User Profile: NotSoCommonSense

NotSoCommonSense

Member Since: November 01, 2011

Comments

123
  • [3] August 28, 2015 at 8:36am

    The answer is quite clear, none of the victims could have been his son!

    #alllivesmatter – stop America’s prenatal holocaust!

  • [5] August 20, 2015 at 9:00am

    Black on white crime? Where is the media? Where is Obama’s speech? After all that could have been Obama’s grandmother!

    Responses (1) +
  • [3] August 17, 2015 at 4:31pm

    I’d be curious to know what this audience thinks about these arguments:
    http://www.livingwaters.com/outreach/180-movie

    Responses (2) +
  • [1] August 14, 2015 at 4:38pm

    “Thank God for abortion. Having over 53 million more people in this country, all born to parents who never wanted them but were just too stupid and irresponsible to think about the consequences of their actions? That would be horrible! We would have an even higher percentage of bums, parasites and criminals…” – Grover_Standpipe

    Well Grover, since you don’t believe that human life has any more value than the rest of the food chain, what would be wrong with killing off the bums, parasites and criminals? Furthermore, that’s quite a leap in assuming that all unwanted children become bums, parasites and criminals. Adopted children might actually become productive members of the community. Why is the choice always death? Your mother doesn’t want you so we’re just going to snuff out your life, we can’t think of any other possibilities.

  • [5] August 14, 2015 at 4:09pm

    “Yeah, cknappp, it’s alive, but so what? There’s nothing inherently sacred about life. We all have to take other lives to eat. What gives human life a value above that of other forms of life?” -Grover_Standpipe

    This is the very essence of the problem. You do not believe that humans are any different than any other species. Of course the problem with this thinking is that every time we take a life to eat, we are committing murder OR we ought to be able to take one another’s lives without consequence just like the remainder of the animal kingdom.

  • [4] August 14, 2015 at 3:53pm

    Not sure I follow the logic here: Unless we all agree on something than we cannot use science to prove that a baby with all its functioning parts and organs including a heart beat and brain waves is in fact a baby? In a partial birth abortion the baby is partially delivered and then killed – I guess until the head exits the woman, she still has a thumb up/down decision over life? Nah that ain’t no baby – nope! Why then does the decision making capabilities of the primary care provider end at birth…if the baby is just too much work and it is impacting the woman’s life style, why can’t she then decide that the ‘born fetus’ is not a baby and discard it?

    Last I checked it takes two to make a baby, why doesn’t the father have any say in this important life or death decision?

  • [5] May 12, 2015 at 10:07am

    I’m white, my family is white, and I know that none of them ever participated in american slavery since they immigrated here 2 generations ago. So when she says it’s a “ya’ll thing”, what group of white people is she speaking to?

    Additionally, I’d like to see her show appreciation for that other group of white people that surrendered their lives to bring an end to slavery in this country…is that a “ya’ll thing” too?

    And why is it that black owned businesses are getting harder and harder to find (if that is even true)?

  • [2] March 19, 2015 at 10:18am

    Wow – finally someone with some common sense! Give that guy his own show following Al Sharpton on MessNBC!

  • [5] March 17, 2015 at 9:29am

    Obama: “If I had a daughter (oh wait I do) she would be just like Azealia!”

  • [13] March 11, 2015 at 9:52pm

    Isn’t this exactly what Brain Williams was just dismissed over? I say its time to dismiss Hillary!

  • [3] March 11, 2015 at 9:50pm

    What is going on in the Secret Service? Have they always acted this way and it just never received any press or is this a reflection of the administration they work for?

    Responses (2) +
  • [4] March 11, 2015 at 12:27pm

    So Mr. Harris, which aspects of this “first-century worldview” should we subscribe to and who should decide that for us? I mean if you are going for the suggest that this aspect is “out-of-date” than what other aspects are out-of-date? Is there really sin, Satan, hell, heaven, right/wrong, Jesus, God? I mean those things just seem so “first-century”. Mr Harris, you are an embarrassment to the God you claim to serve!

    I appeal to you, brothers, to watch out for those who cause divisions and create obstacles contrary to the doctrine that you have been taught; avoid them. For such persons do not serve our Lord Christ, but their own appetites, and by smooth talk and flattery they deceive the hearts of the naive. – Romans 16:17-18

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] March 5, 2015 at 9:05am

    One of the things I liked most about Ben Carson was that he seemed willing to take on political correctness because as he said it was silencing people. And now it seems as though he has been silenced by political correctness. Assuming he has the facts to support his question, then there was absolutely nothing offensive about it. If homosexuals do not chose to be homosexual, as so many claim, then how can so many enter prison straight and come out homosexual? I’m still waiting for the answer…..

