User Profile: normbal


Member Since: October 01, 2010


123 To page: Go
  • [29] January 26, 2015 at 8:17am


    1 – Predators. Puma, Coyote-dog hybrids? This would leave obvious evidence.

    2 – Theft. Dog fighting rings, hungry OTAs (Other Than Americans).

    3 – Aliens. (little nod to H2 programming there).


    Keep your freaking dogs INDOORS. Even though they are our first lines of defense, they’re a LOT like little children and rely upon us to protect them.

    As a long-time dog owner, I blame bad “parenting” for the majority of these disappearances, regardless of who or what is taking them.

    Responses (4) +
  • [2] January 14, 2015 at 10:16pm


    Lena Dunham.

    The ghost of Andy Warhol called from the great beyond.

    He wants you to give your fifteen minutes back so someone with talent can use them.

  • [27] January 12, 2015 at 6:11pm

    This is “diagnostic” folks. The man is a sociopath. More properly, he has a sociopathic personality disorder. It has been diagnosed by better medical minds than mine. He not only doesn’t care, he’s not even aware of this being an issue. Very dangerous individual, especially with a pen and a phone – and Valerie Jarrett or George Soros at the other end of it.

    Responses (3) +
  • [4] January 12, 2015 at 5:32pm

    Portraying Mohammed as merciful? Never. Never never. The frogs at Charlie Hebdo just opened themselves up for another round of whoop-a**.

  • [55] January 11, 2015 at 12:30pm

    Because he’s used up all his vacation time this year?

    Because he’s a sociopath?

    Because so many of the muslim terrorists in Paris would want his autograph?

    Because Valerie Jarrett wouldn’t let him go?

    Responses (1) +
  • January 10, 2015 at 9:12pm

    There is only islam.

    Google that.

    Get your guns while you can.

    Responses (1) +
  • January 7, 2015 at 2:38pm

    An employee of Charlie Hebdo told L’Humanite that the assailants spoke perfect French and said they were al Qaeda members.

    But let’s not jump to conclusions. Let’s judge them by their actions.

    And blame it on global warming.

    And guns.

    Responses (1) +
  • [6] January 6, 2015 at 2:36pm

    What a complete crock.

    When something THIS important comes up, you make darned sure you are there to vote.

    Had he been watching the weather reports he could have DRIVEN here last night. Hell, I could have driven down and BACK in time for the vote.

    What a lame-a**ed excuse.

    This thing has subterfuge, hidden agenda, plausible deniability and conspiracy written all over it.

    Please Lord, let the shooting start in ernest.

  • [18] January 5, 2015 at 12:57pm

    There is a process known as “Hegelian dialectic” used by the left (Marxists, socialists, progressives) to get to the unjustifiable ends they desire – no matter the means. This is a process of gradual erosion of belief in time-proven standards and laws in favor of whatever is expedient to their purpose. We call this process “social norming.”

    If our end goal is to desensitize people to the presence of guns, to “normalize” them in every day life, we simply ensure they are SEEN, spoken about, debated, just as NRA, GOA, SAF, JPFO and all the other state alphabet gun owner groups and many new, especially women shooters, are doing.

    This is NOT about the guns. No more so than owning and driving a high horsepower automobile is about cars as much as it is about power and disempowerment and class envy. Gun control is about control. The end game is total victim disarmament and victimization of the disarmed. Exactly as it has played out in every country it’s been done.

    If we want a society where we trust others to have/hold/use firearms (you know, to exercise the natural, civil, constitutionally protected, HUMAN right to keep and to BEAR arms), open carry is the normative behavior.

    Remember, when Rosa Parks sat in the front of the bus there were many people in her community who insisted she was pushing the envelope, was doing more harm than good, that nothing good would come of it.

    Keep pushing the envelope, folks. We’ve nothing to lose but our chains.

    Responses (2) +
  • [7] January 4, 2015 at 6:14pm

    The following truths courtesy of Ann Barnhardt. She’s often accused of having crazy eyes.

    Nevertheless, these are all true;

    A.) The constitutional republic referred to as the United States of America no longer exists. TRUE.

    B.) The Rule of Law is no longer in force in the former United States. TRUE.

    C.) The Constitution of the United States and the system of government it defines is therefore no longer in force. TRUE.

    D.) The body going by the name “United States Congress” has been rendered meaningless in praxis. TRUE.

    E.) National-level representative politics in the former United States is a completely false facade, kabuki theater, designed to entertain and mollify the masses who are of average intelligence, and to launder looted money and enrich the oligarch class. TRUE.

