Kudos for not including Beck in this list — on TheBlaze yet! :)
 October 29, 2015 at 9:17pm
Misreported…? Typo..? Pretty sure it was “Witch out!”
 October 1, 2015 at 7:18am
Except for Cruz, there is not a SINGLE elected federal representative who is truly working FOR America; rather, for their own selfish desires to grow their personal wealth through legislated (I avoided “legalized”) theft.. Name ONE professional politician who wouldn’t become a beggar without this forced taking of our $$$.. People like Trump, Buffet, Root, etc could be the biggest employers if government got out of the way. As Margaret Thatcher said:”The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money.” Time for capitalism to reload & reboot America; or is it too difficult for Beck to understand which of the candidates has the capitalistic skills to do that? Hint: forced taking is NOT a viable business model. I’ll take a guy who BUILT something over a wannabe control freak who couldn’t build a LEGO model without government paying for the kit.
Except Trump used forced taking (eminent domain) against a private citizen, using the power of the government to force them to give up their property so that he could have it.
A man who does not respect property rights has no problem taxing YOU to pay for others, my friend. That is the thing that bothers me the absolute most about Trump, and to my knowledge he hasn't explained it. I'm not sure there could BE an explanation, besides, " I had political connections and they didn't. I had power and they didn't."
 October 1, 2015 at 6:58am
ANY candidate showing signs of Beckism would lose my support. Beck has become Pelosi-light — “accept my beliefs before you learn the truth”. He prefers childish rants based on ignorance rather than learn any candidate’s full story before shilling for/against them. He’s become worse than the lame-stream media for spreading disinformation.
Actually, twisting someone's words and ascribing motives to other words being unspoken is very much a lawyerly tactic.
 September 18, 2015 at 9:25am
A replay of Mark Levin is easier to take than Glenn’s delusions. If BHO (and BOTH establishments) had not so badly deconstructed this country, Glenn’s vanilla government would be great; but we need a DOER to resolve what ails NOW… I would love Cruz as POTUS; but his 2nd debate showed he is too timid to handle the difficult post-BHO LEADERSHIP we need.
Memo to current POTUS/occupier: Lead (as an American), follow (the Constitution), or GET OUT OF THE WAY!!!
 September 18, 2015 at 9:01am
Gimme a break! BHO has enough bots to protect is preferred history – he doesn’t need Trump to do it. If the libs think BHO needs Trump to cover for him, then it’s already time for Trump to move into the WH.
BHO: Lead (as a true American), follow (the Constitution) or get out of the way!!!
Are you talking about Arrogant unPartiotic antiAmerican Pinocchio Nose Muslim golfer'n'gofer King Bo the self appointed dicktater of the USA - our leader, foreign policy chief, negotiator. director of the economy, defender of the USA & Constitution - all with no experience resulting in his dismal failure?
[-1] August 29, 2015 at 3:03am
So many clairvoyants and soothsayers… all predicting how a Trump presidency will turn out… Where were you all before and during the current pResident’s terms? Unable to correctly predict what was so obvious to many; yet we’re supposed to believe you now?
A lot of voters stayed home last time, and we got more of OneBigAssMistakeAmerica!! At least Trump is a builder, not a fundamentally changing destroyer.
Unlike every other candidate, he’s using mostly his own funds; and IF he does get to play some golf while in office, I doubt he’ll be using Air Force One which your annual income tax bill couldn’t keep in the air for 5 minutes! Yes! 5 MINUTES! Do the math.. Does no-one even get that BHO is leaving our heirs with an “irresponsible and unpatriotic” debt which will have DOUBLED under his reign? Does no-one remember BHO’s favorite words (HALF, DOUBLE) during his initial run?
Soothsayers… NOT! Bunch of SOOTsayers more interested in wallowing in a country where the takers are now out-numbering the makers — how in Hades does anyone think THAT is going to work out in the next ballot count?
Other than OPINIONS; WHAT do you MAKE Justin?
Your arguments here are really off-base, although I appreciate your time.
First, "soothsayers"? Come on! Countless conservatives, myself included, warned the nation about Barack Obama. You can't be serious.
Second, what does Barack Obama's mistakes have to do with this conversation? If anything, it just proves my point. Just like Obama, Trump makes promises he knows he won't be able to keep. If you think Trump is going to round up 10 million illegal immigrants and ship them across the border, you're dreaming.
