In 1963, the Communist Party of the USA launched it’s goals – 45 of them.
#26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”
#40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.
Even though the CPUSA is pretty low profile, many articles of its agenda have hit mainstream politics. It’s gone so far that, in 2013, the CPUSA actually sued the Democrats for stealing their platform! The communists aren’t all that bright – what has happened is that socialists have gained increasing control of the DNC and have taken their ideology with them. The CPUSA may as well quit and join the Democrats.
Mr Bush is quite right. America must reject the constant attacks on its natural basic morality, which is being attacked to make the introduction of socialism possible. Even Stalin, after WW2, recognised that the moral strength of the American family and its staunch adherence to Christianity had to be diminished before communism had even a remote chance of taking hold in your country.
This is the way that the GOP must unflinchingly proceed…
Thanks, been there and done that about 2 years ago. Time to do it again.
Thanks for the reminder and the yet.
Of course none of those were ever declared to be Communist goals by any actual Communist. They were alleged to be Communist goals by a right wing crank named Cleon Skousen who wrote a book back in the 1950s in which he listed all of the social and political trends that he didn’t approve of and tried to blame them all on Communists in the hopes of scaring people into agreeing with his reactionary opinions.
Actually the communists hate and persecute gays. Read up on Putin’s Russia. So did Hitler.
 May 17, 2015 at 6:29pm
Thank you, Miami.
The question should also be asked: If there were no WMDs in Iraq, then what, precisely, did Chemical Ali gas the Kurds with? And how did he acquire that unsavoury moniker?
A scurrilous attempt to rewrite history has been perpetrated by those who detest Mr Bush…
 May 17, 2015 at 6:20pm
Oh, come on, guys.
It wasn’t that terrible, in fact, most of the monologue was funny. It;s quite easy to see what his point was and it wasn’t to excuse perversion or anything like that. Are we so conditioned with political correctness that we feel we must automatically recoil from any condemnation of child molesters that isn’t solely shrill outrage? Condemning them with humour is just as good – and sometimes more powerful.
And he was correct. In the 70′s there was little public condemnation of child molesters. We, as children, were all severely admonished to avoid strangers, but it wasn’t until the 80′s that these miscreants started being regularly hauled into court.
I remember when the law was changed here (sort of) so that teachers were publicly prosecuted and shamed if they were caught interfering with children. To everyone’s astonishment, significantly more women teachers than men were hauled up in front of the beak. Who would have thought?
For those who, like me, were unable to view the video on this page (as is so often the case), here it is on youtube:
"... In the 70′s there was little public condemnation of child molesters...." I challenge that statement. In the '70s and prior, child molesters often received street corner justice rather than burdening a child with reporting his / her rape to the police and then having to testify in court. Remember, during that time period, there were FATHERS in the home who would deal sternly with those who messed with their kids. Not so as the "Great Society" programs and no-fault divorce kicked in and destroyed two-parent families. Then the state had to step in.
 May 16, 2015 at 5:49am
Yep, I aced it as well. Given that I come from the other side of the planet indicates to me that the test was too easy. That said; I was helped a couple of times by the multiple choice options.
The platitudes that I received at the end were quite wrong. Except for “You are a wealth of obscure facts about the past.” That’s true, sadly.
For example: Did you know that “In God We Trust” which is stamped on your coinage, and found in other places, actually came from a Puritan battle standard in the 17th century?
Ah, dear me… If only these legions of useless little nuggets that clutter my brain were worth actual money…
 May 15, 2015 at 2:19am
The reason is simple, Cat.
The Communist Party of the USA set out its goals several decades ago. I have the whole thing somewhere but I can’t find it at the moment. One of the goals was to destroy the moral strength of the American family because it make the successful introduction of socialism immensely difficult – if not impossible.
The way that they chose to do it was to employ feminism to push the mothers out into the workforce.
The upside of this is that women have a much greater choice in life than they ever did before, and that’s a good thing. The bad thing is that women were made to feel a lesser contributor, and less self-fulfilled, if they didn’t get out of the house.
It seems that the only people who remembered the old adage ” the hand that rocks the cradle rules the world” were the communists, and they intended to do the rocking.
That video was fun. I have another one for your enjoyment. The best bit comes right at the end. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrH1Y7Jf59E
Luckily, the majority of western women, while rightly accepting the advances that early feminism gave them, have tossed the rest of the socialist nonsense into the trash bin of history…
Maybe you were looking for something like this...
