I am SO hoping that somebody, the FBI or anyone else, dumps her un-redacted emails on the table for all to see the true depravity of this master criminal. She may not be the world’s best liar….Barry takes that one, but the slot for world’s worst liar is open. The real story is in what the emails say…not how or when she tried to delete them.
I highly recommend a listen to Mark Levin’s show from last night (http://www.marklevinshow.com/audio-rewind/) where he detailed the actual meaning of the 2nd Amendment, then went on to give a meticulous breakdown of the false statistics being used by CNN and libs in general. The factual information is well worth the time.
Oh the ACTUAL meaning of the 2nd Amendment.
Prove this 'statistic' false.
Add a gun to ANY environment and the chance for injury or death is increased. (Perhaps even significantly.)
If there is not a gun present in an environment (say a school) then... the chance of injury or death from a gun is not present.
On top of that... The chance that an attack - like a mass shooting - occurring in such an environment (like at a school) is far less likely than an injury or death related to a gun that has been volunteerily introduced into such an environment.
And the more guns brought into such environments...
The greater the chance of injury or death from one of those guns.
All while the chance of an attack occurring remains nominal.
Folks who want to introduce guns to gun free zones are simply introducing a greater risk of injury or death associated with THOSE guns volunteerily brought into such environments - more so than they are creating 'safety' against highly unlikely attacks.
Or are some of you now going to argue that these attacks are far more common than you folks have previously said?
One is more likely to be injured or killed by a gun owned or introduced to an environment by someone they know than by an 'outside assailant '.
@ zapparules, more deaths occur each year, over the past decade, from vehicles than guns. To use your argument:
1) Add a vehicle to ANY environment and the chance for injury or death is increased.
2) And the more vehicles brought into such environments…
The greater the chance of injury or death from one of those vehicles.
3) Therefore, we should bad vehicles.
@Zappa You're right.
"If there is not a gun present in an environment (say a school) then… the chance of injury or death from a gun is not present."
How do you suggest we keep a criminal from introducing a gun to that environment?
Let me destroy your argument in one swift hit.
Gun ranges. Gun ranges. Pull up the stats for how many injuries and deaths occur there….
Gun ranges are one of the the safest places in this country, yet everyone there is armed, so please sit down.
@zapparules - Man, I don't know what planet your logic comes from, but it sure makes zero sense here.
I can take a pencil off a student's desk & stab you in the eyes & throat, causing you to bleed out and die. Does that mean that having pencils in school increases the chance for injury or death? A gun is a tool, just like a pencil. It is not the tool that increases the chance of injury or death, it is the crazy evil person that enters that environment, selects a tool, and uses it to harm or kill people. That is the cause, not the tool.
To quote previous analogies: If guns kill people, then pencils misspell words and forks make people fat.
Gun control is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars.
Please go back to the planet of wacky logic. You will be happier there & so will we. Have a safe trip.
 October 2, 2015 at 2:42pm
FYI, Jason’s CR rating: B (82%). Not too shabby and the best so far.
 September 30, 2015 at 11:26pm
Ya see that Barry???? You know how that works…..Don’t tell anyone what you’re about to do, do whatever the hell you want, tell everyone you’re doing something other than what you actually did, then ridicule anyone who’s telling the truth about it. Did Vlad learn that from you, or vicey versey?
Barry needs no coaching on deceptiveness, in boxing they call it "taking a fall".
Holy crap. Grand slam.
 September 30, 2015 at 8:38pm
C’mon guys, does he really need to supply tailor-made sound bites to the media that will only be used against him? He spent 18 minutes in the Senate flatly calling McConnell a liar and a crony to his face for all to see and hear, he’s made many similar monologues recently. He’s gotten virtually no support from other Senate Republicans and is the ONLY one who has directly stood up to Turtle Man. It couldn’t be any more obvious that he wants him gone but he keeps it classy for the media, a very wise habit.
Agreed. Screw the MSM and their tactics to destroy people.
