User Profile: NotAConstituencyGroup


Member Since: November 21, 2012


  • [4] April 17, 2015 at 12:05pm

    Neocon has come to mean “A person not on the left who I disagree with politically”.

    Thus, like most invectives the definition changes based on the person using the term.

  • [1] April 9, 2015 at 10:15am

    Politicians, or anyone else who happens to being steamrollered.

  • [2] April 7, 2015 at 12:06pm

    Does bracket selection indicate intelligence?

    If so, queue up “smartest man in the (empty) room” jokes since 6,996,358th of 11,570,000 is below average.

    Explains the draw: Vote for him, you will feel good about how smart you are! (By comparison.)

  • [3] April 3, 2015 at 10:31am

    Of course big business is against religious freedom for shop owners, eliminating protections for small shop owners will drive some of them out of business, which is good for big business.

    Big business isn’t a conservative enterprise, it’s at best agnostic, and at worst anti-freedom.

  • [38] April 2, 2015 at 10:33am

    Any one else notice how as part of any highly suspect or criminal action launched by this administration they also launch an investigation? That way they can always say “We don’t comment on ongoing investigations.”. “Oh, okay, its part of an investigation. I guess we’ll hear “why” when there is a new administration in power.”

    Responses (1) +
  • April 1, 2015 at 5:54pm

    Thanks for your replies, they are all good points.

  • [3] April 1, 2015 at 4:41pm

    I’m more puzzled than anything else. What made Jim Norton snap on Trevor Noah’s detractors, and not on comments about anything that was actually important?

    Responses (4) +
  • [13] April 1, 2015 at 11:24am

    So much for the liberal mantra that the heart is all that matters.

  • [1] March 31, 2015 at 12:56pm

    Hey zapparules, I thought I drop you a line, how’s it going dude?

    (I’d replay to your message to me, but I can’t figure out what it was supposed to say. Can you write it again with all of the words and/or as complete thoughts? All I can figure out is you want Pence to do it with Obama, which considering the topic sort of makes sense. I guess.)

  • [30] March 31, 2015 at 11:57am

    I say take a page out of Obama’s playbook:

    1. Blame someone else for signing this into law.
    2. Demand an investigation.
    3. Go golfing.

    Responses (11) +
  • [6] March 31, 2015 at 11:48am

    Sounds like he’ll fit in over there nicely.

    And hurray for social media, without which he wouldn’t have been able to fully express himself.

  • [1] March 30, 2015 at 3:10pm

    Don’t worry Dattebayo, they lie about hating guns too. Oh wait…

  • [3] March 30, 2015 at 2:44pm

    The governmental voice of tolerance has spoken…

    Man this law must be expected to work really well or all of this push back wouldn’t be so strong.

  • [4] March 30, 2015 at 12:45pm

    Is this one of the 57 states he didn’t have time to visit on the campaign trail in 2012?

  • [25] March 30, 2015 at 10:28am

    He’s now on food stamps? HA!!! Take that America!!! (Yo “ModerateRepublican” this is an example of my tax dollars supporting something I don’t agree with, as if _anyone_ has far to look for examples.)

    Hurray for social media and the idiotic behavior it encourages!

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] March 30, 2015 at 10:08am


    Re Taxes: Well I think it is safe to say that everyone who actually pays taxes has their taxes go to protecting things and people they disagree with. EVERYONE. ALL THE TIME. WITHOUT FAIL. This would be a good argument against TAXES not against this law.

    Ironically on the religious hypocrisy front from what I’ve seen the hypocrisy appears to mostly be coming from the people who go looking for religious business owners to shut down, screeching about “tolerance” when they can’t tolerate those people’s religious beliefs.

    So I guess hypocrisy is a two way street? Unlike tolerance?

  • [42] March 27, 2015 at 6:57pm

    A scary monster at that.

  • [-2] March 27, 2015 at 6:46pm

    Ripe, I’m not the one that has problems sleeping, you are (according to what you wrote). I was just making sure that bit of absurdity is what you actually meant to write.

    Anyway I’m still waiting for an explanation of what George’s statements are supposed to mean if he doesn’t have an agenda Re:Gays. (i.e. a “Gay Agenda”)

  • [38] March 27, 2015 at 3:43pm


    If that is the correct response (a capitalistic backlash), why is it necessary and desirable for “civil rights” commissions to force businesses to violate their owner’s principles and consciences in the first place? (This bill was a response to such actions)

    Why not just boycott the businesses that you find objectionable instead of forcing your personal brand of morality upon them?

  • [6] March 27, 2015 at 1:29pm

    Reality is what is real, and apparently to you embracing reality means living in fear. (Simply going off of what you have written here.)

Restoring Love