User Profile: NukeHaze

Member Since: September 01, 2010

CommentsDisplaying NukeHaze's 10 most recent comments.

  • Encino M,

    You show your bigotry and prejudice against southerners. Yherefore anything you say following those opening words becomes irrelevant. Statutory rape is statutory rape, period. We do not need you on here proclaiming Whooo-pie Goldberg’s RAPE-rape ideology. We just now have the added hate crime potential. I say they prosecute using both statutory rape and hate crime.

    And if you think Florida has been part of the South for the last 30 years, apart from the panhandle which GA and AL should annex, FL has not been part of the South. It has been lost to you elitist nazi progressives just like CO and MT(unfortunately recently discovered). WY, UT, ID are the only states in the Rock West still not purhed of their very souls. Make no mistake, religion itself, especially Christian is under threat of being wiped from mainstream culture or changed to accept everything PC. If mine accepts the chamg in the boy scouts to allow essentially coed tent camping so little perverts cantry and convert my own kids to another lifestyle because they have chosen to forsake the “morally straight” part of the oath, I foresee a change of venue by an exodus of people the likes of which has not been seen since Moses led them out of Egypt. The last institution and religion I would have ever expected to cave to Sodom and Gomorrah seem to be teetering on it..

  • X… there are plenty of reasons and doublestandards in play to prosecute and the doublestandard discriminating against young men and parents if something is not done. Parents are responsible for their minor children until 18 unless they are emancipated through the courts. This is why the whole abortion as readily available as a Flintstones chewable without parental consent is so wrong. You cqnnot both tell people you are tolerant and at the same time be intolerant of those who disagree with you. She made a choice to seduce and convert a younger minor to a lifestyle that is as narcissistic as any behaviour known to humanity. A young man would already be found guilty if this had been hetero. That is discrimination too. People are not born this way. It is a choice. If it were a matter of being born that way, every identical twin would have the same “orientation”as their twin which they do not since they have identical DNA. The Progressive liberal propaganda wants to shove this down our throats for population control just like abortion and infanticide and obamacare. It is another evil heinous act of anti-nature which they claim to worship while performing wholly indefensible unnatural acts.

    You all need to get over this hate term you have in “homophobe”.

    We are “HETEROPHILIACS” !

  • Harry the legal precedentthat man+woman>children=family has been established since long before governments. Hence there is no reason for government to be in it at all. Marriage is not a civil right in the U.S Constitution and is therefore to fall under the 10th amendment and is up to the states as it is not to be defined by the federal government.

    Try having and shooting an a in your own home and see if you are not deprived of your freedom if you are not supposed to have it according to progressive encroacents on civil liberties.

    Honestly how can you be shown that you are wrong so much by so many people legally even without acknowledging it? All you have to do if your motives are sincerely what you claim they are is to havearriage be the legal term for hetero unions specifically and any other be a civil union? To try to revionist assume the word and define it in the manner you seem to be attempting to do is a blatant attempt to destroy and redefine the traditional roles of mother and father and the nuclear family. You are being disingenuous just as Gessen admitted in the other article as to what the true motive is. Progressives never sold any of their bad ideas as bad ones but they are nonetheless. This lunacy will jave far reaching negative repercussions on theajority of the population that may not be immediately seen just as the healthcare abomination. Is that one in the Bill of Rights, too? Funny how you progressives have coopted “civil rights”

  • Harry thanks for missing the majority of my points debunking your logic in favor of citing a precedent for interracial marriage between a biological man and biological woman both opposite gender in the HUMAN race. You obviously consider yourself MENSA but are not. Stay with me now… notwithstanding that you neither proved me wrong nor prpved yourself right, but, according to your “logic” and implications, no state can deny civil rights enshrined in the Constitution. Though not your words, it is nonetheless what you meant. By your own arguments then, since the Bill of Rights is obviously “civil rights” for citizens of this country, no state can infringe on anyone’s right to bear arms.

    OR any person’s civil right to free speech, freedom of association, etc. based on s e x, race, blah blah blah…YET THEY DO. .AGAINST race by hammering affirmative action on people as a major one among many.

