User Profile: MoDem


Member Since: September 30, 2011


123 To page: Go
  • [-1] July 19, 2016 at 11:02am

    Rock. When you vote, you vote for someone. Not against someone. You’re saying, this person represents me and will be my voice. Neither Trump, nor Clinton fit that bill for me. This secondary consequences b.s. detracts from what voting really is about.

  • July 14, 2016 at 9:54am

    That metaphor is so labored it gave birth.

  • [1] July 6, 2016 at 9:36am

    I bet maybe 1% of the people who blasted her actually abide by every single flag code. Sactimonious jerks.

    Responses (2) +
  • [-1] July 5, 2016 at 9:32am

    Reading between the lines, it appears the cops are trying to sat that a guy shot off a homemade firework, it didn’t explode when launched. Then whoever shot it didn’t pick up or dispose of the device, either not being able to find it or believing it was a dud. Then some time later a person steps on it and the pressure causes the explosion.

    I don’t believe this is what you would call an IED or a typical terrorist bomb. They usually would have shrapnel or something to shoot out upon explosion to cause mass casualty.

  • [-1] June 30, 2016 at 2:30pm

    Did you see the story about the U.S. Airstrikes, authorized by Obama, that took out an ISIS convoy and killed 250 ISIS fighters? If Obama is a Muslim sympathizer he’s really bad at it.

  • [47] June 14, 2016 at 10:44am

    So people supporting a candidate who says that we should discriminate based on religion and countries of origin say they should be discriminated against based on whom they support.

    You’re either for discrimination or against it.

    Responses (10) +
  • [12] May 25, 2016 at 1:43pm

    First two trials were guilty verdicts that were overturned on appeal. Third was a mistrial. Fourth was the only one that was a not-guilty verdict. Hardly prosecutorial misconduct.

  • [10] May 23, 2016 at 5:58pm

    This is an easy move for Trump. 1. If it is terrorism, he’s right. 2. If it wasn’t terrorism, he can talk about how there’s a liberal conspiracy to cover up the truth and a larger portion of the country is so distrustful they’ll believe it.

    The public trust is so low and the bad information on facebook and other b.s. blogs is so prevalent that you can always claim it’s terrorism and you’ll never be wrong.

    Responses (2) +
  • May 19, 2016 at 9:42am

    Did Trump tweet out his prayers to the families affected, or just the tween in this article?

  • [1] May 19, 2016 at 9:37am

    Sarge, I think the point is that Trump is implying that if he were in charge he would have stopped it. How, do you think he would do that? Especially given that this attack (unconfirmed) would have been organized on foreign soil and carried out on a foreign plane over foreign lands. How exactly is a U.S. President supposed to stop that?

  • [2] May 10, 2016 at 9:13am

    How would they write the law? Statute _____: “No muslim shall be allowed to enter the United States, unless Donald Trump says it’s okay. Heil Donald!”

    Responses (2) +
  • [10] May 9, 2016 at 9:29am

    You’re right. Democrat Congress, Democrat President…… and Democrat Trump! (at the time)

    Responses (1) +
  • [6] May 4, 2016 at 12:21pm

    Seriously guy, how the f— is it “stealing votes” you try to get someone to vote for someone other than trump and somehow its “stealing”?

    Responses (1) +
  • [20] May 4, 2016 at 12:20pm

    You might have to change your name. 16yrsofhell.

    Responses (1) +
  • [3] April 27, 2016 at 10:03am

    The Democrat and Republican Parties are not government institutions, they are private. They can do whatever they want. You have 0 right to vote for whom a private institution decides to put forth as their candidate for President. The fact that they’ve set up a primary system is out of their belief that it benefits them, rather than a legal requirement.

  • [6] April 20, 2016 at 9:19am

    What’s funny is how many people think you have the right to vote when the Republican Party is a private entity, not a government one.

    The Republican Party, as a private institution, can come up with whatever system they want to select who they will put forward as their candidate for President.

    The primary season is less about voting and more about advertising and building momentum.

  • [9] April 20, 2016 at 9:17am

    What’s funny is that you think you have the right to vote when the Republican Party is a private entity, not a government one.

    The Republican Party, as a private institution, can come up with whatever system they want to select who they will put forward as their candidate for President.

  • [-7] April 14, 2016 at 5:22pm

    Not really applicable since a German Shepard does not have a manufacturer. However, if your German Shepard kills someone, you can be sued for it.

  • [-4] April 10, 2016 at 5:48pm

    This comment is fear mongering on Becks part. Contested conventions happen and none them have doomed the GOP yet. Not even the one in 1920 when the two front runners hated each other but neither secured enough delegates to win on first ballot. Their two camps couldn’t come together because of the vitriol and that opens the door for a guy to win the nomination who had only won one state primary, Ohio. The people didn’t feel betrayed and that candidate won the general on a landslide. Does this sound familiar?

    Responses (2) +
  • [3] April 6, 2016 at 9:39am

    JP. Rubio isn’t saving them for anyone. Rubio knows that after the first vote the delegates will move away from Trump in droves. He just needs to hold onto his through the first ballot,then after that they’re unbound and will go where they want.

123 To page: Go