Such is a true CLASSIC / A must read for all.
From the above link...
Its been uncovered that the CIA and Gloria Steinem used feminism to destabilize society!!!
And that – get this!!! The CIA “In fact, it has always been the instrument of a dynastic international banking and oil elite (Rothschild, Rockefeller, Morgan) coordinated by the Royal Institute for Internal Affairs in London and their US branch, the Council for Foreign Relations.”
And if that weren’t enough! …
“The agenda of this international cabal is to degrade the institutions and values of the United States in order to integrate it into a global state that it will direct through the United Nations.”
Shocking – right?
If only I – the world had known this sooner!!!
And to think. I actually believed equality for women was a just and noble cause.
Boy do I look stupid now.
And then I learned…
“in the 1980´s, the CIA flooded Black ghettos with cocaine”
So once again it was ‘whitey’ – the “international banking and oil elite” who continued to try and enslave ‘the black man’ – this time with drugs!
And here I was thinking poor education, impoverishment, wide-spread failed family values – and continuing racial oppression were the primary causes of many coloreds turning to drugs. When after all it was just part of ‘The Big Plan’.
And there is more!!!
I just can’t believe I was so easily duped to believe that the fight for equality / for equal opportunity for women was but “a grotesque fraud perpetrated on society by its governing elite.”
Again from: http://www.rense.com/general21/hw.htm
Did you know… “Man loves woman. His first instinct is to nurture (“husband”) and see her thrive. When a woman is happy, she is beautiful. Sure, some men are abusive. But the vast majority have supported and guided their families for millennium.”
And that… “Feminists relentlessly advance the idea that our inherent male and female characteristics, crucial to our development as human beings, are mere “stereotypes.” This is a vicious calumny on all heterosexuals, 95% of the population. Talk about hate! Yet it is taught to children in elementary schools! It is echoed in the media. [And perhaps WORST of all...] Lesbians like Rosie O´Donnell are advanced as role models.”
Say it isn’t so!
AND did you know…?
“All of this is calculated [CALCULATED they say] to create personal confusion and sow chaos among heterosexuals. As a result, millions of American males are emasculated and divorced from their relationship to family (the world and the future.) ”
It’s all SO CLEAR to me now.
Screw male-female equality!
I want my relationship to my family back
 May 14, 2015 at 6:27pm
I agree, Joe. Never write anything down that you wouldn’t want to see on the front page…
 May 14, 2015 at 6:25pm
This seems like a classic honey trap to me. Mr Diehl’s texts are slobberingly enthusiastic while the interns replies are carefully encouraging but seem to lack reciprocal passion.
Now that the scalp has been taken, the intern is hiding behind an attorney who isn’t hired by her but was a former Democratic state House member. Mr Willoughby is being most solicitous.
 May 12, 2015 at 8:55am
The points that you mention gave me pause also, Fishing.
I gave it some thought and then I realised that the writer knows that he is likely addressing prospects who are new to the extremist ways. It’s also likely that they are english-speaking citizens of the target nation and not exactly Koranic scholars. They are radicalised cannon fodder.
I was also a bit perturbed by the condescending use of “secret agent” and “special agent”. but I think that the writer may be trying to present a romantic view to the prospect. A James Bond sort of thing. Let’s face it, these prospective terrorists are likely to be uneducated malcontents with a criminal background who might be searching for a purpose in their lives – a higher calling, so to speak – although I realise that this isn’t always the case.
The reason that I believe it is genuine is that there are statements that dove-tail very neatly with things that I already know about.
Am I certain? Not in this murky, double-dealing war. But I think that the probability is high…
 May 12, 2015 at 8:37am
I think that Jeb Bush is taking the view that something must be done to raise scholastic standards, which is laudable, but Common Core is the wrong thing.
For a long time I had trouble figuring it all out and then John Oliver (Jon Stewart’s sidekick on the Daily Show) made this video. It’s funny, of course, but it also presents the problem in a very succinct manner.
NZKiwi, Now all you have to do is convince our trolls who are complete denial mode to read and understand what these savages have to say. Apparently, they must also believe those beheadings, burnings, and just plane old murder of those in their way, or being a non-believer to be faked. Oy vey!
They are indeed here and I take them at their word as to their intentions. I've seen them saw heads off and burn a man alive. ISIS wants to end the west and I can say quite confidently that they'll fail and America will destroy herself from within.
