User Profile: MoDem

Member Since: September 30, 2011


123 To page: Go
  • [-2] October 21, 2016 at 12:26pm

    To enter residence without warrant must have probable cause to believe a crime was being committed (not had been committed) or a belief that a person’s health and well being was in danger. I guess they could make an argument that they were doing the former but I’d take my chances with that if I were defense counsel. If family had just refused to answer door and announced that no one in the house was injured or in need of medical attention, it would have been the better move.

  • [-2] October 21, 2016 at 12:23pm

    warrantless entry into a residence is only allowed to prevent a crime from being committed or to assess the health and well being of an occupent. Since cops had no probable cause that a crime was being committed (they only had evidence that a crime had been committed) the only argument they could make was that based on the nature of the car and the fact the car was registered to a particular person they could investigate and assess the well being of that individual. Doesn’t look like that’s what they tried to do that here. Argument could be made but if residents had just refused to open door it would have been the smarter move. Remember article has no information showing witness observing a particular person driving the vehicle.

  • [4] October 21, 2016 at 10:45am

    Sorry, read that comment and it didn’t come out like I wanted. I was focusing on actions of police and mom and son prior to everyone coming out of the house and attacking cops. Everything after that is completely ********.

  • [-18] October 21, 2016 at 10:43am

    The mom and kid should have been respectful, but the officers had no warrant to enter property so that refusal is legitimate.

    Responses (7) +
  • [-2] October 20, 2016 at 12:42pm

    How dare you disparage the integrity of WikiLeaks. They are infallible. For shame.

    Responses (1) +
  • [5] October 20, 2016 at 7:14am

    I love how a vast minority of people start using “we the people” to sound more legitimate when espousing conspiracy theories.

  • October 19, 2016 at 8:47pm

    So do we belive this and believe Trump’s accuser, or not believe either? Or do put on Trump blinders and belive this but not Trump’s accuser?

  • [8] October 19, 2016 at 11:14am

    Honor and integrity, from a swing state and happens to be a minority. Glad we didn’t pick this guy.

  • [-2] October 18, 2016 at 9:40pm

    Exception to hearsay rule is when the statement is from a party opponent.

  • [8] October 18, 2016 at 11:59am

    “Critically injured 2-year old” should not be a throwaway sentence in the middle of the story. Maybe after telling us that the officers are okay you spend another sentence or two to let us know how the little boy is doing?

    Responses (1) +
  • [3] October 17, 2016 at 8:39pm

    You want journalists hacking private citizens Gmail accounts?

    Responses (2) +
  • [3] October 16, 2016 at 9:22am

    Sarge: Ha, no I didnt. But actually every other article except for blaze had the ammonium nitrate thing in it. Apparently the undercover agent posed as the supplier.

  • [3] October 16, 2016 at 7:49am

    Stopping a guy from walking into a club with a gun is pretty difficult. When someone is trying to buy large amounts of ammonium nitrate, ya that might raise a few more flags.

    Responses (2) +
  • [2] October 16, 2016 at 7:44am

    They go that long so they can no every facet of the operation, get all their contacts, build up fool proof evidence and show it wasn’t entrapment. Defenses have won verdicts in the past when they stopped the plot earlier because there hadn’t been “a substantial step” in actually carrying out the attacks. So they usually wait until they can meet that standard. Also, feds don’t like to lose trials and don’t take chances so they wait until they have a sure thing before they arrest.

  • [-1] October 15, 2016 at 10:23pm

    Okay over/under on old white people hanging around polling places claiming that the same minority voted multiple times when in fact it was different people of the same ethnic background with their excuse being “they all look alike”? I’m putting the line at 8.

    Responses (1) +
  • [11] October 15, 2016 at 10:20pm

    Rock solid proof there buddy.

  • [-1] October 15, 2016 at 7:22am

    If the DNC steals elections. How did 2000 Bush v. Gore happen? Or are we supposed to ignore that because it doesn’t fit into our victim/martyr narrative?

    Responses (2) +
  • [-3] October 14, 2016 at 8:54pm

    They’re the only Republicans to win a presidential election in the last 30 years, but ya sure, they’re worthless.

    Responses (2) +
  • [11] October 14, 2016 at 5:32pm

    Trump is letting Hilary win because of his idiocy. But then again he’s not really a Republican, is he?

  • [9] October 14, 2016 at 4:34pm

    I was gonna say: “Let me put on my shocked face.” But that guy is worn out.

    Responses (1) +
123 To page: Go