User Profile: mikegray24

mikegray24

Member Since: August 30, 2011

Comments

123
  • [1] May 22, 2016 at 1:51pm

    If you place so little value on your own life, feel free to “challenge” yourself however you like. But just know that when your corpse is laying frozen on Mount Everest until the end of time, I will still be remarking what an idiot you are.

  • [2] May 22, 2016 at 12:22pm

    I can’t help but wonder why people still insist on committing suicide in this manner. They could just blow their brains out for a few cents.

    Responses (2) +
  • May 18, 2016 at 2:59pm

    I think you need to review what federal law refers to when it talks about coordinating with super PACs. It essentially forbids a campaign telling a PAC how and where to spend money. None of your facts point to that. To my knowledge, appearing at fundraisers is not a violation of law. If you can counter that, then by all means do so.

    I hate to have to point this out but just because Trump said Cruz illegally coordinated with a super PAC doesn’t make it true. In fact, much of what he says is provably false. I’m not trying to change your mind or offend you, I’m just pointing out the obvious.

  • May 18, 2016 at 11:26am

    If you’re going to declare it a fact, in capital letters, no less (must be a super-duper fact), then how about providing some kind of evidence that Cruz coordinated with super-PACs, in violation of federal law.

  • [3] May 18, 2016 at 1:32am

    And now Trump is sucking from the teat. So there goes that whole charade.

  • [3] May 18, 2016 at 1:17am

    And yet, Cruz was “bought and paid for” because he once took out a loan from evil Wall Street. You people can’t have it both ways.

    Responses (10) +
  • [1] May 16, 2016 at 10:48pm

    What kind of building is this guy expecting to find in “the countryside” that would be even remotely representative of WTC? Or any building that resides in the First World, for that matter?

    This guy is just basically running a Kickstarterish campaign to make the most viral video in history. He’s going to take $1.5 million from conspiracy nuts and multiply it by ten.

  • [2] May 9, 2016 at 6:28pm

    To clarify, I’m not saying the government should be involved. But people should be pretty angry. Like torches and pitchforks angry.

  • [2] May 9, 2016 at 6:24pm

    It’s not that it’s a news source. It’s that it’s a conduit for information. Sure, private company can do what it wants, blah blah. But when the free flow of information is surreptitiously poisoned, it’s a big issue. It’s akin to a phone operator listening to your calls and disconnecting them if topic is something forbidden. Would we say, jeez you’re an idiot if you’re getting your news over the phone? Hell no.

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] May 8, 2016 at 1:52pm

    I’ve seen a number of comments saying “better safe than sorry.” I agree, if the guy is lighting his shoes, assembling something with wires, and so on. But at what point is furious scribbling a danger to anyone? What difference does it make if it was algebra or Arabic?

    People who live their lives afraid of their own shadows could at least apply a little logic to their irrational fear.

  • [25] May 3, 2016 at 9:50pm

    I did the right thing. I supported a limited-government conservative. He didn’t win, so this is where we part ways. Enjoy your big-government progressive! You have a couple of choices. When the GOP wants my support, it will nominate a small-government conservative. Until then, enjoy!

  • [18] April 25, 2016 at 6:39pm

    Especially since a lot of people voting for Trump literally are planning on voting for Clinton later.

  • [17] April 22, 2016 at 10:32pm

    Why do people act like delegates are inanimate objects sitting on a table that someone can just climb through a window and steal? As opposed to thinking human beings that make decisions for themselves.

  • [34] April 13, 2016 at 8:51pm

    I honestly don’t care that Hannity supports Trump (a conclusion I came to on my own a while ago because it’s pretty obvious). But it bothers me that he pretends otherwise. Just be honest about it because trying to hide it is way, way worse.

    Responses (1) +
  • [15] April 10, 2016 at 4:29pm

    And where are all the delegates complaining about the gestapo treatment that back up this “observation?” Because the only people that are making this “observation” so far work for Trump.

  • [2] March 31, 2016 at 11:56pm

    The CIA experimented with using cats as listening devices to spy on the Soviets. It was called Project Acoustic Kitty. Seriously, Google it.

  • [14] March 20, 2016 at 12:06am

    People who go for the “unique” look, as in this case, are really screaming “look at me!” Hey, that’s fine, and I’d never stiff a tip over something like that. But when you scream for attention, you’re kind of opening yourself up to the occasional negative response.

  • [2] February 29, 2016 at 7:18pm

    He’s assuming he’s going to be the nominee and is already trying to work the media for the general election. He probably said something to the effect of, look guys, I’m a good democrat and all that crap is just red meat to get the zombies all stirred up.

    Responses (1) +
  • [33] February 17, 2016 at 11:12pm

    That’s bad enough, but they’re going to pique my interest and then not even tell me what was in the damn wall?

  • [2] January 14, 2016 at 2:48am

    He doesn’t want the Fed audited? And he demonstrates this by publicly supporting auditing the Fed?

    I think maybe you haven’t thought this all the way through. Yes, he missed the vote. It would have been nice if he made it. With more than 40 nays, it was dead. Would have been nice doesn’t mean much then. When a person runs for president, he has to pick his battles. There are only so many hours in a day.

123
Restoring Love