“The results may or may not surprise you.” Since when did The Blaze hire the Captain Obvious guy from their Captain Morgan commercials to right their headlines? Those are the only two reactions to a pole.
While I agree that the headline is stupid, I would humbly suggest that before someone criticizes someone else's writing, they should learn how to spell "write" before writing it.
lots of laughs watching the libs in here talk about anything but Hillary’s
whopping 12% of voters that would vote for this hag
the type of poll mslsd is talking about is NOT spelled P-O-L-E.
 April 15, 2015 at 11:43am
Because my wife’s a CPA. student loans don’t pay themselves.
I'd give it a few more years. I'm sure Hillary is entertaining student loan amnesty for more votes. Her staff is probably calculating the numbers of votes as we speak.
Then she can find work doing actual accounting?
There are other uses for accountants than tax work. The vast bulk of accounting systems can adapt to any tax structure. Working for a company they need people to manage their books, their profits, losses, costs, cost accounting, investments, etc etc...
Hey, I understand, worked plenty on taxes in my professional career, Even more reason to abolish the IRS,
Been waiting for someone to finally say this.
I believe this is the main reason everyone ignores the flat tax idea. A flat tax would instantly remove hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of jobs from the economy.
That's a completely acceptable unintended consequence if you ask me, but I'm sure most CPA's would disagree.
The industry should have never existed in the first place. People that are smart enough to earn their CPA can perform other job functions. Life will suck for them for a time, but eventually it will work itself out.
Abolish the IRS, and move to a flat/fair tax.
 April 10, 2015 at 3:42pm
Joe, it is not a lawful order to ask me to exit my car unless I am being arrested. So your saying that I should ignore my constitutional rights just so a cop doesn’t tase me. How about we teach the cops to calm their s*** and follow the law?
 April 1, 2015 at 12:47pm
How do you know the kids did not have the right of way? Then after the kids got across the road, the guy could have driven off but chose to follow them and continue the altercation. Then he decided to retrieve a gun and threaten their lives. But sure, you’re right, its all the kids fault.
 April 1, 2015 at 12:45pm
You’re assuming the kids were not in a crosswalk and did not have the right of way. Not saying you’re not right, but that’s not contained in this article.
 March 19, 2015 at 4:38pm
/sarcasm on/ You know what I hate… Gays destroying the sanctity of marriage. /sarcasm off/.
 March 13, 2015 at 6:18pm
I didn’t watch the show. Did Mr. Beck ever say what Mr. Norquist, published, said or did that leads him to believe he enables the Muslim Brotherhood? The article contains vague statements but no specifics.
Sorry, I’m from Missouri, the “Show Me” state. Can’t make a decision on whose right or wrong without facts and if your willing to throw down the gauntlet like Mr. Beck just did, I hope he has the facts to back it up.
It was gaffney, not beck. And you tube would be glad to show you.
"...DIDN'T WATCH..." first-hand info?? ....relied on PROGGYMSM-SECONDHAND SMOKESCREEN??
Need to work on your possessive pronoun usage. Should be who's and you're, not whose and your. No offense . . .
 March 11, 2015 at 3:35pm
A parenting plan in a domestic case is when the parents sign an agreement on how a child will be raised. Upon reading other articles it looks like mom and dad signed the parenting plan in the original paternity case saying that the kid would be circumcised, then mom found some b.s. online about it being dangerous, no she is trying to back out of the agreement. Dad sued and won the case and she absconded with the kid. This is not government overreach, this is government enforcing contractual obligations on the part of both parties.
Believe me it is more painful to get a circumcision at age 22 (like me) than newborn or even 4 (like this guy) and if she had lived up to her agreements in 2012 the kid wouldn’t even remember it by now.
I agree, if she signed an agreement, she's at fault here.
I can't believe all the people jumping the gun to say this is judicial overreach. No, no it's not. Enforcing contracts and mediating parental disputes is exactly what judges are supposed to do.
ok if mom agreed to it and signed a contract she should have done it then. but the child is now four shouldn't he have a say in the matter. at 22 it probably did hurt but there are many injury's we suffer in life that also hurt and luckily we heal and the pain goes away. I guess I am just on the side of the kid especially if it wasn't done at birth.
[-5] March 3, 2015 at 5:30pm
Did anyone in Sharpstown, TX even watch Robocop and absorb its lessons?