One can say what they want on the Senate floor without revenge but once you do it in the media it's open season on you.
Could never have said it better myself. Cruz exudes class, honesty, and respect. He will not be tricked by the media into those sound bites you mention. He answered the question twice, with style. And like you said, he's already had his say on this matter, and the media had a field day with that, using all kinds of degrading comments because of his TRUTHFUL statements. He's good at thinking before he speaks, and he doesn't take a long pause before he answers. We need more like him. Everybody just needs to eat crow and shut up.
All comments well said.
I like it when others see between the lines. What motivates the media? What Motivates the Voters? What Motivates Obama? That is a long List.
Cruz as President would bring Honor and Class back to the Oval Office!!!!
 September 30, 2015 at 8:44am
Sorry, wrong answer DLV. So let’s think this through….Barry keeps playing in his sand box (translation: golf course) while we let Vlad take care of ISIS, and that he will. When the smoke clears, Vlad takes all HIS war toys and goes home and we say, “Gee, thanks Vlad, we appreciate your help with those pesky beheaders.” WRONG….ISIS is just a perfect excuse for Vlad to own the ME and firmly expand and entrench his power and influence. To say the least, Barry owes Romney a BIG apology for that crack at the debate.
 September 30, 2015 at 7:19am
For seven years, Lord Barry has ridden on the coattails of all the presidents that came before him and sooner or later, it was put up or shut up. He has squandered all of the power, prestige and influence that this nation has built up. No, Barry, you DIDN’T build that…..you have destroyed that.
While I don't like Russia ordering the U.S. anywhere we aren't getting anywhere in Syria. Isis grows stronger and Obama is weak. Putin on the other hand will defeat Isis. For once we aren't doing everything so let Russia go ahead for once
I used to think people like Kerry and others in this administration were pacifists from the 60s and 70s. I have now come to the conclusion that I think they are what I call avoiders. Life is full of difficult choices and sometimes requires hard choices to be made that have unpleasant consequences. I think these types of personalities are unable to deal with the hard choices as well as the consequences so they take other actions no matter how convoluted to avoid this. Hence "avoiders"
Obama is a complete idiot. This would not be happening if our great nation lead by a POS president did not fail. America is viewed as a loser and has been told to move aside. After all of the lives we have lost and the money we have spent we will achieve nothing.
If I had a nickel for every "like" you should get, our deficit would be paid off.
Total mud on Barry's face!!!
Well we see who came out on top after their meeting... looks like Putin has drawn a red line... lets see if the racist *astard we have for a leader tucks his tail and runs.
Obama is the enemy from within in, an extreme ideologue who was brain washed all his life to hate America. He not doubt enjoys what's been accomplished, a diminished U.S. and is flooding our country with usurpation, guy is bad news period!
 September 29, 2015 at 7:07pm
In a live interview this afternoon, Hannity tried to get Rand to admit that the Senate leadership deceived the American people and let them down…..Rand did quite a dance, but deflected to the end….he just wouldn’t admit it.
 September 29, 2015 at 6:44pm
Long distance telepathy…nice to have great thinkers tuned to the same frequency. ;-)
Trolls: form line to the left, please!
 September 29, 2015 at 6:35pm
Rand said pretty much the same thing on Hannity this afternoon. Well, Rand…I guess Ted just hasn’t learned how to kiss McConnell’s a$$ like you have. Cruz is the only one with the ‘nads to stand up to the failed “leadership” and perhaps that’s why you’re desperate enough to attack him.
MKFlyboy, LOL, first thought that occurred to me as well.
MKFlboy!! You stole my comment word for word. Now I'm just sitting here all...stupid like.
How ya' been, Brother?
Guess that says it all.
Rand Paul is showing his own "lack of decorum" now.
Rand sticks up for Mitchy every chance he gets. He lied about Matt Blevin and helped his best bud get reelected .
