User Profile: mjmaverick

mjmaverick

Member Since: December 07, 2011

CommentsDisplaying comments newest to oldest.

  • September 26, 2012 at 7:18am

    It is called exercise. Run 3 miles every night, eat your normal food in sane amounts and you will not pack on pounds. It really does not cost much to not be fat. Such rational as “it costs too much to be thin” is one of the dumbest things I have ever heard.

  • August 30, 2012 at 6:48am

    No, she didn’t. She has no interest in going back to the White House under any title. Exactly what she told Hannity on his show yesterday. Do a little research before publishing an article with such an obvious answer.

  • August 8, 2012 at 7:08am

    @SLAYER

    Funny, I have been using only windows since the late 90′s and have NEVER had any of the problems or difficulties of which you speak. The very reason I believe Apple products are way overblown and significantly over hyped.

  • August 6, 2012 at 11:34am

    @VERCEOFREASON

    So your potential problem with Romney is that he may have followed the LAW and LEGALLY exempted a portion of his income from taxation? Again, you are upset that he MIGHT have followed the LAW?

    Maybe he did……who cares? It is a legal and smart move. Have you ever purposely paid the government more in taxes then you actually owed? Didn’t think so. Any rational and sane person would consider Romney a moron for paying more taxes then he had to. The fact that you are upset that he may have done something legal and smart is rather hilarious. Of course, the rich are the ones that can take different tax breaks than the non rich, they make the kind of money that qualifies them for such breaks. Duh! Let me guess….you choose not to take the mortgage interest deduction or child tax credit so you can pay more……doubt it. Your hypocrisy is screaming.

  • July 24, 2012 at 10:29am

    @Verceofreason

    You are minimizing the intent of the amendment. It isn’t about just allowing citizens to own firearms. The intent is to allow U.S. citizens to protect themselves from the tyranny of a GOVERNMENT. Last time I looked at the weapons used by our military they were using just a few things more powerful than an AR15. Applying the 2nd amendment correctly I should be able to walk into a weapons shop and buy a full auto weapon, a tank or a shoulder fired rocket. Basically, if we as citizens are to be capable of defending ourselves from a tyrannical government, by the intention of the 2nd amendment, I as a U.S. citizen should be able to possess any weapon my government might use in the unconstitutional revocation of my liberty. A hunting rifle does meet those qualifications.

    I can hear the liberal, weenie argument already. That would be too dangerous. Yup. Freedom is dangerous……to those who hate it. The founders did not frame the Constitution as the beginning of a utopia.

  • July 24, 2012 at 8:27am

    @JROOK

    Yes, it would infringe on the 2nd amendment. You are minimizing the intent of the amendment. It isn’t about just allowing citizens to own firearms. The intent is to allow U.S. citizens to protect themselves from the tyranny of a GOVERNMENT. Last time I looked at the weapons used by our military they were using just a few things more powerful than an AR15. Applying the 2nd amendment correctly I should be able to walk into a weapons shop and buy a full auto weapon, a tank or a shoulder fired rocket. Basically, if we as citizens are to be capable of defending ourselves from a tyrannical government, by the intention of the 2nd amendment, I as a U.S. citizen should be able to possess any weapon my government might use in the unconstitutional revocation of my liberty. A hunting rifle does meet those qualifications.

    I can hear the liberal, weenie argument already. That would be too dangerous. Yup. Freedom is dangerous……to those who hate it. The founders did not frame the Constitution as the beginning of a utopia.

  • July 23, 2012 at 4:20pm

    Try to pay attention….He gave his views because he was asked. Shame on him for answering a question honestly in spite of the potential consequences. I love how the left only knows tolerance to be that you agree with them on any particular issue. I don’t see any liberals calling out any Muslim positions on these topics…..I wonder why?

  • July 23, 2012 at 8:58am

    Yep. Because it is much better to make murder legal so that the murderer might not die while committing murder. Makes perfect sense to me…..sheesh.

