And Hillary has a fund raiser with Cher, woo hoo.
Breitbart earlier today had pix and people saying they knew "Trump would be their for us."
I guess that he can't be everywhere like Chickenman
Don't forget he can tango too!
August 19, 2016 at 9:32pm
That explains why they are not there. With all the flooding they can’t reach the targets they would steal from.
 August 18, 2016 at 9:18pm
If they make something hack proof the only result will be a better group of hackers. Hackers will take it as a challenge to hack something hack proof.
It is not an independent system. The driverless cars get input from google maps or similar apps as well as sensor input to determine red lights, lane marking, other vehicles and such. Those inputs can be compromised.
Also, what if the computer decides to reboot itself while driving?
August 18, 2016 at 7:02pm
If a self drivingg car gets hacked, who is liable for damages?
You can put penis head on every ballot. He's not going to win sh*t. Only Becky's cult will vote. Amazing.
 August 8, 2016 at 10:43am
It doesn’t matter if the photo was taken in February or yesterday. It raises health issues that need to be answered before the election.
August 3, 2016 at 12:36pm
If he really meant what he said he would have resolved the issues with the VA.
 August 2, 2016 at 11:19pm
The latest poll on on Hollande shows a 90% disproval rate.
 August 2, 2016 at 11:17pm
Let me correct your comment.
“You call this presidential material? She’s already shrouded in secrecy,with lawsuits and tax audits…”
 August 2, 2016 at 11:15pm
I would agree with you except for one thing. The media has a habit of selective editing comments. Even if the actual transcripts and videos show nothing that can be used against him, selective editing can make it aeem so.
And if released with selective editing it would make it harder to impanel an impartial jury.
 August 2, 2016 at 11:23am
Bill is trying to find the lady who posed for the body.
 August 2, 2016 at 11:22am
Wesring a burka, how would they know?
 August 2, 2016 at 11:21am
It is offensive to me that we have to kowtow to one specific group.
 August 1, 2016 at 7:39pm
It is only Congress that can regulate this type of thing.
 August 1, 2016 at 2:42pm
Preventing those with opposite views from speaking sounds like something Nazis and communists would do.
If verbal baiting is what it is, so be it. Hopefully it will cause a dialog to open.
Seems the leftists have their minds made up and are afraid they may be confused by the truth and thus have to change their minds
No one is taking away his right to speak, he is just not invited to speak there.
Anarchy - the problem with your argument, is that the student's right to speak is being taken away. That's the issue here. The University has no problem with no end of liberal / left speakers. However the students are not allowed to have a conservative 'element' (speaker) on campus of any kind. Controversial or not - they are being denied the same rights and privileges of an alternate view. By force.
Personally, I say vote with your wallet - get the hell out of these bastions of liberal brain washing facilities and spend your money on places that are open minded. Shoot, maybe even once you do graduate, start gathering like minded people to build a new University that others want to attend. It is sorely needed these days.