User Profile: No_More_War_Please


Member Since: February 02, 2013


123 To page: Go
  • October 8, 2015 at 5:38pm

    Yes, and how did the get them? Lol, most of them came from us along with the satellite targeting information we gave Saddam back when his government belonged to ours.

    Yes, those WMD’s. The ones from the Reagan era that everyone including the UN and IAEA knew about. The ones that weren’t functional, but were too dangerous to move. The ones the US military tried to move and as a result got a whole bunch of soldiers sick in the process, and then they covered it up. Those WMD’s. The ones we didn’t invade Iraq over.

  • October 8, 2015 at 5:29pm

    Those were declared. Everyone knew about them. Even the UN. They weren’t usable, and were not the WMD’s we invaded Iraq over. You need to stay up-to-date.

  • October 8, 2015 at 5:28pm

    No, it’s not up for debate. Saddam had no usable WMD’s. Period.

  • October 8, 2015 at 5:23pm

    “War is a racket. It has always been.

    It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives.

    A racket is best described, I believe, as something which is not what is seems to the majority of the people. Only a small “inside” group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few at the expense of the very many. Out of war a few people make huge fortunes.”
    -USMC MG Smedley Butler, two-time Congressional Medal of Honor recipient

  • October 8, 2015 at 5:13pm

    See my above comment. Those were rockets carrying mustard gas that we knew were there. The UN and the IAEA knew they were there. They were all declared. Hence, they don’t count. The UN, and U.S. allowed them to stay put because they were too dangerous to be moved and disposed of properly.

  • October 8, 2015 at 4:41pm

    Lol, nice try, but I’m about to smash that argument to smithereens.

    All of the WMD’s you’re referring to were declared and known by the UN and U.S. intelligence. They were from the Reagan era back when Saddam’s government belonged to the Republican Party (how do you think he got them?) They weren’t functional, and we’re too dangerous to move so the UN allowed them to stay put. Aand are you really so stupid as to believe that the Bush administration was really trying to push America into war all over a little mustard gas? Lol, if you are, you’re just an idiot.

  • October 8, 2015 at 8:21am

    Conservatives will blindly keep repeating that to themselves in their head.

  • October 8, 2015 at 8:16am

    The “war is hell” excuse to justify the killing of innocent civilians works so long as those civilians killed aren’t you and yours. When a terrorist shoots up a military recruiting station over here, and ends up killing a bunch of U.S. civilians, do we ever accept that rational from them?

  • October 8, 2015 at 8:13am

    Where the heck have you been? You see, this is what happens when you only get your news from Fox News or TheBlaze. Half a dozen news outlets have reported on this story already. It’s literally been all over the place.

    In the future I suggest the three following places for credible news that will give you just the facts. Period.

    1.) NPR
    2.) BBC
    3.) Al Jazeera

  • October 8, 2015 at 7:21am

    So what was that, again, about them hating us for our freedoms?

  • October 8, 2015 at 6:15am

    And I thought GB said he would never post or trust anything coming from Alex Jones or Infowars…

  • [-5] October 7, 2015 at 6:08am

    Funny…did Dick Cheney retract his statements about WMD’s when it was proven that Iraq had none?

    Lol, what a bunch of damn hypocrites.

    Responses (6) +
  • October 2, 2015 at 8:23pm

    Stewart was simply pointing out the hypicracy of conservatives:

    Middle Eastern terrorists kill some people: US invades two countries, spends 3-4 trillion dollars, thousands of soldiers killed, hundreds of thousands of soldiers maimed, millions of innocent civilians killed, millions of innocent civilians displaced from there homes, people tortured, civil liberties taken away, etc.

    Domestic terrorists kill some people: Crickets chirping…

    Responses (2) +
  • October 2, 2015 at 6:38am

    Queen Esther,
    The Shah was installed in 1953 when the CIA overthrew the democratically elected leader of Iran, Mohammed Mosadeq, at the behest of the United Kingdom to prevent the Iranian government at the time from nationalizing the AIOC (Anglo-Iranian Oil Company), today known as BP (British Petroleum). Learn history. Google: Operation AJAX

  • [-5] October 1, 2015 at 8:53pm

    Bibi wants Iran invaded and destabilized for the same reasons he wanted Iraq invaded and destabilized. Iran is the largest Arab state in the Middle East currently (as Iraq was), and it represents the only real blockade standing in the way of Isreal’s goals of expanding its territory further into Lebanon. The Likud have for sometime now been trying to further its illegal territory grabs and those damn Iranians just won’t play ball!

  • [-5] October 1, 2015 at 8:26pm

    Here’s my best NetanYAHOO impression:

    “Blah, blah, blah, you gotta believe me!”

  • [-7] October 1, 2015 at 6:24pm

    Once again, the Zionists bring up the Holocaust. Jesus, it happened over 70 years ago! Get over it already!

    Could the reason for Iranian hostility be because you, the Likud, and the neocons in America constantly plot and threaten to bomb them? Of course not. Just keep regurgitating the same tired talking points. They hate us for our freedoms. Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah…..

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] September 26, 2015 at 5:46pm

    I may be young, but I know and understand what the Bible says and what God’s message is to His people. (FYI, the church is Isreal. There is only ONE chosen people, and those are people who profess faith in Christ for their sins. Not some geopolitical faction or nation that defines themselves based on silly borders drawn on a map by politicians.)

    I am not some charlatan like GB or Hagee that bastardize the scriptures to advance my own petty agenda.

  • [3] September 26, 2015 at 7:41am

    Yes, they are Biblical illiterates. They wouldn’t understand the Bible if Jesus Christ himself slapped them in the face and explained every single word of it to them.

  • [3] September 25, 2015 at 9:19pm

    John Hagee is the same lunatic, false prophet who tried to say that Jesus Christ did not “intend” to die on the cross. He received so much backlash from even the evangelical community that he was forced to print a retraction, and tried to claim that, “that wasn’t really what he meant to say.”

    Complete and utter heresy.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love