User Profile: nzkiwi


Member Since: October 11, 2010


123 To page: Go
  • [76] October 12, 2015 at 5:09am

    I credit him for more than that, Seeker. That was presidential – a leader’s speech.

    You’re right. He (and Mr Trump) have called out the media – which takes courage as they are a powerful political force and some are using that power nefariously.

    Consider these recent developments:

    For the upcoming Canadian elections, one of two left-wing parties promised the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation $115 million if they win. The other left-wing party promptly upped the bid to $150 mil should they prevail. How’s that for blatant bribery?

    The Huffington Post (Germany) is posting the names and photos of people who comment opposing Islamic migration. Huffpo purports to be a news organisation and it begs the question; just what happened to their journalistic integrity? (That’s rhetorical.)
    ” It is now time: Let’s give this issue the necessary publicity finally. We have to deal with the sick thought-world of these people.” – Huffpo Germany

    We recall German Chancellor Angela Merkel leaning on Mr Zuckerberg to censor anti-immigration Facebook posts. Facebook is now blocking comments opposing Islamic immigration into Europe (and banning accounts) under the guise of suppressing “hate speech”. And they aren’t alone.

    This nascent conniving cabal desperately needs exposure to lethal amounts of sunlight. One hopes that Mr Carson’s salvo is but the beginning…

    Responses (1) +
  • [7] October 9, 2015 at 6:36am

    “More than anything, the prize is intended as an encouragement to the Tunisian people…”.

    Perhaps the Nobel Peace Prize awarded to President Obama was meant as a similar encouragement. That worked out well, didn’t it… I read recently that the chairman of the committee now regrets the selection of Mr Obama for the award.

    I don’t wish to knock the Tunisian people – in fact, I wish them all the best – but the Peace Prize has been allowed to become rather valueless due to the political stance of the awarding committee…

    Responses (4) +
  • [2] October 9, 2015 at 6:24am

    It’s true, Witchy – sort of…

    I had a look at this some time ago, and it’s undoubtedly an intriguing idea. However, the more one looks into it, the less promising it appears. They have set a date of 2027 for the manned landing after a number of exploratory and preparatory “Mars shots”.

    I am, for one, very, very sceptical. But who knows?

    Here’s their website. Consider it carefully before giving them any money…

  • [24] October 9, 2015 at 6:08am

    I agree with you, Granite.

    I’ve always felt that President Clinton’s dalliance with Ms Lewinski was a far lesser crime than to deliberately lie to the American public about it.

    But perhaps that’s why his fellow politicians were so nervous, given that he stated that the allegations were “100-percent false”.

    Given the current upheaval, I’d be nervous, too…

    Responses (3) +
  • [3] October 9, 2015 at 5:55am

    I’ve just had the strangest thought…

    If one looks at the picture of the whole planet on the right hand side of the second graphic; doesn’t the white area look exactly like the silhouette of Mickey Mouse’s close canine companion, Pluto?

    Cue creepy “Twilight Zone” theme… :)

  • [24] October 9, 2015 at 5:43am

    Jesus, Monk, don’t you think your comments – particularly the “edit” comment – are getting a little bit savage?

    I don’t always agree with Mr Beck myself. In fact, I think all of us have disagreed with him over one point or another at sometime in the past – just as we disagree with the editors and each another occasionally.

    It’s clear that Mr Trump and Mr Beck have little time for each other, but was that attack necessary?

    Glenn Beck created this forum from which, I dare say, we all have benefitted insofar as it has encouraged us to dig into subjects to discover the truth – to the extent that it’s now become a habit for most of us. And we get to test our conclusions out in front of the ever-unforgiving trolls.

    People can be wrong – I know I have been – but that surely doesn’t call for such personal vitriol, does it?

    Take a deep breath, my friend, and count to ten. Then hit “post”…

    Responses (1) +
  • [34] October 7, 2015 at 12:05pm

    He IS speaking the truth, Apple, but not the whole truth.

    The whole truth includes the “Strong Cities Network”.

    While it’s true that the various alphabet agencies have become ever-increasingly involved in general law enforcement, and even a non-government agency which is the Federal Reserve “police”, the real threat is the agreement last week that partners the UN with cities around the world to “combat violent extremism”.

    This agreement was reached with the UN by the Obama administration and announced by Attorney General Loretta Lynch last week.

    The misdirection is the it’s a global initiative but make no mistake; this is the first careful step towards establishing a UN-controlled police force in your nation – and others if they can get away with it. They are waiting to see what the reaction of the American population will be. If the reaction is muted, or if it goes unnoticed, you may be sure that increased powers will gradually be conferred on a foreign-controlled police force operating at the local government level.

