User Profile: NanAugie

Member Since: August 09, 2011

CommentsDisplaying NanAugie's 10 most recent comments.

  • As a woman I was completely offended by this. It was completely off the ick charts! Seemed like he was telling woman they should all rejoice as they continue to drop their panties for their (like that was all they were good for), and that heck he didn’t even need to take any precautions as abortion would take care of any “little problems” that arose. Disgusting – managed actually to make abortion a male issue – not a female one. Kinda has the “Hey now there’s no reason for you not to spread your legs for me, and no reason for me to ever grow up and take responsibility – if it happens YOU can always kill it.” Disgusting.

  • @Progressivepete – one thing you’re overlooking though…the jobs lost during the recession were full time higher waged jobs…..the jobs being added now (at less then the amount needed to maintain the the population) are almost ALL Part-time, low wage jobs…..that’s one of the reasons food stamps are on the rise. The jobs being offered pay so little you still qualify for food stamps.

  • Actually that’s exactly how things used to be in America. It was called courting. That was back before they got rid of shame, which was also a great deterrent, and replaced it with state sponsored sexual education in schools (not the boring sex ed I had in school but the classes today that go as far as demonstrating proper condom application). That was before feminism, cable tv and “progressivism” took over. Now we are told that is all old fashioned and out of touch.

  • You can support gay marriage and still be on the right…many do (personally I’m more for expanding civil unions with all the same rights – I mean if you’re anti-christian why do want to get married in a Christian Church anyway?

    What I don’t understand is that none of these liberals have a problem with the fact that they can’t get married in a mosque, and there are no boycotts of Muslim business’s when they support the death penalty for being gay. It’s so unbelievably bizarre to me. I mean they actually defend Islam but call Christians hate mongers.

  • @ BruceP – I call BS back. I have gay relatives, gay friends and gay employees, but I showed up to support Chick-fil-a. It was not anti-gay, it was pro-free speech and pro-freedom of religion. The hate and intolerance is coming from the left not the right…open your eyes and ears.

  • That is incredibly awesome – so moving. Thanks Penn, Teller, & the Blaze for putting it here.

  • “College student turned activist,” bzzzzz wrong! She was an activist all along, pretty obvious when you checked out her school info. The law degree itself is just another tool for activism. Why doesn’t anyone ever call her on that?

  • As much as I’d like to pin this on Obama I can’t (though he most certainly has made it worse as he spends money to “educate” people to the existence of this plan. I used to work for Verizon and the Lifeline program used to be funded largely by the Salvation Army. A year or so before the election it was taken over by the DOE, and what was once funded by private donations became a taxpayer expense. And it pays for a lot more than it used to.

    Before it would pay all outstanding Basic Phone bills just once so that the applicant could get local phone service, the second time a person tried to get assistance the percentage paid for was less, the 3rd time was lesser still and there was no 4th chance. Now that the taxpayer is footing the bill they will cover a certain dollar amount a year – every year. This was above the already greatly reduced monthly rate and any required deposits.

    They added cell phones around that same time and rolled out an advertising campaign (much like they did with the food stamp program), letting college students know that even if they live at home they could still qualify. Yup, they use your taxpayer dollars to create posters and radio ads to let the neighbors kid know that he can get free food and free phone service on your dime.

  • “and they don’t believe that they should be ruled over by black people,”
    The problem with that above statement has nothing to do with race. The objection is over a FREE nation (of many colors) being “RULED OVER” by ANYONE!.

    The President is not supposed to rule over anyone, he’s supposed to govern. Unfortunately, Obama is as confused by that little distinction as this guy.

  • Actually I think she thought she was being smart as I didn’t hear her say “I didn’t call you a name” what I heard her say was “I didn’t call your name.” I really think she thought she was being really clever. At least that’s how I heard it when I saw it live – can’t listen to the vid at the moment. Can’t stand the smug woman myself.