User Profile: No_More_War_Please


Member Since: February 02, 2013


123 To page: Go
  • August 17, 2015 at 11:46am

    Because like all good commies (W included), he loves a good foreign intervention.

  • August 17, 2015 at 11:45am

    Bwahahahahahahahaha!!! Watch out, ISIS will be rolling through Nebraska next Tuesday! Everybody grab their muskets! To arms! To arms!

  • August 17, 2015 at 11:43am

    Actually there were a lot more people voicing opposition to it than you’d like to believe. Almost every nuclear nonproliferation and weapons expert said Saddam had no nukes, and that the likelihood of him obtaining them was slim to none.

    But let’s take your line of thought and run with it shall we? 97% of scientists in the world believe man-made global warming is real and actually happening. Will you go along with them? I mean, it’s the majority right?

  • August 17, 2015 at 11:39am

    Actually Obama hasn’t. His wars in Pakistan, Somalia, Lybia, etc. haven’t helped, but it was W who had the biggest hand in turning th Middle East into jihadistan. It’s important to lay blame where it properly belongs. That’s the only way we can ever learn, right?

  • August 17, 2015 at 11:38am

    That’s a complete and total lie. “Victory” in Iraq was never achieved. We never got the utopian democracy the W said we’d get. The Bush administration repeatedly changed its story to fit the current situation and you know it. Sectarian violence would go down and W would say, “See! This is proof the insurgency is in it’s final throws!” But then sectarian violence would go right back up and they would change their story again and say, “See! The insurgency is giving us all they’ve got which obviously means they’re in their final throws!” Your hero changed his story again and again and again and again, and you bought all of it.

    Victory was never achieved. Peace was never won. That narrative pushed by the neocons is an absolute farce and anyone actually paying attention knows it.

  • [-3] August 17, 2015 at 11:27am

    Has anyone ever stopped to consider that Iranian hard-liners only chant “Death to America” because the warhawks and neocons in this country continually threaten to bomb them? This despite the fact that Iran has never invaded another country.

    Responses (4) +
  • [-16] August 15, 2015 at 9:16am

    Brought to you courtesy of George W. Bush’s war in Iraq.

    Responses (8) +
  • [-1] August 13, 2015 at 10:57pm

    The U.S. sold weapons to Iraq when they were fighting Iran. So does that mean that Iran should sanction the U.S.?

    Responses (1) +
  • [-1] August 13, 2015 at 10:53pm

    More money that was theirs to begin with. You forgot that caveat.

    Responses (1) +
  • [-1] August 13, 2015 at 10:52pm

    These people wouldn’t know hypocracy if it slapped them in the neocon faces. Cruz is the ultimate definition of a hyprocrite. I’m pretty sure if you looked up that work in Webster’s dictionary you’d see his picture next to it.

    Responses (1) +
  • [-1] August 13, 2015 at 10:50pm

    And what was he doing in Iraq to begin with?

    Responses (2) +
  • [1] August 12, 2015 at 9:11pm

    Still no different than Petraeus spilling his book of CIA secrets so that he could get his weaner wacked.
    Both of them should get life in prison.

  • [-1] August 5, 2015 at 10:46pm

    Conservatives are wrong on pretty much everything having to do with foreign policy — even when it comes to their idol Ronaldus Magnus the Great. Reagan was not a chickenhawkn in the same way that all neocons would like to imagine him as. After, the marines were massacred in Lebanon, he pulled all U.S. troops out of the area.nin his memoirs he explained that it wasn’t worth spending American lives in countries whose politics were so irrational.

    Additionally, it was William Hayward (a close adviser to Reagan) who claimed that Reagan had told him in a private meeting once that “these sons of b-tches want me to send the army everywhere! But I am not going to have 50,00 troops in Nicaragua!”

    So even on Reagan, the chickenhawkn neocons are dead wrong.

    Responses (2) +
  • August 5, 2015 at 7:06pm

    Has nothing to do with taking Iran’a word. If you had actually read the deal you’d know that, instead of the talking points you’re getting straight out of Tel Aviv. This deal is entirely backed up by UN IAEA inspections. From the moment Iran’s uranium is mined out of the ground it will be subject to constant inspection by the IAEA. Every facet of Iran’s nuclear program will undergo scrutiny and inspection from every country signatory to this deal. Stop falling for the paranoia and fearmongering propaganda. Learn a little bit!

    Responses (3) +
  • [-28] January 24, 2015 at 9:56am

    Let’s be honest with ourselves for just a moment here. Yes, Chrs Kyle was extraordinarily good at killing people, BUT he also did so in an illegal, unconstitutional war. So that makes him the invader and the murderur. Also, we know that he lied about a lot of things in his personal memoir, American Sniper (there’s a reason Jesse Ventura sued him for defamation…AND WON). This makes Kyle a liar on top of things. Not exactly the picture of a Christian hero.

    Responses (12) +
  • [-1] January 11, 2015 at 7:18pm

    LOL! “We bombed and killed a whole bunch of innocent people in WWII, so what’s the big deal?!?” When will you conservatards learn that the whole “two wrongs makes a right” argument is not a valid defense? Can you imagine the horror and disgust if Mexico bombed America and was achieving a civilian casualty rate of 80% and higher? Lol, the media wouldn’t be able to shut up about it. But whatever, it’s just a bunch of brown people, right? Yeah, screw those guys…

  • [-4] January 11, 2015 at 2:27pm

    Lol, if an 80% civilian casualty rate doesn’t qualify as apartheid, you’re probably either a sociopath or a conservative. Now that I think about it…is there any difference between the two?

  • [-2] January 11, 2015 at 2:23pm

    Ok good, so your auguing that Bush was/is just like Obama. How does that validate your argument again?

  • [1] January 11, 2015 at 2:21pm

    Hahahaha, more like “bankruptcy and selling out our liberties and freedoms for empire is coming to you!” Lol, quit with fearmongering. If anything America is less free today because you sat silently by while Bush robbed us of our liberty. But hey, anything to kill a few brown people, right?

  • [-6] January 11, 2015 at 11:49am

    Let’s discuss this: did the French government’s actions in Mali and Libya motivate these attacks?

    Responses (3) +
123 To page: Go
Restoring Love