separation of church and state was never a “founding principle”.
November 23, 2013 at 8:21am
With you on that one. I don’t really care, but stop forcing it on me. And Savage is no activist FOR the gay movement, he uses his sexual orientation as a silencer to opponents of his ideology. If he didn’t have a loud speaker and platform to spew his nonsense, I wouldn’t care that he favors the same ideology as the President. I’d just count him as another stupid starry-eyed follower. But he does have a platform and uses it to silence others based solely on sexual orientation.
If they can't reproduce they're broken and are of no use to society except to be a drain on it.
Someone is trying to silence others based solely on sexual orientation? What kind of monster would do that?
Gay people certainly can reproduce, and many do. It sounds like you have a real problem with elderly and infertile couples though....
Some one should point out more sexual assaults and rapes happen at PUBLIC SCHOOL.... Than happen at the church... When will savage be honest and not racist? The answer is never.. Keep hating others savage u racist
I have to say that I totally agree with you on this subject.
How can gay couples reproduce without the opposite sex being involved in some way!? A man and a man or a woman and a woman cannot naturally produce children. Don't they teach that at Hogwarts?
Gay couples can have children with outside help, as with elderly or infertile couples. So since elderly and infertile couples cannot procreate without outside help, I suppose their marriage are invalid as well?
A woman or a loving married heterosexual couple that can not have children (for whatever reason) are "broken and of no use to society"?
'Broken and of no use to society'
LOL...The idiot's argument when they have no other recourse...
That was your exact argument about gay people.
October 31, 2013 at 2:59am
How easily these sheep are led to their slaughter. They need a class on what DIVERSITY means, and criticism of the president is not a violation of it. Anyone who does this to their employees needs to have their pants sued off.
October 31, 2013 at 2:55am
Exactly. And anytime I see “partnership” coming from the government….it means tax $$$$. The first lady is wasting a lot of time and money at our expense for her ridiculous pet projects.
October 31, 2013 at 2:45am
What budget? That’s funny. And why do they think they can keep proclaiming that the deficit has fallen under Obama and it will magically be true? 1984.
October 26, 2013 at 3:27pm
This guy can spin his way out of wet paper bag. First he says, Obama didn’t lie, but doesn’t bring up ANYTHING to back that up, but rather spins his way into a tight corner saying that “their plans weren’t up to snuff-we made them better”. So…..in other words, you mandated that they meet a specific standard and since they don’t meet the standard under law, it was CANCELLED. The new plan with the acceptable coverage is insanely expensive. Even better, he spins into “The Republicans didn’t have any alternative….”. First, they did have alternatives, but why were they responsible for an alternative to something that the Dems INSISTED be shoved down our throats when our concern was jobs, economy, not healthcare? Furthermore, he gets into a tizzy and reverts to blaming Bush. What a supreme idiot.
October 26, 2013 at 2:57pm
I agree with this. Manatees are for the most part a gentle animal. The cruelty towards them is unwarranted.
October 26, 2013 at 2:45pm
Exactly. Unless his bill unwrangles the unnecessary regulations that strangled the system to begin with, this is nothing more than Kabuki Theater. I am not impressed.
October 26, 2013 at 2:04pm
I was thinking the same! But every little bit helps. I don’t use it at home either.
October 26, 2013 at 2:02pm
I think you may be correct.
October 26, 2013 at 2:00pm
I think you say this about once a week. Not only are you incorrect, you are pathetic. Let it go.
October 25, 2013 at 8:47pm
That’s what I was thinking. Notice, he, like many people who advocate for this, have NO idea how it would work. Thanks for letting us know you never picked up a history book in your life Brand.
October 22, 2013 at 2:07pm
Most of what he is claiming was never proven, despite Andrew Breitbart’s offer of a reward of evidence. This is just sheer desperation–if Dems were not feeling the heat, they wouldn’t revive this nonsense again. And the Kenyan thing? Kenyans brought that up, not the Tea Party. And who said he wasn’t a citizen? Hillary.
After posting the first time on this comment, I realized something.
Killary claimed then communist candidate, obama, that he wasn't a citizen. Does that mean she saw his now sealed college transcripts?
you no facts confuse liberals . they only have thought patterns in the milliseconds
October 15, 2013 at 3:22am
No RJ, that would be the NoCyrus app from Google! (they have one for Kardashian too)
October 14, 2013 at 4:29pm
October 14, 2013 at 4:19pm
“According to the Weekly Standard, however, the phrase “no reasonable expectation to privacy” is a “stock phrase” that is “used in the terms and conditions of many government websites and information systems.””
So is it standard to HIDE it?? Nice whitewashing Weekly Standard. That water bucket must be getting pretty heavy. The average person is not going to “view source” on ANY page. If it is standard and in the terms, it should be visible.
October 2, 2013 at 10:36pm
It amazes me that there is so much alarmist propaganda being spilled out by D.C. and the media over non-essential employees. Well, okay, THAT doesn’t amaze me, but the stupidity of people to buy into it amazes me. Obama said yesterday the federal government was the largest employer in the nation. THAT is the problem. They shouldn’t be.
Exactly. They produce nothing, maybe IRS agents that steal revenue.
Or EPA guys vacationing on our dime posing as a spook from the CIA for years getting commendations and performance rewards.
September 1, 2013 at 7:03am
It still never ceases to amaze me the ignorance that went into first supporting Obama, and second, the ACA. While this business owner is still experiencing sticker shock, let’s not count on him ceasing to support the policies that make the extinction of his business possible.
August 23, 2013 at 1:49pm
There is nothing in place (and shouldn’t be) that requires you to gauge someone’s “hate” when buying a home. In fact, it’s the opposite. The sellers are on the hook for anything that remotely resembles discrimination through Fair Housing. I don’t agree with what this guy is doing,it’s disgusting, but you can’t start attacking buyers as a result and gauging anything but their financial ability to buy property or a home. If people do not want to be associated with him when he moves in, if they want to stay–they just need to make it as uncomfortable as possible for him to be there, and if they prefer to move, so be it.
August 23, 2013 at 1:25pm
I really have enjoyed this show over the years, but when they inject politics (and their view) into the episodes, I have to turn the tv off. Guess this timer is off my schedule permanently. Usually they dive in a small amount and surprise you by taking more than one side on the issue which is why I have stuck with them in the past. However, considering this whole damn thing was bolstered in order to divide the country, can’t go with them stirring it back up.