User Profile: Nabuquduriuzhur


Member Since: December 30, 2012


123 To page: Go
  • July 23, 2014 at 12:22am

    Here is the music and midi file for the original hymn:

  • July 23, 2014 at 12:18am

    Going along brainless
    Go without independence
    Going along in noontide and in stuporous eve
    Waiting for orders and the time of shearing
    We shall go rejoicing, with the crowd as many sheep.

    Bringing in the Sheep
    Bringing in the Sheep
    We shall go rejoicing
    Bringing in the Sheep

  • July 22, 2014 at 2:22pm

    I wrote this for National Wave of Foolishness:

    “Does it make sense for a woman on the job wear something provocative to the point of stopping traffic, then complaining when “everyone hits on” her? Responsibility for choices, anyone? It’s not exactly reasonable to wear something tremendously revealing and then to “complain” about “too much attention,” when the entire point of a woman wearing something tremendously revealing is to attract attention, is it not? If a woman doesn’t want a given type of attention, then it’s logical not to wear clothes designed to attract that type of attention. The see-through shirt or plunging to the waist neckline is pretty distracting to others on the job. It’s astonishing how many women will wear something to work that they would wear to advertise to guys at a college sex party— and then they complain about the results from wearing it to work. Isn’t the workplace is the place for work?

    For those women that do that, what about the reverse? Would you want guys to show up for work, wearing see-through shirt and pants? Or wearing a tie and nothing else? Would you accept stupid complaints from them about “too much attention” or that “I’m getting hit on at work” if they did that? Then don’t do it yourselves. Have some concern for coworkers who want to get their work done.”

    Responses (1) +
  • [17] July 22, 2014 at 2:17pm


    Seems to me that women need to have some modesty, rather than having it all “hang out” and then getting bent out of shape when someone pays attention.

    She is a hypocrite and not worthy of respect.

  • [7] July 22, 2014 at 2:13pm

    Public place. No expectation of privacy.

  • July 22, 2014 at 2:05pm

    If I understand their idea, then something hardened the core of some rock formation into those arches. The question is: what would do it? I suppose an electric current strong enough to vitrify sand grains could do it, but what natural process other than lightning could make such a current.

  • July 22, 2014 at 2:01pm

    What is interesting to me is what would create the “core” of rock in such a shape as an arch. An anticline is the right shape, but would not readily form arches like that, not being able to support itself if the underlying rock is eroded out. The shape reminds me of magnetic field lines, but it doesn’t seem likely that magnetism could be strong enough to do that. Admittedly the Earth’s magnetic field is much less than even a century ago, but even at it’s strongest, it’s pretty weak.

  • [5] July 22, 2014 at 1:56pm

    Unfortunately, I don’t have the bandwidth or software on my site to host a Christian conservative comment room. Seems like it would be a good thing.

  • [6] July 22, 2014 at 1:54pm

    Agreed. The coding is terrible. It requires jumping through many hoops to get something in the comment boxes successfully.

  • July 22, 2014 at 1:52pm

    Romans 2: 19-23 “19 if you are convinced that you are a guide for the blind, a light for those who are in the dark, 20 an instructor of the foolish, a teacher of little children, because you have in the law the embodiment of knowledge and truth— 21 you, then, who teach others, do you not teach yourself? You who preach against stealing, do you steal? 22 You who say that people should not commit adultery, do you commit adultery? You who abhor idols, do you rob temples? 23 You who boast in the law, do you dishonor God by breaking the law? “

  • [14] July 22, 2014 at 1:44pm

    Hypocrisy doesn’t move us, either.

    Mr. Beck has complained about tracking. SO WHY ARE 20 TRACKERS ON THIS PAGE????

    Responses (1) +
  • [14] July 22, 2014 at 1:42pm

    What Mr. Beck doesn’t seem to understand is that people listen to his show and read his site for information and the conservative view.

    Most of us simply don’t care about showboating and millions wasted on “Oh wonderful me” stuff.

    Responses (1) +
  • July 22, 2014 at 12:59pm

    What amazes me is that there is a least one man in Berkeley who is not insane. God bless, Rabbi.

    Responses (2) +
  • [5] July 22, 2014 at 3:39am

    I mean that, Mr. “Potter”


    If you are LGBT, it’s very good chance you haven’t.

    It’s the most selfish lifestyle I’ve ever seen. People are just THINGS to be used and discarded like so much garbage. People are just used.

    How many people have you used in the last week, Mr. Potter? In the last month? In the last year?

    Do you realize that they are people, too? With dreams, minds, hearts, souls?

    That they matter just as much as you do?

    Do you EVER think of anyone else, Mr. Potter?

    Because you push LGBT, I dare say you probably don’t.

  • [10] July 22, 2014 at 3:35am

    re: Harry Potter

    Seriously, would you stop putting words in other people’s mouths?

    You know what? I don’t like the gay lifestyle. Why? Because it HURTS the people in it and the people around those in it.

    The idea that we are supposed to let someone hurt themselves and hurt others is not right. First, it’s the second most violent group in the United States after black Americans. Second, it has a 12 year reduced lifespan. Third, the lifestyle is one of using other people as things for one’s own personal gratification. That leads to hurt feelings and violence. Fourth, those in it cannot commit to one person, despite the propaganda. When they show a couple, the media carefully doesn’t talk about the 20 or 30 partners they had the prior week. One of my friends who was a lesbian was fighting with her partner because they would stray and sleep with others. Think that makes for violence? You betcha.

    Then add in the 30-fold increase in infectious disease in non-HIV positive homosexuals. With HIV, it becomes literally astronomical.

    Between 40 to 50% of black Americans now test positive for HIV. That means that considerably more actually have it. We are looking at the death of most of the black race in the U.S. because of black promiscuity and the LGBT lobby spreading disease in them.

    Part of my family is black. What about them when people like you push LGBT?

    Ever consider that there are other people other than yourself????


  • [4] July 22, 2014 at 3:27am

    It says something, that a decade ago when I last worked for the feds, that in our little satellite office, the thought of slacking off literally never crossed our minds. We did our 8 to 12 hours in the field and in the office. It wasn’t unusual to walk several miles in the field in one day while doing surveys.

    How things have changed.

    For example, the stuff I see now is scary. When I worked for a regulatory agency, private property was private property. You just didn’t go on someone’s property without permission. Nowadays some of these people just waltz onto private property without even asking. The entire attitude of government has changed.

  • [2] July 22, 2014 at 3:23am

    Only thing I can think of is that they are related to Bruce Jenner, who must be really irritated by how trashy his family turned out.

  • [1] July 22, 2014 at 3:22am

    Ooops. Drat. Right affer I said that, I’ve seen a few seconds here and a few seconds there. It’s hard to avoid her in the media.

    I’ve never watched her reality program. Bwahahahahah!

  • [6] July 22, 2014 at 3:20am

    I admit it: I’ve NEVER watched a program with Kim Kardashian.

    To the Left that would mean I’m some kind of nut…

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] July 22, 2014 at 3:19am

    Same people who do it now.

123 To page: Go