TheBlaze Books Give You More!

CommentsDisplaying Native54's 10 most recent comments.

• Gay Gym Teacher Continues Fight After Being Fired by Catholic School Over Revelations of Her Same-Sex Relationship

  May 15, 2013 at 10:52pm

  In reply to redsred.

  @HarryPotter

  Harry argues from the primes of his/her sexual attraction being innate and inborn. Never mind there are many multitudes of former LGBTQ. And so, that very fact debunks the comparison of innate, LGBTQ sexual behavior to race.

  And what HP can’t seem to get is, this private organization had every right to dismiss this woman … who obviously knew the rules and choose to ignore them. Sorry! I have no sympathy for this woman and her deceptive actions.

• Would Ronald Reagan Support Gay Marriage?

  May 4, 2013 at 8:13pm

  @K Chad Roberts

  “-Do you (or do you wish to) recognize non ‘male-female monogamous’ relationships as a binding relationship with familial-rights under the law?
  -Do you (or do you wish to) recognize non ‘male-female monogamous’ relationships as a binding relationship with familial-recognition under the tax code?
  -If yes to either, do you call this binding relationship Marriage or something else?

  Argue about the specifics all you want, but these questions must be answered and solved in some way.”

  Why must this be addressed ONLY for genderless coupling? Let’s look at reforming the inheritance tax for everyone. As well as for domestic partners not sexually involved, such as blood relations in a common financial relationship. Most all these items can be addressed by the legal system … Ever heard of “Legal Zoom?” But noooo! What you want is SPECIAL treatment for an abnormal sexual behavior. Sorry guys, but even pagans never equated same-sex couplings with those of historical ma/woman relationships. Doing something like that is just bizarre! And weakens the moral compass of the nation. Just as it did to the Roman Empire during it’s demise.

• Would Ronald Reagan Support Gay Marriage?

  May 4, 2013 at 7:52pm

  In reply to freedom888.

  @HarryPotter
  (QUOTE)
  “no one is being forced to recognize or accept it, no one is forced to change their religious beliefs, no one else is denied anything or effected at all.”

  REALLY??

  This is gov coerced validation over an aberrant sexual behavior.

  – A Christian photographer was forced by the New Mexico Civil Rights Commission to pay $6,637 in attorney’s costs after she refused to photograph a gay couple’s commitment ceremony.
  http://www.examiner.com/photography-in-sacramento/christian-photographers-must-shoot-gay-weddings

  – A psychologist in Georgia was fired after she declined for religious reasons to counsel a lesbian about her relationship.
  http://www.onenewsnow.com/Legal/Default.aspx?id=957496

  – Christian fertility doctors in California who refused to artificially inseminate a lesbian patient were barred by the state Supreme Court from invoking their religious beliefs in refusing treatment.
  http://www.pacificjustice.org/es/news/cal-supreme-court-rejects-doctors-rights-conscience
  http://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/story?id=4941377&page=1

  – A Christian student group was not recognized at a University of California law school because it denies membership to anyone practicing sex outside of traditional marriage
  http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/constitution/3923-high-court-rules-against-christian-group-at-california-law-school

• Would Ronald Reagan Support Gay Marriage?

  May 4, 2013 at 7:11pm

  In reply to freedom888.

  @HarryPotter

  . HOMOSEXUAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE …. This is a short list ….

  Rates of violence against homosexuals are the highest within the homosexual community, lesbian couples being the highest (homosexual-on-homosexual disputes/violence)….

  (Now keep in mind that people who identify themselves based on their homosexuality only account for no more than 2-3% of the entire population), but represent a disproportionate amount of domestic violence rates to their small population…

  Of the LGBT victims who sought services from the New York City Gay and Lesbian Anti-Violence Project, 36% of clients in 2003 and 38% of clients in 2004 filed police reports regarding intimate partner violence. (Diane Dolan-Soto & Sara Kaplan, New York Lesbian, Gay, Transgender and Bisexual Domestic Violence Report, at 6 (2005), available at
  http://www.avp.org/publications/reports/2005nycdvrpt.pdf.)

  Rates of violence against homosexuals are the highest within the homosexual community, lesbian couples being the highest (homosexual-on-homosexual disputes/violence)…

  Of the LGBT victims who sought services from the New York City Gay and Lesbian Anti-Violence Project, 36% of clients in 2003 and 38% of clients in 2004 filed police reports regarding intimate …
  http://www.avp.org/publications/reports/2005nycdvrpt.pdf.)

• Would Ronald Reagan Support Gay Marriage?

  May 4, 2013 at 6:32pm

  In reply to freedom888.

  @HarryPotter

  The harmful medical effects enough not to ever engage in this confused sexual behavior.

  • Unhealthy: Astonishingly consistent data from public health agencies continue to affirm homosexual practice as leading to disease rates vastly disproportionate to the tiny numbers (1-3 percent) of practicing homosexuals in society. For example, in 2008, the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) surveyed “men who have sex with men” (MSM) in 21 major U.S. cities [see this CDC Fact Sheet] and found that one in five MSM had contracted HIV, and 44 percent of those did not even know it.
  http://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/docs/FastFacts-MSM-FINAL508COMP.pdf

  Lesbians Are More Likely Than U.S. Women Overall to Have Risk Factors for Gynecologic and Breast Cancer
  http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/3318301.html

  Study: HIV-positive Practicing Homosexual Men 9000% More Likely to Develop Anal Cancer http://www.physiciansforlife.org/content/view/1338/27/

  For a population of just 1.5% [5], the risks far outweigh the rewards. Death and disease accompany promiscuous and unsanitary sexual activity. 70% to 78% of gays reported having had a sexually transmitted disease [13]. The proportion with intestinal parasites (worms, flukes, amoeba) ranged from 25% to 39%[18] to 59%. As of 1992, 83% of U.S. AIDS in whites had occurred in gays [21]. The Seattle sexual diary study [3]reported that gays had, on a yearly average:

• Would Ronald Reagan Support Gay Marriage?