  • [2] March 4, 2015 at 11:19am

    I didn’t realize that former Senator Barney Frank had become a High School teacher in Connecticut

  • February 24, 2015 at 8:32am

    The second article is simply bogus. The actual rape statistics for Providence year to year are shown here:

    http://www.city-data.com/crime/crime-Providence-Rhode-Island.html

    And while there was a drop from 2003 to 2004, 2005 had nearly as many as 2002. And besides it ignores national crime trends, and the revitalization that the city was going through during the late 1990′s and early 2000′s

    http://wpri.com/2014/07/14/chart-violent-crime-in-providence-fell-45-between-1991-and-2012/

    http://www.urbanophile.com/2013/05/07/worcester-v-providence-is-downtown-revitalization-the-sum-of-urban-revitalization-by-stephen-eide/

  • February 24, 2015 at 8:15am

    I am quoting statistics from some fairly reliable sources – who is it that is debunking them?

    According to the National Center of Victims of Crime, 1 in 5 girls will be the victim of sexual abuse.

    http://www.victimsofcrime.org/media/reporting-on-child-sexual-abuse/child-sexual-abuse-statistics

    According to Rape Abuse & Incest National Network every 107 seconds another American is sexually abused. 293,000 each year!

    https://www.rainn.org/statistics

    According to CASA 1 in 5 women will be the victim of sexual violence.

    http://www.casa.org.au/casa_pdf.php?document=statistics

  • [-2] February 23, 2015 at 3:39pm

    Can anyone argue that having porn readily available to anyone at any age is constructive to our society? 1 in 5 women will be raped or sexually abused in America today. 20% of women! You wanna talk about a war on women! To suggest that making prostitution and brothels legal is going to make that problem better is absolutely idiotic. That’s similar to the argument that they made in Colorado that marijuana use would go down once its legalized – uh huh, that’s clearly working out for them! There are 600 to 700 rapes reported in Las Vegas every year. Compare that to New York where there are 1,000 to 1,200 reported cases. The population of Las Vegas – 603,500 and New York – 8.4 million. So clearly legalizing prostitution is not the answer! And clearly porn has no positive effect on society. What would make a ton of sense, since we live in a free society is to have a common sense approach to porn on the Internet which is to structure it in such a way as to allow easy, guaranteed ways to block it for those that do not want it infiltrating their home and families! For example requiring that any X-rated material be published in a .porn or .prn (or some other derivative) domain! Then you simply block content from those domains and you’ve allow the Internet to be a constructive tool in your house without some of its destructive nature.

    Responses (2) +
  • [12] February 19, 2015 at 12:43pm

    So if holding up a sign saying “White Power” is so racial and offensive, then why is blaming issues in the black communities on “White Privilege” not racial or offensive?

    Responses (1) +
  • [9] February 17, 2015 at 4:15pm

    “The church will continue to be even more irrelevant when it quotes letters from 2,000 years ago as their best defense” – so Rob, what parts of this ancient manuscript are real then? Can people just choose which ones they want to believe and which ones are irrelevant just because the culture says so? Do morals come from culture? If the culture decides that its okay for men to have sex with children as young as 10 – would that become morally acceptable too? How about slavery – if the culture decides that we collectively would like to bring it back – would that become morally acceptable? How about mutual consent for murder – the wild west dual at sundown – if the culture decides that’s a reasonable means to resolve disputes – would that be morally acceptable? Just where does the churches’ definition of morals come from Rob? This notion of culture determining morals simply does not work. Just because it is culturally acceptable does not make it morally right and if it is not morally right then how can the church “accept it”? By your definition Rob the church should also just accept abortion – I’m sure God is okay with taring apart a baby for convenience, after all, the culture seems to think it is okay. So if the church doesn’t agree with the culture – then the church must change…wow so much for being the light in a dark world…

  • [4] February 17, 2015 at 3:01pm

    One of my questions about evolution is that over millions of years suddenly there is man. Regardless of the insane possibility of this occurring and life being created from nothing etc…here we are at that point in history – there is man! Where did woman come from? And they both happened to arrive on the scene within a 40-50 years of each other in order to procreate. And furthermore they had to arrive on the scene at the same time and had to be geographically located close enough to discover one another. What are the odds of that?

    Responses (3) +
123
Restoring Love