User Profile: MTSchmidt


Member Since: February 03, 2011


  • [7] August 26, 2016 at 12:06pm

    When did Beck EVER promote any of those? I have been listening to him since 2006 and he has never “shilled” for such things. He has only always promoted Constitutionalism and conservatism. You are purposely trying to lead people astray and it is shameful.

  • [13] August 24, 2016 at 2:34pm

    This may be a shock to you, but you don’t have to read anything from the Blaze. Brietbart welcomes all kinds of people if you don’t like Beck. Beck has been nothing but honest over the years I have listened to him.

  • [11] July 4, 2016 at 9:39am

    Probably not for a long time beside some alternative media. What I find ironic is that Trump’s son is making that statement when Trump himself added to the problem. He has used to the media his entire career to con the people. His most recent con is his own presidential run where he outright lied about Ted Cruz over and over again. In my opinion, he lost all right to complain when he both exemplified and furthered the problem. Typical leftist.

    Responses (3) +
  • June 7, 2016 at 11:49pm

    I would say start with the Gospels. What Christ did for sinners is of the utmost importance. Understanding what the Bible says about His return doesn’t mean much if they don’t know God and have surrendered their heart to Him. “…I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.” John 14:6

  • [6] May 20, 2016 at 8:14pm

    You obviously don’t understand what it means to value life. The rape would be profoundly tragic and there would be so much pain and anger….but that baby is an innocent person. No one should have the right to stop that life. It did nothing to merit death.

    Responses (1) +
  • [6] May 20, 2016 at 12:25am

    Communistic ideology has infected the church. Its sole purpose to to rot it from within so that Christianity is illegitimized in the eyes of the people. In the mind of a communist (or progressive), once Christianity is gone – there is nothing to stop communism from taking over the world. If you do not believe me, look up Lenin’s thoughts on Christianity. They lift up and push Homosexuality as a corrupting force. Once the job is done however, they will eradicate the homosexuals as well. What is most frustrating, is that these gay pastors don’t even realize that this is what they are doing. With such an abundant source of destruction, they don’t even need to come in with an army – we will destroy ourselves…they can just say they want peace, demand that we all just peacefully co-exist and then bide their time….

  • [3] March 26, 2016 at 2:35pm

    Funny, because according to your post history, the truth matters very little to you. You have already decided that Cruz is guilty without a shred of evidence.

  • [4] March 26, 2016 at 2:08pm

    Maybe before you open your mouth, you should make sure you have some evidence of a video showing a clear case of an affair; unless you think a person should be guilty until proven innocent.

  • [6] March 26, 2016 at 2:05pm

    Some of the women that were accused are looking into pressing charges. The campaign most likely will let them take care of the lawsuit because if Cruz did the lawsuit, it would be front line news for months while it is being resolved…something that would only hurt his campaign.

    Responses (2) +
  • [1] March 25, 2016 at 6:08pm

    Explain to me how that is proof? How many of their stories are nothing but gossip or rumors that truly have no basis in fact? Where is the evidence? If such evidence existed, why haven’t they released it yet? Finally, why are you willing to believe this when they haven’t given you any actual reason to do so yet? You need to think and not just react on emotion.

  • [-3] March 25, 2016 at 5:59pm

    I would love some verifiable evidence of his affairs. Or is an article claiming it just enough for you?

  • [2] March 25, 2016 at 5:51pm

    What is truly sad, if not perhaps frightening, is that these people are not even asking for proof. National Inquirer comes out with it and Trump supporters don’t ask to see verifiable records before running with it. It is disgusting to me that they are willing to destroy a man’s reputation without any form of evidence or work…such lazy thinking; it is no wonder why we are in such desperate straits as a country. Dangerous times my friends.

    Responses (3) +
  • [10] March 25, 2016 at 1:08am

    So let me get this straight:
    An anti-Trump Super PAC, not affiliated with Cruz or his campaign, sends out an ad targeting Melania. Now, yes, Trump has a right to defend his wife, but why is he not addressing it with the Super PAC that has no affiliation with Cruz? Why is he attacking Cruz for something that someone else did? You say that Cruz is complicit because he didn’t condemn it. But why does he have to condemn a stupid action of another individual? that logic opens up to attacking Cruz for every negative word said about Trump by every person in America because that would amount to the same case we have before us; namely, a non affiliate S-PAC ad being blamed on Cruz. But this goes back to my first question that has yet to be answered; if Trump truly wants to defend his wife, why is he attacking Cruz and his wife and not the Super PAC? Also, if someone did to my wife what was done to Melania, why would I want to highlight her possible, and most likely, embarrassment of the situation by constantly bringing it up in social media. To me, this points to the thought that this is all theater for him. He is not interested in defending his wife, he is interested in hurting Cruz. That is all and it is despicable.

    Responses (2) +
  • [5] March 16, 2016 at 9:11pm

    How is it a smear job to point out that a volunteer for Trump is a white supremacist? Not only that, but that she spoke to his support ON TELEVISION. Any other candidate would not allow such associations. If I were running, would not a white supremacist group campaigning for me, donating to me, supporting me, speaking for me, or anything else for me. I would ask them to support someone else because their principles are antithetical to my own.

  • March 13, 2016 at 7:38pm


    There are obviously more but I think these two should suffice to show a pattern. Notice the distinct difference in conduct of Cruz from Trump.

  • [1] March 13, 2016 at 7:32pm

    He already has changed politics, but not in a positive way. The people have legitimate anger. However, instead of encouraging people to direct that anger into restoring the constitution, he has given people the excuse to act in their emotion; the end result of which has pushed people close to the Tipping Point. Unfortunately, when people revolt in such a state, it will always look more like the French Revolution than the American. That is why Cruz is my candidate. He recognizes the betrayal of Washington and directs that anger to something constructive…bring back the Constitution to its rightful place on top. I never hear Trump talk about the Constitution except when he is forced to talk about it through an asked question.

    Responses (1) +
  • [-1] March 13, 2016 at 7:08pm

    Only on the surface statements does some of his message sound right. However, when he has to discuss policies in detail on the fly, his theater performance cracks and you get a glimpse into his very liberal ideology. This happens very often in interviews and during the debates under pressure.

  • March 13, 2016 at 6:59pm

    Ted Cruz on multiple occasions has allowed protesters on stage to have an open dialogue. He has been doing this long before Trump has ever let anyone, supporters or not, on stage.

    Responses (3) +
  • [1] March 12, 2016 at 12:21am

    Yes, they absolutely need to be stopped. However, it is the way we stop them that matters.

    Responses (2) +
  • [3] March 12, 2016 at 12:09am

    Show me how my analogy is wrong