Rand Paul is still hurting from this Trump speech and the first debate where Trump nailed Rand after Rand tried attack Trump for his Clinton donation. Rand came to Trump with his hand out for free money too... and walked away with a pocket full of cash.
Regardless, he is right. You can't sit and call people liars and attack them then expect them to support your legislation. I don't like GOP but got to have someone that do something besides shut down the government.
Rand Paul is so committed to the Presidency that he's gonna be on the ballot for Senator too. The reason he's doing that is because he knows he doesn't have a snowball's chance of winning the nomination. Just like his daddy.
@ Rand Paul.
You’re a coward.
You just called the ONLY true Patriot senator Ted Cruz, names, you stupid hypocrite.
After you turncoated with Mitch, you screwed the pooch. Can't walk back playing with the Devil.
Rand….quit trying to be John McCain.
"I just chose not to call people liars on the senate floor"
Yeah, Rand, you choose to call Republicans "crazy" for wanting voter ID.
There is a a dignified beauty in seeing a man standing up heroically against all opposition, defying the odds. Stories are written of such men, and as Shakespeare reports those poor emasculated souls who do not stand with such heroes, will hold their manhood cheaply...LOL.
But there are other stories, of men who defy the odds not through brute strength, but through cleverness, and strategy. If all conflict in life is war, as Sun Tzu has said. Then perhaps we need both to win.
There are times where building relationships, having patience and waiting for the enemy to show his weakness is the best approach, and then there are times to be bold, aggressive, and to lay it on the line.
I think Cruz is by-far the better candidate between these two, but it all means nothing if he cannot win. So Paul does have a point.
And that's why I don't like Rand Paul.
This could almost be a Star Wars episode.
Luke Skywalker played by Ted Cruz.
Rand plays Darth Vader.
Mitch is the Emporer.
And the Millennium Falcon is getting fueled up right now.
Luke, it’s about too-late thirty, let’s roll.
Rand don't go down this road. You will lose and lose some more. It's stupid to go after someone who is so likeminded especially when right. You're still my favorite but you've shot yourself in the foot. Don't stoop to these games
Guys Rand isn't establishment not even close. The worst you can say of him is that he plays the game. If that turns you off from voting from him fair enough I won't argue. But to say that he is establishment is a blatant lie. His voting record is who he is and he ALWAYS goes against the establishment. Strategically speaking this was a massive shot in the foot and I had to face palm here. Cruz is very conservative and stands for the truth. No one is doing decorum Rand when no one else does it. Once again Im disappointed in how he says things just like he shot himself in the foot the first time against trump. If trump is gonna implode him implode. Don't uou do it necuase you'll make him stronger
And soon we will hear Rand invoke Reagan, al the while forgetting Reagan's 11th.
And I promise you, Cruz will not reply in kind about Rand, he is made of better stuff.
No, he's just learned how to kiss Donald Trump's @$$ instead. Rand's point is that in spite of all his childish bloviating Cruz hasn't been able to get a dang thing done. Rand understands that in order to succeed in politics you have to negotiate with people, build relationships, and work to move your agenda forward one step at a time. Cruz just thinks behaving like a 5-year-old will get him elected, and it won't. He is a feckless, immature, neocon fraud, and increasingly becoming just Donald Trump's MiniMe.
You people are so easily led by the media. He was asked a question about why Ted Cruz was not given roll call by the other Republicans and he answered the question. Simple as that. All the media needs to do then is add the words attack or slam in the headline and everyone turns on there blinders and refuses to look at the context of why he said what he did. He didnt just bring it up out of the blue to attack Cruz, he was answering a question asked of him. Instead of letting the media dictate the narative maybe you people should be upset at the media trying to stir up contention when there is none.
Rand made a big mistake standing with McConnell for his re-election.
But don't attack one of the few allies in the Senate. You want to be lonely? Attack Cruz. Is Mike Lee next?
Cruz stock just went up.
Both Cruz and Paul have their points. Now, let's just let things play out. Paul shouldn't have backed McConnell and Roberts, as they are the stalwarts of the senior leadership, them, and Hatch, tht have DC in a headlock of stupidity and lacking of common sense.
