User Profile: MSrebel

Member Since: August 10, 2011

CommentsDisplaying MSrebel's 10 most recent comments.

  • Her point about government imposed slavery is well founded, it is financial slavery to have to hand over a third of one’s income to a socialist state bent on manufacturing equality.

  • So typically thoughtless. I-pads to the heads of State, mispronounce or wrongly speak military rank, now this. Too busy playing golf, or inciting revolution on some college campus to sit down and write a letter to thirty men he put in harm’s way. What a buffoon.

  • That jackass says he doesn’t “want the money” yeah sure. It’s an R-3 zone, blah, blah ‘blah…If it’s not about the money, not a commercial enterprise and not something you really want to do, why not just look the other way? We have legal precedence for that; no one in the Federal government enforces all the laws, only the ones that don’t cost votes or indict the AttorneyGeneral.

  • Odd, it wasn’t until she took “citizenship training that she had a problem with her dress. She went to the ACLU for advice and decided to contest a dress code she had already been following. So much for faith-based protest. She knew before she took the job Disney has a strict dresscode. It is part of the Disney mystique to keep people in character. Patrons expect to see cartoon characters and smiling faces, not Muslim “terrorists” in masked garb. She knew what she did while applying for the job, she knew there would be consequences for reneging on her agreement, she worked the job for months, so it can’t be a conscientious objection she is raising. Disney offered her options, she declined. This is an attempt by the ACLU to further erode the vestiges of Americana. Let her go start her own amusement park and invite all the radicalized teens across America to join her in a faqua festival or a jihad jamboree at her AllahRama theme Park.

  • This pompous ass never mentioned Obama’s gaffe of corpsman did he? Or the one about 57 states in the union? Dawkins better enjoy his notoriety now.

  • Typical liberals, vapid airheads without the ability to think for themselves or formulate coherent arguments on basic concepts. It’s OK tho’ Jay Carney will give them their prep sheets next week.

  • Why? Your thinking is skewed, isn’t it? Every criminal, every gay pervert is someone’s child. Does a father or mother have to divorce themselves of all moral clarity in order to show love for their child? Must a mature reasoned adult have to capitulate to the ever-changing social attitudes to be acceptable to you. Laws are written to provide clarity. Do we just discount a law that we don’t agree with? (This administration does, but I mean a real citizen.) Social laws, laws of nature are laws; nonetheless. Does my perverted son (if I had one) get to tell me that I must accept his perversion, for him to love me? It’s the same logic, isn’t it? Right is right, wrong is wrong. There are absolutes; and homosexuality is absolutely wrong at every level. If my son walks away to the dark side, I’m not following. Condoning wrongdoing is why this world is in the toilet already, moral obfiscation and situational ethics has cast doubt on society and left our youth confused and exploited. This father should be applauded for his strength, integrity and honor to principles. When his son stops his filth, I’m sure he will be welcomed back. It was after all, the son’s choice.

  • Right you are; it is a lifestyle choice; a behavior (as is all sexual activity) it is not some uncontrollable compulsion pre-wired into our DNA. Too many gays has found solice in God and have changed back to a natural use for their body, proving it can be done. Until a few decades ago homosexuality was recognized as a mental defect, a sickness of the mind (and soul). It wasn’t until enough gay activist controlled the APA did the “studies” change.

  • Right on! It is too late I fear.

  • I can’t imagine why the foul postings of ignorant, promiscuos fools is “newsworthy” for the BLAZE. Why would any editor regurgitate the venom of non-entities? You have in fact given substance to the rants of obscure, couch potato, welfare dependent whores sitting around castigating righteously inclined persons. You have given an audience to the dregs of society; how liberal of you! I assume your need for ratings or exposure prompted your decision to give this crap airtime. I’m disappointed in the BLAZE for “printing” this non-news story. These critics couldn’t even muster the energy to run to the welfare office, let alone an Olympic track; why is their opinion worth anything? Our culture is doomed.