and ideas known to the public at large are established as facts just through their acceptance of such.
Facts can also be established via illustration, without supporting evidence. For example, I think you're an idiot. Now, that can be an opinion on the face of it if all I have is an opinion that I think you are, but when you offer a plethora of evidence of your inability to reason in coherent terms and have a decided lack of reading comprehension skills, it becomes factual just by example alone, and any objective observer would agree that you are indeed an idiot.
Too, other determinations can be made in a similar manner. For example, it can be factually stated that you are an intensely cruel, evil person, just by reading your prior posts in support of offering up little children to homosexuals, because these little creatures are being used as pawns to satisfy a dark, disgusting agenda, as in the case of the little boy who was coached by his lesbian mother to speak up for her mental illness, declaring it to be normal even though the little tyke at 8 years old knows nothing about sex and is really too young to understand it all.
People like you and this mother should be tried in criminal court and put away for life so you can't harm even more children.
If you want to issue a proof by illustration, you have to make clear what pieces you are referencing. Just saying "your previous posts" really doesn't establish anything, hence your proof is based on unestablished claims, hence it isn't actually a proof.
As for common acceptance, I don't accept your proposition so it clearly isn't that common. However, if it so common and I'm just an idiot as you claim, then you should have no trouble finding reputable sources that would agree with you... right? I mean, it should be so easy for you to find just one instance where a verifiable individual with an expertise in academia makes the claim that African American studies is easy, pointless, and just an excuse to push minorities through school.
Surely this wouldn't be asking too much of you.
Please include this in your next post or you can consider this my last correspondence with you on this subject. I don't think my request for you to backup your claims is too unorthodox, especially given I've supported mine.
I look forward to your response... Hahahaha!
Robert..... I may not agree with everything you say, but I appreciate the way you bring a no nonsense cut to the chase approach when 'trying' to defend your positions. I say trying because you can't win against close minded brainwashed idiots aka progressive liberals. Glad to have you my side of the arguments, the side that uses facts and not emotions for the basis of their positions.
“If you want to issue a proof by illustration, you have to make clear what pieces you are referencing. “
I made it perfectly clear, since you’re fully aware of the reference.
“As for common acceptance, I don‘t accept your proposition so it clearly isn’t that common.”
Whether you accept it has nothing to do with commonality since you’re operating on a twinkie wavelength beyond the normal limits of commonality.
“However, if it so common and I’m just an idiot as you claim, then you should have no trouble finding reputable sources that would agree with you… right?”
Wrong “reputable” sources aren’t needed to verify that which is outside the purview of normality., which you are. The obvious is obvious by definition.
“I mean, it should be so easy for you to find just one instance where a verifiable individual with an expertise in academia makes the claim that African American studies is easy, pointless, and just an excuse to push minorities through school.”
Academia is so submerged in PC drivel they wouldn’t dare tell the truth. They’re useless as references. How utterly dumb.
“Please include this in your next post or you can consider this my last correspondence with you on this subject. I don’t think my request for you to backup your claims is too unorthodox, especially given I’ve supported mine.”
You've supported nothing. I’m not surprised you’re slinking away with your tail between your legs like
Posted on December 9, 2011 at 6:33pm
"Robert….. I may not agree with everything you say, but I appreciate the way you bring a no nonsense cut to the chase approach when ‘trying’ to defend your positions. I say trying because you can’t win against close minded brainwashed idiots aka progressive liberals. "
Yes, I agree, guy. They operate on a wave length all their own. But, quite frankly, I don't really want to convince them of anything. My purpose is to stick to the truth and point it out to people who are broadminded enough to understand it.
Somebody wrote something that really describes them accurately: "Liberals have both feet planted firmly in the air."
And Michael Savage always says that, "Liberalism (progressivism) is a mental disorder." Both are uncannily accurate.
Trying to logic with them is like wrestling jello. It's a waste of time, but I'm not going to let anything they say go unchallemged.