ehhhhh, not so much, only in certain situations and very rarely when Police are involved. Police can use any number of legal “grey areas” to search your car.
the no. 1?
” I smell marijuana”
even if the actually don’t, it’s enough to feign a drug dog encounter.
they search you and ANYTHING they find WILL be used against you. and if they find nothing, they will still write you a ticket, and will have taken up sometimes hours of your time.
etc… etc… etc…
(side note: any state that has decriminalized/legalized marijuana, the smell of it can no longer be used as probable cause to search your vehicle, the courts have ruled… just fyi)
 March 30, 2015 at 8:34am
any charge that stems from disobeying a cops illegal order will get tossed by any decent and honest judge, but not if you resisted, then you’re going bye bye…
now, on my property, and no warrant… that a different matter… that’s a judgment call…
Your care is your property and a warrant is required for a search.
So what? they come to your property and refuse to leave, you will be in the same place as Randy Weaver @ rube ridge. It is the front line cop who gives or denies you your rights, after that court is just picking up the pieces.WE HAVE TO STRIP POLICE OF THEIR POWER AND PUT IT BACK IN THE HANDS OF THE CITIZENs
miller do you know canada law in the states a car police need either warrant, a visual or arrest or a trained dog
 March 30, 2015 at 8:29am
Police don’t have the power or authority to just order you around…
Police and the citizenry need to learn what a legal order is.
(this is Canada, the laws in the US will vary by state, in mine, i don’t have to roll the window down all the way, only enough to be able to hear and hand.)
refusing to obey an illegal order from a cop is also NOT grounds for arrest.
examples of legal and non legal orders:
Legal: Cop: “excuse me sir, get on the side walk and off the street while you’re walking”
Illegal Order Cop: ” you can’t film me while Im talking to you, give me that phone/camera”
now, it is illegal to resist an officer, even when he gives an illegal order, unless he is using deadly force, or unreasonable force to enforce said illegal order, then you may resist with any and all force needed to defend yourself, but only then. If you resist an illegal order/request, be ready to either be arrested for some BS thing like disturbing the peace or disorderly conduct.
now of course this is how it is in practice. Constitutionally you can ignore any and all illegal orders… and the cop who enforces them ceases to represent the government at that time.
Maybe someone on the plane needed to be taken out, and big money interests convinced the pilot that his family and friends would all be killed if he did not crash the plane, putting all of the suspicion on him!
Here is an idea. Grow up. No, you did not say what "everyone" is thinking. My thinking is sadness for all those lost. How can you place blame and proof on lack of a name? Pure sadness.
Andreas Lubitz doesn't sound very islamic.
Heavy.com: Andreas Lubitz: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know
Andreas Lubitz was the co-pilot of Germanwings flight 9525 who reportedly intentionally crashed the plane into the French Alps and killed all 150 people on board.
Here’s what you need to know:
1. He Was German
Lubitz, 28, was German national from Montabaur, Germany.
2. He joined Germanwings in September 2013.
3. He had 630-hours logged as a co-pilot.
4. He allegedly locked the pilot out of the cockpit when the pilot went to use the restroom.
5. He can be heard calmly breathing on the blackbox as flight 9525 descended and crashed into the French Alps.
Re:“Lufthansa, the German pilots’ union and the Lufthansa flight training school in Bremen where the pilots trained”
which may be relevant considering:
Police closed first IS/iSIS/ISIL Mosque in Germany Raid in Bremen: Police closes for the first time IS mosque in Germany
There is zero proof that he is a Muslim. He most likely was suicidal.
With all your naysayers about "not a Muslim"... Typical leftist mindset. Come back to this article in a couple days when they reveal HE WAS a Muslim. It's going to happen on our own land, and no one will see it coming... Wait... There's this day in history that many people USED to remember. Now it's just another day. How soon they forget about September 11th.
September 11th is going to be nothing in consideration to what is coming to an unprepared country led by an unqualified "acting" president. All us "conspiracy theorists" will be redeemed one day. Politically correct responses in three, two, one...
It's amazing how much press something like a plane crash gets when.........
A democrat American HATING terrorist is in the whitehouse.
you mean CO-pilot.
They HAVE released the name of the co-pilot - the one in CONTROL at the time of the crash.
Considering it was the pilot - the one locked out and banging to get back into the controls - who they did not give a name for...
It very well may be that the co-pilot - Andreas Lubitz, a 28-year-old German - is / WAS a Muslim.
OK. Then what?
Oh. Don't allow ANT Muslim pilots.
Yea. That is a reasonable and responsible response to this possibility.
What ALWAYS ends badly is when people like you - unable to even comprehend what you just read - then go and make irresponsible and unreasonable suggestions for how to deal with real challenges we face.
There was another co-pilot suicide crash in the past five years, but I don't remember whether or not he was muslim. Google too tied up with Flight 2525 to do any reasonable search.
Regardless, was already avoiding flying because of the hassle with TSA.....yeah, that's as good an excuse as any.
Checked he is not muslin, try gay!
Maybe his ex-wife or lover was on the plane. (Sarc)
I'm betting that he was on drugs from a young age, pharmaceutical grade speed to be precise.
Adderall to be even more precise.
We'll know his religion long before we know his prescription history.