Monk. Most likely they have done studies and decided that danger to an employee is greater outside the store than inside. They then run the numbers to determine what percentage of the time an employee would be hurt/killed attempting to stop someone outside the store and add up the costs of worker’s comp and lawsuits from heirs of employees they would get when the employee is hurt/killed. After that they compare that number to the average amount stolen from a Walmart in a given year and there’s your answer as to what they will do. Walmart is a large Corp., it has no soul or feelings, therefore its actions and procedures are determined by $$$ only.
 February 4, 2015 at 5:29pm
Measles vaccine is 97% effective. We rely on herd immunity to protect the 3 percent.
[-3] February 4, 2015 at 4:56pm
Right now the kids are in the physical and legal custody of Children’s Services. So they have every ability to vaccinate the children. Also, it is highly likely that these kids may be placed in a home with other children which are in Children Services’ custody. So they would have the duty to protect those children as well from unvaccinated children.
The more pragmatic course of action would be to wait until the TPR is finished and then have the kids vaccinated because then the parents would have no rights left regarding the children.
The parents have not lost their parental rights yet. If/when they do, their legal guardian can take care of that detail.
If Children's Services is concerned that they may already have custody of some infectious kids from outside the border ( or otherwise ), then they should take care to keep these un-vaccinated kids segregated and not dump them into a general population. If they get custody, it's their call. Until then, it's not.
Sounds like the parents are no angels, but rights are rights and can't be waived ' just because'. The State must show evidence and give grounds for terminating parental rights and go through the courts. They can't just assume that the parents rights have already been terminated because they want to do it.
So they would have the duty to protect those children as well from unvaccinated children.
Excuse me, but why would healthy vaccinated kids need to be protected
from healthy un-vaccinated kids?
Even if one of the un-vaccinated kids got sick...
the other kids are already vaccinated and thus protected if they get exposed.
(Hint: that's what vaccines are for.)
 February 3, 2015 at 9:54am
I agree with the other random comments in the middle of the scripture lesson comments. People need to chill the f out. It’s a carnival cruise line commercial.
Also, I don’t believe that the concepts of evolution and religion are mutually exclusive, so maybe that’s why I don’t think its such a big deal.
 January 29, 2015 at 4:49pm
A person has the right to refuse to voluntarily provide information to an officer, that includes standing still while he takes your picture. So, if an officer says “hold still so I can take your picture”, while not being under arrest, you are being “detained” which has a similar legal effect. If you are being detained then you have a right to have counsel present and to refuse to cooperate. Now, that doesn’t mean a cop can’t take your picture, (you are in a public place after all) but he can’t force you to hold still while he does it.
Agree ranger. There is a caveat for life of the mother. Eptopic pregnancies occur and in that situation no one makes it if the pregnancy is not terminated. I went to a Catholic University and the rule of thumb the professor taught was “Whatever action which will lead to the creation of more Catholic babies is usually where the Church goes.” When the life of the mother is threatened they would be okay with abortion because the mother could always have more babies later.
I think goldencomando is combining a State prosecution of a DWI charge and the administrative action of taking a license because of a refusal. In every state in the union a person if arrested upon probable cause to believe they have committed a traffic related offense while under the influence and then refuses to provide a breath sample loses their license for one year. You can get a hardship which is why I think he brings up the 7 month thing. The reason they can do this is because driving is a privilege and not a right, which is also the reason it is “probable cause” rather than “beyond a reasonable doubt”. The son would have had an opportunity to fight the refusal determination by administrative hearing and could have appealed an adverse ruling to a County Judge.
This administrative action has zero connection with the a DWI charge brought by a county or municipal prosecutor. I would be interested in what happened with that charge given these facts.
 December 11, 2014 at 12:04pm
The stupidest part is that you don’t even have to pray. One option is to thank the chef who prepared your meal.
[-2] December 8, 2014 at 12:38pm
Gas prices were $1.89 but the dow was trading at 7,000 or so at the time. The fact that gas is $2.40 (where I live) and the dow is trading at close to 18,000 is more impressive.
Also, no President cannot take credit for the majority of oil prices since most of the global supply/demand is set by OPEC. But that won’t stop Presidents on both sides of the aisle of both taking credit and placing blame on others for gas prices.