You are assuming he is being truthful. Good luck with that. Don’t forget up until 18 months ago he was best buddies and supporting Hillary.
 July 21, 2016 at 9:48am
Can you absolutely, 100% guarantee me he will appoint a constitutionalist?
 July 21, 2016 at 9:38am
Trump insulted Ted’s wife, cast hateful, untrue accusations on his father and called him lying Ted over, and over. While Ted campaigned with honesty and dignity, stayed on topic which was what’s good for the country and the people..
If he wanted Ted’s endorsement, all he had to do was apologize. Oh, excuse me, I forgot Trump never apologizes, ever.
Exactly, what Trump did was not politics, it was disgusting and personal and directed at the one person who had stayed out of the gutter with Trump.
And Cruz’s surrogates insulted and belittle Trump’s wife. Called her a ‘lesbian pornstar’ and questioned her character and morals. Cruz’s surrogates posted an image and declared in the most insulting way they could think of ‘is this who you want as first lady’ in an effort to shame HER. And Cruz did…..nothing.
The bottom line in all this is that Cruz hides behind his surrogates and Trump doesn’t. You talk about Trump insulting Cruz’s family and yet ignore the fact that Trump was the first one to defend them. That’s right, if you bothered to actually read something, you’d know that Trump in early November defended Cruz’s children from a vicious cartoon that depicted them as trained monkey’s. He did it without prompting and called for families to be off-limits at the time. Cruz even agreed with him.
That is until Cruz supporters and surrogates started insulting and belittling Trumps wife. Then Cruz said nothing. He was silent. He was silent because he thought it could work to his advantage. He didn’t care about other people’s families being attacked or ridiculed or insulted. Only his own. So now you whine and cry about how Trump insulted Cruz’s precious family with no regard for how Cruz allowed Trumps family to be belittled and insulted. Those who make this argument are hypocrites, just like Cruz. At least Trump had the courage to speak for himself rather than hide behind others like Cruz did throughout the entire Primary.
[-1] July 19, 2016 at 7:47pm
thop1960: Me too.
 July 19, 2016 at 10:43am
I think they are self-loathing arrogant. If they can’t be happy, nobody should be happy.
 July 18, 2016 at 8:38pm
Rabbit lives don’t matter. They are devouring my garden in plague proportions.
1) Can you kill a rabbit with a pellet gun?
2) Can you buy a pellet gun without a permit?
3) Is it legal to fire a pellet gun within city limits?
4) Are West Coast Cottontails good to eat?
1) Yes. .22 rifles average 1000 to 1200 fps (Rough numbers). High velocity air rifles can exceed 1200 fps.
2) Most likely. It's hard to say positively yes knowing these wacky laws nowadays.
3) In many cities, yes, as it is not a firearm. However, whacky laws, check your local ordinances.
Try a big box store like Gander Mountain or Cabela's. They usually have a good selection.
July 18, 2016 at 8:24pm
 July 18, 2016 at 8:21pm
Shep’s never been long intellect. That short coming is like the elephant in the room on every show he does.
Well, some people are hung, but that doesn't mean that they get a noose wrapped around their neck and dropped several feet.
And word has it, that Donald is well hung...or well hanged, if you prefer ...
Can't figure out the proper English? Reason it through.
 July 15, 2016 at 11:58pm
“I understand a business owner has a right to refuse service if he wants to, . . . .”
Picture this: Suppose the place is being robbed, someone dials 911. When they do I hope they realize the police can’t reserve the right to refuse service. Uncomfortable people be damned, you’d better be nice to them, you may need them in a hurry one day.
Oh I forgot, they can’t speak English. What will they say to the 911 operator?
Many believe that, but it's not true:
“Law enforcement agencies and personnel have no duty to protect individuals from the criminal acts of others.” -Lynch vs North Carolina Department of Justice 1989
"There is no constitutional right to be protected by the state (or Federal) against being murdered by criminals or madmen. It is monstrous if the state fails to protect its residents against such predators but it does not violate the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, or, we suppose, any other provision of the Constitution. The Constitution is a charter of negative liberties: it tells the state (gov't) to let people alone; it does not require the federal government or the state to provide services, even so elementary a service as maintaining law and order"
(Bowers v. DeVito, U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, 686F.2d 616 ).
