You should get your own blog and use it to criticize other bloggers.
March 15, 2016 at 10:43am
Hypocrisy: progressives don’t let it ruin their day. Why should you?
March 15, 2016 at 10:41am
1. When you argue the most extreme circumstance to make your case (e.g. woman will most definitely die during pregnancy without abortion), you have lost the argument.
2. You argue that limits on abortions should be decided by a medical professional, yet
3. You turn around and state matter-of-factly that life begins during birth. So, no medical degree is needed when you decide (rather, Planned Parenthood) decides life begins, but you can’t comment on limits to abortion because you’re not a doctor. Got it.
Hypocrisy: progressives don't let it ruin their day. Why should you?
 April 3, 2015 at 2:00am
I have a stack of paperwork a civilian needs to fill out in order to volunteer for the military.
I’ll just leave this here.
 February 27, 2015 at 12:35pm
So many points that have nothing to do with the actual story. You simply dislike Matt and therefore apply that dislike to his opinion. No one here is swayed by your “checkingbothsides” nickname. Perhaps not ALL regulation is bad, but in the case of a free and open service like the internet, IT IS BAD. If you think they made health care better by dictating that everyone should have it, you’re profoundly misinformed and astonishingly naive. Matt is right about this one.
Actually radical liberals like those on Salon say Hillary is too conservative believe it or not. They even call Obama conservative lol. They want Elizabeth Warren for president for God knows what reason.
September 19, 2014 at 12:33pm
DUDE. Spoiler alert?
 September 17, 2014 at 1:33pm
I know your dad’s slowest seed was singled out to create you. What a shame.
 September 10, 2014 at 1:10pm
I spoke personally with a nurse who happened to be dating my friend and worked at a clinic that specialized in HIV patients. I asked her what her patient demographic was like, without disclosing any private details.
90% gay men. I’m not saying it’s a punishment, but it’s passed easily that way for a reason.
 September 9, 2014 at 2:35pm
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.
Matt 10:34 KJV
 September 9, 2014 at 2:01pm
If fertilized eggs had no rights, there’s a chance that “woman” might never have been born. There’s a reason that in the animal kingdom, young are fiercely protected by their mothers–the future of their species depends on it. Can we please start acting like animals?
No no, haven't you heard? It's "biology" that causes women to vote for pro-abortion candidates.
I mean, every female in the animal kingdom has that powerful instinct to have her un-born offspring killed, right???
"If fertilized eggs had no rights, there’s a chance that “woman” might never have been born"
That's funny, because abortion has been legal for almost 50 years, yet HERE WE ALL ARE.
You dolts post junk like this
under the falsehood that all fertilized eggs are females.
Nothing you people say makes any sense.
 September 2, 2014 at 1:54pm
“Sorry, I couldn’t hear you over the oceans receding and the planet healing. Did you say you’re another earnest person who’s been level headed? Cuz it sounded like, for a second, you said another journalist was beheaded. Gotta run, TTFN.” – Barack Obama
 September 2, 2014 at 12:16pm
The fact that these workers are paid what their labor is worth remains self-evident. If you want higher wages, update your resume and start looking for a job that requires more of your brain, rather than following some obviously communist pied piper like an automaton without reasoning for yourself the consequences of what you’ve been told is an “unjust” society.
 August 28, 2014 at 4:37pm
Religion was never meant to be banned from the public square, hence the “shall not prohibit the free exercise” clause. You can argue until you’re blue in the face, atheists (and lawyers), but that’s the the truth.
The real problem here is that by forcing religion out of schools (and all mention thereof), the cities, counties and states are A) removing all free will from students and teachers, B) removing their right to choose, and C) placing all responsibility for learning upon the faculty/school and none upon the student/parent. Offering to lead a student in prayer if he/she so desires is not a violation of their civil rights, nor is it coercion, indoctrination or forced fellowship. It is a free choice to exercise their faith in a place of learning, which is what religion is about. Students should have a say in this, but alas, they are again the victims of a war of words and ideas between those who understand the principles of freedom, and those who wish to see it revoked.
 August 22, 2014 at 4:44pm
What I don’t get is that in several states, including Utah and now Florida, the definition of marriage (not a ban on same-sex marriage, as it is often mistaken for), is considered by a federal judge as unconstitutional. OK. The unclear part is: if the judge has decided a law is unconstitutional, how is it open for appeal? Isn’t that like shutting down a Golden Corral for tainted food, then allowing it to stay open as long as people still show up to eat? It either is unconstitutional or it’s not. I get that appellate courts are designed for this purpose, but holding up a law against the constitution, calling it bogus and then saying “wait, don’t go tying empty pop cans to your car just yet…” seems to be a bit idiotic. In any case, two men joining together is not a marriage. A marriage exists between opposite genders who have the potential to create a family, which is why it has been protected this long. Good going, Florida.
April 11, 2014 at 1:19pm
I worked for American Traffic Solutions in Scottsdale AZ for a few months before I left for a higher paying job. At the time, I defended the cameras against friends and acquaintances, but having left the company some time ago, I have to agree with the opinions of dissent here. These cameras seem to instill fear in drivers, rather than promote confidence. They do have their merit, however the argument that drivers break fast and hard in a yellow light when they should probably go through it is a valid one.
April 11, 2014 at 12:53pm
King Lamoni (nice reference btw) is correct. Rather than make inflammatory statements, why not seek to bridge the gap between those who have been able to overcome adversity and those who are struggling with it still? Whites have their share of problems, their poor, their destitute and their needy. Whites, blacks, asian, mexican and other all have a common enemy here: oppression wielded by those in power who seek to divide, conquer and eventually yoke. We cannot let that happen. Start by volunteering in your church, community, food bank, or other outreach program to show you are committed to a positive change. The best way to convert someone to the truth is by example, never the fire/sword.