  • July 12, 2012 at 8:28am

    Come on Blaze! This reporting is pathetic. Rush did not slam Romney or his speech. He was slamming the NAACP audience Romney was speaking to. Rush did not say Romney should have tailored his speech to the audience. Rush basically was making the point that because Romney is a white guy and not ashamed of being a white guy that the NAACP audience would ignore and hate his speech no matter what Romney said. Please try to report accurately. It really isn’t that difficult.

  • June 21, 2012 at 7:50am

    Interesting. However, the Nissan GTR is quicker for about $180,000 less.

    Responses (2) +
  • May 23, 2012 at 7:03am

    Unfortunately, Zimmerman will be going to jail no matter what the actual evidence indicates. The Black Panthers and those who have some hand in supporting them will intimidate all the witnesses involved, the beginning of which I believe we are already seeing. I like to believe that truth always wins out but I am not so sure it is going to be allowed to in this case.

    Responses (1) +
  • May 17, 2012 at 7:32am

    There is no such thing as an atheist. Argue all you want, not a single one exists.

    An atheist who claims that all this argument is about is protecting the Constitution is disingenuous at best. When I meet a claimed atheist who can be consistent and defends the whole Constitution with the same energy, then I might be able to take such a statement seriously. Start with the right to life maybe?

    Responses (1) +
  • April 26, 2012 at 7:25am

    Oh.No.They.Test.On.Animals………….Cry me a river. Who cares? The same people against this oh so inhumane testing also defend the slaughter……again, SLAUGHTER of millions of babies every year. Why? Cause babies are punishment! Like I said. When liberals can be consistent about their supposed respect for life then, maybe, just maybe, I might start to listen to their positions on some of this useless crap but until then, SHUT UP! I have never met a consistent liberal in my life. Go demonstrate against the SLAUGHTER of millions of babies and then we might be able to take you seriously.

  • April 26, 2012 at 6:49am

    I really hate to break it to you all. I really hate to think it. I really hope this prediction is not true. I am beginning to believe that none of these communists are going anywhere after the next election. Not because Obama wins but because there won’t be any election. Obama will create a crisis that gives him what he thinks to be a reason to cancel the elections and thereby remain in power for as long as he cares to. If you think the media wouldn’t back him if he tried it think again. When has anyone challenged this guy? He has been acting as king and/or dictator since his inauguration with little push back even from those in government who should be pushing back. This guy will not be going anywhere. You now live in a kingdom. Better get used to it or be prepared to mount up for revolution.

  • April 9, 2012 at 10:31am

    Reason 4327 to not go anywhere without your handgun.

  • April 4, 2012 at 3:59pm

    Where is fire from the sky when you need it?

  • April 4, 2012 at 9:06am

    How is it possible that college kids who have been educated by America’s superior public school system can be so dumb? They want a free college education but can not do the math required to arrive at the conclusion it is impossible. The state of California doesn’t have any money. How is it they expect the state to pay for their schooling? With what exactly? The federal government doesn’t have any money. How is it they expect the nation to pay for their schooling? Once again, with what exactly?

    Responses (1) +
  • April 3, 2012 at 4:08pm

    Funny then that home schoolers consistently test out higher than the children attending your government indoctrination stations……I mean public schools.

  • April 2, 2012 at 6:43am

    Of course. Just because other people who understand what is currently going on in this country and choose not to freak out, lose their minds or become despondent and deathly serious manage to still enjoy their favorite sports they are stupid. Relax and get a life. Your, I am more serious about the collapse of this country then you are because I do not care about sports is way arrogant. I understand where this country is headed but I still enjoy life and will continue to even when the crap does hit the fan. Me being unhappy and depressed does nothing to change things. It is possible to know politics, history and economics yet still know sports. Relax!

  • March 29, 2012 at 8:07am

    Yes, atheism does have a deity. The atheists deity is the atheist himself. The atheist believes that what he decides to be right is right and that what he decides is wrong is wrong so indeed he does have a philosophy of life and ethical system. The atheist worships himself and provides himself with his own moral definitions. They can deny it all they want, the atheist bases who he is, what he does and doesn’t do and the conclusions he makes about others on a belief system. He has a defined world view to the extent that any atheist can somehow define the undefinable non absolute whereby they live their lives. It is a religion.