User Profile: Mr_D

Member Since: September 23, 2010


  • September 12, 2016 at 8:44am

    To the medical layman voter, it is clear that Hillary is not fully capable to function from either a physical or mental perspective. Mentally, she can’t remember things of critical importance. Those critical things that would help to clear her. Physically, she can’t even attend a 1.5 hour 911 ceremony without the assistance of a half dozen Secret Service personnel to carry her into her van. She lost complete muscle control.

    Also…. don’t forget that during one of the debates Hillary strangely disappeared ..”into the bathroom”. Based on the subsequent Hillary pattern of strange medical issues the layman voter should assume a physical or mental defect that she is desperately trying to hide from the voters.

    The voters need her complete medical records. If not, they should assume their assumptions about her are accurate and she if not fit for the 24/7 job of president of the USA.

  • [3] September 7, 2016 at 6:21pm

    Another clear way that we know she is lying is that every program has its own Security Classification Guide (SCG) that determines what is classified and what is unclassified. Things such as system capabilities and especially limitations are ALWAYS classified; If the enemy can gather this information, they’ll know how to defeat our systems.

    She is lying because many higher level programs have SCGs that are themselves CLASSIFIED. The guide includes portion markings within it. So… in order to properly classify using many SCGs, you MUST be aware of how to read classified markings.

  • [12] September 6, 2016 at 5:46pm

    As one, vets are concerned with protecting America.
    Some believe that Hillary does not understand that a paragraph beginning with a “(C)” is marked Confidential. Maybe we all should believe her. She is (C)NILE and, thus, unfit to serve

  • [3] September 2, 2016 at 7:13pm

    Like Obama and many other high level officials, Hillary is an Original Classification Authority (OCA). OCAs are trained and entrusted to originate classified information within their area of responsibility. She is also, like every other person with access, legally required to protect all other classified information, even if she didn’t originate it. The basis of performing this task is through classified markings, “(C)” or “(S)”, or “(TS)”, including associated codewords. Saying that you do not understand classified markings (as she formally did to the FBI) is admitting you do not know how to do your job. You, thus, cannot be afforded access to any classified… ever.
    Hillary’s “interview” with the FBI and her denial that she isn’t familiar with basic classified markings, i.e. “(C)” or “(S)”, or “(TS)” is laughable. It’s extremely dangerous to the country if she can’t even understand that “(C)” means Confidential and demands protection.
    She has FAILED, by her very admission. Either she is lying or she is incompetent. In any case, we can’t trust her with classified material, ever. Since the president requires daily access to classified, she does not qualify to be president and should step down and let her VP run in her place for the sake of the USA and the world.

    Responses (1) +
  • August 31, 2016 at 10:13am

    Here’s a thought.

    First secure the borders and require ALL illegals to self-identify. Second, deport all felony criminals, the worst first. Criminalize as a felony all those who don’t self-identify so they can be deported ASAP after they are found. Then pass Kate’s law to jail all those who reenter. Being compassionate, their children can stay if they are citizens, but the illegals must post a bond that guarantees they can financially support their children after they are deported. Or… they can take their children with them to their home countries, until their US citizen children are self sufficient.

    We don’t need more drug dealers. Obama has released even more, some who used firearms. Obama doesn’t care, he has lifetime Secret Service protection he signed into law during his administration. What about the rest of the 318 million Americans he is putting at risk. Castro did the same thing in the 1980′s.

  • [4] August 19, 2016 at 7:31pm

    Obama is more comfortable negotiating water hazards found on every golf course in the world or negotiating with terrorists than navigating the Louisiana water hazards caused by record floods.

  • [2] August 16, 2016 at 10:05pm

    In 1980, due to economic problems and internal tensions Fidel Castro had problems. So he exported many of his problems (released Cuban prisoners and even some from mental hospitals) and permitted them to “emigrate” with others to the US, sending them to the US during the Mariel Boatlift. He knew many of these “problem” Cuban “refugees” would degrade life in the US and make life for Castro easier. He didn’t care.

    Obama commuted sentences of many “low level” drug criminals some who even possessed firearms, releasing them to roam freely in the US. Plus, he also released more hard-core and hardened terrorists from GITMO. Many of these worst-of-the- worst will eventually return to the battlefield and terrorize innocent citizens here and abroad easily entering through Obama’s porous (open) border(s) policy.