Calogrides v. Mobile, 475 So. 2d 560 (Ala. 1985); Cal Govt. Code 845 (no liability for failure to provide police protection)
Calogrides v. Mobile, 846 (no liability for failure to arrest or to retain arrested person in custody)
Davidson v. Westminster, 32 Cal.3d 197, 185, Cal. Rep. 252; 649 P.2d 894 (1982) (no liability for failure to provide police protection)
Stone v. State 106 Cal.App.3d 924, 165 Cal Rep. 339 (1980) (no liability for failure to provide police protection)
Morgan v. District of Columbia, 468 A.2d 1306 (D.C.App. 1983) (no liability for failure to provide police protection)
Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 (D.C.App 1981) (no liability for failure to provide police protection)
Sapp v. Tallahassee, 348 So.2d 363 (Fla. App. 1st Dist.), cert. denied 354 So.2d 985 (Fla. 1977); Ill. Rec. Stat. 4-102 (no liability for failure to provide police protection)
Keane v. Chicago, 98 Ill. App.2d 460, 240 N.E.2d 321 (1st Dist. 1968) (no liability for failure to provide police protection)
Jamison v. Chicago, 48 Ill. App. 3d 567 (1st Dist. 1977) (no liability for failure to provide police protection)
Simpson's Food Fair v. Evansville, 272 N.E.2d 871 (Ind. App.) (no liability for failure to provide police protection)
Silver v. Minneapolis, 170 N.W.2d 206 (Minn. 1969) (no liability for failure to provide police protection)
Wuetrich V. Delia, 155 N.J. Super. 324, 326, 382, A.2d 929, 930 cert. denied 77 N.J. 486, 391 A.2d 500 (1978) (no liability for failure to provide police protection)
Chapman v. Philadelphia, 290 Pa. Super. 281, 434 A.2d 753 (Penn. 1981) (no liability for failure to provide police protection)Morris v. Musser, 84 Pa. Cmwth. 170, 478 A.2d 937 (1984) (no liability for failure to provide police protection)
This means that if you want protection from violent crime, for you and your loved ones; it’s up to *YOU* and *YOU ALONE* to provide it.
 July 12, 2016 at 12:16am
So stair, you don’t think Obama is responsible for any of what’s going on here? Seriously?
 July 11, 2016 at 3:49pm
It makes sense he would change after being discharged from the Army. He was caught harassing and/or stalking a woman. He was caught with a stash of stolen women’s under ware. He was shamed and made to take responsibility for his actions. It was just too much for his delicate snowflake psyche.
P.S. The honorable discharge was a clerical/gov. mistake.
 July 11, 2016 at 3:33pm
“But it may be that the ideal that he thought of our government, what he thought the military represented, it just didn’t live up to his expectations.”
There you have it. Blame someone or something else. I know, let’s blame Obama! I do.
Funny, America is being destroyed from within due to the cowardice of
the vast majority of the center/right people who do nothing but blame
someone else for it.
That is totally whitewash by them, Their son was a perv and was returned early from deployment because he was charged with sexual harassment by a woman who also accused him of stealing her underwear. This was said by someone who said he was a bunkmate and also his military lawyer. He was supposed to get a dishonorable discharge but in true military fashion he was given an honorable discharge instead. When the woman rejected him and then made the accusation against him, his male ego was hurt. Everything he has done since has been to make him feel better about himself and prove to himself and the world that he is a MAN! What better way to than to prove yourself a Hero to the people you admire - Farrakhan and the Black Power people. than to go after those people that they claim to be enemies and are in authority.
So stair, you don't think Obama is responsible for any of what's going on here? Seriously?
Don't get lost in the blame game and miss the point.
He believed the "Hope and Change" he had been taught. When he went into the real world he found out it was all a lie. In his frustrated and lost state it is easy for Anyone to give him a focus for his rage. Who do you think he was talking to in the barracks at night?
I'll give you one guess who mentored this angry young black man.
But we are all guessing what happened to him. The parents can only tell us When.
 July 11, 2016 at 3:11pm
Points for practical advice.
 July 8, 2016 at 9:07pm
“Our office is committed to ferreting out and prosecuting all forms of corruption and fraud, regardless of who the offender is,” said U.S. Attorney A. Lee Bentley. “In our nation, no one is above the law.”
If only it were true.
 July 6, 2016 at 11:06am
” . . . on the ******* flag?!?! ” How respectful is that?
Me too, not a great choice of words for Old Glory.
 July 3, 2016 at 7:41pm
This generation is going to have to learn a lot of lessons the hard way.
 July 2, 2016 at 1:17am
Great economics lesson. Thanks!
 July 2, 2016 at 1:10am
She looks perfectly happy to me.
 July 1, 2016 at 11:08am
She’s been telling us to “move on” ever since Bill told us he did not have sex with that woman. Damn her, I’m sick of hearing it
Move on, move on. Keep moving. Let’s move America forward. Toward what? Pay no attention to the corruption going on behind the curtain. Move on!