User Profile: Mr_D


Member Since: September 23, 2010


  • [1] February 18, 2016 at 6:41pm

    As a person with prior access, I find Sen Rubio’s obvious acknowledgment of Sen Cruz’s disclosure of “possible” classified information in the earlier debate 4 inexcusable. I find it hard to believe it isn’t more widely reported.

    Even if what Sen Cruz spoke of was NOT classified, Sen Rubio highlighted it (as if he thought it WAS) and, thus, make it worse. Regulations demand that disclosed and publicized classified data NOT be acknowledged. Rubio did so in a fit of anger.

    Rubio rightly says that Hillary isn’t qualified to be commander in chief after her email disclosures, and in the same manner, Rubio would also be disqualified.

  • [1] February 16, 2016 at 8:31am

    The future President will take an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States.

    If TRUMP actually believes that CRUZ is unqualified, this oath requires he defend it. Why should he wait until/ or if he is elected? I believe, he is obligated to take any legal means possible, including filing suit.

    TRUMP should not use this birther issue as a threat to force a personal apology from CRUZ. Rather he should show he will support a Presidential oath and file suit now to defend the republic.

  • [2] January 8, 2016 at 7:53am

    She did a great job. Unilaterally disarming is just what Obama is doing on the nuclear side, too.

    A few comments on the show.

    Obama doesn’t care about victims. He doesn’t know their names. He even called Gabby Giffords, Gabby Gifford during the CNN town hall.

    To make school children and the staff more secure, permit weapons on campus. Permit concealed carry holders to carry on campus. Hire armed undercover security officers. Pres Obama’s children are accompanied by an armed secret service detail having both semiautomatic and probably fully automatic weapons (submachine guns). Why are the President’s children more valuable than the children of everyday Americans?

    Since the 2nd Amendment is at the Federal level, why are all Federal buildings gun free zones? American’s rights are certainly being infringed at the Federal level even though the Amendment is at the Federal level.

  • January 4, 2016 at 1:10pm

    Analogous to yelling “Fire” in a crowded theater, Hillery personally incited a terrorist organization to produce a propaganda recruitment video using Donald Trump. “What difference does it make?” I guess it IS all about the video. She should ask Al Shabab for consulting fees.

    Since she has personally aided the enemy, how can she ever become the Commander in Chief of the US military?

  • December 15, 2015 at 7:54am

    The alleged, “most transparent administration” is again becoming discolored. The dark shades of Benghazi are coming to light. The Dept of State and DHS are in charge.

    Administration officials, including the FBI, took an oath to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. They cannot defend the Constitution and not fully defend “We The People..” US citizens must take priority over these Afghan soldiers who conspired to leave their duty and THEIR country behind.

    Prioritizing Afghan soldiers who violated their agreements by concealing their identities that would permit capture is inexcusable. How can we “say something if we see something” when government officials won’t give the citizens the information to do so.

    They trust Afghan soldiers who have demonstrated they cannot be trusted more than than US citizens. I expected the Dept of State to do this but I expected more from the FBI Director Comey after seeing him on 60 Minutes.

  • [1] December 11, 2015 at 7:30am

    There IS an attempt to divert attention away from failed leadership……. Bergdahl’s.

    Army Regulation 600-100, describes leadership and Army values. This regulation focuses on leaders at all levels and in all cohorts: officers, warrant officers, noncommissioned officers, Soldiers [i.e Bergdahl], and
    DA civilians.

    “Leaders must be competent, full spectrum warfighters, and professionals who understand the strategic implications of their actions, behaviors, and decisions on Army, Department of Defense (DOD), and national objectives. They must understand that failure to act can impede operational progress by delaying development and delivery of required resources, through increased anti-American sentiment and enemy resistance, and by strengthening the appeal of ideas propagated by U.S. adversaries. (1-4f)

    Bergdahl “successfully failed” to comply with every single one: loyalty, duty, respect, selfless service, honor, integrity, and personal courage.

    He must be court martialed. If the Army accepts an Article 15, Nonjudicial Punishment. It’s a further slap in the face to all active duty and vets.

  • [3] November 20, 2015 at 5:27pm

    The left is beating up Trump about a comment he did not make about making a database to track Syrian (and other foreign) refugees (of which some MUST be terrorist sleeper). These same “Americans” have no problem supporting a US gun database of law-abiding and previously background checked United States citizens and gun owners and, thus, tracking Americans.

    Statistics confirm, background checked gun owners commit much less crime than non-gun owners.

  • [1] October 13, 2015 at 4:55pm

    “Unplanned Parenthood” has not gone far enough.

    To remove all conflicts of interest (and perceptions), the use of any “cells, waste, medical byproducts, bio-waste, etc…) for any use, even “research” should be illegal. Only then, will all conflicts of interest be eliminated.

    Abortions can still be performed, but there will no longer be any incentives (even if not paid) that may encouraging abortions. We can conduct medical research without becoming like the Germans of WWII.

  • October 11, 2015 at 8:46am

    Ford pardoned, the “…I am not a crook…” Nixon. Carter pardoned thousands of Vietnam draft dodgers.