I mean, I can understand trying to get along, but those three, they need to get along with the rest of their life, away from the Senate. It's pretty tough to call out for Term Limits, when you're backing 2 of 3 Senators that haven't known life outside of DC since.....Hell, they may have paved the roads in DC, it's been so long.
Just word of caution to Paul, no offense, but expect Cruz to respond in kind at some point.
I like Rand on a lot of things, but when he calls someone ELSE out for being a firebrand trying to go it alone, he must think we're either stupid or have short memories. He's pulled a NUMBER of lone wolf legislative stunts, including a high profile filibuster. He's constantly calling the GOP out when it bucks the Constitution (which the GOP claim to follow and respect, thereby effectively calling them liars by another name). And if passing bills is a measure of success, do you know who has LESS sponsored bills passed than Ted Cruz? Yup, Rand Paul!
Check here for Cruz: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/browse?sponsor=412573
Check here for Paul: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/browse?sponsor=412492
Notice which one DOESN'T have the "enacted" button available on ANY of his 136-odd sponsored bills
Maybe he fancies that the role of a Senator is to be as effective in Congress as his father was? Ron loved to sponsor ridiculously lopsided bills that he KNEW he could persuade NO ONE to vote for, just so he could stand on the sidelines while the business of the government grew and grew out of all proportion just so he could yell out to the actual players: hey you, stop playing, you're not playing by the rules, I'm the only one who actually respects the rules. He was a perfect case-study in legislative futility.
In other words, it's more about playing procedural a$$ kissing games and following the usual protocol than doing the will of the people. The people want change so bad, but attack the people who will stand for them and actually do what they say they will do. Sometimes it might take a government shutdown for good to come out of it. We just don't want change bad enough to endure the suffering that is required for that to happen. It is the signature characteristic of our nation. Change is going to hurt and until you are willing to endure GREAT sacrifice and GREAT suffering that change will never come. Sometimes you must be willing to sacrifice friendships and scorn from your own party. The truth is something we do not appreciate in this country. If Ted Cruz calls someone a liar, you can bet that person is a liar. Instead of attacking the person who is a liar, the liars attack Ted Cruz. And the people buy it. Rand is a significant part of the problem in government. It's the people who are willing to stand alone and be sacrificed by their own party that are the answer to what ails this country. They will always be known as men of honor. They keep their word. They don't play political grab a$$ like Rand Paul. Rand is exactly the reason we keep getting what he have been getting with NO results. If you had a Senate filled with men like Ted Cruz the American people would be getting what they desire. With Rand.....Not so much.
And that's the problem. These guys are more worried about "decorum" in the Senate, rather than the JOB of the Senate.
A few people here are interested in Cruz, the rest of America....not at all. He has a record for biggest negative ratings.
Yes, keep supporting him, be unique, be different
This from Rand Paul, the same man that backed and sang the praises of Mitch McConnell:
"Rand Paul Slams Ted Cruz, Explains Why the Texas Senator ‘Can’t Get Anything Done Legislatively’"
Does Rand Paul not know how stupid sounds to people with a brain and principles?
My thoughts exactly. Cruz hasn't been able to get anything done because he calls a spade a spade regardless of the decorum or rules of the senate. He doesn't act based on personal relationships but on Constitutionality.
I think he just endorsed Ted!
So Rand, Liars aren't liars? I don't get it.
Rand Paul - "...I just chose not to call people liars on the senate floor..."
So Rand, you're saying Ted can't get anything done in Congress because he told the truth & the liars have sad hearts and want to take their toys & go home to pout?
If Congress is so petty that they can't stand up to someone calling them out, maybe we just need to march down there, grab these babies by their ears, & drag them back to their respective states & send up people that are willing to fight to SAVE THIS NATION & stop it from circling the drain.
