User Profile: mscaptbilly

mscaptbilly

Member Since: January 23, 2013

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [2] August 19, 2015 at 5:47pm

    If you want to quibble, birth control failure rate varies from method to method-.05 percent to 24%. Incorrect birth control failure rate can go to 28% or higher. Unprotected sex IS just part of it. Just look at the numbers. Let’s say 25% or 13,750,000 of those fetuses were aborted due to birth control failure, leaving 41,250,000 that were aborted either because they used unsafe sex or got pregnant and changed their mind? How many do you think got pregnant wanting a child then changed their mind? Convenience. Murdered for convenience. So it’s only 41MILLION plus or minus fetuses murdered because of passion, lack of responsibility, didn’t use the birth control correctly, or whatever, but the end result was STILL the same. The fetuses ended up dead. And the mother was NOT inconvenienced for whatever reason. I chose unsafe sex because that is the most likely. I don’t see correct or incorrect birth control failure that high. I suspect It just happened” is the most frequent phrase amongst the reasons, across the charts.

  • [1] August 19, 2015 at 11:10am

    Obama not only has lied to WeThePeople, he has also convinced our allies it is the Deal of the Century. What is most disturbing is the Democrats would rather vote for the Party than for the Country. Obama canNOT be trusted. The Democrats KNOW he has lied on every single thing he ever presented. WHY are they trusting him now? PARTY, PARTY, PARTY! Their actions are traitorous.
    I predict if this Deal is signed, with clause #36, a Notice of 35 days to vacate the Deal, Iran will negate the Deal quickly: take their $150BILL and run. Further, I believe there will be nuclear activity sooner than we think in the Middle East. Who knows, it might be here! Death to Iran: unfortunately, this Iran Nuke Deal is Death to America!

  • [2] August 19, 2015 at 10:48am

    Hi RJJ-Good point! I agree. I suspect they stopped, observed, and took a “hike.” We’re not their type. What I don’t “get” is how we “eeuuuh” at species that eat their young and then dole out our money to the likes of Planned Parenthood. Double standard, I guess. No sauce for the Goose! Or is it the Gander?

  • [16] August 19, 2015 at 10:41am

    The latest statistics I could find were 99.31% of abortions were for convenience. NOT for rape, incest or the health of the mother, but convenience, which all spells for the most part, UNPROTECTECTED SEX! So, if you think about if, 99% of the 55+MILLION babies were exterminated because these couples decided to NOT take the time to have protected sex. Passion resulting in death. At one time in my life I beieved in a woman’s choice. I still do, only now I have switched my belief in what that choice is. The choice is now protectected sex, NOT murder because you can’t control your sex drive for one small moment. And for this a person dies for your convenience. That’s a choice?

    Responses (1) +
  • [8] August 19, 2015 at 10:31am

    Amen

  • [6] August 18, 2015 at 2:23pm

    WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE MITCH? JOHN? You act as though the world ends if Obama MIGHT veto a Bill. If Obama vetoes the Iran Nuke Bill, this is the time when YOU TWO do your duty and get the votes, both GOP and Democrrats to override him. This is the time Mitch and John DO THEIR JOBS! Get them to vote for the country NOT the Party!
    Let’s see what you are made of, Mitch, John. Do something for WeThePeople for a change!

  • [4] August 3, 2015 at 9:33am

    Hillary’s emails have bitten her on her over-sized butt and she is sooo well padded she just hasn’t felt all the pain yet, nor has she been able to “shake it” free. It will NOT come loose, no matter how much the MSM ignores or pans it. If Biden enters the race, and it is looking more hopeful in his camp for him to do so, the Democrats will play those emails into a bigger problem for Hillary than any GOP candidate can. If Biden ignores them, he sets up a perfect storm for the GOPs and if he attacks her with them, HE gets to ride the storm.

    Either way, those emails are going to be her undoing, as week by week, new piecemeal evidence keeps her lies in front of WeThePeople and the press and brings out new ones. She’ll continue to feign innocence as the emails shout “guilty!”

  • [8] June 30, 2015 at 2:05pm

    Leave it to Obama to put God’s rainbow on HIS house-What a narcissist-
    God’s rainbow was a promise to never destroy the earth again by water-he didn’t say anything about fire, or nuclear weapons, or heart attacks..or… Watch out Obama-God smotes those who mock him!

    Responses (2) +
  • [2] June 23, 2015 at 11:52am

    Will Don or someone put up “Whitey”?..or “Honkey”…or whatever the denigrating name blacks have for whites? It really should be a two-sided conversation. After all Obama IS HALF WHITE, even though he never refers to his Mother’s DNA or the GrandParents that raised him. Obama’s Jerimiah Wright is showing.

  • June 19, 2015 at 4:08pm

    Hi RJJ-So nice to hear from you. God forbid common sense would waft its way into a left winger-Ha! AS IF! My thoughts aren’t original, of course, but I loathe Obama calling for gun control and politicians pointing fingers at each other. Don’t they remember that old saying about when the 1 finger is pointed outward, 3 are pointed directly back at them? Guns and policies do not make a person do evil unto another, but I can never remember anyone ever talking about this. In the minds of all of the non-talkers, is to admit it to acknowledge evil does exist, and if they don’t, it doesn’t? Well, I shot my philosophy for today. Hope all is well.