    Castro thought he was was helping his country and hurting the US, who he considered its enemy. What’s Obama’s doing?

    In reply to the contribution Trump and Gitmo: Sheep Dog Ethics

  • [3] August 16, 2016 at 7:59pm

    As an Original Classification Authority Hillary is trained to ORIGINATE classified documents and what is classified and what is not. Her documents contained internal classified markings (other than the headers which can easily be removed for “convenience”).

    Why was no search done for the original classified documents and then a word for word comparison done to see what percentage these originally classified documents matched the “sanitized” documents residing on Clinton’s servers? That alone would clearly show INTENT.

    This reminds me of a song, “Don’t ask me any questions, and I won’t tell you any lies.” That is the new FBI theme song.

  • [10] August 16, 2016 at 7:48pm

    Let’s compare the two CRIMES.

    1. Saucier: later tried to get rid of the photos by destroying a laptop, camera and memory card,

    Clinton: Wiped wipe data (did not just “try”) from numerous electronic devices using sophisticated software that does not permit recovery. (Typical deletion of a file does not wipe the drives rather deletes pointers to the data segments.)

    Essentially equivalent crime, but Clinton succeeded.

    2. he [Saucier] “understood that he was not allowed to.”[ Photograph the photograph the entire propulsion system].

    Clinton: As an Original Classification Authority she is trained to originate classified documents and what is classified and what is not. Her documents contained classified markings (other than the headers which can easily be removed). Why was no search done for the original classified documents and a comparison done to see what percentage these classified documents matched the “sanitized” documents residing on Clinton’s server? That alone would clearly show INTENT.

    Both were trained as to the proper classification methods, so BOTH should be guilty. Only one was an OCA.

    3. Further, he [Saucier] showed them to his ex-wife and at least one other woman he lived with at the time.

    Clinton: By not following security protocols she was trained to do, she “showed” the documents to our enemies around the world.

    Both provided classified information to others. Clinton provided classified to our enemies from around the world.

  • [2] August 6, 2016 at 11:50am

    “But he said that it was “unprecedented for the FBI to show the kind of transparency” it did in discussing its investigation of Clinton and recommendation to prosecutors to forgo criminal charges.”

    Let’s assume Hillary is correct and she did not lie to the FBI. In fact, the FBI director, Comey also said she did not lie. So the obvious question is, “Why didn’t the FBI ask questions designed to uncover Hillary’s deception and lying?”

    The voters’ response to that question will define the next election. It has clearly affected support for Trump and led to an increasingly negative view of the Obama justice department including the FBI itself, a critical part United State’s Justice for EVERY citizen…of all persuasions.

  • [5] August 3, 2016 at 11:51am

    Payoffs can be disguised; Just like this one was. Why use hard cash? Honest people use digital transfers, ACH, etc. It’s “safer”. Only dishonest people, drug dealers and terrorists, want to go the cash method of payments.

    Just look at what the big corporations and foreign governments “paid” to Hillary for her 20 minute speeches… hundreds of thousands of dollars. More than ten years of a low income person’s yearly income is typical for a Hillary payoff.

  • [5] August 3, 2016 at 9:54am

    Reports say we paid to release the traitor, Bergdahl too.

  • [5] August 3, 2016 at 9:52am

    Reports say we paid Iran $400M (equivalent) to grease the release of four hostages. That was in conjunction with the underhanded deal permitting Iran to quickly gain a military nuclear weapons capability. Since Iran is a terrorist nation. What happened to… America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists?

    Ransom only encourages more hostage taking, not less. Paying $400 million for four hostages places a $100M price tag on Americans’ heads. Funding terrorists using hostage money only makes ……terrorists great again. Funding terrorists provides aid and comfort to the enemy, and that’s one element of TREASON.

    A great and strong America never paid ransom to anyone. We used our “national assets” to rescue them (like Israel does). Tiny Israel is much more powerful and stronger than the US is now under the Obama/Hillary administration.

    Trump will make America great again; Obama and Hillary only make terrorist organizations great again.

