User Profile: milez5

milez5

Member Since: July 04, 2011

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [30] February 27, 2015 at 11:20pm

    No one could be more obsessed with terrorism than King. But he is a typical neoconservative. he wants war without end in the Middle East, but wide open borders here at home.

  • [24] February 25, 2015 at 2:36am

    Those cops and their double talk are as bad as ours.There may be no crime in digging a hole, but clearly someone went through a good deal of time and expense to dig that hole and shore it up with expensive wood. If they were on the up and up they would have come forward by now. Obviously that means that whoever dug that tunnel had a nefarious purpose of some kind.

    Responses (2) +
  • February 23, 2015 at 2:20am

    Yes, and it is interesting that she can sense that Obama is antisemitic, as indeed he might well be, when it comes time to defend her own position, but she is still willing to act as one of his most ardent supporters over all. Her hypocrisy would seem to know no bounds.

  • [257] February 23, 2015 at 1:51am

    This is typical. The guy comes in here and works on an American film—I guess that’s another job Americans won’t do—and then when he gets a silly award just for doing his job he can’t just accept it graciously. Oh no, he has no attack the nation that gave him the award.

    Responses (7) +
  • February 23, 2015 at 1:31am

    The truth is that there are some scientists that believe that belief in God and the theory of evolution are not mutually exclusive. The problem would seem to be getting them to go on TV or radio and make that point. I guess they don’t want the controversy and possible loss of grant funding that getting into a public argument with one such as Dawkins might cause. That of course means that the only refutation to the things Dawkins says comes from preachers like the one in the article who is only able to say that God is real, the bible tells me so. Unfortunately, that line of argument does not work on all that many people any more. If scientists who disagree with Dawkins want him to be challenged they are just going to have to man up and do it.

  • [1] February 18, 2015 at 3:17am

    Yes, thank the lord for big government. They are only here to help. Oh who, who I ask you would save us from those evil corporations if not the always benign, well meaning and dare i say it? Yes I will. The lovers embrace that only such a large, all consuming, all encompassing entity like our beloved government can show.

  • [2] February 18, 2015 at 3:09am

    Yes that really is the bottom line. The left is not interested in making things easier for the little guy and they certainly have no interest in promoting fair competition.They only want control and power. The internet is far too much of a tool of empowerment for the ordinary citizen. For that reason the left would gladly kill it if they could, but because that is too hard they will settle for regulating(controlling) it as much as possible and doing all they can to block or drown out dissent.

  • [5] February 17, 2015 at 12:24am

    It would be nice to find a WAY TO STOP THIS NONSENSE.

  • [58] February 16, 2015 at 11:42pm

    I hope this is true and that it sticks. Time will tell I guess

    Responses (4) +
  • [23] February 12, 2015 at 2:47am

    Looked like pissed off people got there car hit and so they jumped out and opened a can on this guy. I think that it was a bit of a twist to say that they were helping the police. They were mad and wanting to beat hell out of the guy that hit their van.

  • [8] February 10, 2015 at 2:38am

    It was an aspiration by a bunch of European leftists with a thrill up their leg.

  • [3] February 10, 2015 at 2:36am

    Well much the same could be said of the Jews in France. How many of the Jews that were in that deli—even now— vehemently defend mass Islamic immigration to France.

  • [28] February 5, 2015 at 2:38am

    The internet is the greatest tool of empowerment ever devised. Most of the publicly available information on earth is now easily accessible in one place. Every great ruler and captain of industry from the past would have given anything to have it. It is not perfect, but it is wonderful and only one thing could ever screw it up. Just like so much else, government overreach is the greatest, perhaps the only, threat to the glorious internet that we have come to know over the past two decades.

    Responses (3) +
  • [27] February 5, 2015 at 2:27am

    Well of course, but she is Hillary the magic **** diver, so of course there is no comparison. Move along now please!!!

  • [14] February 4, 2015 at 11:26pm

    Yes, if a cop–having just seconds to decide to shoot or don’t shoot— shoots the suspect and has this device on his belt how much trouble will he be in for not “choosing” it.

    Responses (1) +
  • [13] February 3, 2015 at 2:20am

    Yes, but the Republicans aren’t likely to do a thing about it. Over on vdare.com a blogger named Federale lays out a number of administrative things that the Republican party could do to hinder the presidents illegal amnesty. But the truth is that the GOP is not likely to do any of them. Their consultants keep warning them not to offend Hispanics and their donors keep telling them that they had better not try to stop the massive flow of cheap labor coming into the country so in all likelihood they will fold up like a cheap lawn chair and do nothing to stop or even slow down Obama’s amnesty.

  • [3] February 3, 2015 at 1:56am

    Just out of curiosity, why vote libertarian? I mean, I agree with you that Jeb Bush and the others are very flawed, but not supporting the Republican nominee will only—granted to a minor degree—aid the socialist Democrat. Now we may well need to do a change up and see if we can really push aside the GOP and replace it with something else. But of course that is not possible before the 2016 election, there is not enough time.

  • [3] February 3, 2015 at 1:49am

    Walker is possibly the best we can hope for, but neoconservative money will very likely try to buy the nomination for Jeb Bush

  • [23] January 29, 2015 at 12:04am

    The problem with your logic is that actions like these reinforce the fantasy of the left that people who own guns are confrontational nuts. Just because a person has a technical “right” to do something that does not mean they should always do it. There is really such a thing as time and place appropriateness The opposite is the logic of a leftist or a spoiled brat. The bottom line is that based on the information in the article the shooting of the dog seems justified, but an investigation will sort that out. There was no reason for that man to go to the police station and confront the police, armed or unarmed.

    Responses (1) +
  • January 21, 2015 at 11:49pm

    You hit the nail right on the head. Not accepting everything is not hate. Not wanting this country to be over run with poor, third world poor when we can’t supply jobs or afford social services for Americans that need them is not hate.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love