  • [18] June 19, 2015 at 12:12pm

    The words were beautiful. We won’t have the conversation that some deeds are purely evil. Regardless of the color of the doers skin, their motive or lack of one, we will dissect, politicize, point fingers, blame, and ignore the underlying thread of the lone actions of these people. Nor will we talk about mental illness and health.
    No. Obama will whip his telephone and pen into a fury writing his EO’s to remove our guns, as though the gun pulls its’ own trigger. The politicians will point fingers at policies. Some blacks will outpour their hatred towards whites, and some whites will feel nothing, just as some blacks felt nothing when similar events occurred to an all white venue. Others will feel guilt, shame or empathy.
    Lone, single people who join ISIS to kill people are evil also, but we won’t talk about that either. The Obama Administration will say “Get them a job” as though that will wipe out the very core of the deed.
    Perhaps the refusal to admit pure evil exists, and mental health issues need to be addressed are why we wallow in repeating the same song, over and over againandagainand… Talking about theses 2 issues will not cure the problem but it puts them in the daylight instead of in the buried grave where we keep them.

    Responses (2) +
  • [3] May 17, 2015 at 12:05pm

    These pretty well describe it

    HillaryBOT-Dems & Liberals who KNOW Hillary’s a bore-makes children cry & puppies shy away BUT are pushing her for Prez ANYWAY

    HillaryBOT-Dems & Liberals who KNOW Hillary hates people & they hate her-KNOWS she LIES-BUT are pushing her for Prez ANYWAY

  • [30] May 17, 2015 at 11:59am

    I was most certainly touched by her comment stating she never felt bitterness. She certainly had reason, but it did not occur. It is in such contrast to the stories we read about the many young people today who are NOT being educated by their own choices; dropping out of school; attitudes; or other self imposed reasons. She was denied her educational dream because of outside forces, but continued in a different direction. She is an inspiration, a living proof illustrating good things can happen to those that wait. A blessing story with a long delayed happy ending.

    Responses (1) +
  • [44] May 9, 2015 at 12:35pm

    WHY do people choose to go adversely face to face with authority when they don’t have to? This woman initiaited the tone of this encounter. We didn’t see what was deemed to be her “nervious” behavior, and since nothing was found it was probably not nervous, but something else, & she did set off alarms. The Border Patrol isn’t always going to be right, but I suspect they recognize much of the signs and are right most of the time. IF they didn’t follow these cues then they would also be attacked for “not” doing their job.

    None-the-less, her combatitive attitude brought the situation to a head. The supervisor was cool headed right up till the end when SHE refused to move and dared him to touch her, and he did-BIG TIME!. He moved her (tased) because she refused. If she had been a hispanic male, speaking with a thick accent, this probably wouldn’t even be a story on the Blaze. BUT MOJO or HuffPost would decry discrimination all day long. The border Patrol has a tough job and walking that fine line has to be difficult.

    Yes we have Rights and they need to be valued and protected, but people need to respect those Rights & STOP acting like asses when it’s not necessary also.

    Responses (2) +
  • [3] May 1, 2015 at 11:55am

    boriszz33-Never mind I found it-but thanks anyway-Interesing still!

  • [1] May 1, 2015 at 11:50am

    boriszz33-Interesting-would you be willing to share your source for Mosby being 4 mos on the job & her husband being on the City Council? Just need to verify before passing it on. I would appreciate it very much, and Thank You.

  • [4] April 5, 2015 at 12:27pm

    Happy Easter RJJ to you and your family-Agree-I had to chuckle-Seemed to me that “Charles” had a tough time keeping a straight face, which made me smile. This was nice on such a joyous morning.

  • [7] March 30, 2015 at 9:02am

    RJJ-Good early morning-

    Did you see this-Had to laugh
    http://www.wnd.com/2015/03/the-hoax-is-the-work-of-glenn-beck/

  • March 29, 2015 at 3:32pm

    Hi RJJ-I keep missing you-Lots of Trolls out on this one..more than usual it seems.

    I did read a different article on this law that I did not agree with, but it did beg a couple of questions. I posted them on another story but basiclly this-How far does a law like this go?

    The 1 example that really made me think was the anethesiologist withholding /refusing to administer drugs to a person w/a defect because they believed birth defects were God’s punishment. No problem except if it was a rural hospital or the only hospital your insurance provided coverage. AND “Do No Harm” doesn’t apply any more than the Cardiologist who refused to put a stent in Captain Bill when he was receiving chemo because the Cardiologist said he “didn’t treat dying people.” (He died later and from something different than what this man was referring to.)

    I support this law. The courts have taken away our rights to faith, but I still have that niggling little question of how far does it go? And I also worry about the definition as it applies to “faith.” Do Satan, Sun, tires, money or any “thing or being” worshipers have the same beliefs & faith rights deemed to Christians and Jews? Who decides? The courts so recklessly have taken away ALL our faith rights. Now who is going to protect them and how? And who is to be protected? Just asking.

  • [1] March 29, 2015 at 12:50pm

    This law does offer a much needed “fix” for those choosing to follow their faith, and to do so without penalty, i.e. not baking a cake or taking photographs for same-sex marriages. The family owned bakery in Oregon that is now defunct is a classic example of the courts stripping personal rights to faith. The penalty was senseless, petty, and cruel. Further, it was unnecessary. The couple won no victory-they closed a business down, one they had done business with, many times before. This incident gave rise to laws like this.

    However, this law can pose questions and my questions are “What is a belief or faith?” and “Where does it stop?” Does it legitimately include a Catholic pharmacist who refuses to fill a birth control prescription because the Catholic church opposes chemical or other birth control? Or what about an anesthesiologist who refuses to administer the drugs to a person with an infirmity because he/she believes birth defects are punishments from God? Yes one can go elsewhere, but the scenario could be in a rural setting, or insurance may only cover that hospital; the point is where or does it stop?

    Are Scientology, Satan, Sun, Tires, money, worshipers of any item, thing, or being defined as “faith” the same as the faith of Christians or Jews? While I loathe the courts for removing our rights, I also see the dilemma of defining faith and where or if this law covers everything. Just wondering.

    Responses (2) +
123 To page: Go
Restoring Love