Further, you can insult me all you like. I do work for a living (many hours, very hard) and I'm proud of what I do. Donald Trump is a great businessman and I admire him for that, but that doesn't mean he has good policy ideas, cares about the Constitution, or is a moral individual. The evidence says otherwise, in fact.
August 28, 2015 at 7:59am
Glenn Beck: Why is this issue even news? How about asking why virtually no pastor ever preaches on my favorite Bible passages? The Song of Solomon… Too erotic? Maybe Trump likes that one too… How long before prudes want to remove it from the Word?
That's true. They might as well worship him. For heaven's sake, if Muhammad's actions are worthy of emulation as Islam clearly teaches, and if it is against Muslim law to criticize the prophet (death penalty), how can I conclude anything but that they do worship him? What difference does it make showing an image of Muhammad, if he is treated like God anyway? What makes them think they don't worship him just because they hyperventilate over not making an image of him?
December 4, 2014 at 8:27am
“Obama called the $9 trillion… irresponsible… unpatriotic.”
Drinking from his own Common Core KoolAid…
My 1950s math says that $9T cut (divided) by 2/3 is $27T…. Nearly there…
Is “2/3″ O’s new math? While running for office, everything was HALF and TWICE…
 December 4, 2014 at 8:09am
* This product requires engine HEAT to generate its 1000W,
* Assume 1000W is 1% of engine output.
* If tank not running, engine MUST run to generate this 1000W.
* Burn 100,000W of fuel energy to save… er… generate 1000W.
Can someone explain the Return on Investment calculation again?
There is very little data in this article about a "secret" technology, which in reality means we are not getting much at all from the data point of view. The key to a thermoelectric system is not necessarily "engine heat", but just plain "heat". Meaning anything that produces adequate heat will do...it doesn't have to be something like a vehicle engine driving a tank AND making heat. This would be an ultimate hybrid or "alternative energy" vehicle, using the thermoelectiric device to power a drive train instead of a whole slug of batteries, internal combustion engine and/or a traditional generator, and a probably very small but efficient and intense heat source, including nuclear. This is actually very promising, more for commercial use than just military, but for better or worse, the gov't currently "owns" it and ain't talking.
Spend billion$$ in YOUR PRIVATE-CITIZEN LEGAL TAXDOLLARS for engineering and billion$$ to produce just ONE FOR TEST...then SPEND BILLIONS FOR LIMITED PRODUCTION... to save ???????? what?????
 October 13, 2014 at 10:26am
At a minimum, you’re missing or deliberately ignoring these questions:
Is requested service one you normally provide?
Do you reserve the right to surcharge for non-standard service?
Should a “protected class” have the right to demand products/services not normally provided by a business? What do you think would be the response if a car manufacturer was asked to deliver a vehicle painted with the LGBT rainbow? I’ll bet it won’t be “Sure. That’s a FREE option.” — at least not yet.
If protected classes have the right to such demands, then shouldn’t ANYone have the same rights?
I’ll bet this company wouldn’t print “Freakishly Arrogant Gays Suck” T-shirts either.. But pro-LGBT decisions also allow for such demands… such a T-shirt would be an opinion v. one that reads “I hate Freakishly Arrogant Gays” which would be declared hate speech — Live by the sword, die by the sword (which tend to be double-edged)…
In this case, the “service” is based on Christian beliefs. If a client wants non-Christian services, then GO ELSEWHERE or be prepared to PAY through the nose for this company’s non-standard (as they define it) service.
I’m sick and tired of these attacks from the Lacking Godly Belief Tactics crowd.
 August 21, 2014 at 9:10am
“The law requires places of public accommodation to offer their services to customers without regard to race, color, religion or national origin,” Elizabeth Cavell, an attorney who works for the atheist legal firm, told KTHV-TV.
So… FFRF is an organization which is clearly wanting to affect public accommodation of a religious nature… doesn’t that make them in violation of the very law they use as the basis of their arguments?
 August 5, 2014 at 11:10am
You obviously have not followed Jason… saw this coming many months ago… the only unknown/surprise was the date&time.
Unlike GB, RL, SH, etc who I also like, Jason had a plan, and implemented it BEFORE quitting… Join GALT.IO and learn instead of acting like a CNN shill.