  May 4, 2013 at 5:33pm

  In reply to freedom888.

  @harrypotter

  (QUOTE)
  “Native:
  One more thing, if you truly think that people choose to be gay, then I challenge you to choose to be gay for a day. I’m not asking you to have sex, just spend a full 24 hours only attracted to your own gender. If you can’t do this, why do you think that we can?”

  We are all born predisposed to one thing or the other. Homosexuality is no different than say… gluttony. But I don’t think we should encourage gluttony in our schools. Their both different types of appetites, and many are predisposed to that behavior. Want to engage in that behavior, have, at it! That is none of my business… UNTIL it starts impacting PUBLIC POLICY and my FAMILY. Especially in the public schools. Then it absolutely becomes my business. My concerns are for public policy, what is taught in the public schools, and community standards. How a person lives their PRIVATE life is their business. What is taught, and impacts my family, is most certainly my business.

  And why should my tax dollar go to subsidize, and validate someone’s aberrant sexual behavior. It’s just insanity!! I’ll fight against that nonsense till my last breath.

• Would Ronald Reagan Support Gay Marriage?

  May 4, 2013 at 4:11pm

  In reply to freedom888.

  @HARRYPOTTER

  Your analogies concerning the twin study is ridiculous! But of course, I wouldn’t expect you to accept. It clearly shows, that there is no one born homosexual. And I have googled the gene argument … There is NO credible scientific studies that prove any such thing.

  And you say you don’t know any ex-homosexuals … Really? Guess you don’t get out much. Youtube alone is full of testimonies from former LGBTQ. http://bit.ly/115TMTl
  Demolishing the idea that ‘there’s no such thing as an ex gay’
  http://treesforlunch.blogspot.com/2011/12/demolishing-idea-that-theres-no-such.html

  No one is entitled to every and all gov benefits … I can’t access many gov benefits to numerous to mention. Am I being discriminated against? You bet! And it’s very understandable, and reasonable that I don’t receive these benefits … I DON’T MEET THE CRITERIA. Neither do unmarried couplings, or same-sex ones meet the criteria for marriage benefits.

  There is no obligation for government to give every human coupling the same entitlements simply to “stabilize” the relationship, or gov benefits. The unique benefits of marriage fit its unique purpose. Marriage is not meant to be a shortcut to group insurance rates or tax relief. It’s meant to build families.

• Would Ronald Reagan Support Gay Marriage?

  May 3, 2013 at 3:25am

  In reply to freedom888.

  @harrypotter

  So tell me … why do you think a sexual behavior is the same as race? There is absolutely NO scientific evidence for a homosexual gene. In fact … The Swedish Identical Twin Study says it’s all about environment and behavior.

  July 13, 2008
  We Are Not Born Gay, Sweedish Twin study Shows

  “In general, twin studies show that when one male identical twin is gay-identified, the other will be gay-identified one time in nine, or only 11% of the time. The percentages are similar for female homosexuality. If homosexual behavior, attractions and identity were completely genetic, the similarity would be closer to 100%. What this tells us is that same-sex attracted twins are not born that way. Thus, within a pair of identical twins – where one twin has same-sex attractions – the other will have opposite-sex attractions eight out of nine times. ”

  The study of twins and homosexuality was touted in a press release as “the largest in the world so far.” The authors said that “more than 7,600 Swedish twins….responded to a 2005-2006 survey of health, beha
  http://current.com/community/89099881_we-are-not-born-gay-sweedish-twin-study-shows.htmity

• Would Ronald Reagan Support Gay Marriage?

  May 3, 2013 at 3:17am

  In reply to freedom888.

  @HarryPotter

  Your sexual proclivity is not, and NEVER has been the same as race. Give that silly nonsensical comparison up. I don’t know if any former people of color, do you? But there are multitudes of former LGBTQ. I mean, what is bisexuality if it’s not an impermanent sexual appetite? You are treated the very same as everyone else. I can’t marry just anyone I want to. You don’t want (so called) equality, what the homosexual community really wants is, societal approval. And you think engaging in a ceremony that counterfeits marriage will give you that acceptance and approval. Sorry potter, but what you want to do is use the force of gov to coerce others into affirming and validating your aberrant sexual behavior. So do your own thing … have a ceremony that mimics true marriage, but leave everyone else alone. And using gov force infringes on the FUNDAMENTAL right of conscience. Why should anyone be forced to validate immorality by participating in events they find morally repugnant. That is truly un-American.

  No you don’t have a problem with any type of sexual behavior … because just like the lesbian that said we should do away with marriage, homosexuals are

• Would Ronald Reagan Support Gay Marriage?

  May 3, 2013 at 2:59am

  In reply to freedom888.

  @HarryPotter

  You are such a ding bat!! Continuing to equate a sexual BEHAVIOR to skin color. How stupid can some people be?

  Gay couples can already do everything married people do–express love, set up housekeeping, share home ownership, have sex, raise children, commingle property, receive inheritance, and spend the rest of their lives together. It’s not criminal to do any of these things.

  Homosexuals can even have a wedding. Yes, it’s done all the time. Entire cottage industries have sprung up from Hollywood to the Big Apple serving the needs–from wedding cakes to honeymoons–of same-sex lovers looking to tie the knot.

  Denying marriage doesn’t restrict anyone. It merely withholds social approval from a lifestyle and set of behaviors that homosexuals have complete freedom to pursue without it. A marriage license doesn’t give liberty; it gives approval. Which is the real reason for demanding the silliness of marriage for LGBTQ.