You can't help but admire the brazenness of Ted Cruz. The man has guts. I stayed up the whole night with him tweeting support during his filibuster. But, what Dr. Paul says is exactly true. Cruz has burned a lot of bridges in the Senate. I'd love to see Cruz win the nomination. But, you know that the GOP establishment and the U.S Chamber of Crony Capitalism will do everything to defeat him. They would probably even take Trump over Cruz. And, if somehow Cruz wins the nomination, do you think there will be any real effort by the establishment or the cronies to help him defeat Hillary or Biden?
Rand Paul plays the game, Ted Cruz refused to play.
I used to respect you, Paul. You're dead to me.
Ted Cruz just kisses the ring of Donald Trump and progressive John Cornyn. Hypocrisy by Ted Cruz supporters has no limits.
 September 29, 2015 at 12:50pm
You’re so right and it sounds like you’ve been listening to/watching Glenn because he was all over this story about a week ago….don’t know why more wasn’t put out on the Blaze. Not much mention of his father’s close ties to CAIR, or the fact that he ran for President of the Sudan twice, but the biggest issue I see is that Irving, TX banned Sharia Law earlier in the year! This whole thing looks like a negative PR setup. Might as well throw in the interview Glenn did with Hansen, a former Green Beret who said if he was going to make a briefcase bomb, it would look just like that.
 September 29, 2015 at 7:21am
Sooooo….their safe isn’t secure enough, but a restroom in Denver was just fine with old Hil!!! Don’t you just love her latest appearances, playing dumb about that messy technical computer stuff with a few smiles and a couple of cackles, the silly sarcasm about ‘wiping’ the server…..oh….and it was really Bill’s old email server that he apparently never even used….gimme a break! Can I see that one again about when she lectured her State Department employees about using secure email?
According to Conservative Review:
Roy Blunt: CR Rating: F (38%)
Perhaps that’s a clue?
 September 28, 2015 at 10:06pm
The simple answer is not enough exposure….he was snubbed at the debates by BOTH Fox and CNN….he is a brilliant, experienced, HONEST man with impeccable integrity in Washington, DC!…. a nightmare to both the dems and the RINOs.
 September 28, 2015 at 9:13pm
You’re getting warm, but perhaps you’re just not familiar with the history of a certain regular blogger who was forced to change screen names multiple times due to questionable behavior. I’ll have to leave it at that.
 September 28, 2015 at 7:55pm
About Mike on the Blaze, I’m 100% sure that that’s been discussed, but Glenn can’t afford him. If Comcast and Time-Warner hadn’t flatly refused to carry Blaze TV, it would be a different story.
Yep, i heard Glenn say that, almost those exact words, i think
on the radio show last year
Off topic, but kinda on topic, all those people that say "Glenn is a
gatekeeper" might want to ponder why TPTB wouldn't make it so
the Blaze was on Comcast and Time-Warner. Just saying...
Not you or me of course, but i am sure you have read comments
out here implying as much, i have. It just doesn't make sense,
Glenn would be everywhere if that were the case.
Careful conservitearin, using simple logic can throw the blaze commenters into a fit.
 September 28, 2015 at 7:43pm
LOL….to use another psychology term, we are all victims of the “conditioned reflex,” hereafter referred to as the “soybomb effect.”
I'd rather call it dumbass fatigue. But I'm not a guy that can make up words and sell them to lemmings.
I'm no progressive.
Soybomb Effect? I thought that is what hits the toilet after too much Tofu. I guess the end result it one and the same.
You're getting warm, but perhaps you're just not familiar with the history of a certain regular blogger who was forced to change screen names multiple times due to questionable behavior. I'll have to leave it at that.
LOL, I understand that S0Ybombs are rather warm at first anyway.
 September 28, 2015 at 5:24pm
FYI, According to Conservative Review:
Kevin McCarthy: F (45%)
Daniel Webster: D (63%)
We need to do much, much better.
 September 28, 2015 at 4:52pm
Excellent, but you left out heavily opinionated, nihilistic, blathering meth-headed trolls.