User Profile: MoDem


Member Since: September 30, 2011


123 To page: Go
  • [4] February 6, 2016 at 1:17am

    Let’s try to be nice to Mrs. Bush. She’s a good person who loves her country, her husband and her children. She’s lived long enough to say what she wants to say and have my respect for it.

    Responses (1) +
  • [6] February 5, 2016 at 7:01am

    Ahh, government regulation of a private industry. How conservative.

    Responses (2) +
  • [1] February 3, 2016 at 9:21am

    They can send them back to the donors, but they are also allowed to shift them over to another person’s campaign who’s running for president. He could also keep the money for his next presidential run. I don’t know for sure, but i don’t think he can use it for his senate campaign, unless there was some language in the contribution forms that allowed it.

    Responses (2) +
  • [-6] February 2, 2016 at 8:42pm

    He handed out 20,000 tickets and 5k showed up. That’s 25%, take out the protesters and lookie loos and he’s pulling under 20%.

  • [10] January 29, 2016 at 9:53am

    Probable cause was the arrest warrant signed by a Federal Judge for crimes related to the occupation of government land.

  • [1] January 28, 2016 at 5:35pm

    If he’s in control of the not-for-profit then he can doctor the numbers to make it look like he raised a huge amount of money for Vets on this night, even if the event is a bust as far as donations. If it was directly going to a separate third-party not-for-profit vet group, it wouldn’t be as easy to manipulate the numbers.

    Clever Trump, always takes care to make sure he doesn’t ever look like a failure.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] January 28, 2016 at 8:44am

    Since when is running and hiding behind wounded veterans “having a pair”?

  • January 28, 2016 at 8:41am

    Last Fox News debate had 24 million viewers. According to Greta’s poll 17% of the people will watch the debate. Currently there are around 300 million people in the U.S. If 17% is accurate that means 51 million people will watch the debate. Math is fun.

  • [-1] January 27, 2016 at 9:11am

    She was announced as moderator months ago. Trump is using this as a smokescreen because he thinks the debate can only hurt his chances in Iowa.

  • [3] January 27, 2016 at 9:10am

    wigone, having conversations with yourself is a troubling sign. You should get that checked out. Also, the choice isn’t between Trump and Clinton. I would choose the 5 other serious republican candidates over Trump any day of the week. They don’t run when things get tough.

  • January 25, 2016 at 3:53pm

    How can this guy meet the needs of the children in his care through the foster system, if he’s in another state? Wouldn’t it be reasonable for the children to be removed from his care if he’s not providing what he signed up to provide?

    Responses (4) +
  • [1] January 25, 2016 at 3:51pm

    Do you equally feel that people who believe the seditionists should do some research and prove the allegations they’ve made?

  • [2] January 16, 2016 at 10:52am

    He is a natural born citizen because by the virtue if his birth he was an American citizen and did not have to be naturalized.

    Anyway, Trump always claims that he has the “best attorneys in the world”. They looked at it in September and said there was no issue and Cruz was eligible. What changed? Is Trump saying his own attorneys are wrong? Or in reality is Trump so petty that he doesn’t care what the truth is?

    Responses (6) +
  • [5] January 14, 2016 at 10:45pm

    Trump offered Cruz the VP spot? He has to know that if he thinks Cruz isn’t eligible for president then he isn’t eligible for VP right? He has to. He can’t be that dumb right? That would be ridiculously dumb.

    Responses (4) +
  • [11] January 14, 2016 at 3:56pm

    I don’t believe for one second that if you run a plate it will come back a “UNDERCOVER FBI AGENT” SHHHHH, IT’S A SECRET.

  • [-1] January 10, 2016 at 2:26pm

    Explain where you find here that this bill gave illegals public funds. All it did was charge the kids in-state prices as opposed to out if state prices.

  • [8] January 7, 2016 at 11:51am

    My Freshman year in college i played on a tennis team with some Moroccans who were Muslim. This was before 9-11 so tensions weren’t high and discussing religion was no big deal. From their perspective they worship the same God, but believe that Christians were wrong and that Jesus was not the prophet the Old Testament spoke about, Muhammad was. They also don’t agree with our belief in the God is both 1 and 3 concept which raises Jesus up as more than just the son of God but also Gog himself. (FYI, this was hotly contested in the early Church and after a big meeting the Books of the New Testament that didn’t follow the 1 and 3 concept were destroyed.)

    I won’t assume that these 4 Muslims had a monopoly on the Muslim belief tenets, but it was how they described it to me.

    FYI, when talking to Moroccans, don’t refer to the French as “their former employers”, not even as a joke. They don’t like it.

  • [1] January 4, 2016 at 4:48pm

    Sigh…Would Beck please cite the federal statute the Judge violated and what that statute proscribes as the possible punishment?

    Responses (1) +
  • January 3, 2016 at 1:38pm

    Winston, not citing CNN for veracity. It’s all the same AP article, CNN just had the whole one with the part about the government’s evidence. It bugs me when blaze edits certain portions of articles out. Regardless of the issue I’d like to be fully informed on what each sides position is so I can make an informed decision about what I think is right. The additional sentence is the worst part of this. What it sounds like was that the Judge tried to impose a sentence he thought was right but that the federal law they were con c cited had a mandatory minimum sentence on it so the Judge had no jurisdictional authority to impose a lesser sentence. Bundy’s have seized a federal building. They are in the wrong and have broken a ridiculous amount federal laws. They literally took up arms against the U.S.A. and have taken our land. Taking it back with any amount of force is 100% justified.

    Responses (1) +
  • [6] January 3, 2016 at 11:50am

    CNN article has full story, including what government’s evidence was. They had an eye witness who saw Hammonds kill at least 7 deer on federal land without a permit. Then a relative of Hammonds testified that they set the fire to cover up the improper killing of the deer. Fire burned through 130 acres and shut down use of the area to all other permitted ranchers for 2 years. Trier of Fact believed government’s evidence over the Hammonds, they got there day in court and lost. Bundy believes the government shouldn’t exist and therefore shouldn’t own land. They believe they should be able to use all land, even if they don’t own it, for their benefit to the exclusion of all others.

    Responses (5) +
123 To page: Go
Restoring Love