@nz…thanks for the link…i started reading it….excellent insight…and it’s info everyone should know
Thanks for the link NZkiwi...
SNL did Not poke fun "at drawing Mohamed", it pointed out the fear instilled by Islamists by their killing some who have drawn her. Sad, even SNL was too afraid to make a mark on the paper.
I wonder if he thinks Climate Change is a made up idea too?
don't be a dupe
nzk, you are crazy.
Just because millions of Muslims tell us that they are radicalized, and then burn people alive and chop the heads of women, children, and men who are Christians to prove it, doesn't make it so.
Wait... maybe it does.
71 pages...interesting number.
Good link...And shows again how little street smarts our "leadership" on all levels has today. We were handed the perfect opportunity 9/11 to finally say enough was enough. And had given all in Islam one clear message to answer...Either wave a white flag surrender and submit or stand and die for your satan evil beliefs. World wide this would have all been over in months with a giant body count of the sons of satan. All done with our nation united as a people with purpose. We today would be living in a much America...One that would have never wanted a Obama...Prosperous. proud free of this "illusion" of safety and a growing police state. Where men of all colors would have looked at each other and talked about how they pulled together to defeat this evil....But no.....Look at what we are becoming ....Really really sad..
Also a fact: It's for reasons like this that I don't watch CNN.
O.K................listen up.....he is correct radical islam does no exist.............it is just islam.................you have the frontline soldiers and everybody else is support troops.................there are no moderates
That “guide” you linked is complete and utter rubbish. It was not written by, nor intended for, actual Muslims or extremists. The author explains the meaning of every term in parenthesis, as if explaining it to someone who knows nothing about Islam.
First of all, If this guide was truly written by and for Mujahid, the author wouldn’t have had to explain anything. Second, why would they publicly post a guide to covert Jihad with all of their insider tips and tricks for any and all government agencies to see?
...all these people have drunken the kook-aid. 90% of the world's Islamic population live under Central Authoritarian Islamic rule...these are the world's "Moderate Muslims"?
I'll agree with her. Saying that there is a radical Islam implies that there is a non-radical Islam and I reject that idea. Islam is Islam. ISIS=Islam, beheadings=Islam, terrorism=Islam... we can just leave the "radical" part off if it from now on.
If all Muslims believe that Sharia is the true law, then ALL must be radical, therefore none are radical and it is just the baseline for all to work from. While his statement is made from ignorance, he may actually be right.
Comedy’s punching up?
Yeah, you keep telling yourself that.
Then in all honesty, EVERYTHING is a made up idea.
It seems kind of odd that when someone is killed by police I’m not allowed to ponder whether their life of crime may have led to the altercation, but when a cartoonist is murdered everyone seems to ask, “well, what was he DRAWING that caused that to happen?”
Free speech is valued by intelligent and moral people, which is why our country has grown increasingly hostile to it.
Offensive speech should not just be a protected form of speech — it’s the only form of speech that should be protected. Non-offensive speech needs no safeguard or consideration. You can go anywhere on the planet and utter things that are not viewed as offensive to the powerful, the privileged, and the violent. As long as your thoughts are agreeable to the people in those groups, you can say anything you want, anywhere you want. Hooray.
You can’t call that free speech anymore than you can say a prisoner has the “freedom” to go anywhere he wants as long as it’s somewhere within his 8×10 foot cell.
A country can be considered a haven of free speech, then, ONLY if people can, for instance, hold peaceful anti-Muslim demonstrations without fear of being killed or imprisoned. Currently, we don’t have to worry about the imprisoned part of that equation, but I think that could change, and probably will.
I happen to agree that the idea of "radical Islam" is made up. Islam is Islam. All one has to do is read the Quran and the Hadith to know what Islam is. Now, there are variations of "Muslims" or followers/believers in how they interpret those books (Sunni, Shia, Sufi, etc) and how much they apply it to daily life ("moderate" vs "radical" muslim - which is another topic altogether), but there is no "radical" Islam. It's all the same.
Dang, I clicked the link and then immediately realized that I just invited the NSA into my house.
I did like the suggestion at the bottom of page 9. "you can call me Barry"
 May 11, 2015 at 6:18pm
I think that your right, MOT, Mrs Obama does seem to have a racist chip on her shoulder.
