User Profile: NoMoreGray

NoMoreGray

Member Since: December 11, 2010

CommentsDisplaying comments newest to oldest.

123
  • November 7, 2013 at 9:10am

    This is why I specifically avoided a Micro/Macro statement, it gets you in the weeds. The reality is their is no evidence of Macro evolution only biased assumption & theory. I have personally read science papers from the UNIV where without any supporting science, the unexplained conclusion is “evolution”. Also the current DATA & historical records show their is a cyclical pattern of warming & cooling. Ignoring these facts in favor of something that can not be seen is… FAITH

  • November 7, 2013 at 8:54am

    willost size and absence of are two different things. Size is open to personal interpretation absence would be a medical reality. Hermaphrodites have a truly agonizing problem and all should be entirely sympathetic, but this too is a medical diagnosis & should not be diminished by those looking for acceptance of a medically unprovable decision.

  • November 7, 2013 at 8:36am

    “a lifelong Mormon who was born a man” This is all the article says about how he was born, maybe you could point out the line I missed.

  • November 7, 2013 at 8:21am

    And of course her unbiased revelation came once she entered the college world. Having a family member in a BIG Ten University she and we have seen first hand the pressure young people of faith are put under to discard their beliefs. After all you can’t follow the religion of Evolution & Global warming & be a Christian.

    Responses (41) +
  • October 24, 2013 at 9:04am

    Setting aside the obvious ? that this book is a well timed piece of propaganda, I’ll say this. If someone runs for office saying that their faith is a factor in their daily decision making and we elect them, AU or no one else has the right to interfere when they make it part of their daily routine. If God forbid we were ever dumb enough to elect a MB type, would anyone dare tell them or their staff they couldn’t stop and face east several times a day? I doubt it, and nor should they. A country founded on religious principles have no right to expect those elected to leave them at the door.

  • October 24, 2013 at 8:19am

    I seem remember someone yelling “what difference does it make”, seems to that person looked a lot like Hillary. Her response here tells me she still does not take responsibility or care.

    Responses (4) +
  • October 18, 2013 at 9:47pm

    “So, what is his VOTING RECORD? Anyone believing in campaign rhetoric at this point should be seen as a threat to others. No voting record, NO DICE”
    Maybe this line does not mean what I think it means, but I thought your point was you would need to see a voting record in order to support someone. In fact your response to my Cruz point seems to reinforce this.
    So, in response to your point a voting record can be deceiving, McConnell’s early voting record would almost certainly gain the support of most conservatives to vote for him, but knowing what you know now, do you believe he is a conservative that can be trusted and you would vote for? Voting records can be bought and sold, the fact is once they are a politician the credibility of the facts you can see are always in question.
    As far as Supreme Court goes, that is a whole other issue and would take more characters then I have left. Suffice it to say all the bad things that have happened from the SCOTUS, prayer in school, Rowe vs Wade, Obamacare & more, lay at the feet of GOP nominees.

  • October 18, 2013 at 4:46pm

    Maybe you should look at McConnell’s voting record, especially the early years. A voting record can tell you where they stand or that they are a good liar (politician). Are you upset that Cruz was elected without a voting record. The man is defined by the life he lives before elected not the deals he makes after.

    Responses (3) +
  • October 18, 2013 at 4:36pm

    Yes I know Weak not week.

  • October 18, 2013 at 4:34pm

    Honestly, I was hoping Glenn would push harder today on the questions Matt did not clearly answer last week. We need to act quick but we also can’t throw our time and money into a basket with a week handle. That would just hand it to those we are trying to remove.

  • October 18, 2013 at 4:17pm

    An early and reluctant Rand supporter I have grown concerned. His stance on Rubio’s Gang of 8 Alien Amnesty bill otherwise known as Immigration reform bill was uncomfortably soft. Next if you watched his support of Cruz’s 21 hours closely as I did, you would have noticed that while giving Cruz a rest, he also pushed for Cruz to cave and accept less & gave interviews that said as much. I was never a Ron P supporter but had become a Rand cheerleader, a reserved one but one just the same. It concerns me again that he would not at least remain neutral giving time for a more representative challenger to emerge. Feels a little like kissing the ring to me.

    Responses (1) +
  • October 17, 2013 at 8:30am

    The Blaze really has to stop re-printing AP stories if “the truth” is ever going to “live here”… “averts default” c’mon

  • October 16, 2013 at 9:24am

    I was politely corrected for a skipped word, guess my brain is to fast for my fingers or I cant’t chew gum and type. I meant “3 more” verses, please forgive, back to the gum. ;-)

  • October 16, 2013 at 9:18am

    Correction accepted, meant 3 more. I actually think the remaining verses draw ought more emotion for the event and the thoughts that gave birth to the anthem.

  • October 16, 2013 at 8:40am

    Not a prank… a test. There are 3 verses to the song and we all proudly stand for one but how many people even new their were more. Again Love it and thank you.

    Responses (3) +
  • October 16, 2013 at 8:38am

    Love it!

    Responses (2) +
  • October 12, 2013 at 10:38pm

    Here are a couple links I tweeted 2 days ago.

    ‏@NoMoreGray 10 Oct
    Will we ever learn, first time 1953 cngrss gives temp 6 bil increase to buy time to fix spending problem http://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2013/03/how-the-nation-resolved-its-first-debt-ceiling-crisis-.html#.UlcDihJoWNI.twitter … @glennbeck

    O says debt ceiling hs not bn a tool to levrge the othr side to cut spndng really? 1953 http://hnn.us/article/150133 @glennbeck #TheNewRepublicans

  • October 12, 2013 at 10:21pm

    Actually the first time the debt ceiling was raised was 1953 and the first time the debt ceiling was used as leverage was…. yes 1953. Simple to find simply search “Debt Ceiling 1953″ and you will get lots of accounts of the events.

    Responses (1) +
  • September 26, 2013 at 8:35am

    Fraud… Take a closer look at Peter Kings history, even in just the last year.

    Primary Threat… Who of you don’t get threatened with being replaced if you don’t do as your employer requires, even if you disagree.

    Kamikaze Pilot… Only because few of our other representatives had the stones to fly with him.

    Republican Party… The minute any party is considered over the will of “We The People” you are on the wrong track.

    “I’ve never seen anyone as unpopular in Republican circles as Ted Cruz,”… Best endorsement ever and by the way, never seen a congress as unpopular with the American People than Peter Kings.

    If there were aver a case to move to Texas and vote for Cruz, King just made it. I will however stay where I am and try to get more “Crazy Like Cruz” congressmen and senators.

    GOP-RIP Long live The New Republicans! Show Peter King and the rest of the GOP where you stand #CrazyLikeCruz

  • September 17, 2013 at 3:27pm

    The GOP has Fox. The Dems have… well everything else. And the Prog’s have porn in a dark corner of the basement. As for the rest of us… I guess we will just have to think for ourselves.

123