Cher needs a good lawyer to sue that democrat plastic surgeon of hers for fraud, practicing medicine w/o a license and assault & battery!!! Yikes!!
 May 22, 2015 at 2:14pm
Appeared to be textbook reaction on exactly what to do in that situation. I was also very happy to see the LEO congratulate Mr. Fannin for his actions. All around, this situation was handled appropriately by everyone…..even the crook did “wised-up” by getting and staying on the ground until police arrived. Though from the newscast, that was not his first at the rodeo for Mr. Fannin, as had to subdue another criminal back in 2011. Outstanding!!!!
May 20, 2015 at 5:01pm
What part of “…..SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED” do these moronic Progressives not understand!!! If they don’t like the 2nd Amendment, let them TRY to changed it with another Constitutional Amendment, until then just just shut the freak UP, geesh!!!
 May 15, 2015 at 6:26pm
I applaud the jury for doing the right thing. The fact that he placed a bomb next to an 8-year old boy tells me everything I needed to know about this scvmbag. Sadly, by the time he’s actually put to death, how old will he be, 40, 50 or 60? I’m 61 years old and I doubt I will live to see that day.
 May 12, 2015 at 11:52am
While I hate to split hairs here, your use of the word “to” when you state “…censoring thing a little to far…” is incorrect, it should be “too” instead. Ironic isn’t it? ;)
May 9, 2015 at 1:47pm
I didn’t say this man’s constitutional free speech rights were violated, nor even mentioned the constitution for that matter. My point is that liberals are all for liberal free speech, but rarely tolerate anyone else from speaking if they disagree. This is very typical on many college campuses as well these days. Talk to a law professor, why, they don’t teach the Constitution, they concentrate on teaching case law, which changes, whereas the Constitution doesn’t change, except through the amendment process.
May 9, 2015 at 1:37pm
What an idiotic statement. It was during a Q&A, so he had every right to ask questions. Krakauer was obviously being very rude to this man, plain and simple.
 May 9, 2015 at 1:31pm
I don’t know about the civil justice system down-under, but if that was here in the US, he would have a great case for libel. He’s obviously been caused public embarrassment and perhaps even financial loss. Lawyers would be lining up to take his case and justly so. I agree that her picture and name should also be posted, including what she did, so she can experience the public embarrassment as well.
 May 8, 2015 at 8:56pm
And people cheering the silencing of someone who dared to have a different opinion and wanted to ask author Krakauer some questions. Yep, free speech is dead and buried here in Missoula, MT. A liberal University town, so what else would you expect.
He could have asked questions, he chose to go a different route. He was at an organized event, he can't just talk about whatever he wants all day.
If he wants to make a speech, write his own book.
Go talk to one of the law professors about Free Speech on private property and during private events.
Guess what, YOU HAVE NO FREE SPEECH ON PRIVATE PROPERTY AND DURING PRIVATE EVENTS. And the constitution does not guarantee it to you.
 May 8, 2015 at 12:51pm
My first impression is duh! Also only one of them is an MB/Al Qaeda?
May 7, 2015 at 12:37pm
Thank you Demsaredumb, you’re right, how could I have forgotten that recent incident.
May 7, 2015 at 12:33pm
All the hard drives, servers and storage devices holding this information must be destroyed, not just delete the data, because we all know it can never be totally “deleted”. NSA servers must meet the same fate of “Shrillery’s” server.
 May 6, 2015 at 12:24pm
How long before Pastors will be required to have their sermons approved by the Commisar, to make sure they are properly secularized, so no one could possibly be offended? This clearly is not the country I grew up in 40-50 years ago. The Fall of America is nearly complete.
Its already been tried in Houston
We're probably not too far away from having a "political officer" embedded in every business HR office, monitoring speech. "Hate speech" is already a sanctioned HR oversight at my company. Our employee handbook spells out the completely subjective description of hate speech as virtually any speech a fellow employee finds offensive, and the first, second, and third (being a terminatable instance) remedy procedure. Not kidding. Lumped in with the "safe working environment" section.
 May 4, 2015 at 6:21pm
Gee I wonder how the NSA and Homeland Security missed this one too? What good is trampling on our Constitutional rights if they can’t stop an attempted terrorist attack on the Homeland? Of course, they were able to stop the Boston Bomber though right…, oh, wait a minute, NSA & Homeland Security missed that one too, not to mention the Time Square SUV loaded with explosives. Perhaps they’re too busy spying on innocent Americans than to concentrate of terror plots. More great reasons to repeal The Patriot Act, once and for all.
 May 4, 2015 at 3:50pm
The crash you just heard was Trumps Presidential intentions crashing to the floor…..He obviously doesn’t understand the 1st amendment, sorta like the current POTUS.
 April 30, 2015 at 1:52pm
I wonder if she said “Trust us”. Another example of the arrogance of this Administration thumbing its nose at the Constitution. Please pray our next POTUS cleans house and requires everyone in govt to abide by the Constitution. I say pray, because I doubt any POTUS, with the exception of maybe Ted Cruz, will have the ballz to do it.
 April 28, 2015 at 5:00pm
Duh! No kidding….I always dunk my cookies in my milk, Hmmmmm!!
 April 28, 2015 at 3:44pm
So, let me see if I have this right, this couple is being suing and it could cost them everything due to discrimination, yet Gofundme can discriminate against them with impunity and get away with it? Amerika is so freaking screwed!! Fair is fair, so freak’n sue the heck out of Gofundme and call it even.
 April 23, 2015 at 1:04pm
Good choice, but I was thinking more of a machete, know what I mean!!!
 April 23, 2015 at 1:01pm
Just because the Supreme Court rules on something, doesn’t make it constitutional. Remember the Dred Scott ruling? What part of “Shall not be infringed” do those black robed morons not understand. Remember it’s all political. Roe v. Wade was decided by 5-4, someday that ruling will be overturned when the People pressure the Politicians/Justices to do the right thing. The science is decided, life begins at conception.