And so far, the tally is 13 for and 0 opposed….With 1 non-committal..
If you are suggesting that my prediction was wrong about conservatives condoning threats of violence – then you better start changing their minds quick.
Who is undecided
well, I put you down for non-committal because your response did not indicate either way.
Well I'm against violence of course but I think the protestor is an idiot because the flag represents ideals which is freedom for all. It doesn't represent a corrupt govt
Good on you then
i think both of the characters in this story are foolish.
 April 26, 2015 at 6:05pm
That’s a good point and she never actually said the explanation.
 April 26, 2015 at 6:04pm
Exactly. It completely skipped over how it got there in the first place as if we are just supposed to forget about how she said how it got there wasn’t a big deal. Either it’s a fail on her part or a fail on the author for not reporting her answer
 April 26, 2015 at 8:25am
Awww just like the little girl who forgave Isis this is great to see
 April 25, 2015 at 9:37am
Stop just stop from all this crap. This is disgusting and makes no sense. Go to something serious
 April 21, 2015 at 4:24pm
If Israel needs it what’s wrong with foreign aid? At least they don’t hate us. What I do know is that Israel and Paul agrees that they don’t want our aid because they don’t need it. And if that’s the case Paul has been in favor of pulling our aid out
 April 21, 2015 at 2:00pm
Getoff- I’m aware of that and I’ve already said he should have payed more attention. I’m just saying he wasn’t complicit.
 April 21, 2015 at 1:59pm
Tim they’re freakin stupid. And probably evil as well. They wanna get rich off this sort of thing. At least the democrats and socialists just tell us who they are as opposed to graham McCain and co.
 April 21, 2015 at 1:57pm
Yes exactly. I wonder what Lindsey and John would say? Ugh those blood thirsty savages
 April 21, 2015 at 1:55pm
Yes Reagan should have payed more attention absolutely. But it still doesn’t mean he himself did something wrong. If Obama were more trustworthy and he made the mistake of not overseeing everything. I could forgive him if something like what Reagan did happened. But with Obama it’s far more than one incident
 April 21, 2015 at 1:52pm
I know they’re similar. But they’re talking us to destruction at a slower pace. Those Rinos also don’t really get government and spending under control do they?
 April 21, 2015 at 1:40pm
I did a huge research project on Iran contra. Reagan was not a micro manager. That could be a mistake depending on how you look at. Basically he told Robert McFarlane to get those hostages home in anyway. And since Reagan didn’t micro manage macfarlane played fast and loose with his words and turned to Israel and Iran to get the hostages back.
Still done under his Administration (and if the same happened under Obama, Conservatives would blame him and call for the noose). All I'm saying is that Rand can't call himself a Libertarian if he wants to be a Reagan-like.
Reagan is not the one and only President in the history of our nation whom the term "the buck stops here" does not apply.
The amount of white-washing and rewriting history in regards to Reagan is crazy. The man was a fantastic President. He simply was not the conservative superhero people pretend he was.
And obviously liberals still blame Reagan. Big whoop, it helped keep Iran and Iraq at each other's throat for another decade, which wasn't a bad play.
Yes Reagan should have payed more attention absolutely. But it still doesn't mean he himself did something wrong. If Obama were more trustworthy and he made the mistake of not overseeing everything. I could forgive him if something like what Reagan did happened. But with Obama it's far more than one incident
Getoff- I'm aware of that and I've already said he should have payed more attention. I'm just saying he wasn't complicit.
Snow, Democrats are incapable of proper foreign policy. They have failed at every foreign policy decision they have attempted. The last Democrat that had any balls was JFK, since then it's been one train wreck after another. LBJ escalated the Vietnam war from 63-68 and it took 5 more years to get out of it and I'm not a big fan of Nixon either. Jimmy Carter, well, his name is synonymous with pathetic economy and lack of backbone in America. Clinton neutered the military, gave out pink slip, sold secrets and intelligence programs suffered. He is responsible for letting OBL go and the intelligence failures that led up to 9/11. Their blood is on his hands, the pathetic POS. I was in the military during his Presidency and field grade officers retired by the boatloads so they didn't have to take orders from him. He was a disgrace, just like Obama is. If it wasn't for the .com boom, Clinton would have been pitiful and had little if any legacy. He did raid the SS bank to balance the budget and now look what we have.
It should also be noted that he publicly took responsibility for the whole thing, including the parts he claimed he was unaware of. He also acknowledged that what he hoped would be a “noble” pursuit degraded into a “arms for hostage” deal.
Your "research project" wasn't nearly huge enough. Check this out:
That's not somebody who "wasn't complicit." He "should have paid more attention" is a laughable attempt at whitewashing his role in selling TOW missiles and much more to the word's #1 state sponsor of terrorism. In addition, he funded and sold arms to UBL and the mujahadeen. And sold chemical weapons to Saddam Hussein.
But hey, he had nice hair and that's good enough for me. Love ya, Gipper!
 April 21, 2015 at 1:37pm
Ya I agree. Poor Rand. One man army. I also like the way he speaks. He tells it to you straight.
Straight? Ask him if he agrees with foreign aid to Israel.
If Israel needs it what's wrong with foreign aid? At least they don't hate us. What I do know is that Israel and Paul agrees that they don't want our aid because they don't need it. And if that's the case Paul has been in favor of pulling our aid out
You're right justangry. Rand Paul is the ONLY candidate for President that isn't a member of the CFR or the Trilateral Commission.
Every President since 1921 has been a member of the CFR, every Secretary of State, has been a member of the CFR, and every President has had numerous members of the CFR (and Trilateral Commission) in their administrations.
That's why Presidents and their political parties come and go, but the agenda always remains the same.
He is not a one man army if we...The People...stand up, wake up, and care about something outside our 4 walls!
 April 21, 2015 at 1:36pm
Tim many have exactly the same policies as Obama or at least similar. Cruz and walker may not but the other Rinos certainly do.
 April 21, 2015 at 1:35pm
Well said Paul. Peace through strength. Don’t get easily involved in nation building and wars that cause us to stay a long time. We should be having people who live in those areas fight the evil. As Paul said the Kurds could be our boots on the ground if they had funding and training.
Vfor- just because it’s extremely difficult doesn’t mean God doesn’t call us to do it. Porn can be extremely difficult to overcome because how easily accessed it is everywhere but God still commands you not to do it.