    This is the beginning…

    Responses (2) +
  • [12] August 20, 2015 at 5:16am

    You’re not hearing the other candidates talking about it much, Monk, because this hypothesis is nonsense.

    Unalien, Sleazyhippo, Panther, and others are right. The conclusions drawn by Mr Buttrill are erroneous.

    The US dollar is the world’s reserve currency because it was previously attached to gold and was stable. President Nixon took the USD off the gold standard but it remained the most stable currency available – and it still is. International traders require a stable currency to conduct business. This is a very involved story full of “ifs” and “buts” that can’t possibly be explained in 1500 characters. If you want to know more, go to Zerohedge. They’ve been following the Chinese economic debacle for some time now, and it’s not a pretty sight.

    The Chinese stockmarket is tanking. Their bubble has burst. China has pumped 100s of billions of yen into it and it’s still not holding. Their government has threatened to arrest any stockholder who tries to rescue their savings by selling their stock for being “unpatriotic”. They are in a desperate situation and had little choice but to devalue their currency.

    The BRICS bank, of which they are a part, won’t allow China SDRs for at least another year because their economy is so unstable.

    China isn’t going to economic war. It’s in survival mode…

    Responses (2) +
  • [-1] August 18, 2015 at 3:46am

    I’m pleased that you were able to advise us of that.

    The put-downs were beginning to get under my skin…

  • [32] August 18, 2015 at 3:06am

    I will certainly give Mr Trump credit for two things:

    1. Attracting record numbers of people to the conservative message – some of whom who would undoubtedly not have tuned to the debate. That exposed them to the Republican’s very strong line-up and was invaluable.

    2. He clearly demonstrated to his fellow candidates that the American people are fed up with politicians who timidly tip-toe around contentious issues. That was a timely education that the GOP desperately needed.


    That doesn’t make him the best candidate.

    I agree with Mr Beck. In my experience that leopards rarely change their spots. People can give the appearance of change, but after a while the cracks start to appear. So I think it’s a good thing that the primaries are a long way off, as Mr Hannity points out.

    I would also say that Mr Trump is connecting with so many people because he’s telling them what they want to hear. Whether he has a rock-hard belief in what he’s saying is another question.

    Fortunately there are several quality candidates for America to consider. I, for one, have great faith in the American people (shaken a little by Mr Obama’s second victory, though it was) and I expect that the right choice will be made.

    Time will tell. Good luck.

    There are a lot of people around the world watching and hoping…

    Responses (5) +
  • [6] August 18, 2015 at 2:12am

    OK, I haven’t been caned in a while so…

    It seems to me that the problem (and its solution) is becoming obscured by quite understandable frustration and fury.

    The first thing to do is put the problem of the current illegal population into a separate box and do first things first – which is BUILD THAT DAMNED FENCE.

    If that isn’t done first, talking about what to do with illegal immigrants already in your country is pointless and just so much hot air from which nothing will eventuate.

    I know that it’s easy for someone who comes from a country separated from its neighbours by thousands of miles of ocean to talk, but to me it seems obvious – just ignore the distractions and build the fence. Once that’s done, and the emotion cools, a sensible policy about who stays and who goes can be formulated.

    Until then, I think that Ms Perino is right…

  • [13] August 18, 2015 at 1:35am

    Hi Monk.

    I agree with your summation of the general frustration with your nation’s political capital city.

    Washington has the air of a weary titan, lethargic with age, bloated by permissiveness, mired in the mundane, obsessed with minor enmity and slight, ill-disciplined, ill-directed, uncaring, and grumpy.

    Fundamental change is urgently required. Not only to reinvigorate your still-great nation and return it to its proper course, but to continue to lead the world, as it has always done, toward a better, freer civilisation.

    Most people in smaller countries such as mine continue to have faith in America, but we are becoming increasingly anxious. We are well aware that if America succumbs, so do we all. As you know, I’m an atheist, but if I did believe in God I’d be doing a lot of praying. As it is; I hope and I make such small contributions as I can to try to persuade people.

    That said; I don’t have the faith in Mr Trump that many others seem to have. I have deep misgivings about him and caution that one must be careful for what one wishes.

    All that aside; that was a great post. Nice work :)

    Responses (2) +
  • [-1] August 18, 2015 at 12:57am


    Nope. Just plain observation.

    Because of Mr Trump’s penchant for publicity, there’s a wealth of evidence available. Take a few hours an check for yourself. Once having done so, I’m pretty sure that you’ll agree with me…

  • [30] August 17, 2015 at 3:04pm

    I also agree with Mr Beck for the most part.

    However, I don’t think Mr Trump’s attraction is because of his swagger. I think it’s because Mr Trump is adept at telling people what they want to hear. And dazzling them with constant reminders of his wealth – which may not be as nearly great as he would have us believe.