    Mayhaps you are really too overwhelmed with rebuttals putting you in your place that you can only read one sentence from each post but I just think you continuing to be in denial says how much your head is buried in your dystopia.

  • Harry get government out of marriage licensing and tax break business altogether and get rid of tax breaks… go with a flat tax and THEN read the other Blaze story where Gessen admits that lgbt’ers are after the destruction of marriage and the traditional nuclear family model…not even about tax breaks. They are heading toward birthing licenses once govt can enable a person for one birth then disable until next license is purchased. You are being more than disingenuous if you claim anything less, however, you do have the right to say it.

  • The_monk

    Why are all of your posts banned or censored? Has monk been banned?

    Monk, I stand by you. Theirs is wrong and no amount of politicking will ever change that fact. This is not intolerance nor is it racist or homophobic or any of that. I am actually quite the heterophiliac.

    Whoever is doing the censoring here and the reporting of comments because you have hurt feelers because of his words or mine even, is performing an hypocritical act if you wish to promote the real journalistic view and the story of what the people actually think. You are controlling our conversation while steering it to deliver an agenda driven message. Shame on you who think we others should not be allowed to have an opinion and kids who we would teach differently than you would propagandize them and us. We have the right to speech, and the freedom to worship if and how we want. You cannot force me to believe otherwise, no matter how much you want to tax me for my religious beliefs. Godspeed the_monk.

  • Harry potter and any who aid and abed you and yours:

    Marriage is not defined in the U.S Constitution but may be in individual states. This I have not researched enough to know which states but then neitherhave you. The answer you seek is to make the federal government trump the states’s rights in defining marriage. It was you progressives who instated such things as federal income tax and exemptions to begin with. Government should never have been in the marriage business but the enticing taxes for getting marriage licenses and licenses to marry is too great for you all. You who worship nature don’t see the natural need to procreate and belong to a specie that requires heterosexual procreation as natural relationships, biblically speaking, don’t see how contradicting your belief system is. Like any politician who would ever think aborting future voters, your view is a short sighted one. The government should not be able to force any pastor or clergy to marry any 2 adults if it is against their religious beliefs. Thatis where you are going with this. If those clergy refuse to marry, then they lose permission from your progressive government to perform any marriages.

    Regarding your argument about absurdly believing people are born gay and forced… if your argument is true: identical twins who obviously carry the same DNA would then both be gay if one was which is not the case. I have extensive experience with research in this subject as a subject. People are not bor

  • Why cant this liberal racist writer just not be racist… or prejudiced? Because she or he voted for Dumbama just because he was black? As Obu++head and so many racist prejudiced liberals always forget, he was half white, too. Meanwhile these same idiots villainize Allen West and Mia Love for not being really black. I do begrudge Congressman West for voting for the NDAA liberty and privacy rights grab but he certainly is a far btter man that either McVain and Grahamnesty are.

  • You are correct, oddball. It is called reverse discrimination and anyone who denies it exists is a “reverse discrimination denier”. I don’t want special treatment which I have never had… I just want fair treatment. When they can tell me that it is now official that fat and ugly people are not discriminated against… we might have made some improvements and when they never ask your race, gender, or age, and do not take body fluid or DNA samples, we might have improved things. Affirmative action has no place in a free society.

  • Wired…you”ain’t right” about this. Osteen is white but I don’t know anything of him or many of the other white preachers listed. I was looking down the list to see who all he outted as being false teachers and it stuck out to me that he did not list Sharpton and Jesse Jackson. Farrakhan can still be a false teacher whether he is Christian or not. Muslims still use the first five books in the Old Testament. I am glad he did not slam Alveda King…or did he?

    The only thing about race I have seen came from you. Or have you forgotten conveniently that some “rappers” are also white. Or perhaps do you think white people can’t rap …or jump? I don’t really care about rap but it is not because of racism or the correct term: prejudice. You are prejudiced because of your prejudging accusations. Get off of your soap box and see his message for what it is; about those who he sees as seeking worldly treasures through exploiting people, God’s children.

    This is also why it is so puzzling that Sharpton and Jackson are not listed thouhh je may think they are false, he may have been reluctant to list them. He surely would have been called Uncle Tom then.