She also thinks that museums are for white people…
In my State Bears are a protected species. They were hunted to almost extinction in the 20's & 30's. Teddy Roosevelt refused to shoot one that was tethered for the kill. That's how the "Teddy Bear" came into being. They are making a comeback and in my area they are spotted occasionally but they are extremely shy.
 May 7, 2015 at 6:28am
Firstly, they weren’t brothers – unless you mean brothers-in-arms, which would be an odd characterisation.
Secondly, they didn’t decide to go and kill on a whim, they were selected for the job by one Abu Hussein al Britani in Syria with whom they were communicating. They would have traveled any distance necessary and they didn’t expect to survive.
 May 7, 2015 at 3:40am
Yes, Keystone, Mr Beck gets it. So do most of the people on this site.
The Islamists are going to kill Pamela Geller, or die trying. The Obama administration has allowed so many savages in that the FBI is becoming overwhelmed.
“There are so many like him [Garland jihadi] that you have to prioritize your investigations.” – FBI official.
Ms Geller has managed to wake Middle America up to the very real threat that is ISIS, and they are right in your communities. More are pouring in, both legally and illegally, and the recruitment drive in your prisons and universities is being stepped up.
And they are coming to kill you.
I’m not being dramatic; they are testing their own power and your resolve. They are becoming increasingly brazen as they find themselves largely unopposed. Here is a “Hannity” clip where the well-known Islamist savage, Ajem Choudary, states that Ms Geller should be killed – right to her face! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6s-JFnw15Q
America owes Ms Geller a debt of gratitude for bringing the threat into clear view. Her action has every prospect of costing her dearly. Her life may well be forfeit.
If ISIS had a camp in Mexico, 5 miles from the border, why didn't they show up to the cartoon contest for the Sunday jihad? Seems odd two brothers would drive more than 1,000 miles to die in a Texas parking lot when fellow terrorists were already in the area.
Firstly, they weren't brothers - unless you mean brothers-in-arms, which would be an odd characterisation.
Secondly, they didn't decide to go and kill on a whim, they were selected for the job by one Abu Hussein al Britani in Syria with whom they were communicating. They would have traveled any distance necessary and they didn't expect to survive.
Pamela needs oath keepers around her.
If you believe Geller has or was needed to 'bring the threat into clear view' then...
You obviously have not been viewing reality previously.
For MANY (of us) we have LONG KNOWN such threats exist.
The real challenge is... How do we deal with such threats?
How great are these threats (to individuals / to the nation / to others - and is that OUR concern?) - ???
We owe Geller NOTHING.
She 'exercised the Freedom of Speech' - in a manner that she and most others knew / know could possibly incite a NOT VALID violent response. (If you didn't know such could be the response then... What? Have you been living under a rock?)
Please do explain nzkiwi how its (ONLY?) Obama's who has "has allowed so many savages in".
Who let those savages in that attacked us from within our own nation on 9/11 - ???
it is time to make a statement to every muslim involved with this
if you try to kill Pamela Gellar or any other American
we will come for you
and it will not be pretty at all
BUT the lying fraud in the White House only sees the Islamic view..he's filth and should be taken into custody for subversion and criminal activities against this country
If you libs are going to say that it is wrong to disrespect peoples faith then you have to extend that courtesy to Christians as well. I know that many of the atheists on this site say very hateful, disrespectful things about the Christian God EVERYDAY! Does that mean you are inciting Christian violence? Do Christians get a free pass because you offended them?
 May 7, 2015 at 1:07am
Mrs Clinton is toast, RJ. The real question is who will the eventual Democratic candidate be?
That said; only a fool would treat this ruthless and battle-hardened political viper with contempt, but I can’t see how she can possibly prevail…
She just stated she wants open borders. Her voters are arriving by the thousands.
Quite easily, actually.
The majority of the public doesn't follow these kinds of details. The Democratic Party will carry her to a Primary victory, then all the blue state's electoral colleges will vote Dem, Red states will vote GOP, and the swing states are the GOP's to lose, so we'll see if they put up a real candidate or Jeb Bush, who, IMHO is really intended to pave the way for HC 2016... But that's a whole other conspiracy theory!
 May 7, 2015 at 12:51am
I realise that this isn’t quite in line with the thrust of the conversation, but President Kennedy has always been a hero of mine.
He was a Democrat of course, but it’s my impression that he was firstly an American. In fact, I sometimes wonder if he would be a Democrat today – or if the current Democrats would even have him. And before I get jumped on, I do realise that his wasn’t a perfect presidency but he was far better than most of those who followed him.