  • [4] October 10, 2015 at 6:18pm

    Carter, a democrat, pardoned all the Vietnam draft dodgers who fled their duty so others could die in Nam. Their selfish actions got rewarded.

    Now Obama, also a democrat, as Commander in Chief, steered the military to go easy on a person who did not meet his commitment to defend the constitution of the United States. Berg.. was a voluntary POW by leaving the safety of his compound. He’ll get POW benefits for life (and even a license plate) that are awarded to those honorable soldiers like Jessica Lynch who was captured against her will. Voluntary POWs should get NOTHING from the taxpayers. Just like during Vietnam, Berg..’s selfish actions are being rewarded. Vote Democrat??

    What does this say to others in the military who took the same oath??

    Responses (3) +
  • October 1, 2015 at 7:58am

    Russia’s Putin is thumbing his nose at Obama and his policy of arming the moderate rebels against Assad. Putin’s first attack was not to attack ISIS, but to take out our allies in the ISIS-free area of Syria.

    Putin knows Obama and will only deliver a deadly speech against Russian’s continued aggression. (Review Obama’s “Just words” speech.)

    Putin knows that Obama is just a “paper kitten”, not a tiger.

  • [6] September 29, 2015 at 10:08am

    With his comments on not supporting an Islamic United States president, Carson has demonstrated that he is the only one of the candidates that will stand behind a president’s oath that ends, “…will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

    All candidates who disagree are disqualified to hold the office of president of the United States of America.

  • September 20, 2015 at 5:23pm

    So some say Bergdahl is going to “claim” he was high when he was “captured”.. so the “capture” it was inadvertent… . Maybe that’s why he was present at a California marijuana farm when they busted the place this summer?? It seemed VERY strange that he would do this. It seems like a planned action to draw attention away from his desertion charge.

  • [2] September 1, 2015 at 8:51am

    “State Department spokesman Mark Toner said Monday none of the information censored in Monday’s release was identified as classified when the emails were sent or received by Clinton, noting the redactions were made and only prior to the release of the emails under the Freedom of Information Act.”

    Clinton’s emails were “subsequently classified”. This gives the impression that they were not classified when sent and received but now are after later classification guidance was written.

    The media should ask for the date(s) of the document(s) that are the basis for the “subsequent classification”, the Security Classification Guides. If they were “subsequently classified” by an “original classification authority” (like Hillary was said to be) who was that person(s). Obama is an “original classification authority” and can delegated authority to others who are trained.. If Hillary was an OCA, she was so trained, and deemed knowledgeable and competent.

    The documents and and provides details on classification and OCA’s. Classifying information just to conceal violations of law, inefficiency, or administrative error or prevent embarrassment to a person, organization, or agency is illegal, according to Obama’s executive order.

  • June 3, 2015 at 9:24am

    How will these private corporations pay to store and retain the immense quantities of data that the government had to build the Utah data center to maintain? The power requirements of this center is huge.

    It just doesn’t seem that the private corporations have the technical resources and financial means to store this data. This just doesn’t add up.

  • [4] May 16, 2015 at 8:47am

    Z was not directly hit so the bullet did not go perpendicular to the vehicle’s path. West, Z’s attorney, said that Z was injured from the windshield. If that is accurate, that would indicate a trajectory that came from behind, a shot from the rear. Even IF Z started the confrontation, this trajectory would indicate Z was retreating… a shot to the back. In FL, it’s a 10/20 LIFE sentence upon conviction.

  • August 20, 2014 at 1:51pm

    When we trade an alleged deserter for five terrorists, we are negotiating with terrorists. It worked last time with Bergdahl. What did we expect?

    Now ISIL wants to negotiate.

  • [4] July 16, 2014 at 9:40am

    While we are doing this set up a sign up list of all illegal “immigration” supporters.

    They should post their names and addresses and permit anyone, any number, to enter their home any time, for any reason, and stay as long as they want. Let them all use your health care, credit cards and bank account. Let them live in the same house as your wife and kids. Finally, let them trash your home and then leave for somewhere else.

  • July 16, 2014 at 9:34am

    Those who truly support this illegal entry of “immigrants” through our open borders should post their names and addresses and permit anyone, any number, to enter their home any time, for any reason, and stay as long as they want. Let them all use your health care, credit cards and bank account. Let them live in the same house as your wife and kids. Finally, let them trash your home and then leave for somewhere else’s home on the list.

    That’s our nation’s immigration immigration policy on a small, “home-wide” scale.

  • [2] July 14, 2014 at 11:51am

    Send them to GITMO. It’s a documented part of their MISSION. “Installation Information

    Naval Station Guantanamo Bay, Cuba is on the front lines for regional security in the Caribbean area. The base supports the ability of U.S. Navy and Coast Guard ships, along with allied nation ships to operate in the Caribbean area by providing contingency and quality logistical support with superior services and facilities. >>>>>>>>>The base also supports the Department of Homeland Security in U.S. migrant operations to help care for displaced migrants from the surrounding area, effectively helping control the flow of illegal immigrants into the United States.”<<<<<<<<

Restoring Love