Uh, the pilot, the senior pilot, was not in the cockpit. He was locked out and therefore not culpable. The person flying the plane at the time of the crash was the co-pilot, Andreas Lubitz. They probably didn't release the name immediately because they needed to notify the family.
Andreas Lubitz... that's the co pilot's name that I read in the above article. Did you read the article or has it just been up dated? Although the name doesn't sound middle eastern (more European), that doesn't mean he wasn't a Muslim. I'm willing to bet that he was but kept it hidden.
[-7] March 23, 2015 at 10:16am
next thing he’ll say is that all churches should unite and acknowledge the pope as leader…
Not hardly! Franklin Graham has been strongly warning against "Chrislam" for years. That is largely why Obama banned him from the Annual Prayer Breakfast.
The Pope; however, is all about furthering the cause of "Chrislam" and having a One-World, all inclusive, sin-loving religion. He IS the False Prophet that God warned us about.
really Mrstirfry99 ??
I don't see the connection. Nor do I understand your incoherent point.
 March 23, 2015 at 10:14am
Wolf in Sheep’s clothing…
 March 23, 2015 at 6:44am
“by hook or by crook huh?”
well looks like it may be time for the militias in this country to march in Washington and physically arrest this man and present him to the jail…
frankly I welcome a dumb redneck right now…
 March 16, 2015 at 10:44am
If congress passes this bill, you know Obama would sign it…
would you need anymore proof at that point that the government does not have your rights and best interests at heart and considers you enemy no. 1??
if this becomes law, will it be time then to arrest the traitors?
sadly, no one will do anything about this… I’m sure we would all jump at the opportunity, but who’s gonna be the sucker dumb enough to be first?
Yeah if the Catholic Church is the anti Christ then what are you nutcase warmongering evangelicals?
You should go back and read the article more carefully and you should also educate yourself about the Catholic Church and its founding, it says in the article that the Church never supported the Nazi's, they invested in German and Italian insurance companies because they were neutral and they invested in both sides. That being said, they should not have been neutral and nor should they have been taking investment gambles.
In its long history the Catholic Church has been infiltrated by corrupt and Ungodly men who wish to mislead souls and this is certainly the case today with so many clergy advancing sins like sodomy, birth control, and even abortion.
The Catholic Church was founded by Christ Himself in the first century, it is the one true Church and the one true faith. Protestantism is a heresy which did not come into existence until over 1500 years after Christ, protestants have no authority to interpret the Sacred Scripture and many of their souls are in mortal danger.
The true, Orthodox teachings of the Catholic Church are the path to salvation.
 March 12, 2015 at 1:48pm
this is probably the best answer for this some what rhetorical question…
He lies in more than words; body language, character, values, etc…
 March 12, 2015 at 1:42pm
no he’s not exaggerating… he really does want your guns and ammo…
 March 11, 2015 at 10:28pm
nor have I signed such a treaty/pact/agreement and thus why I have no problem perpetrating “war crimes” against my enemies… foreign and domestic…
March 11, 2015 at 10:19pm
actually, dispute popular belief and local, state and federal laws, the ownership of a fully automatic firearm is NOT illegal. Any law that says it is illegal is null and void because it is contrary to the constitution.
Nobody said it was illegal to own an automatic weapon. I said it probably wasn't legal to use one to go hunting.
It isn't contrary to the Constitution to regulate ownership of things like automatic weapons. Article III of the Constitution says that the judicial branch of the U.S. gets to interpret the Constitution and the Supreme Court says that the federal government and the states can regulate firearm ownership. Under certain conditions, you can be banned from owning any weapons and that has already been found to be Constitutional. Holding your breath, stamping your feet and saying it isn't so doesn't change the length of your stay at a federal penitentiary if you don't follow federal gun regulations.
Well stated, RabidPatriot.
I have coined an acronym over the years: SCOO
It stands for "Supreme Court Of One"
I've got plenty of opinions regarding laws that are constitutionally questionable and Supreme Court decisions that are inconsistent with the Constitution and logic.
For example, there is a footnote to Plyer v. Doe (1982) that I soapbox about quite often.
I don't make conclusory statements about constitutionality, however. It doesn't really advance a position to just show that you have a strong opinion: the logic that you can muster is what changes other people's opinions.
[-5] March 11, 2015 at 9:05pm
@Christos speaks the truth.
learn your history. Go and read Winston Churhills writings, especially his “novels” and you will clearly see that he had the same beliefs as Hitler, Stalin, FDR, they just disagreed on the way to achieve the goal.
[-3] March 11, 2015 at 9:01pm
yes he was.
thesis + anti-thesis = synthesis.
[-1] March 11, 2015 at 9:00pm
yes, listen to a Muslim on Muslims…
it’s all BS.
it’s thesis and anti-thesis to achieve synthesis, the synthesis being a one world religion/government.
Albert Puke ring a bell?
March 11, 2015 at 6:49am
he’s correct. They’re only pusses because he had the balls to actually say it…
March 11, 2015 at 6:47am
and this is a news story because???
Glenn is spouting off various facts about the start of WWIII and the blaze is publishing more nonsense…
if you care at all about the content of this story, other than to express outrage that it was even published, YOU are part of the problem in this country…
Sorry Glenn, but your news site only publishes real news 1/4 of the time… that’s what you get for hiring a woman who used to run HuffPo…