User Profile: Mikepal

Mikepal

Member Since: August 15, 2011

Comments

123
  • [2] January 28, 2016 at 2:27pm

    I’m not sure but since the events are at different times, they might be able to do the undercard debate, then go to the Trump event afterwards.

  • [1] January 26, 2016 at 4:47pm

    His defense is basically that CNN choose which question would be directed to which person. How is that any better than them planting questions? Combing through submitted questions and directing who they go to is only a bit better than writing them themselves. Particularly since this was a selected audience and not just some random people walking on the street.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] January 22, 2016 at 2:22pm

    They’re burning it off, which changes it from the components of natural gas which is mostly methane, to the byproducts. Same as if that natural gas was burned to heat a house or heat an oven. So if there’s “harm” to them burning it on site, how does that change from transporting it somewhere else, and then burned in a house?

  • January 22, 2016 at 2:14pm

    I think the problem is it has to be compressed to 3,600 psi in order to make sense for vehicles. Which takes specialized compressors. And then the sheer volume coming out is just way more than needed for even a fleet of vehicles.

  • [1] January 22, 2016 at 1:59pm

    Send the AP to chemistry class. When you burn natural gas, which is mostly methane, it is no longer natural gas or methane. That’s the reason it is burned off instead of just allowed to vent to the air. If there were a problem from burning methane, then why does that suddenly become ok by using natural gas instead for stoves, ovens, heaters, etc. What they really want is higher costs for these companies and higher revenues for the government.

    Responses (1) +
  • [3] January 22, 2016 at 12:18pm

    If they call Trump, it focuses all media on this trial and things like the trade. Which is why this will never happen.

  • [13] January 21, 2016 at 4:56pm

    Wow, in her speech she was complaining about how high drug costs have soared under Obamacare. Of course she’s too dumb to understand that she was complaining about what Obamacare has caused.

    Responses (1) +
  • [5] January 17, 2016 at 10:22am

    The US media set this trend, not the police here or the politicians. But all have joined in.

    Responses (1) +
  • [14] January 17, 2016 at 10:13am

    Yes but notice the media in the U.S. did this on their own. The police didn’t send out a memo. “A group of teens looted a convenience store” is a typical example.

    Exception of course is the races must always be reported in an officer involved shooting, except if it doesn’t match the narrative the media wants out.

  • [3] January 15, 2016 at 5:56pm

    It was a stolen police gun so there was no way to spin it to gun control. So he left it alone.

  • [10] November 22, 2015 at 6:07pm

    I had the same initial thought. Didn’t make sense for a sec.

  • [18] November 22, 2015 at 6:04pm

    So they’re following the example set 2 years ago when “refugees” from Latin America did the exact same thing by the thousands. Of course nearly none of those “children” and families showed up for their court dates, but no problem when there’s sanctuary cities all over the place.

    Responses (3) +
  • [1] August 5, 2015 at 7:08pm

    Way back I was told by someone who worked for a court, that they can’t prove you received it. But now in my area, they started having too low a show up rate and started issuing real summons to some people who don’t show. Not everyone of course, but they try to make examples, so people show.

  • [20] August 5, 2015 at 6:56pm

    What happens is literally people will pick the person they are familiar with. That old line about politicians saying, “I don’t care what they say about me in the paper, just spell my name right” is true. Get people who aren’t following the election on the phone to poll, and they don’t want to say they don’t know. They’ll just pick someone.

  • [1] July 30, 2015 at 4:06pm

    I think the complaints will often have multiple claims under each allegation, some of which will be quantified where possible. Then other claims will be listed with “damages to be proven at trial.”

    So if a dog bit someone, the claimed damages would include the actual amounts spent on medical care, which they would specify the amount of. Then they’d throw in lost wages, pain and suffering, future expenses, future lost wages, and other things where they don’t have an amount for. But will hire an expert to calculate and testify on.

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] July 30, 2015 at 3:35pm

    Why are you assuming the pipes are buried or in the wall?

    But yeah, there’s clearly more to the story than it’s the water supplier. If someone or something is breaking pipes, there’s contamination getting in somewhere.

  • [17] July 30, 2015 at 2:23pm

    Yeah, it is Redmond Washington. Way more likely a political statement versus an issue reading a birth date. Show me a person selling liquor who can’t make out birth dates. It’s part of their job and the fines for selling to underage people are big. In my state, they fine the clerk, plus the store, to make sure the clerks have personal incentive.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] July 27, 2015 at 6:39pm

    He has to worry about over penetration. You can Google map this place. It is across the street from a residential area. 2 parking lots and a wide street away, but hardly over 100 yards. The first house on the left is brick, and on the right is a brick commercial building in front so there’s that. His store front is angled and he’s shooting probably toward the brick commercial building in the video. But there’s a lot of wood siding houses down that road.

  • May 22, 2015 at 6:40pm

    Recycling water isn’t much more expensive that what they already do. The water has to be cleaned to a basically drinkable level by federal law before being dumped into the ocean, which is what Los Angeles does with all its treated water. It is not legally clean enough to use for drinking water, but is close. If they go the few extra steps to make it drinkable, then let it go through some natural aquifers over years, no one would even know the difference. If people go up in the mountains where the water already comes from, they’ll see lots of animals go to the bathroom right near water sources, and stuff ending up in the water. Not to mention fish dying and going to the bathroom right in the water. But people don’t think anything of that.

    If it’s a problem mentally, Orange County, CA uses a second set of pipes to provide recycled water for landscaping.

  • April 2, 2015 at 2:03pm

    This is so old. I saw stories like this back when people had to manually type this on a typewriter instead of just emailing it.

123
Restoring Love