User Profile: Mrstirfry99


Member Since: November 22, 2010


123 To page: Go
  • October 1, 2014 at 6:25pm

    Wake up people!!!

    who gives a flying crap about rules for the MlB?!?!

    if you do, you RE stupid. This country is about to be destroyed and people really care about baseball rules??

    some of you deserve the trouble that you will get…

    bah bah bah…

    Responses (3) +
  • [12] September 30, 2014 at 5:41pm

    any officer who would enforce this is violating the constitution and should be dealt with as an armed Terrorist, yes and armed terrorist.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] September 30, 2014 at 4:10pm

    good for him, such an order can be easily ignored like every other law, and also easily overturned. yawn… just go away already. I’m satisfied knowing that Eric Hder has an eternal judgment waiting for him. If Eric Hder and Barack Obama get into heaven, than I have nothing to worry about.

    Responses (2) +
  • [14] September 25, 2014 at 6:25pm

    here’s a simple concept FBI, yes you FBI monitoring this website, If you stop illegally and unconstitutionally spying on us and our smartphones via Sting ray devices, then we wouldn’t be forced to invent away to shut you out.

    go suck an egg.

  • [5] September 23, 2014 at 9:45pm

    incorrect. sort of.

    The only way a DUI checkpoint is legal is if it meets the following criteria:

    It’s location has been published at least 3 days in advanced by the currently accepted form of notice (newspaper currently, websites).

    They must put up signage well before the check point and allow for people to turn off/provide a detour. And choosing said detour/turning around can not be used as probable cause against you.

    If, after all of these steps are taken, you drive into a checkpoint, it is assumed on your part that you are volunteering for said checkpoint.

    If police fail to take All of the above steps, everything they obtain from you through the checkpoint is I admissible in court and can not be used as further probable cause.

    Responses (3) +
  • [12] September 23, 2014 at 9:31pm

    They are both right.

    Regardless of the constitutionality of the checkpoint, While operating a motor vehicle , you are required, as the operator, to hand over your drivers license upon request, because, yes operating a motor vehicle on public roads is a privilege.

    Anything beyond presenting your ID at one of these checkpoints does not need to be complied with, Nor should it, regardless of the nature of the check point.

    Anything beyond this if you do not say “am I being detained, am I free to go” makes your encounter voluntary, and you the allow officers to do what they want.

    Responses (1) +
  • [28] September 20, 2014 at 7:55am

    this country is full of wuss’.

  • [36] September 17, 2014 at 1:44pm

    really… who cares? no more diamonds? I can think of worse things in the world to run out of.

    Bacon. Imagine no more Bacon. (shudders to self)

    Responses (7) +
  • [6] September 14, 2014 at 12:02pm

    yup. That’s all the DEA is. The legal means of the Govn’t collecting their tax from the drug cartel in the guise of a “war on drugs.”

    The drug cartels do not send money or drugs that gets sold through border patrol checkpoints. The ones they DO send through is their way if sending their bribe money. Millions in cash and product. ( product that is then in turn, sold anyways…) This justifies the War on drugs and the Mitarization of Police.

    Responses (1) +
  • [44] September 14, 2014 at 7:59am

    When the Government fails to do the Job the People pay them to do, the People have the Right and the Authority to the the Job, because the People loan their authority to the Government, and if you wont use it, than we will.

    We are legally allowed to do this. About time someone did the Governments job for them.

    Next step, Washington DC if/when 0bama does executive amnesty!!!

    Responses (1) +
  • [3] September 10, 2014 at 5:23pm

    The Supreme Court has already stated that you need a warrant to search a cell phone. That includes any video in that phone. That means if you wan the video on it as evidence, you need a warrant. ANY officer without who tries to STEAL your phone, is committing an unconstitutional act and at that moment may be resisted legally, because they cease to be an agent if the government, are in effect, a civilian, and you may defend yourself accordingly.

    Brookfield Construction Co. v. Stewart, 284 F.Supp 94: “An officer who acts in violation of the Constitution ceases to represent the government.“

  • [3] September 10, 2014 at 5:11pm

    Under what authority did the President authorize this $$$?? CONGRESS authorizes spending. Thanks for stealing my $$$ again, 0bama.

  • [6] September 10, 2014 at 12:57pm

    These units are also being given out so the DOD/DHS already have units and weapons staged through out the country, that way, when the order is given, there’s a response team in almost every major city.

  • [12] September 10, 2014 at 12:56pm

    Riddle me this, why does the Dept. of Wducation have a SWAT team???

    answer: almost every government agency will be used to TRY and inact Martial Law.

  • [85] September 9, 2014 at 6:13pm


    it may be time we collectively stop paying our taxes.

    Responses (2) +
  • [5] September 9, 2014 at 4:26pm


    correct. I say we file a class action lawsuit against the smithsonian for violating our rights as heterosexuals! I demand that we have equal display!! LGBT is the new black. ridiculous.

  • September 9, 2014 at 1:20pm

    Choice A can be excused to a degree. B and C can not.

  • [-1] September 9, 2014 at 1:19pm

    Arrest the Child. Cruelty to animals. He’s just a kid you say? Ok, arrest the Parents for allowing it to happen. A 4 yr old IS capable, unless mentally retarded, of knowing that repeatedly throwing a puppy on the ground is wrong. So either the child is A. Mentally Retarded. B. Evil, or C. his PARENTS did not teach him that this is not ok.

    Responses (1) +
  • [34] September 9, 2014 at 6:28am

    you forgot Lucifer. 0bama definitely has him on speed dial.

    Responses (1) +
  • [5] September 1, 2014 at 2:23pm

    If police Depts. are getting equipment from the military, equipment designed for the Military and warfare, using Military tactics for urban warfare, essentially given the same authority as shirts in a warzone, How are the Police NOT a standing army?

    This is the face of tyranny

123 To page: Go