User Profile: Mrstirfry99


Member Since: November 22, 2010


123 To page: Go
  • [1] March 30, 2015 at 8:40am

    ehhhhh, not so much, only in certain situations and very rarely when Police are involved. Police can use any number of legal “grey areas” to search your car.

    the no. 1?

    ” I smell marijuana”

    even if the actually don’t, it’s enough to feign a drug dog encounter.

    they search you and ANYTHING they find WILL be used against you. and if they find nothing, they will still write you a ticket, and will have taken up sometimes hours of your time.

    etc… etc… etc…

    (side note: any state that has decriminalized/legalized marijuana, the smell of it can no longer be used as probable cause to search your vehicle, the courts have ruled… just fyi)

  • [20] March 30, 2015 at 8:34am

    any charge that stems from disobeying a cops illegal order will get tossed by any decent and honest judge, but not if you resisted, then you’re going bye bye…
    now, on my property, and no warrant… that a different matter… that’s a judgment call…

    Responses (3) +
  • [18] March 30, 2015 at 8:29am

    Police don’t have the power or authority to just order you around…
    Police and the citizenry need to learn what a legal order is.
    (this is Canada, the laws in the US will vary by state, in mine, i don’t have to roll the window down all the way, only enough to be able to hear and hand.)
    refusing to obey an illegal order from a cop is also NOT grounds for arrest.
    examples of legal and non legal orders:
    Legal: Cop: “excuse me sir, get on the side walk and off the street while you’re walking”
    Illegal Order Cop: ” you can’t film me while Im talking to you, give me that phone/camera”
    now, it is illegal to resist an officer, even when he gives an illegal order, unless he is using deadly force, or unreasonable force to enforce said illegal order, then you may resist with any and all force needed to defend yourself, but only then. If you resist an illegal order/request, be ready to either be arrested for some BS thing like disturbing the peace or disorderly conduct.
    now of course this is how it is in practice. Constitutionally you can ignore any and all illegal orders… and the cop who enforces them ceases to represent the government at that time.

    Responses (1) +
  • [143] March 26, 2015 at 8:10am

    The good money’s on the pilot being a Muslim… There I said what everyone is thinking…

    The proof is that they have not released his name…

    Here’s an Idea, don’t let Muslims fly planes, it always ends badly…

    Responses (15) +
  • [-7] March 23, 2015 at 10:16am

    next thing he’ll say is that all churches should unite and acknowledge the pope as leader…


    Responses (3) +
  • [3] March 23, 2015 at 10:14am

    Wolf in Sheep’s clothing…

  • [3] March 23, 2015 at 6:44am

    “by hook or by crook huh?”
    well looks like it may be time for the militias in this country to march in Washington and physically arrest this man and present him to the jail…

    frankly I welcome a dumb redneck right now…

  • [9] March 16, 2015 at 10:44am

    If congress passes this bill, you know Obama would sign it…

    would you need anymore proof at that point that the government does not have your rights and best interests at heart and considers you enemy no. 1??

    if this becomes law, will it be time then to arrest the traitors?

    sadly, no one will do anything about this… I’m sure we would all jump at the opportunity, but who’s gonna be the sucker dumb enough to be first?

    Responses (1) +
  • March 15, 2015 at 8:29pm

    the camo in the first picture, ATACS-AU?

    Responses (1) +
  • [6] March 14, 2015 at 1:50pm

    yet talk to the average catholic and they’ll deny vehemently the Catholic Churches support and involvement with Adolf Hitler and the Nazis…

    the Roman Catholic Leadership, not the individual catholic, is anti-Christ, and is in fact modern Mithraism.

    Responses (3) +
  • [2] March 12, 2015 at 1:48pm

    this is probably the best answer for this some what rhetorical question…

    He lies in more than words; body language, character, values, etc…

  • [5] March 12, 2015 at 1:42pm

    no he’s not exaggerating… he really does want your guns and ammo…

  • [2] March 11, 2015 at 10:28pm

    nor have I signed such a treaty/pact/agreement and thus why I have no problem perpetrating “war crimes” against my enemies… foreign and domestic…

  • March 11, 2015 at 10:19pm

    actually, dispute popular belief and local, state and federal laws, the ownership of a fully automatic firearm is NOT illegal. Any law that says it is illegal is null and void because it is contrary to the constitution.

    Responses (2) +
  • [-5] March 11, 2015 at 9:05pm


    @Christos speaks the truth.

    learn your history. Go and read Winston Churhills writings, especially his “novels” and you will clearly see that he had the same beliefs as Hitler, Stalin, FDR, they just disagreed on the way to achieve the goal.

  • [-3] March 11, 2015 at 9:01pm

    yes he was.

    thesis + anti-thesis = synthesis.

  • [-1] March 11, 2015 at 9:00pm

    yes, listen to a Muslim on Muslims…

    it’s all BS.

    it’s thesis and anti-thesis to achieve synthesis, the synthesis being a one world religion/government.

    Albert Puke ring a bell?

  • March 11, 2015 at 6:49am

    he’s correct. They’re only pusses because he had the balls to actually say it…

  • March 11, 2015 at 6:47am

    and this is a news story because???

    Glenn is spouting off various facts about the start of WWIII and the blaze is publishing more nonsense…

    if you care at all about the content of this story, other than to express outrage that it was even published, YOU are part of the problem in this country…

    Sorry Glenn, but your news site only publishes real news 1/4 of the time… that’s what you get for hiring a woman who used to run HuffPo…

    Responses (2) +
  • [5] March 10, 2015 at 7:12am

    and soon, the American people will let all the fascist in government know how we feel…

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love