His greatest achievement was holding back his bellicose generals and preventing the world from leaping from the precipice into nuclear war. His determination to prevent this hideous conflagration probably contributed to his assassination, and it was a breath-takingly close run thing. Those who doubt that haven’t studied those distant events closely.
To my mind, this innocuous but valuable program further demonstrates the commitment that he had to his country, his fellow Americans, and his nation’s future.
No kicking here NZkiwi,
Want to read my latest take on this subject? It's just a rough 1st draft at present. I liked JFK too.
JFK cause the missile crises because he was a political wimp, it wasn't until he got tough with the blockade that the Soviets behaved themselves ( even though he gave up missiles in Turkey). He was close to being ruined politically when his reputation was save by being killed and his greatest claim to fame was being stupid enough to get his boat run over by the enemy. He used blacks to get him elected and them abandoned them, it took LBJ to pass the Civil Rights agenda. Take off the rose colored glasses
 May 6, 2015 at 6:21am
I’m absolutely stunned.
Not just because the media, with few exceptions, has piled onto Pamela Gellar, but also how the Islamists have cowed Americans. How the hell did that happen?
How could the US media, the one profession specifically protected by the 1st Amendment, be so craven, so unutterably spineless as to side with savages. Oh, sure, they give perfunctory lip service to the ideal of free speech, but then say that the cartoons aren’t really free speech. They say that Ms Gellar was “provocative” and “stupid”.
Why hasn’t the Blaze published the winning cartoon – which may well cost the artist, an ex-Muslim, his life if ISIS has any say in the matter? And why has the media not noted that Ms Gellar is now a stated target of that savage ideology?
Isn't it amazing that there is not a shred of chivalry left in western society? Glenn Beck himself threw her under the bus. All three of those wuss' refused to defend her by saying "oh I would never have had such an event" Yeah we know Beck, you would have sent teddy bears!
Pray for us, but don’t despair, for we have always been this way, and occasionally the door to the sausage factory swings open for all to see the process. Hmmm sausage. Although the Golden Rule will be tossed in our face, it will not lead to our demise. We still have our touchstones and a healthy distrust of all that glitters. The “F’em if they can’t take a joke” spirit is still alive and well. As we don our “Kiss the pork” BBQ aprons we declare, “We’re all kuffars now. Who wants ribs?”
A new mother nature taking over.
and help influence social justice, etc. You hardly hear any of them talk about being a source of record for the public, or being a part of the checks & balances as originally intended.
How could the media be so craven? Because the mission of the media has changed. I suppose there has always been some level of conflicted interest as politicians attempt to co-opt media, and as media attempt to co-opt politicians....but it seems as if it's currently at a critical mass.
There is a difference between reporters, or media organizations, taking a passive role by focusing more or less on what's going on in Washington and taking an active role by darn near fabricating information to support political agendas.
The spirit of what is being taught at J-School seems to be different than maybe what use to be...shifting from the role of a balancing power & watchdog for the public to something more of a social justice warrior and advocate for a specific political ideology.
I've heard several interviews given by journalists on what motivated them to go into their profession, and almost all talk about the opportunity to give voice to
I am also stunned at the stupidity of the populace. The Bible tells us not to call others fools but it's just pressing on my lips fffffffffffffooooo....idiots! How can people be looking into the very face of evil right here in our own land and defend these monsters? I would put down such strict new rules governing this scourge of Islam that they become so stymied they will hopefully leave. But it's more important to be nice. Let's be tolerant while they try to kill us. Don't want to be racist as they kill us.
 April 29, 2015 at 2:53pm
It appears on the surface that NYC lost their case and, in a fit of petulance, took their ball and went home.
What really happened is that the Islamists scored a major victory over the American Constitution by frightening a major city’s leadership into compliance with Shari’a.
April 25, 2015 at 9:09pm
Thanks Bio, but nobody was hurt. Just the usual loss of bottled wine from the supermarket shelves. Our buildings are designed with earthquakes in mind these days.
I saw your last greeting but I didn’t reply as it was so long after the fact that I figured you wouldn’t be back to check. I wish I could spend more time on here.
We bought the yacht, by the way. Blue water in three years, all going well!
Best wishes to you and your family. Your youngest must be coming up for a birthday soon if I remember correctly. Happy birthday to him if I’m right.