There is NOTHING in the Constitution that can be remotely construed to relate to this. BUT there is Individual Liberty to chose what one believes and how one lives.
 November 20, 2015 at 11:20am
All ammunition should be wiped on bacon. These richard craniums dont get their virgins, and not so eager to die. You must deal with the enemy on their level.
Looking forward to the showdown. Bring it.. WE are not Europe, we carry and can shoot.
November 18, 2015 at 2:24pm
Well done! Send this to O’Reilly and see if he reads it..
 November 18, 2015 at 2:22pm
Ding Ding.. your a winner and absolutely correct. Unfortunately O’Reilly didnt educate himself about the questions he was asking. Its called Taqiyya(perfectly ok in their scripture) to the infidels Bill. Try that for the word of the day.
[-1] November 18, 2015 at 12:57pm
Just say YES, there are NO Islamists that are Christian and they can be vetted. One time you need to show some balls.
and who do you think has more balls than Ted Cruz?
ummm, isn't that he just said? Or did I miss something?
 November 18, 2015 at 12:14pm
O’Reilly you never disappoint me.. What a bamboozled buffoon. I have studied the Koran, I suggest you should read it for what it says. Sharia is Sharia there are no flavors, just vanilla. Try asking Dr. Zuhdi Jasser to come on with this guy and let them talk.
 November 17, 2015 at 4:28pm
Roger that, and take the shackles off the guys
 November 17, 2015 at 2:13pm
To heck with your global citizen.. I am an citizen of the United States and that is far as it goes… you can have the outhouse to swim in.
 November 17, 2015 at 12:56pm
Ben, I like you and your an honorable man. That was the dead wrong answer.
Disclaimer: I will not ever support any action anywhere for any circumstance until the ROE are disbanded and allow our military to totally protect their own and KILL all the enemy where ever they are.
That being said, the correct answer is.. A completely overwhelming force to annihilate ALL the enemy and there will be collateral damage if those are not smart enough to get away from the attack.
As a Marine, I am sure you can appreciate the message that he was trying to convey. What he was saying is that he is NOT a military expert and acknowledging that, he would not begin trying to put a number on it. My guess is if he went to the Joint Chiefs and said, "I want to wipe out ISIS as quickly as possible and with as few as possible US casualties", the Joint Chiefs would respond with a plan similar to what you propose.
The answer is to hand the military the mission and support the decisions they make 100%.
Carson did not disagree with you. He simply said he would never give less than what the military asked for. Contrast that with Obama who when told the military needed 80,000 soldiers in Afghanistan gave them 30,000. Overwhelming force for a SEAL team op may not require 50 men, where as 50 men cannot defeat ISIS. Dr. Carson is correct. The president determines the goal (i.e. the destruction of ISIS), then he listens to the Generals in charge and gives them what they determine they need, and "not one fewer soldier."
November 12, 2015 at 4:00pm
I work here and I am so glad I am getting the F out of this bul***** place in Dec. They are more interested in diversity and tolerance than educating people. We DO live in a binary system.. If you took your head out of your a** Jessica, it is or should be taught in Biology 101.. male and female. Morte to the University system!
 November 12, 2015 at 3:52pm
I thought I was alone. Good, They can have all that crap technology.
 November 6, 2015 at 10:40am
Bi*ch sold her soul for money and fame and its plain to see what she has become. Good for you Ben. Vetting my butt. Ben your spot on. All candidates, hold your ground and just dont get sucked in to this crap.. just refuse to do interviews.. the people who are like this will not vote for you anyway so why bother.
no beck ,how about Imgram be good to have a conservative women ,who can be fair and tough.let beck be a drama queen on his own
 October 30, 2015 at 1:00pm
So she issued retraction on Twitter… BFD and I emphasis the F.. Lets say CNN has 100,000 idiots watching and hear a lie. So the liar goes on Twitter and post a retraction that only 1% see.. They got their message to the 99,000 and 1,000 saw the retraction.. How about retracting on the same place you lied.