User Profile: offroadjonny

offroadjonny

Member Since: February 19, 2013

CommentsDisplaying comments newest to oldest.

  • July 11, 2013 at 4:13pm

    Well, this man never comments on his true intent for going there, or through there. Was it to purposely evoke the BP to react this way ? Or, was he simply going through the area and the BP blatantly violated his rights by breaking the window ? I don’t know ! I am always sickened by this kind of action by a “professional” officer no matter what the situation is. They are trained to be MORE professional than the public and yet, time after time, we see them on video acting like hyped-up gorilla’s.

  • April 24, 2013 at 3:51am

    If one more stupid politician tries to touch the Constitution, I swear their name better be the headline for the next days newspaper as recently deceased !

  • April 22, 2013 at 9:10am

    I think The Blaze has wasted its time by even putting this story out. It only proves that more gun laws are useless and criminals, determined to do mass damage, seem to have their own rules that don’t follow the governments…..how dare them ! As a law-abiding citizen, I am offended by this and I demand that criminals stop breaking the law immediately ! It’s getting to expensive !

    Responses (1) +
  • April 22, 2013 at 8:59am

    I agree ! This is really a stupid point and a waste of time to report ! I don’t see how it made it to release ! The Blaze can do better than that. OBVIOUSLY, a criminal is not going to draw any attention to themselves by applying for a permit ! For a gun or explosives ! I am pro-gun, and 2nd Amendment and believe the CRIMINAL should be punished for their crimes and not the law-abiding citizens.

  • February 21, 2013 at 4:56am

    I thought is was a very sincere letter with some real concerns and had a luster of irrogance towards the presidents gun issues today.I thought it was very logical and i hope it plants a seed in the presidents head that spreads.Americans will not be disarmed!

  • February 21, 2013 at 4:44am

    @grimmster>>>> I like your knowledge that you express in you response! But lets not forget that AR15′s were in existance before the M16.The government wanted a new rifle for the troops in Vietnam and had the AR15 tweeked to the M16 model.The .223 round was developed, from the .222 round ,to wound the enemy for the purpose of gaining information during interogations. I don’t believe the AR15 is a “term” as much an actual item.There are several companies making there own versions of the AR15.I don’t think there was anything wrong with your comment,i just wanted to clarify the AR15 issue i seen.

  • February 20, 2013 at 8:54am

    But this Administration swears it is the MOST transparant Administration ! Ofcourse,they only want you to see what they want you to see…no secrets here!

  • February 19, 2013 at 1:07pm

    So how would they respond to a big fat lawsuit for violating the first amendment and add to it descrimination, for being associated with guns in any form at all? I would like to see how fast they change their attitudes then !