    I’ve spent the last week digging into Mr Trump’s past and I’m left with a feeling of great disquiet. There is a recurring theme of self-aggrandisement, of promising great and exciting things which may, or may not, come to pass, and of lying. When it’s noted that he’s running rough-shod over vulnerable people, his standard reply is “I don’t care”. And he doesn’t. He isn’t frightened of lawsuits, he relishes them and is perfectly comfortable operating right at the edge of the law.

    His vulgar personal attack on Ms Kelly wasn’t a momentary failing, it’s his natural response to anyone offering the slightest criticism. He is a bully who has often threatened to stop a project, risking considerable damage to others, until they accede to his wishes. He demonstrated this trait by suggesting that if he isn’t the GOP’s candidate, he might well run as an independent which would likely result in a Democrat in the Oval Office.

    You guys have one narcissist in the White House. Do you really want another?

    Mr Trump has spent his lifetime trying to impress everybody, but it seems to me that he is trying to impress one person above all others.


    Responses (3) +
  • [157] August 16, 2015 at 5:49am

    Did you notice the demonstrator’s signs, 44? The were printed by ANSWER Coalition and PSLweb.

    PSLweb (Party for Socialism and Liberation) is a communist organisation referring to itself by the gentler label of “socialist”, presumably so as not to frighten off prospects. It’s latest publication “Revolution Manifesto” is subtitled “Understanding Marx and Lenin’s Theory of Revolution” which is pretty unambiguous.

    They intend the overthrow of awful capitalism for much nicer socialism standing as it does for “solidarity, friendship and co-operation between all peoples” requiring “building a new revolutionary workers’ party in the heart of world imperialism”.

    Their naivete would be charming were they not suspiciously so well-organised and seemingly very well funded. They are usually in the company of ANSWER Coalition.

    Equally well-funded and organised, ANSWER appears to be anti-war. It was formed just three days after al-Qaeda’s 9/11 attack on America with the explicit aim of stopping the US invading Iraq and Afghanistan. The timing is curious to say the least. ANSWER’s website states that it is, at its core, “a partnership between Arab and non-Arab activists” which supports the Palestinian people, Gaza, Cuba, Yemen, Somalia, etc. as well as peace (except for Israel).

    As an afterthought they are also against racism in the US.

    Question 1. What are they doing here? A membership drive?
    Question 2. How did they get into Nancy Pelosi’s inner circle, and who is using who?

    Responses (1) +
  • [58] August 15, 2015 at 12:29am

    It’s a sad fact that these horrors will not abate while Mr Obama remains in office – in fact they are likely to escalate.

    His administration has funded, and continues to fund, various terrorist organisations around the world, some of which it cynically helped to create. If this can’t be done directly, it’s done by sending aid to those organisations and nations which support the terrorists.

    And when innocents such as the kind and lovely Ms Mueller get ground up by these savage and vicious entities, Mr Obama directly intervenes to stop the victims or their families receiving appropriate compensation from the wicked.

    If Mrs Clinton attains the presidency, it won’t change. As Secretary of State she supported and facilitated Mr Obama’s objectives. Some of the terrorist facilitators that Mrs Clinton helped subsequently donated large sums to the Clinton Foundation, so she will have a greater conflict of interest as president than she already does – and be beholden to the worst creatures that the world currently harbours.

    One might ask why this isn’t common knowledge, and why the conniving, disgraceful miscreants aren’t brought to book.

    But I guess that we already know…

    Responses (3) +
  • [2] August 13, 2015 at 12:53am

    Having dug down a little further, it’s seems that I was seduced by a conspiracy theory.

    Silly me – I try hard to avoid them.

    I see that the local Navajo Indians are involved in a developing scrap with the EPA over this matter…

  • [2] August 13, 2015 at 12:44am

    Thanks for that Celestialfire.

    Although the EPA was talking about it, it looks as though the superfund thing is now off the table.

    I should have dug deeper…

    Cheers, mate.

  • [13] August 12, 2015 at 7:17pm

    There may be more to this than meets the eye, Monk.

    According to a Zero Hedge report, a retired geologist who now lives in the area wrote a letter to the editor of the local paper predicting this event SEVEN DAYS before it happened.

    His letter is a scathing indictment of the EPA. In his missive he accuses the EPA of likely foreknowledge of the event, and, given his own professional prediction, it seems to be likely that their own professionals must have understood the risks.

    However, wait until you read why he thinks that they did it…

    Responses (5) +
  • [4] July 5, 2015 at 5:28am

    Speaking of mutants, Slayer, I’ve often wondered why Miss Universe is always won by somebody from Earth.

    There’s something fishy going on…

    Responses (1) +
123 To page: Go
Restoring Love