CommentsDisplaying mjmaverick's 10 most recent comments.

‘We Are Hungry!’: Meet the Students (and Teachers!) Behind the Viral Video Mocking Michelle Obama’s New Lunch Mandates

September 26, 2012 at 7:18am

In reply to Jenny Lind.

It is called exercise. Run 3 miles every night, eat your normal food in sane amounts and you will not pack on pounds. It really does not cost much to not be fat. Such rational as “it costs too much to be thin” is one of the dumbest things I have ever heard.
Did Condoleezza Rice Hint That She’s Leaving the Door Open for a White House Bid?

August 30, 2012 at 6:48am

No, she didn’t. She has no interest in going back to the White House under any title. Exactly what she told Hannity on his show yesterday. Do a little research before publishing an article with such an obvious answer.
There’s a New ‘Epic’ Hack That Uses Only Two Easily Found Pieces of Information — And Here’s How to Protect Yourself

August 8, 2012 at 7:08am

In reply to I Luv America.

@SLAYER

Funny, I have been using only windows since the late 90′s and have NEVER had any of the problems or difficulties of which you speak. The very reason I believe Apple products are way overblown and significantly over hyped.
‘For The Past Ten Years Harry Reid’s Been Beating His Wife’: Megyn Kelly Panel Slams Reid for Tax Comments

August 6, 2012 at 11:34am

In reply to tommytruck.

@VERCEOFREASON

So your potential problem with Romney is that he may have followed the LAW and LEGALLY exempted a portion of his income from taxation? Again, you are upset that he MIGHT have followed the LAW?

Maybe he did……who cares? It is a legal and smart move. Have you ever purposely paid the government more in taxes then you actually owed? Didn’t think so. Any rational and sane person would consider Romney a moron for paying more taxes then he had to. The fact that you are upset that he may have done something legal and smart is rather hilarious. Of course, the rich are the ones that can take different tax breaks than the non rich, they make the kind of money that qualifies them for such breaks. Duh! Let me guess….you choose not to take the mortgage interest deduction or child tax credit so you can pay more……doubt it. Your hypocrisy is screaming.
Limbaugh: ‘Blaming Guns for Murder Is Like Blaming Forks for Obesity’

July 24, 2012 at 10:29am

In reply to OneTermPresident.

@Verceofreason

You are minimizing the intent of the amendment. It isn’t about just allowing citizens to own firearms. The intent is to allow U.S. citizens to protect themselves from the tyranny of a GOVERNMENT. Last time I looked at the weapons used by our military they were using just a few things more powerful than an AR15. Applying the 2nd amendment correctly I should be able to walk into a weapons shop and buy a full auto weapon, a tank or a shoulder fired rocket. Basically, if we as citizens are to be capable of defending ourselves from a tyrannical government, by the intention of the 2nd amendment, I as a U.S. citizen should be able to possess any weapon my government might use in the unconstitutional revocation of my liberty. A hunting rifle does meet those qualifications.

I can hear the liberal, weenie argument already. That would be too dangerous. Yup. Freedom is dangerous……to those who hate it. The founders did not frame the Constitution as the beginning of a utopia.
Limbaugh: ‘Blaming Guns for Murder Is Like Blaming Forks for Obesity’

July 24, 2012 at 8:27am

In reply to schroeder123.

@JROOK

Yes, it would infringe on the 2nd amendment. You are minimizing the intent of the amendment. It isn’t about just allowing citizens to own firearms. The intent is to allow U.S. citizens to protect themselves from the tyranny of a GOVERNMENT. Last time I looked at the weapons used by our military they were using just a few things more powerful than an AR15. Applying the 2nd amendment correctly I should be able to walk into a weapons shop and buy a full auto weapon, a tank or a shoulder fired rocket. Basically, if we as citizens are to be capable of defending ourselves from a tyrannical government, by the intention of the 2nd amendment, I as a U.S. citizen should be able to possess any weapon my government might use in the unconstitutional revocation of my liberty. A hunting rifle does meet those qualifications.

I can hear the liberal, weenie argument already. That would be too dangerous. Yup. Freedom is dangerous……to those who hate it. The founders did not frame the Constitution as the beginning of a utopia.
BURN: ‘Muppets’ company donates Chick-Fil-A money to GLAAD

July 23, 2012 at 4:20pm

In reply to Verceofreason.

Try to pay attention….He gave his views because he was asked. Shame on him for answering a question honestly in spite of the potential consequences. I love how the left only knows tolerance to be that you agree with them on any particular issue. I don’t see any liberals calling out any Muslim positions on these topics…..I wonder why?
Woman Dies After Having Abortion at Planned Parenthood Clinic

July 23, 2012 at 8:58am

In reply to Steelhead.

Yep. Because it is much better to make murder legal so that the murderer might not die while committing murder. Makes perfect sense to me…..sheesh.
‘Snow White With Testicles’: Limbaugh Slams Romney NAACP Speech

July 12, 2012 at 8:28am

Come on Blaze! This reporting is pathetic. Rush did not slam Romney or his speech. He was slamming the NAACP audience Romney was speaking to. Rush did not say Romney should have tailored his speech to the audience. Rush basically was making the point that because Romney is a white guy and not ashamed of being a white guy that the NAACP audience would ignore and hate his speech no matter what Romney said. Please try to report accurately. It really isn’t that difficult.
How Much Do You Want the New Aston Martin ‘Supercar’?

June 21, 2012 at 7:50am

Interesting. However, the Nissan GTR is quicker for about $180,000 less.