    Responses (3) +
  • [10] July 6, 2016 at 10:28am

    Clinton should have been charged. As an ORIGINAL CLASSIFICATION AUTHORITY, she was trained to properly handle and ORIGINATE classified information. Unlike lower-level employees having access to classified, she does not need to use security classification guides or rely on information contained in another documents; She’s an ORIGINATOR. Thus, she was clearly negligent in handling United States and especially foreign high level security information and should have been prosecuted. Foreign governments can’t trust the USA if Hillary is in office.

    Reports also say that some information would have disclosed “sources and methods”. Thus, she likely compromised people and technical methods. No “commoner” person committing these acts would EVER be able to retain or obtain any security clearances. So if she cannot retain or obtain a security clearance, she is by definition unfit for any office requiring security CLEARANCES.

  • [6] June 10, 2016 at 1:02pm

    If it looks like a duck…..its a duck.
    “Racketeer Influenced And Corrupt Organizations Act (Rico)
    A federal law, passed in 1970, that allows prosecution and civil penalties for certain acts (including illegal gambling, bribery, kidnapping, murder, and money laundering) performed as part of an ongoing criminal enterprise. RICO has been used to prosecute members of the mafia, the Hells Angels motorcycle gang, and Operation Rescue, an anti-abortion group, among others. ” (
    ……………and just maybe Hillary?

    150 FBI agents for an email server??

  • [1] February 18, 2016 at 6:41pm

    As a person with prior access, I find Sen Rubio’s obvious acknowledgment of Sen Cruz’s disclosure of “possible” classified information in the earlier debate 4 inexcusable. I find it hard to believe it isn’t more widely reported.

    Even if what Sen Cruz spoke of was NOT classified, Sen Rubio highlighted it (as if he thought it WAS) and, thus, make it worse. Regulations demand that disclosed and publicized classified data NOT be acknowledged. Rubio did so in a fit of anger.

    Rubio rightly says that Hillary isn’t qualified to be commander in chief after her email disclosures, and in the same manner, Rubio would also be disqualified.

  • [1] February 16, 2016 at 8:31am

    The future President will take an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States.

    If TRUMP actually believes that CRUZ is unqualified, this oath requires he defend it. Why should he wait until/ or if he is elected? I believe, he is obligated to take any legal means possible, including filing suit.

    TRUMP should not use this birther issue as a threat to force a personal apology from CRUZ. Rather he should show he will support a Presidential oath and file suit now to defend the republic.

  • [2] January 8, 2016 at 7:53am

    She did a great job. Unilaterally disarming is just what Obama is doing on the nuclear side, too.

    A few comments on the show.

    Obama doesn’t care about victims. He doesn’t know their names. He even called Gabby Giffords, Gabby Gifford during the CNN town hall.

    To make school children and the staff more secure, permit weapons on campus. Permit concealed carry holders to carry on campus. Hire armed undercover security officers. Pres Obama’s children are accompanied by an armed secret service detail having both semiautomatic and probably fully automatic weapons (submachine guns). Why are the President’s children more valuable than the children of everyday Americans?

    Since the 2nd Amendment is at the Federal level, why are all Federal buildings gun free zones? American’s rights are certainly being infringed at the Federal level even though the Amendment is at the Federal level.

  • January 4, 2016 at 1:10pm

    Analogous to yelling “Fire” in a crowded theater, Hillery personally incited a terrorist organization to produce a propaganda recruitment video using Donald Trump. “What difference does it make?” I guess it IS all about the video. She should ask Al Shabab for consulting fees.

    Since she has personally aided the enemy, how can she ever become the Commander in Chief of the US military?

  • December 15, 2015 at 7:54am

    The alleged, “most transparent administration” is again becoming discolored. The dark shades of Benghazi are coming to light. The Dept of State and DHS are in charge.

    Administration officials, including the FBI, took an oath to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. They cannot defend the Constitution and not fully defend “We The People..” US citizens must take priority over these Afghan soldiers who conspired to leave their duty and THEIR country behind.

    Prioritizing Afghan soldiers who violated their agreements by concealing their identities that would permit capture is inexcusable. How can we “say something if we see something” when government officials won’t give the citizens the information to do so.

    They trust Afghan soldiers who have demonstrated they cannot be trusted more than than US citizens. I expected the Dept of State to do this but I expected more from the FBI Director Comey after seeing him on 60 Minutes.