User Profile: MoDem


Member Since: September 30, 2011


  • [1] April 15, 2015 at 3:52pm

    “The results may or may not surprise you.” Since when did The Blaze hire the Captain Obvious guy from their Captain Morgan commercials to right their headlines? Those are the only two reactions to a pole.

    Responses (2) +
  • [5] April 15, 2015 at 11:43am

    Because my wife’s a CPA. student loans don’t pay themselves.

    Responses (5) +
  • [9] April 10, 2015 at 3:42pm

    Joe, it is not a lawful order to ask me to exit my car unless I am being arrested. So your saying that I should ignore my constitutional rights just so a cop doesn’t tase me. How about we teach the cops to calm their s*** and follow the law?

  • [10] April 1, 2015 at 12:47pm

    How do you know the kids did not have the right of way? Then after the kids got across the road, the guy could have driven off but chose to follow them and continue the altercation. Then he decided to retrieve a gun and threaten their lives. But sure, you’re right, its all the kids fault.

  • [4] April 1, 2015 at 12:45pm

    You’re assuming the kids were not in a crosswalk and did not have the right of way. Not saying you’re not right, but that’s not contained in this article.

  • [2] March 19, 2015 at 4:38pm

    /sarcasm on/ You know what I hate… Gays destroying the sanctity of marriage. /sarcasm off/.

  • [7] March 13, 2015 at 6:18pm

    I didn’t watch the show. Did Mr. Beck ever say what Mr. Norquist, published, said or did that leads him to believe he enables the Muslim Brotherhood? The article contains vague statements but no specifics.

    Sorry, I’m from Missouri, the “Show Me” state. Can’t make a decision on whose right or wrong without facts and if your willing to throw down the gauntlet like Mr. Beck just did, I hope he has the facts to back it up.

    Responses (3) +
  • [12] March 11, 2015 at 3:35pm

    A parenting plan in a domestic case is when the parents sign an agreement on how a child will be raised. Upon reading other articles it looks like mom and dad signed the parenting plan in the original paternity case saying that the kid would be circumcised, then mom found some b.s. online about it being dangerous, no she is trying to back out of the agreement. Dad sued and won the case and she absconded with the kid. This is not government overreach, this is government enforcing contractual obligations on the part of both parties.

    Believe me it is more painful to get a circumcision at age 22 (like me) than newborn or even 4 (like this guy) and if she had lived up to her agreements in 2012 the kid wouldn’t even remember it by now.

    Responses (3) +
  • [-5] March 3, 2015 at 5:30pm

    Did anyone in Sharpstown, TX even watch Robocop and absorb its lessons?

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] February 6, 2015 at 5:24pm

    Monk. Most likely they have done studies and decided that danger to an employee is greater outside the store than inside. They then run the numbers to determine what percentage of the time an employee would be hurt/killed attempting to stop someone outside the store and add up the costs of worker’s comp and lawsuits from heirs of employees they would get when the employee is hurt/killed. After that they compare that number to the average amount stolen from a Walmart in a given year and there’s your answer as to what they will do. Walmart is a large Corp., it has no soul or feelings, therefore its actions and procedures are determined by $$$ only.

  • [4] February 4, 2015 at 5:29pm

    Measles vaccine is 97% effective. We rely on herd immunity to protect the 3 percent.

  • [-3] February 4, 2015 at 4:56pm

    Right now the kids are in the physical and legal custody of Children’s Services. So they have every ability to vaccinate the children. Also, it is highly likely that these kids may be placed in a home with other children which are in Children Services’ custody. So they would have the duty to protect those children as well from unvaccinated children.

    The more pragmatic course of action would be to wait until the TPR is finished and then have the kids vaccinated because then the parents would have no rights left regarding the children.

    Responses (2) +
  • [1] February 3, 2015 at 9:54am

    I agree with the other random comments in the middle of the scripture lesson comments. People need to chill the f out. It’s a carnival cruise line commercial.

    Also, I don’t believe that the concepts of evolution and religion are mutually exclusive, so maybe that’s why I don’t think its such a big deal.

  • [11] January 29, 2015 at 4:49pm

    A person has the right to refuse to voluntarily provide information to an officer, that includes standing still while he takes your picture. So, if an officer says “hold still so I can take your picture”, while not being under arrest, you are being “detained” which has a similar legal effect. If you are being detained then you have a right to have counsel present and to refuse to cooperate. Now, that doesn’t mean a cop can’t take your picture, (you are in a public place after all) but he can’t force you to hold still while he does it.

    Responses (2) +
  • [4] January 23, 2015 at 12:44pm

    Agree ranger. There is a caveat for life of the mother. Eptopic pregnancies occur and in that situation no one makes it if the pregnancy is not terminated. I went to a Catholic University and the rule of thumb the professor taught was “Whatever action which will lead to the creation of more Catholic babies is usually where the Church goes.” When the life of the mother is threatened they would be okay with abortion because the mother could always have more babies later.

    Responses (1) +
  • [9] January 6, 2015 at 8:36am

    Lawyer vs. Blowhard. Lawyer wins.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] January 5, 2015 at 9:16am

    Why on earth would a rocket need surgery?

  • January 5, 2015 at 9:15am

    I think goldencomando is combining a State prosecution of a DWI charge and the administrative action of taking a license because of a refusal. In every state in the union a person if arrested upon probable cause to believe they have committed a traffic related offense while under the influence and then refuses to provide a breath sample loses their license for one year. You can get a hardship which is why I think he brings up the 7 month thing. The reason they can do this is because driving is a privilege and not a right, which is also the reason it is “probable cause” rather than “beyond a reasonable doubt”. The son would have had an opportunity to fight the refusal determination by administrative hearing and could have appealed an adverse ruling to a County Judge.

    This administrative action has zero connection with the a DWI charge brought by a county or municipal prosecutor. I would be interested in what happened with that charge given these facts.

  • [5] December 11, 2014 at 12:04pm

    The stupidest part is that you don’t even have to pray. One option is to thank the chef who prepared your meal.

  • [-2] December 8, 2014 at 12:38pm

    Gas prices were $1.89 but the dow was trading at 7,000 or so at the time. The fact that gas is $2.40 (where I live) and the dow is trading at close to 18,000 is more impressive.

    Also, no President cannot take credit for the majority of oil prices since most of the global supply/demand is set by OPEC. But that won’t stop Presidents on both sides of the aisle of both taking credit and placing blame on others for gas prices.

Restoring Love