    F.) Given the reality of the true premises above, any person who holds or seeks to hold national-level public office is, by definition, morally, intellectually and/or psychologically unfit to hold public office (The Barnhardt Axiom). TRUE.

  • [42] January 2, 2015 at 11:27am

    Q: How many feminists does it take to change a light bulb?

    A: That’s not funny.

    Responses (3) +
  • [10] January 2, 2015 at 11:26am

    Typical liberal. No moral compass. No backbone. Doesn’t want to “offend” anyone. Sure. You don’t need to worry about it – bank 50% of your income for the next five seasons and retire to Belize. Screw the feminazis.

    Responses (1) +
  • [41] December 30, 2014 at 2:40pm

    Seems to me that Cuoco is fulfilling the feminist’s dream, doing what she wants, how she wants, not seeking approval from the so-called feminists who would brow beat and ridicule her (and have) over living her life the way she is comfortable living it.

    Like MLK’s “Dream” of being judged by ones character, Cuoco is being judged by HERS, and if those judgments have value, she is very well remunerated for her character.

    For the feminists, it’s sour rapes… grapes.

    Responses (1) +
  • [3] December 24, 2014 at 12:38pm

    And it is truly amazing how few people actually know about the origins of “progressives” and the Fabian society. They’re quite open about it, too. Have their very own website, college scholarship (Rhodes’ Scholarship named for a cofounder Cecil Rhodes who once had a country in Africa named for him), school of economics (college of lies, The London School of Economics), and plans for world domination quite exclusive of the muslims who have their own plan. Truly astounding we know so little about them in the sense that the mainstream media never talks about the connections between our very own “fabians” (Soros, Obama, Clintons, Bushes, all the rest), The Federal Reserve bank and the – quite intentional – collapse of the dollar and US civil society.

  • [13] December 24, 2014 at 11:36am

    Been reading about this today – it’s all over the web.

    Calls for “justice” (what’s that? Whatever “they” say it is – usually in very large denominations), arrest and conviction of the racist cop, burn baby burn, all the usual talking heads were woken up and spoon-fed talking points for breakfast. And what, exactly is for breakfast? A great big bowl filled with a heaping steaming pile of Progressive agenda sprinkled liberally with racist aspersions and crispy leftist bon mots.

    Seems like the guy – ahem, the 18 year old boy, while, really, close to an infant if you think about it – was a gentle giant who had just recently donated a kidney to a sick cousin and was on his way to a blood drive at a local church, planned on attending MIT in the fall, was secretly working on “the cure for cancer” in his spare time, and, although he HAD BEEN a member of the notorious “Diindu Nuffin” gang, his mom, 30 year old Uneequah assures us he’s a good boy who would never do anything bad to anyone. He was, in fact, “turning his life around.”

    Calypso Louis Farrakhan and Al Charlaton will be certain to dive into the fray after they extricate themselves from their harems later this morning. President Obeyme will be informed when he awakes sometime around 10 or noon as His Earship pleases.

    Another Casus belli? Bring it.

    Just one more looting day until Christmas

  • [5] December 23, 2014 at 10:52am

    What, no one recalls this has been happening in America for the past ten years? There was that college in where, South Carolina a few years back, and another event in So California?

    It’s about the muslims. This is what they do. This is what they have ALWAYS done in every country they’ve taken over. No one VOTES for a government to be run under sharia, it happens by terror and slaughter. Incite, terrorize, claim victimhood while their advance forces disrupt society and kill, kill, kill.

    It is time to raze their command and control centers (aka “Mosques”), salt their fields and forbid the practice of their political system in civilized nations everywhere.

    Responses (1) +
  • [7] December 21, 2014 at 8:48pm

    How can people still not get this? “Allah” does not mean “God.” If it did, why did they change the name since the time of Isaac and Esau from JHVH?

    And this is CLEARLY not related to “The Religion of Piece” but another isolated incident of a lone wolf running amok.

    Move along, nothing to see here.

    Responses (1) +
  • [3] December 21, 2014 at 12:54pm

    In more blood.

  • [4] December 17, 2014 at 10:46am

    The entitlement and arrogance of this woman astounds me. Because she was asked for help getting something off a shelf in a Target, she attributes this to her RACE? Possibly the ugliest woman to ever inhabit the white house (Eleanor Roosevelt wins this one hands down), even though every media outlet has plastered her face on checkout stand magazines for almost 8 years, she assumes everyone on the planet will realize that SHE is the FIRST LADY and treat her with what kind of deference? That expected by royalty? Hey, Imelda, buy your shoes elsewhere.

  • [3] December 16, 2014 at 2:49pm

123 To page: Go